MaxillaNCT07574099
Loading Protocols for Dental Implants Placed in Healed Fully Edentulous Maxilla
A study testing Immediate implant loading and Early loading in people with Maxilla and Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation, run by University of Belgrade at 1 site in Serbia.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare immediate versus early loading protocols for complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in healed edentulous maxillae. The main questions it aims to answer are: How does the timing of delivery of the prosthesis affect the stability of the implant and the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Maxilla, Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
- What is being tested?
- Immediate implant loading and Early loading
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSerbia
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to Mar 2035
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients in good general health with no current history of systemic disease or medication use that could interfere with the treatment;
- Patients with complete maxillary edentulism who had lost their teeth at least 6 to 8 weeks prior to the proposed ''allon- six'' implant rehabilitation; and
- Clinically compliant patients consenting to be enrolled into the study.
Who cannot join
- Active or chronic disease that affects bone metabolism or wound healing;
- Diminished mental capacities that could mitigate the ability to comply with the protocol;
- Residual roots or teeth;
- History of maxillary augmentation;
- Oral carcinoma or inflammatory changes; and
- History of head and neck radiotherapy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Serbia1 site
Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Belgrade, 11000
About this study
Official title: Immediate Vs Early Loading Protocols in Rehabilitation of Healed Fully Edentulous Maxilla
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare immediate versus early loading protocols for complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in healed edentulous maxillae.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- How does the timing of delivery of the prosthesis affect the stability of the implant and the surrounding soft and bone tissue?
- Does prosthesis delivery time affect quality of life and patient satisfaction? Researchers will compare immediate and early (6 weeks after implant placement) loading protocols in rehabilitation of fully edentulous upper jaw.
Participants will:
- Receive 6 dental implants in the edentulous upper jaw and after that complete fixed dental prostheses will be delivered immediately or 6 weeks after implant placement.
- Visit the clinic at the scheduled time for checkups and tests
Read the detailed description
Surgical protocol Prior to surgery antibiotic prophylaxis (2 g amoxicillin with clavulonic acid or, in case of allergy, 0.6 g clindamycin, 1 hour before the procedure) and antiedema therapy (0.004 g dexamethasone 1 hour before the procedure) was administered. Patients rinsed their mouth using 15 mL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solution for 1 minute preoperatively. The surgical procedures were performed under local anesthesia using 4% articaine, 1:100.000 epinephrine. Centers of the intended implant sites were marked according to the reference marks present in the patient's existing complete removable denture that had been used as the radiographic stent. A midcrestal incision was made, then full-thickness buccal and palatal flaps were elevated. Implant sites were prepared by strictly adhering to the manufacturer's protocol for low-density bone using drills of increasing diameter (Institut Straumann). To provide adequate primary implant stability, underpreparation was performed: 1. In low-density type D3 bone, the profile drill was skipped; and 2. In low-density type D4 bone, the final sequence and profile drills were skipped. Intermittent drilling under copious irrigation was performed with low hand pressure and a physiodispenser running between 600 and 800 rpm. A total of 144 sites were prepared, followed by placement of 144 SLActive surface (Bone Level Tapered, Institut Straumann) implants. Bone quality was assessed according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification. In sites with dehiscence or fenestration resulting in an exposed implant surface, localized bone augmentation was performed using bovine-derived xenograft (Geistlich Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and covered with a type 1 collagen membrane (Geistlich Bio-Gide, Geistlich). Healing screws (Institut Straumann; NC healing abutment Ø4.8 mm conical 5 mm and RC healing abutment Ø5 mm conical 6 mm) were placed and primary wound closure was achieved with 5-0 single resorbable sutures (AssuCryl Lactin, Assut Sutures of Switzerland, Pully-Lausanne, Switzerland). Patients were discharged with recommendations regarding dietetic and hygienic regimens. Antibiotic protocol consisted of 2 g amoxicillin with clavulonic acid (divided into 2 doses) or, in case of allergy, 1.8 g clindamycin daily (divided into 3 doses) for the following 5 days. Antiedema therapy (0.004 g dexamethasone) was administered 24 hours postoperatively. Prosthetic protocol After dental implant placement, patients were randomly assigned to immediate loading or early loading groups.
Implants for patients from Test Group were immediately loaded using S-R abutments (Institut Straumann) with temporary restorations. Patients from Control Group did not receive any kind of prosthetic temporization and were left with healing abutments. For Test Group an open-tray impression technique was used for provisional restoration. Impressions were made using: ASilicone material (Hydrorise implant, Zhermack, Badia Polesine, Italy), splinted impression posts (RC and NC impression post, Straumann) and a plastic impression tray (Miratray, Hager Werken, Duisburg, Germany). Provisional restorations were made digitally with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein). Plaster models with scan bodies were digitized with a laboratory scanner (3Shape E1, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Final virtual design of provisional restoration was performed with 3D design software (exocad Matera 2.3, Exocad, Darmstadt, Germany). Drilling of PMMA blocks was performed in a 5-axis milling machine (Zenotec Select, Wieland, Pforzheim, Germany). The following final Straumann screw retained abutments for the prosthetic bridge (Institut Straumann) were chosen according to implant angulation and surrounding soft tissue height. For the interface between the screw-retained abutments and final prosthetic work, copings for screw retained abutments (Institut Straumann) were used and bonded to the final prosthesis.
At the end of the 6-week healing period for both groups, definitive prosthetic restorations were delivered. In preparation for the definitive prosthesis, a final open-tray impression was taken with an individual tray and polyether material (Impregum Soft, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany). An analog ceramic layering technique was performed in the process of producing a porcelain fused to metal restoration (Shofu Vintage Halo Porcelain, Shofu Dental Corporation, Ratingen, Germany). The metal framework was made using cobalt chromium metal powder material (Starbond Easy Powder 45, Scheftner, Mainz, Germany) with additive manufacturing technologies (EOS, Krailling, Germany).
- Conditions
- Maxilla, Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
- Being tested
- Immediate implant loading, Early loading
- Keywords
- edentulous maxilla, dental implant, implant loading protocol, complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
- Medical subject headings
- Tooth Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immediate implant loadingDevice
Also called Test group
Implants will be immediately loaded using S-R abutments (Institut Straumann) with temporary restorations. An open-tray impression technique was used for provisional restoration. Provisional restorations were made digitally with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein). Plaster models with scan bodies were digitized with a laboratory scanner (3Shape E1, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Final virtual design of provisional restoration was performed with 3D design software (exocad Matera 2.3, Exocad, Darmstadt, Germany). Drilling of PMMA blocks was performed in a 5-axis milling machine (Zenotec Select, Wieland, Pforzheim, Germany). After 6 weeks they will receive final prosthesis.
Early loadingDevice
Also called Control group
At the end of the 6-week healing period, definitive prosthetic restorations were delivered. In preparation for the definitive prosthesis, a final open-tray impression was taken with an individual tray and polyether material (Impregum Soft, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany). An analog ceramic layering technique was performed in the process of producing a porcelain fused to metal restoration (Shofu Vintage Halo Porcelain, Shofu Dental Corporation, Ratingen, Germany). The metal framework was made using cobalt chromium metal powder material (Starbond Easy Powder 45, Scheftner, Mainz, Germany) with additive manufacturing technologies (EOS, Krailling, Germany).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediately loading | Experimental | Implants will be loaded with temporary prosthesis immediatelly after their insertion Receives: Device: Immediate implant loading |
| Early loading | Active comparator | Implants will be left to heal with healing abutments for 6 weeks without prosthesis Receives: Device: Early loading |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant stability
Implant stability will be recorded by Osstell Mentor and Penguin using Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) method. Results were recorded on an implant stability scale (ISQ) from 1 to 100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant was.21 Two consecutive measurements delivering the same ISQ values were considered authentic.
Measured: Implant stability will be measured at the time of implant placement (baseline) and at post-op week 6 (prior to delivery of definitive prosthetic restoration) and then after 5, 10 and 15 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Insertion torque
Insertion torque was measured with a torque wrench (Institut Straumann) and recorded in Ncm.
Measured: During surgery, at implant placement in prepared implant site.
Marginal bone loss change from baseline to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Following prosthesis and multiunit abutment removal, standardized healing abutments (identical to baseline protocol) were placed. CBCT images were acquired at the same exposure parameters as baseline and analyzed by one blinded examiner using OnDemand3D software (Cybermed Inc., Seoul, South Korea). MBL was measured as the linear distance from the implant shoulder to first bone-implant contact at four sites per implant: mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal aspects.
Measured: At final prosthesis delivery (baseline), after 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Changes in Buccal Plate thickness from baseline to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Following prosthesis and multiunit abutment removal, standardized healing abutments (identical to baseline protocol) were placed. CBCT images were acquired at the same exposure parameters as baseline and analyzed by one blinded examiner using OnDemand3D software (Cybermed Inc., Seoul, South Korea). BPT was measured perpendicular to the implant axis at two locations: 2 mm apical to the implant-abutment connection and at implant midlength.
Measured: At final prosthesis delivery (baseline) to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Oral health-related quality of life
Oral health-related quality of life was evaluated using the OHIP-19 questionnaire. It consists of 19 questions and patients rated each item on a 5-point scale, where 0 indicated "never" and 4 indicated "constantly." The total OHIP-19 score was obtained by summing the scores from all questions. Lower score meant improved quality of life.
Measured: At implant placement (baseline), 1 month after definitive prosthesis delivery, and after 5,10 and 15 years
Patient satisfaction
Patients specified their level of satisfaction related to function, esthetics, and discomfort/pain by indicating a position along a 10-cm line between 2 endpoints where the beginning of the line was marked as complete unsatisfaction and the end as maximum satisfaction on Visual Analogue Scale.
Measured: At implant placement (baseline), 1 month after final prosthesis delivery and after 5,10 and 15 years follow up.
Implant survival rate
Implant survival was defined as implant in situ regardless of condition or peri-implant disease presence.
Measured: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Prosthesis survival rate
Prosthesis survival was defined as original prosthesis in function with or without minor repairs.
Measured: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Complications
Biological complications (implant failure requiring removal, peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis) and mechanical complications (prosthesis fracture, veneer chipping, screw loosening/fracture, abutment complications) were recorded.
Measured: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2026
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completionMar 2035 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2035 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MaxillaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, single-institution, randomized, controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Belgrade
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aleksa Markovic, University of Belgrade
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07574099
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16/36
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 1 May 2026
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: 1 month, 5 years, 10 years and 15 years outcomes will be published in the journal.
Publications
Markovic A, Misic T, Janjic B, Scepanovic M, Trifkovic B, Ilic B, Todorovic AM, Markovic J, Dard MM. Immediate Vs Early Loading of Bone Level Tapered Dental Implants With Hydrophilic Surface in Rehabilitation of Fully Edentulous Maxilla: Clinical and Patient Centered Outcomes. J Oral Implantol. 2022 Oct 1;48(5):358-369. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00045.
PubMed 34937085Uysal VMB, Markovic A, Misic T, Scepanovic M, Trifkovic B, Ilic B, Todorovic AR, Markovic J, Dard MM, Janjic B. Immediate Versus Early Loading Protocols in Rehabilitation of Fully Edentulous Maxilla: A 5-Year Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2026 Oct 2. doi: 10.1111/joor.70330. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42827082
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immediate Vs Early Loading Protocols in Rehabilitation of Healed Fully Edentulous Maxilla
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07574099
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16/36
- Conditions
- Maxilla, Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- edentulous maxilla, dental implant, implant loading protocol, complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BelgradeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2035 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2035 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare immediate versus early loading protocols for complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in healed edentulous maxillae.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How does the timing of delivery of the prosthesis affect the stability of the implant and the surrounding soft and bone tissue?
- Does prosthesis delivery time affect quality of life and patient satisfaction? Researchers will compare immediate and early (6 weeks after implant placement) loading protocols in rehabilitation of fully edentulous upper jaw.
Participants will:
- Receive 6 dental implants in the edentulous upper jaw and after that complete fixed dental prostheses will be delivered immediately or 6 weeks after implant placement.
- Visit the clinic at the scheduled time for checkups and tests
Detailed description
Surgical protocol Prior to surgery antibiotic prophylaxis (2 g amoxicillin with clavulonic acid or, in case of allergy, 0.6 g clindamycin, 1 hour before the procedure) and antiedema therapy (0.004 g dexamethasone 1 hour before the procedure) was administered. Patients rinsed their mouth using 15 mL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solution for 1 minute preoperatively. The surgical procedures were performed under local anesthesia using 4% articaine, 1:100.000 epinephrine. Centers of the intended implant sites were marked according to the reference marks present in the patient's existing complete removable denture that had been used as the radiographic stent. A midcrestal incision was made, then full-thickness buccal and palatal flaps were elevated. Implant sites were prepared by strictly adhering to the manufacturer's protocol for low-density bone using drills of increasing diameter (Institut Straumann). To provide adequate primary implant stability, underpreparation was performed: 1. In low-density type D3 bone, the profile drill was skipped; and 2. In low-density type D4 bone, the final sequence and profile drills were skipped. Intermittent drilling under copious irrigation was performed with low hand pressure and a physiodispenser running between 600 and 800 rpm. A total of 144 sites were prepared, followed by placement of 144 SLActive surface (Bone Level Tapered, Institut Straumann) implants. Bone quality was assessed according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification. In sites with dehiscence or fenestration resulting in an exposed implant surface, localized bone augmentation was performed using bovine-derived xenograft (Geistlich Bio-Oss, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and covered with a type 1 collagen membrane (Geistlich Bio-Gide, Geistlich). Healing screws (Institut Straumann; NC healing abutment Ø4.8 mm conical 5 mm and RC healing abutment Ø5 mm conical 6 mm) were placed and primary wound closure was achieved with 5-0 single resorbable sutures (AssuCryl Lactin, Assut Sutures of Switzerland, Pully-Lausanne, Switzerland). Patients were discharged with recommendations regarding dietetic and hygienic regimens. Antibiotic protocol consisted of 2 g amoxicillin with clavulonic acid (divided into 2 doses) or, in case of allergy, 1.8 g clindamycin daily (divided into 3 doses) for the following 5 days. Antiedema therapy (0.004 g dexamethasone) was administered 24 hours postoperatively. Prosthetic protocol After dental implant placement, patients were randomly assigned to immediate loading or early loading groups.
Implants for patients from Test Group were immediately loaded using S-R abutments (Institut Straumann) with temporary restorations. Patients from Control Group did not receive any kind of prosthetic temporization and were left with healing abutments. For Test Group an open-tray impression technique was used for provisional restoration. Impressions were made using: ASilicone material (Hydrorise implant, Zhermack, Badia Polesine, Italy), splinted impression posts (RC and NC impression post, Straumann) and a plastic impression tray (Miratray, Hager Werken, Duisburg, Germany). Provisional restorations were made digitally with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein). Plaster models with scan bodies were digitized with a laboratory scanner (3Shape E1, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Final virtual design of provisional restoration was performed with 3D design software (exocad Matera 2.3, Exocad, Darmstadt, Germany). Drilling of PMMA blocks was performed in a 5-axis milling machine (Zenotec Select, Wieland, Pforzheim, Germany). The following final Straumann screw retained abutments for the prosthetic bridge (Institut Straumann) were chosen according to implant angulation and surrounding soft tissue height. For the interface between the screw-retained abutments and final prosthetic work, copings for screw retained abutments (Institut Straumann) were used and bonded to the final prosthesis.
At the end of the 6-week healing period for both groups, definitive prosthetic restorations were delivered. In preparation for the definitive prosthesis, a final open-tray impression was taken with an individual tray and polyether material (Impregum Soft, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany). An analog ceramic layering technique was performed in the process of producing a porcelain fused to metal restoration (Shofu Vintage Halo Porcelain, Shofu Dental Corporation, Ratingen, Germany). The metal framework was made using cobalt chromium metal powder material (Starbond Easy Powder 45, Scheftner, Mainz, Germany) with additive manufacturing technologies (EOS, Krailling, Germany).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, single-institution, randomized, controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediately loading | Experimental | Device: Immediate implant loadingImplants will be loaded with temporary prosthesis immediatelly after their insertion |
| Early loading | Active comparator | Device: Early loadingImplants will be left to heal with healing abutments for 6 weeks without prosthesis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients in good general health with no current history of systemic disease or medication use that could interfere with the treatment;
- Patients with complete maxillary edentulism who had lost their teeth at least 6 to 8 weeks prior to the proposed ''allon- six'' implant rehabilitation; and
- Clinically compliant patients consenting to be enrolled into the study.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Active or chronic disease that affects bone metabolism or wound healing;
- Diminished mental capacities that could mitigate the ability to comply with the protocol;
- Residual roots or teeth;
- History of maxillary augmentation;
- Oral carcinoma or inflammatory changes; and
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate implant loadingAlso: Test groupImplants will be immediately loaded using S-R abutments (Institut Straumann) with temporary restorations. An open-tray impression technique was used for provisional restoration. Provisional restorations were made digitally with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein). Plaster models with scan bodies were digitized with a laboratory scanner (3Shape E1, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Final virtual design of provisional restoration was performed with 3D design software (exocad Matera 2.3, Exocad, Darmstadt, Germany). Drilling of PMMA blocks was performed in a 5-axis milling machine (Zenotec Select, Wieland, Pforzheim, Germany). After 6 weeks they will receive final prosthesis. | Device | Immediately loading |
| Early loadingAlso: Control groupAt the end of the 6-week healing period, definitive prosthetic restorations were delivered. In preparation for the definitive prosthesis, a final open-tray impression was taken with an individual tray and polyether material (Impregum Soft, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany). An analog ceramic layering technique was performed in the process of producing a porcelain fused to metal restoration (Shofu Vintage Halo Porcelain, Shofu Dental Corporation, Ratingen, Germany). The metal framework was made using cobalt chromium metal powder material (Starbond Easy Powder 45, Scheftner, Mainz, Germany) with additive manufacturing technologies (EOS, Krailling, Germany). | Device | Early loading |
Primary outcome
Implant stability
Time frame: Implant stability will be measured at the time of implant placement (baseline) and at post-op week 6 (prior to delivery of definitive prosthetic restoration) and then after 5, 10 and 15 years
Implant stability will be recorded by Osstell Mentor and Penguin using Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) method. Results were recorded on an implant stability scale (ISQ) from 1 to 100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant was.21 Two consecutive measurements delivering the same ISQ values were considered authentic.
8 secondary outcomes
Insertion torque
Time frame: During surgery, at implant placement in prepared implant site.
Marginal bone loss change from baseline to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Time frame: At final prosthesis delivery (baseline), after 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Changes in Buccal Plate thickness from baseline to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Time frame: At final prosthesis delivery (baseline) to 5,10 and 15 years follow up
Oral health-related quality of life
Time frame: At implant placement (baseline), 1 month after definitive prosthesis delivery, and after 5,10 and 15 years
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: At implant placement (baseline), 1 month after final prosthesis delivery and after 5,10 and 15 years follow up.
Implant survival rate
Time frame: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Prosthesis survival rate
Time frame: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Complications
Time frame: 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, after 5, 10 and 15 years follow up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 34937085Markovic A, Misic T, Janjic B, Scepanovic M, Trifkovic B, Ilic B, Todorovic AM, Markovic J, Dard MM. Immediate Vs Early Loading of Bone Level Tapered Dental Implants With Hydrophilic Surface in Rehabilitation of Fully Edentulous Maxilla: Clinical and Patient Centered Outcomes. J Oral Implantol. 2022 Oct 1;48(5):358-369. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00045.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42827082Uysal VMB, Markovic A, Misic T, Scepanovic M, Trifkovic B, Ilic B, Todorovic AR, Markovic J, Dard MM, Janjic B. Immediate Versus Early Loading Protocols in Rehabilitation of Fully Edentulous Maxilla: A 5-Year Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2026 Oct 2. doi: 10.1111/joor.70330. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. 1 month, 5 years, 10 years and 15 years outcomes will be published in the journal.
Related trials for Maxilla
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Long-Term Stability of Soft and Hard Tissues After Guided Bone Regeneration in the Maxillary Anterior Region
Alveolar Bone Deficiency
Not yet recruiting
Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Acute Oro-Antral Communication Closure
Acute Oroantral Communication
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Mandibular Overjet in Children With Maxillary Retrognathism
Maxillary Retrognathism, Children
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Implant-Abutment Connections
Dental Implant, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Recruiting
Accuracy of Maxillary Two Customized 3D Titanium Miniplates Versus Four Customized 3D Miniplates
Orthognathic Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Immediate implant loading and Early loading in people with Maxilla and Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation, run by University of Belgrade at 1 site in Serbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant stability (time frame: Implant stability will be measured at the time of implant placement (baseline) and at post-op week 6 (prior to delivery of definitive prosthetic restoration) and then after 5, 10 and 15 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07574099, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.