Fetal MacrosomiaNCT07575152
Estimation of Fetal Weight by Measuring Abdominal Circumference, Abdominal Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Thickness, Femur Length and Mid-thigh Soft Tissue Thickness
An observational study of Fetal Macrosomia and Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia), run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
Traditional methods for estimating fetal weight (EFW) often miss the mark because they focus on bone and circumference while ignoring fetal fat. This study proposes a more inclusive formula to fix that. Current models (using BPD, HC, AC, and FL) are the standard but suffer from high observer variability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fetal Macrosomia, Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia), Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR)
- What is being tested?
- 3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of delivery
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 30 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: full term pregnant women within 48-72 hours before delivery
Who may be able to join
- Singleton Gestation.
- Gestational Age: Participants must be at a term ≥ 37 weeks
- Timing of Examination: Sonographic EFW must be performed within 48 -72 hours prior to delivery.
- Welling to share in the study.
Who cannot join
- Fetal Anomalies.
- Amniotic Fluid Disorders: oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios
- Maternal morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2)
- Maternal medical disorders: as diabetes, hypertension, systemic lupus erythromatosis or others affecting fetal growth
- Fetal Hydrops
- Fetal Malpresentation
- Fetal growth restriction
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Estimation of Fetal Weight by Measuring Abdominal Circumference, Abdominal Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Thickness, Femur Length and Mid-thigh Soft Tissue Thickness: Cross Sectional Study.
Traditional methods for estimating fetal weight (EFW) often miss the mark because they focus on bone and circumference while ignoring fetal fat. This study proposes a more inclusive formula to fix that. Current models (using BPD, HC, AC, and FL) are the standard but suffer from high observer variability. These formulas struggle at the extremes (macrosomia or growth restriction) and fail to account for fetal adiposity, which makes up 10-12% of a newborn's mass. The study introduces a novel formula that moves beyond simple bone measurements by integrating Soft Tissue Thickness (STT). By accounting for a broader range of biological variants and fat distribution, this new model aims to provide a non-inferior, more precise predictive value for fetal weight compared to traditional methods.
Read the detailed description
Accurate estimation of fetal weight (EFW) is fundamental to modern obstetric management. Traditional sonographic biometry-utilizing biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL)-is the standard for predictive modeling. However, these parameters are limited by significant inter- and intra-observer variability and a loss of precision at the extremes of fetal weight, such as in cases of macrosomia or growth restriction. Furthermore, conventional formulas often fail to account for fetal adiposity, which constitutes 10-12% of total neonatal body mass. Recent literature suggests that the integration of soft tissue thickness (STT) measurements-specifically mid-arm, subscapular, abdominal subcutaneous, and mid-thigh thickness-can enhance the accuracy of EFW. While the Scioscia and modified Scioscia formulas rely exclusively on FL and mid-thigh measurements, this study proposes a novel, multi-parametric approach. By combining AC, fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness, FL, and mid-thigh soft tissue thickness, we hypothesize that our formula offers a non-inferior predictive value. This model accounts for a broader range of biological variants and soft tissue distribution patterns that significantly influence overall fetal mass.
Detailed history (maternal age, obstetric history, medical history, previous macrosomic fetuses, previous shoulder dystocia). Gestational age is calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period and confirmed by either a first- or second-trimester ultrasound scan. When the ultrasound-determined gestational age differed from that calculated from the last menstrual period by >7 days in the first trimester, or by >10 days in the second trimester, the ultrasound-determined gestational age is used.
The study will be bi-phasic, 1st phase is model development phase in which we develop a mathematical model for fetal weight estimation incorporating (abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness), the 2nd phase is a validation and comparison phase in which we test our model and compare it to modified Scioscia formula and conventional Hadlock formula.
For measurement of femur length (FL) Each caliper is placed at the ends of the ossified diaphysis without including the distal femoral epiphysis if it is visible.
For the measurement of AC, the transverse section of the fetal abdomen should be as circular as possible, and the fetal spine preferably in the 3- or 9-o'clock position, umbilical vein at the level of the portal sinus, stomach visible and kidneys not visible. The AC is measured directly at the outer surface of the skin line, with ellipse calipers.
Mid-thigh STT: measured linearly in the standard longitudinal section used for FL measurement. In the middle third of the fetal thigh, with the femur lying parallel to the transducer, mid-thigh STT was measured from the outer margin of the skin to the outer margin of the femur shaft. The measurement was taken, providing that the greater and the lesser trochanter are turned upwards. This section assures the correct view of the lateral side of the femur (vastus lateralis, which is the biggest part of the quadriceps femoris) Abdominal Subcutaneous STT: Measured at the level of the AC plane, anterior 1/3rd of abdominal circumference between outer and inner edges of abdominal wall by ultrasound.
Actual birth weight (AFW) was immediately measured after delivery by a neonatologist using digital medical neonatal scale.
- Conditions
- Fetal Macrosomia, Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia), Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR)
- Being tested
- 3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of delivery
- Keywords
- fetal weight estimation, fetal soft tissue thickness, Macrosomia, fetal growth restriction, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness, fetal abdominal soft tissue thickness
- Medical subject headings
- Fetal Macrosomia, Fetal Growth Retardation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of deliveryOther
ultrasound examination of full-term pregnant women with 48-72 hours of delivery measuring Abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length and mid-thigh soft tissue thickness.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Full term pregnant women | full term pregnant women with in 48-72 hours of delivery either cesarean section, spontaneous vaginal delivery or induced vaginal delivery. Receives: Other: 3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of delivery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
development and validation of novel method for fetal weight estimation
a novel module for fetal weight estimation depending on abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness.
Measured: within 48- 72 hours of delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fetal MacrosomiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Khaled Mustafa Attyia, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07575152
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AssiutFetalWT
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 4 May 2026
- Last updated
- 12 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3.
PubMed 29516387Deter RL. Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control. Semin Perinatol. 2004 Feb;28(1):23-32. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.011.
PubMed 15058899Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):314-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.5253.
PubMed 18307214Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):766-74. doi: 10.1002/uog.1779.
PubMed 15586365Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Balasubramaniam M, Romero R. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jun;24(6):817-28.
PubMed 15914686Larciprete G, Di Pierro G, Barbati G, Deaibess T, Jarvis S, Valensise H, Romanini ME, Gioia S, Arduini D. Could birthweight prediction models be improved by adding fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008 Feb;34(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00741.x.
PubMed 18226124Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80006-3.
PubMed 9024084Galan HL, Rigano S, Radaelli T, Cetin I, Bozzo M, Chyu J, Hobbins JC, Ferrazzi E. Reduction of subcutaneous mass, but not lean mass, in normal fetuses in Denver, Colorado. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):839-44. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117350.
PubMed 11641662Skovron ML, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Kim JM, Chitkara U. Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation. J Ultrasound Med. 1991 Mar;10(3):153-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.3.153.
PubMed 2027188Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):1030-8.
PubMed 1448248Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(2):155-61. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.028.
PubMed 15085892Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1751.
PubMed 15505877Rosati P, Exacoustos C, Caruso A, Mancuso S. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan 1;2(1):23-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02010023.x.
PubMed 12797002
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Estimation of Fetal Weight by Measuring Abdominal Circumference, Abdominal Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Thickness, Femur Length and Mid-thigh Soft Tissue Thickness: Cross Sectional Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07575152
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AssiutFetalWT
- Conditions
- Fetal Macrosomia, Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia), Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR)
- Keywords
- fetal weight estimation, fetal soft tissue thickness, Macrosomia, fetal growth restriction, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness, fetal abdominal soft tissue thickness
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Traditional methods for estimating fetal weight (EFW) often miss the mark because they focus on bone and circumference while ignoring fetal fat. This study proposes a more inclusive formula to fix that. Current models (using BPD, HC, AC, and FL) are the standard but suffer from high observer variability. These formulas struggle at the extremes (macrosomia or growth restriction) and fail to account for fetal adiposity, which makes up 10-12% of a newborn's mass. The study introduces a novel formula that moves beyond simple bone measurements by integrating Soft Tissue Thickness (STT). By accounting for a broader range of biological variants and fat distribution, this new model aims to provide a non-inferior, more precise predictive value for fetal weight compared to traditional methods.
Detailed description
Accurate estimation of fetal weight (EFW) is fundamental to modern obstetric management. Traditional sonographic biometry-utilizing biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL)-is the standard for predictive modeling. However, these parameters are limited by significant inter- and intra-observer variability and a loss of precision at the extremes of fetal weight, such as in cases of macrosomia or growth restriction. Furthermore, conventional formulas often fail to account for fetal adiposity, which constitutes 10-12% of total neonatal body mass. Recent literature suggests that the integration of soft tissue thickness (STT) measurements-specifically mid-arm, subscapular, abdominal subcutaneous, and mid-thigh thickness-can enhance the accuracy of EFW. While the Scioscia and modified Scioscia formulas rely exclusively on FL and mid-thigh measurements, this study proposes a novel, multi-parametric approach. By combining AC, fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness, FL, and mid-thigh soft tissue thickness, we hypothesize that our formula offers a non-inferior predictive value. This model accounts for a broader range of biological variants and soft tissue distribution patterns that significantly influence overall fetal mass.
Detailed history (maternal age, obstetric history, medical history, previous macrosomic fetuses, previous shoulder dystocia). Gestational age is calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period and confirmed by either a first- or second-trimester ultrasound scan. When the ultrasound-determined gestational age differed from that calculated from the last menstrual period by >7 days in the first trimester, or by >10 days in the second trimester, the ultrasound-determined gestational age is used.
The study will be bi-phasic, 1st phase is model development phase in which we develop a mathematical model for fetal weight estimation incorporating (abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness), the 2nd phase is a validation and comparison phase in which we test our model and compare it to modified Scioscia formula and conventional Hadlock formula.
For measurement of femur length (FL) Each caliper is placed at the ends of the ossified diaphysis without including the distal femoral epiphysis if it is visible.
For the measurement of AC, the transverse section of the fetal abdomen should be as circular as possible, and the fetal spine preferably in the 3- or 9-o'clock position, umbilical vein at the level of the portal sinus, stomach visible and kidneys not visible. The AC is measured directly at the outer surface of the skin line, with ellipse calipers.
Mid-thigh STT: measured linearly in the standard longitudinal section used for FL measurement. In the middle third of the fetal thigh, with the femur lying parallel to the transducer, mid-thigh STT was measured from the outer margin of the skin to the outer margin of the femur shaft. The measurement was taken, providing that the greater and the lesser trochanter are turned upwards. This section assures the correct view of the lateral side of the femur (vastus lateralis, which is the biggest part of the quadriceps femoris) Abdominal Subcutaneous STT: Measured at the level of the AC plane, anterior 1/3rd of abdominal circumference between outer and inner edges of abdominal wall by ultrasound.
Actual birth weight (AFW) was immediately measured after delivery by a neonatologist using digital medical neonatal scale.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Full term pregnant women | – | Other: 3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of deliveryfull term pregnant women with in 48-72 hours of delivery either cesarean section, spontaneous vaginal delivery or induced vaginal delivery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- full term pregnant women within 48-72 hours before delivery
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Singleton Gestation.
- Gestational Age: Participants must be at a term ≥ 37 weeks
- Timing of Examination: Sonographic EFW must be performed within 48 -72 hours prior to delivery.
- Welling to share in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Fetal Anomalies.
- Amniotic Fluid Disorders: oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios
- Maternal morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2)
- Maternal medical disorders: as diabetes, hypertension, systemic lupus erythromatosis or others affecting fetal growth
- Fetal Hydrops
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd trimester ultrasound examination within 48-72 hours of deliveryultrasound examination of full-term pregnant women with 48-72 hours of delivery measuring Abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length and mid-thigh soft tissue thickness. | Other | Full term pregnant women |
Primary outcome
development and validation of novel method for fetal weight estimation
Time frame: within 48- 72 hours of delivery
a novel module for fetal weight estimation depending on abdominal circumference, fetal abdominal subcutaneous soft tissue thickness, femur length, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29516387Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3.
- Background: PubMed 15058899Deter RL. Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control. Semin Perinatol. 2004 Feb;28(1):23-32. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.011.
- Background: PubMed 18307214Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):314-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.5253.
- Background: PubMed 15586365Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):766-74. doi: 10.1002/uog.1779.
- Background: PubMed 15914686Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Balasubramaniam M, Romero R. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jun;24(6):817-28.
- Background: PubMed 18226124Larciprete G, Di Pierro G, Barbati G, Deaibess T, Jarvis S, Valensise H, Romanini ME, Gioia S, Arduini D. Could birthweight prediction models be improved by adding fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008 Feb;34(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00741.x.
- Background: PubMed 9024084Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80006-3.
- Background: PubMed 11641662Galan HL, Rigano S, Radaelli T, Cetin I, Bozzo M, Chyu J, Hobbins JC, Ferrazzi E. Reduction of subcutaneous mass, but not lean mass, in normal fetuses in Denver, Colorado. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):839-44. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117350.
- Background: PubMed 2027188Skovron ML, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Kim JM, Chitkara U. Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation. J Ultrasound Med. 1991 Mar;10(3):153-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.3.153.
- Background: PubMed 1448248Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Spencer JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):1030-8.
- Background: PubMed 15085892Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(2):155-61. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.028.
- Background: PubMed 15505877Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;25(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1751.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Fetal Macrosomia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Analysis on the Health of Newborns in Three Hospitals, 2008-2024
Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality, Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia)
Recruiting
Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Macrosomia at Term: Diagnostic Accuracy Within 24 Hours of Delivery
Macrosomia, Fetal Weight
Recruiting
New Markers of Glycation to Predict Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Macrosomia.
Macrosomia, Fetal, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy
Enrolling by invitation
Artificial Intelligence and Gestacional Diabetes
Gestational Diabetes, Macrosomia, Fetal
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Fetal Clavicular Measurement to Predict Fetal Macrosomia
Macrosomia, Fetal, Large for Gestational Age
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fetal Macrosomia and Intrauterine Growth Disorders (IUGR and Macrosomia), run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Khaled Mustafa Attyia, Master's degree (+201005503250, khaled.hussien@med.aun.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
development and validation of novel method for fetal weight estimation (time frame: within 48- 72 hours of delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07575152, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.