AzTrials
AzTrials

Geographic AtrophyNCT07570355

Pterygopalatine Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy

A study testing Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation in people with Geographic Atrophy, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) stimulation in adults with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Geographic Atrophy
What is being tested?
Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 31 Jul 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, ranging from 25 to 80 letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/320 to 20/25).
  • A confirmed diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), with no involvement of the foveal center. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging must demonstrate a total GA area of 2.5 to 17.5 mm² located within a 30° field centered on the fovea, with the presence of any pattern of increased autofluorescence at the junctional zone of GA. In cases of multifocal GA, at least one lesion must be ≥1.25 mm² in size.
  • If both eyes meet the eligibility criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA will be selected as the study eye. If BCVA is equal in both eyes, the right eye will be designated as the study eye.

Who cannot join

  • History or evidence of submacular surgery or other treatments for AMD in the study eye, with the exception of oral vitamin and mineral supplementation.
  • History of intraocular surgery within 3 months prior to screening, or the presence of ocular conditions requiring surgical intervention during the study period.
  • Receipt of any periocular or intravitreal injection therapy in the study eye within 3 months prior to screening.
  • History or evidence of choroidal neovascularization in either eye, or the presence of any other retinal disease that may confound the assessment of macular structure or function (e.g., diabetic retinopathy or pathologic myopia).
  • Presence of severe systemic disease or any other condition deemed unsuitable for study participation.
  • Inability to comply with scheduled visits or complete study procedures due to cognitive impairment or other factors, as judged by the investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian

    Shanghai, 200030

    Xiehe Kong, MD, 021-13621775647, ynomrahkong@163.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Safety Evaluation of Pterygopalatine Ganglion Stimulation in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) stimulation in adults with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more

Is PPG stimulation feasible to implement, as reflected by participant adherence to the intervention and completion of follow-up assessments? Is PPG stimulation safe, as assessed by the incidence of adverse events and clinical ophthalmic examinations? What are the preliminary effects of PPG stimulation on choroidal perfusion, retinal sensitivity, visual acuity, and the progression of GA lesion area?

Researchers will compare active PPG stimulation with sham stimulation (a procedure that mimics the intervention without delivering real stimulation) to assess feasibility and safety, while exploring potential therapeutic effects.

Participants will:

Receive active or sham PPG stimulation according to randomization over a 12-month study period Attend scheduled clinic visits for safety monitoring and multimodal ophthalmic assessments Undergo examinations including optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence imaging, microperimetry, and visual acuity testing

Being tested
Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation, Sham pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation
Keywords
Geographic Atrophy, Pterygopalatine Ganglion, Sphenopalatine Ganglion, Clinical Trial, Age-related Macular Degeneration
Medical subject headings
Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation

    Electrical stimulation was delivered using a disposable sterile needle electrode (0.30 × 60 mm; Beijing Keyuan Medical Devices Co., Ltd., China). Under ultrasound guidance, the needle tip was advanced into the pterygopalatine fossa. Ipsilateral pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation was administered to the study eye using an intermittent waveform at a frequency of 5 Hz and a current intensity of 1-2 mA for 10 minutes. The stimulation intensity was adjusted to elicit a mild local electrical sensation as perceived by the participant.

  • Sham pterygopalatine ganglion stimulationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Sham sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation

    During sham stimulation, a disposable stainless steel needle (0.25 × 25 mm) was inserted superficially at the same anatomical location as in the active stimulation group, to a depth of approximately 2 cm. Ultrasound guidance was applied in an identical manner to that used in the active intervention to mimic the procedural experience. However, the internal circuitry of the stimulation device was disconnected to prevent current delivery. The device interface continued to display real-time parameters, including current intensity, frequency, and stimulation duration, thereby maintaining the appearance of active operation.

Study groups in NCT07570355
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active stimulationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation
Sham stimulationSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Sham pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of participants who completed the trial

    Proportion of participants who were successfully randomized to either intervention group, fully adhered to the assigned intervention protocol, and completed all scheduled follow-up assessments.

    Measured: At 12 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Incidence of adverse events

    Measured: From enrollment to 12 months

  2. Choroidal structure

    Measured: -7 to 0 days, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  3. Retinal sensitivity

    Measured: Baseline (0), 6 months, and 12 months

  4. Standard and low-luminance best corrected visual acuity

    Measured: -7 to 0 days, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  5. Geographic atrophy lesion area and square root-transformed geographic atrophy area

    Measured: -7 to 0 days, 6 months, and 12 months

  6. Contrast sensitivity

    Measured: Baseline (0), 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  7. 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire score

    Vision-related quality of life was assessed using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). This corresponds to a score between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better visual quality of life

    Measured: Baseline (0), 6 months, and 12 months

  8. Treatment credibility scale score

    Assessed by asking participants to rate their response to five questions on a 10-point treatment credibility scale developed by Borkovec and Nau. Higher scores represent higher expectations of efficacy.

    Measured: 1 week and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07570355
Sponsor's protocol ID
ShanghaiIAMM2026011
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
7 Apr 2026
Last updated
6 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pterygopalatine ganglion stimulation in people with Geographic Atrophy, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiehe Kong, MD (021-13621775647, ynomrahkong@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of participants who completed the trial (time frame: At 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in