AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD)NCT07572708

Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) for the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (NERD)

A study testing Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation in people with Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD), run by Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multicenter study aims to evaluate whether Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) is effective in treating Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (NERD). NERD is a common condition where patients experience symptoms like heartburn and regurgitation, but no visible damage can be seen in the esophagus… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD)
What is being tested?
Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
204 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 May 2026to 31 Mar 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-75 years, irrespective of gender
  • Typical heartburn symptoms for at least 3 months
  • Heartburn on at least 2 days during the run-in diary period
  • Endoscopically confirmed NERD (no esophageal erosions, Los Angeles grade N or M) within 12 months
  • Willingness and ability to comply with all study procedures and to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Familiarity with acupuncture points and their functions (e.g., previous acupuncture experience or medical training)
  • Any esophageal structural or mucosal disease (e.g., Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis LA grade A-D, eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal stricture, varices, malignancy, or prior chemical/thermal/radiation injury)
  • Presence of gastric or duodenal ulcers
  • History of or suspected diagnosis of functional heartburn or functional dyspepsia by Rome IV criteria
  • Systemic diseases affecting gastrointestinal motility (e.g., systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, amyloidosis), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin ≥7.0%), severe cardiovascular disease, significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, or severe psychiatric disorders
  • Inability to discontinue prohibited medications (PPIs, P-CABs, H2RAs, prokinetics, or other GERD-directed therapies) except for protocol-defined rescue medication during the study
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker, defibrillator) or other implants susceptible to electrical stimulation
  • Local skin disease or severe hypersensitivity at stimulation sites
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy during the study period
  • Participation in other interventional clinical trials within the past 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

pengyu Huang, PhD contact

+86-133-7700-1986

China1 site
  • Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital

    Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315000

    Xiaoyan Ruan, MD, +86-574-87018524, lihuiliethics@163.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) for the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (NERD): A Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

This multicenter study aims to evaluate whether Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) is effective in treating Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (NERD). NERD is a common condition where patients experience symptoms like heartburn and regurgitation, but no visible damage can be seen in the esophagus during an endoscopy. TEA is a non-invasive treatment that uses a small device to deliver mild electrical stimulation through the skin on specific acupoints. This study will compare the effects of real TEA treatment with a sham (inactive) control. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: active TEA treatment or sham stimulation. Neither the participants nor the researchers evaluating the outcomes will know which treatment is being given. The main outcome is the improvement of reflux symptoms after 4 weeks of treatment. The results of this study may provide a new non-drug option for patients suffering from NERD.

Read the detailed description

Study Design

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at multiple centers in China. A total of 204 eligible participants with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) or sham stimulation for 4 weeks. Randomization will be performed centrally using a computer-generated permuted block design (fixed block size of 4), stratified by study site. Due to differences in stimulation location, treatment administrators will be aware of group assignment; however, participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts will remain blinded to treatment allocation. Group labels (Group A / Group B) will be used in the electronic case report form (eCRF) to maintain blinding.

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from gastroenterology clinics. Eligible participants must meet all of the following criteria: age 18-75 years; typical heartburn symptoms for ≥3 months; heartburn on ≥2 days during the run-in diary period; endoscopically confirmed NERD (no esophageal erosions, Los Angeles grade N/M) within 12 months; and willingness to discontinue acid-suppressive therapy during the study. Key exclusion criteria include familiarity with acupuncture points, presence of esophageal structural or mucosal diseases (e.g., Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis LA grade A-D), gastric or duodenal ulcers, functional heartburn or dyspepsia by Rome IV criteria, uncontrolled systemic diseases, implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker), pregnancy, and participation in other interventional trials within the past 3 months.

All enrolled participants will be categorized based on heartburn frequency during the baseline run-in period (electronic diary) into two subgroups: Subgroup A (heartburn ≥4 days/week) and Subgroup B (heartburn 2-3 days/week). This stratification will be used for prespecified subgroup analyses to explore potential differences in treatment effects across symptom frequency populations.

Intervention and Study Procedures

The total study duration is 10 weeks, consisting of a washout period (Week -2 to Week -1), a baseline run-in period (Week -1 to Week 0), a treatment period (Week 0 to Week 4), and a follow-up period (Week 4 to Week 8).

Active TEA Group: Electrical stimulation will be applied unilaterally at the ST36 (Zusanli) acupoint, located on the anterolateral aspect of the leg, about one finger breadth lateral to the anterior crest of the tibia and just below the tibial tuberosity. One electrode will be placed at ST36 and the other 3-5 cm vertically down from ST36. Stimulation parameters are: 25 Hz pulse frequency, 0.5 ms pulse width, 2 seconds on and 3 seconds off. Current amplitude will range from 1 to 9.5 mA and will be gradually adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant. Participants will self-administer TEA for 1 hour twice daily (morning and evening, within a flexible time window from 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM) for 4 consecutive weeks.

Sham TEA Group: Electrodes will be placed unilaterally at the olecranon and 3-5 cm vertically down from the olecranon, an area not associated with known acupoints for gastrointestinal regulation. The same stimulation device and parameters (including visual and auditory signals) will be used, but the electrical output will not exceed the sensory threshold, providing an identical user experience without active therapeutic stimulation.

Assessments and Outcome Measures

Participants will complete daily electronic symptom diaries from Week -1 through Week 4 and at Week 8. Heartburn severity is assessed using a 0-3 scale (0=none; 1=mild, noticed but does not affect activities; 2=moderate, interferes with daily activities; 3=severe, significantly affects daily life or sleep). A heartburn-free day is defined as a day with a heartburn score of 0 and no use of rescue antacids.

Clinic visits will occur at Week 0 (baseline), Week 4 (end of treatment), and Week 4 (end of treatment). At each visit, participants will complete the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q) and the GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) will be assessed at Week 4. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) will be assessed at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8. Rescue medication use will be recorded from Week 0 to Week 4. Treatment acceptability and persistence of efficacy after TEA discontinuation will be evaluated at Week 8. Safety assessments, including adverse event monitoring, will be conducted throughout the study from Week 0 to Week 8.

Sample Size

The primary endpoint is the proportion of 24-hour heartburn-free days during the 4-week treatment period. Based on prior randomized GERD trials and published TEA studies, the expected proportion of heartburn-free days is estimated at 45% in the TEA group and 25% in the sham group (absolute difference 20%). With a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, 86 participants per group are required. Allowing for an anticipated dropout rate of approximately 15%, 102 participants per group will be enrolled, for a total sample size of 204 participants.

Statistical Analysis

Primary analyses will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all randomized participants who received at least one treatment session and provided at least one post-baseline assessment. Per-protocol (PP) analysis will be conducted as a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome (proportion of heartburn-free days) will be compared between groups using the chi-square test, and further analyzed using logistic regression models adjusting for study site and baseline symptom measures. Secondary continuous outcomes measured repeatedly over time will be analyzed using mixed-effects models. In the ITT analysis, missing primary outcome data will be handled using conservative non-responder imputation (missing diary days considered as non-heartburn-free days). All statistical tests will be two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. Secondary outcome analyses will be interpreted as exploratory and will not be adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Prespecified subgroup analyses will be conducted based on baseline heartburn frequency (≥4 days/week vs. 2-3 days/week). An interaction term "group × heartburn frequency subgroup" will be included to test heterogeneity of treatment effect across subgroups (P_interaction < 0.10 considered significant). All subgroup analyses are exploratory and will not serve as evidence for primary conclusions.

Safety Monitoring

Adverse events (AEs) will be collected systematically throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. Expected AEs based on TEA intervention characteristics include local skin reactions (itching, redness, rash, tingling, burning sensation, mild swelling), electrical stimulation-related discomfort (intolerable tingling, involuntary muscle twitching, dizziness, nausea), and device-related issues. Severity will be graded as mild (no effect on daily activities), moderate (affects daily activities, may require intervention), or severe (significantly affects daily life or requires active medical intervention). Serious adverse events (SAEs) will be reported to the principal investigator within 24 hours and to the ethics committee in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Study Period

The total study duration is from April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2028. Patient recruitment and intervention will occur from April 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027. Data management and statistical analysis will be conducted from January 1, 2028, to January 31, 2028. Study report writing will be completed from February 1, 2028, to March 31, 2028.

Being tested
Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation
Keywords
NERD, Transcutaneous electrical Acustimulation, Neuromodulation, Multicenter
Medical subject headings
Non-Erosive Reflux Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcutaneous Electrical AcustimulationDevice

    Transcutaneous electrical acustimulation delivered via a portable stimulator. Stimulation parameters: 25 Hz pulse frequency, 0.5 ms pulse width, 2 seconds on and 3 seconds off. Current amplitude ranges from 1 to 9.5 mA, adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant. Self-administered at home for 1 hour twice daily (morning and evening, within a flexible time window from 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM) for 4 consecutive weeks.

Study groups in NCT07572708
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ST36 TEA GroupExperimentalParticipants receive active transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) at the ST36 (Zusanli) acupoint unilaterally.
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation
Sham TEA GroupSham comparatorParticipants receive sham transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) with electrodes placed unilaterally at the olecranon and 3-5 cm vertically down from the olecranon.
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Title Proportion of 24-Hour Heartburn-Free Days During the 4-Week Treatment Period

    Description Heartburn is defined as a sensation of warmth, burning, or acid-burning discomfort in the substernal or epigastric region. Heartburn severity is assessed using a 0-3 scale: 0=none; 1=mild (noticed but does not affect activities); 2=moderate (interferes with daily activities); 3=severe (significantly affects daily life or sleep). A heartburn-free day is defined as a day meeting both of the following criteria: heartburn score = 0 on that day, and no use of rescue antacids on that day. The proportion of heartburn-free days is calculated as (number of heartburn-free days) / (number of valid observation days) during the 4-week treatment period.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 28 (the 4-week treatment period)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Weekly Proportion of 24-Hour Heartburn-Free Days During Treatment

    The proportion of heartburn-free days (heartburn score = 0 and no rescue antacid use) calculated separately for each week of the 4-week treatment period.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 of the treatment period

  2. Title Change from Baseline in GERD-Q Total Score

    Description GERD-Q (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire) is a 6-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing reflux symptoms and their impact. Total score ranges from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4 (end of treatment), and Week 8 (end of follow-up)

  3. Title Change from Baseline in GERD-HRQL Total Score

    GERD-HRQL (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life) is a validated instrument measuring GERD-specific quality of life. Total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4 (end of treatment), and Week 8 (end of follow-up)

  4. Rescue Medication Use

    The proportion of participants requiring rescue antacids during the treatment period, measured as the number of days with rescue medication use and the total amount of rescue medication consumed.

    Measured: During the 4-week treatment period (Week 0 to Week 4)

  5. Persistence of Efficacy After TEA Discontinuation

    The proportion of 24-hour heartburn-free days during the last week of the follow-up period, after TEA treatment has been discontinued. Heartburn-free day defined as heartburn score = 0 and no rescue antacid use on that day.

    Measured: Last week of follow-up period (Week 8)

  6. Patient Global Impression of Change and Treatment Acceptability

    The PGI-C (Patient Global Impression of Change) assesses the participant's perceived change in symptoms on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater improvement (better outcome). Treatment acceptability is measured by participant-reported willingness to continue TEA or recommend it to others.

    Measured: Week 4 (PGI-C) and Week 8 (treatment acceptability)

  7. Overall Safety Profile of TEA

    Description Incidence, severity, and relationship of adverse events (AEs) to the intervention. Expected AEs include local skin reactions (itching, redness, rash, swelling), electrical stimulation-related discomfort (tingling, muscle twitching, dizziness, nausea), and device-related issues.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 8 (entire study period)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2026
  2. Study start1 May 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
204 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07572708
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY2026SL117-01
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
1 May 2026
Last updated
15 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared because sharing de-identified data related to acupuncture points and electrical stimulation parameters faces challenges in standardization and is subject to local human genetic resource management restrictions.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation in people with Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD), run by Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Qiaosu Zhao, MD (+86-158-6720-0749, zhaoqiaosu_2@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Title Proportion of 24-Hour Heartburn-Free Days During the 4-Week Treatment Period (time frame: Day 1 to Day 28 (the 4-week treatment period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in