AzTrials
AzTrials

Embolism ArterialNCT07581652

ICGA for Vascular Embolism After Hyaluronic Acid Injection

An observational study of Embolism Arterial, run by Chongli Yu at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Facial vascular embolism following hyaluronic acid injection is a rare but potentially serious complication that may lead to tissue ischemia, necrosis, and scarring. Early assessment of local tissue perfusion is important for evaluating treatment response and predicting clinical outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Embolism Arterial
What is being tested?
Indocyanine Green Angiography Assessment
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jul 2025to 30 Mar 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of consecutive patients treated at the Center for Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, for facial vascular embolism following hyaluronic acid injection between July 2025 and March 2026. Participants will be identified retrospectively from existing medical records, indocyanine green angiography imaging data, treatment records, and follow-up documentation generated during routine clinical care.

Who may be able to join

  • History of facial hyaluronic acid injection.
  • Clinical diagnosis of facial vascular embolism after hyaluronic acid injection, with symptoms or signs such as pain, skin color change, livedo-like discoloration, delayed capillary refill, or tissue ischemia.
  • Received initial rescue treatment at the study center.
  • Had indocyanine green angiography imaging performed before and immediately after initial rescue treatment as part of routine clinical care.
  • Had sufficient medical records and follow-up information available to assess subsequent treatment and tissue outcomes.

Who cannot join

  • Incomplete indocyanine green angiography imaging data.
  • Insufficient medical records or follow-up information to assess the main study outcomes.
  • Missing key clinical information needed for study analysis.
  • Duplicate records or records with concerns about data reliability.
  • The patient or legal representative explicitly objected to the use of historical clinical data for this study, if applicable under local ethics requirements.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100144

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Value of Indocyanine Green Angiography for Real-Time Assessment of Vascular Embolism Following Hyaluronic Acid Injection

Facial vascular embolism following hyaluronic acid injection is a rare but potentially serious complication that may lead to tissue ischemia, necrosis, and scarring. Early assessment of local tissue perfusion is important for evaluating treatment response and predicting clinical outcomes.

This retrospective observational study aims to evaluate whether indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) can provide objective, real-time information on tissue perfusion in patients with facial vascular embolism after hyaluronic acid injection. The study will review existing medical records, ICGA imaging data, and follow-up information from patients treated at a single center. The main question is whether ICGA findings before and after initial rescue therapy can help assess early perfusion recovery and identify patients who may require additional intervention or develop persistent tissue damage.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study will use existing clinical data generated during prior routine care, including medical records, ICGA imaging data, and follow-up documentation. No additional examinations, treatments, or study-specific follow-up visits will be introduced.

The study focuses on patients with facial vascular embolism following hyaluronic acid injection who underwent ICGA assessment before and immediately after initial rescue therapy. ICGA was performed as part of prior clinical evaluation to visualize local tissue perfusion in real time. Quantitative perfusion-related parameters were obtained using imaging analysis software.

The analysis will compare ICGA-based perfusion changes within the same patient before and after initial rescue therapy. The study will also explore whether baseline perfusion status and early perfusion recovery are associated with subsequent clinical management and tissue outcomes. Patients may be descriptively stratified according to whether additional intervention was required after initial rescue therapy.

All data will be collected retrospectively and de-identified before analysis. The study does not alter previous clinical decision-making and does not expose participants to additional physiological risk. The main study-related risk is potential loss of confidentiality, which will be minimized through de-identification, restricted access to study data, and secure data storage.

Being tested
Indocyanine Green Angiography Assessment
Keywords
Indocyanine green angiography, Hyaluronic acid injection, Facial vascular embolism, Hyaluronidase, Rescue therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Indocyanine Green Angiography AssessmentOther

    Indocyanine green angiography was performed as part of prior routine clinical evaluation to assess local tissue perfusion in patients with facial vascular embolism following hyaluronic acid injection. In this retrospective observational study, existing ICGA imaging data obtained before and immediately after initial rescue therapy will be reviewed and analyzed. No additional ICGA examination will be performed for research purposes.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median Within-Participant Change in ICGA-Derived Ingress Rate From Before to After Initial Rescue Therapy

    Ingress rate is an indocyanine green angiography-derived perfusion parameter representing the maximum slope of fluorescence intensity increase. It will be measured immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy. The reported value will be the within-participant change in ingress rate, calculated as the post-treatment value minus the pre-treatment value.

    Measured: Periprocedural: immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy

  2. Median Within-Participant Change in ICGA-Derived Time to Peak From Before to After Initial Rescue Therapy

    Time to peak is an indocyanine green angiography-derived perfusion parameter representing the time interval from first visible fluorescence to peak fluorescence intensity. It will be measured immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy. The reported value will be the within-participant change in time to peak, calculated as the post-treatment value minus the pre-treatment value.

    Measured: Periprocedural: immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy

  3. Median Within-Participant Change in ICGA-Derived Curve Ingress From Before to After Initial Rescue Therapy

    Curve ingress is an indocyanine green angiography-derived perfusion parameter representing the area under the fluorescence-time curve from the start of fluorescence increase to peak fluorescence intensity. It will be measured immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy. The reported value will be the within-participant change in curve ingress, calculated as the post-treatment value minus the pre-treatment value.

    Measured: Periprocedural: immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07581652
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026042018584440
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
28 Apr 2026
Last updated
12 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Embolism Arterial, run by Chongli Yu at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median Within-Participant Change in ICGA-Derived Ingress Rate From Before to After Initial Rescue Therapy (time frame: Periprocedural: immediately before initial rescue therapy and immediately after completion of initial rescue therapy). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in