Surgical EducationNCT07583082
Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training
An observational study of Surgical Education, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators'… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Education
- What is being tested?
- Observational
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- May 2026to Sep 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Staff neurosurgeons, neurosurgical fellows, neurosurgical residents, and medical students from four Quebec institutions.
Who may be able to join
- Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from one of four Quebec institutions who do not fit the exclusion criteria.
Who cannot join
- For medical students, participation in a previous trial where they received training on the NeuroVR surgical simulator or the ex vivo calf brain simulation model.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Mohammed Babgi, MD contact
Canada1 site
Neuro Imaging and Surgical Technologies Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4
About this study
Official title: Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training: A Case Series Study
Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators' knowledge, has not been previously measured in a realistic operative environment.
The investigators have therefore developed a simulation platform integrating an ex vivo calf brain and a 3D-printed skull model attached to a force sensor capable of capturing real-time forces applied to the brain. A cross-sectional case series study will be conducted to evaluate the validity of the system. Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform three simulated subpial resections each using our ex vivo calf brain simulation platform. The forces applied by the microscissors, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic aspirator onto the brain will be captured along with kinematic data. This study aims to establish the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale: The subpial resection technique is a complex neurosurgical procedure that is essential for brain tumor and epilepsy surgery. However, opportunities for trainees to gain hands-on experience with this procedure without risk to patient safety are limited. The force applied on the brain during tool-tissue contact is a critical factor impacting patient safety. While virtual simulation platforms enable force monitoring, ex vivo animal brains cannot readily capture quantitative data. The investigators have therefore developed a prototype of a simulation platform that integrates a force sensor and a calf brain and can accurately detect real-time forces during simulated subpial resections. This study seeks to investigate the validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Hypotheses:
- The forces applied by instruments on an ex vivo calf brain during simulated subpial resection procedures will significantly differ between novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
- The ex vivo calf brain force detection system will demonstrate face, content, construct, and convergent validity.
- Levels of negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load will be greater in surgical trainees compared with experts.
Primary Objective: To measure and compare the forces applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants during simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedures.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of the ex vivo calf brain force measurement setup.
- To determine how the simulation platform influences emotions, stress, and cognitive load of participants of different expertise levels.
Setting: McGill University Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital.
Participants:
Neurosurgeons (experts): Staff neurosurgeons at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical fellows (trainees): Neurosurgical fellows at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical residents (trainees): Neurosurgical residents at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Medical students (novices): Students enrolled in medical school at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Design: A cross-sectional case series study.
Methodology: This study was approved by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board, Neurosciences-Psychiatry. A case series study will be conducted where medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform subpial resection tasks on an ex vivo calf brain model. Calf brains will be placed in a 3D-printed skull model to mimic a realistic human operative environment. The 3D-printed skull model was prototyped from a publicly available CT scan obtained from Embodi3D, an open-access medical imaging repository, and reconstructed in 3D using the open-source software 3D Slicer version 5.10.0. A 6-degree-of-freedom force/torque sensor (Nano17 IP68, ATI Industrial Automation Inc., North Carolina, USA) and a USB data acquisition board (NI-6210, National Instruments Inc., Texas, USA) will be used to measure real-time forces applied to the brain. Participants will use microscissors, bipolar forceps, and a SONOPET ultrasonic aspirator (Stryker, Portage, Michigan, USA) to perform each simulated procedure. All three surgical instruments will be continuously tracked using infrared cameras, allowing kinematic data (velocity, acceleration, and jerk) of each instrument to be derived. The tasks will be performed using an OPMI pico surgical microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) and video-recorded using a Blackfly S GigE embedded microscope camera (FLIR, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA), allowing a broader instrument view for evaluation of tracking data and postoperative performance. Before, during, and after the trial, all participants will self-report their emotions using Medical Emotions Scale (MES) and their stress using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) on 7-point Likert scales. All participants will also report their cognitive load after the trial using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) on 5-point Likert scales and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) on 7-point Likert scales. Expert participants will fill out questionnaires assessing the face and content validity of the ex vivo calf brain force detection setup on 7-point Likert scales. Blinded expert raters will watch the videos of each procedure and grade it using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rating scale to determine the simulation platform's construct and convergent validity.
Study Procedure: Upon arrival, participants will read and sign an informed consent form. They will then fill out a pre-trial questionnaire assessing their demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, gender, age, institutional affiliation, etc.) as well as their baseline emotions and stress. Each participant will receive standardized written instructions on instrument use and function and presented with an image outlining the location of the three subpial resections on the ex vivo calf brain in front of them. Participants will adjust the operating microscope according to their preferences. The resections will be performed using microscissors to make an initial incision in the pia mater, bipolar forceps to lift the pia, and an ultrasonic aspirator to remove the assigned cortical area. After the first and second tasks, participants will fill out questionnaires assessing their emotions and stress once more. Finally, after the third task, novice and trainee participants will fill out a post-trial questionnaire assessing their emotions, stress, and cognitive load. Expert participants will fill out face and content validity questionnaires, followed by the post-trial questionnaire.
Significance: This study will provide validity evidence to support the educational utility of a novel ex vivo calf brain force detection system using both traditional and contemporary frameworks. For the first time in a realistic operative environment, it will be possible to monitor the force applied on the brain. The force and kinematic data collected from this case series study will be used to build an intelligent tutoring system capable of monitoring performance and mitigating errors during human surgical procedures.
- Conditions
- Surgical Education
- Being tested
- Observational
- Keywords
- Surgical Education, Surgical Simulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ObservationalBehavioural
As such, no interventions are provided. All participants will perform three subpial resections on an ex vivo calf brain.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure
Throughout each simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedure, forces applied to the brain during tool-tissue contact will be measured by the force/torque sensor in grams and Newtons. This will enable for the assessment of differences in force applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
Measured: 1 day of study
Secondary outcomes (7)
Face validity questionnaire responses
Expert participants will fill out face validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the realism of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest realism and 7 indicating highest realism.
Measured: 1 day of study
Content validity questionnaire responses
Expert participants will fill out content validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the educational utility of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest utility and 7 indicating highest utility.
Measured: 1 day of study
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores for each simulated subpial resection procedure
Blinded expert raters will review videos of each procedure and grade them using a modified OSATS rating scale on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating worse performance and 7 indicating better performance. This will allow for the assessment of differences in performance between each expertise group, providing evidence of the platform's construct and convergent validity.
Measured: 1 day of study
Strength of emotions elicited
Measured using the Medical Emotions Scale (MES) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections. Participants self-reported emotional states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
Measured: 1 day of study
Levels of stress
Measured using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections. Participants self-reported stress states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
Measured: 1 day of study
Levels of cognitive load
Measured using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) after the trial. Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 5-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 5 indicating highest intensity.
Measured: 1 day of study
Levels of cognitive load
Measured using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) after the trial. Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
Measured: 1 day of study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2026
- Study startMay 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Surgical EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rolando Del Maestro, McGill University
- Investigators
- Rolando F. Del Maestro, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre, McGill UniversityAmir Hooshiar, PhD, Study director, Surgical Performance Enhancement and Robotics Centre, McGill UniversityHoussem-Eddine Gueziri, PhD, Study director, Laboratoire sur la science des données, Université TÉLUQD. Louis Collins, PhD, Study director, Neuro Imaging and Surgical Technologies Lab, McGill University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07583082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018 4395
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 13 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data obtained from primary and secondary outcomes may be shared if other researchers have an interest in this data.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training: A Case Series Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07583082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018 4395
- Conditions
- Surgical Education
- Keywords
- Surgical Education, Surgical Simulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators' knowledge, has not been previously measured in a realistic operative environment.
The investigators have therefore developed a simulation platform integrating an ex vivo calf brain and a 3D-printed skull model attached to a force sensor capable of capturing real-time forces applied to the brain. A cross-sectional case series study will be conducted to evaluate the validity of the system. Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform three simulated subpial resections each using our ex vivo calf brain simulation platform. The forces applied by the microscissors, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic aspirator onto the brain will be captured along with kinematic data. This study aims to establish the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale: The subpial resection technique is a complex neurosurgical procedure that is essential for brain tumor and epilepsy surgery. However, opportunities for trainees to gain hands-on experience with this procedure without risk to patient safety are limited. The force applied on the brain during tool-tissue contact is a critical factor impacting patient safety. While virtual simulation platforms enable force monitoring, ex vivo animal brains cannot readily capture quantitative data. The investigators have therefore developed a prototype of a simulation platform that integrates a force sensor and a calf brain and can accurately detect real-time forces during simulated subpial resections. This study seeks to investigate the validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Hypotheses:
- The forces applied by instruments on an ex vivo calf brain during simulated subpial resection procedures will significantly differ between novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
- The ex vivo calf brain force detection system will demonstrate face, content, construct, and convergent validity.
- Levels of negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load will be greater in surgical trainees compared with experts.
Primary Objective: To measure and compare the forces applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants during simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedures.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of the ex vivo calf brain force measurement setup.
- To determine how the simulation platform influences emotions, stress, and cognitive load of participants of different expertise levels.
Setting: McGill University Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital.
Participants:
Neurosurgeons (experts): Staff neurosurgeons at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical fellows (trainees): Neurosurgical fellows at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical residents (trainees): Neurosurgical residents at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Medical students (novices): Students enrolled in medical school at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Design: A cross-sectional case series study.
Methodology: This study was approved by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board, Neurosciences-Psychiatry. A case series study will be conducted where medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform subpial resection tasks on an ex vivo calf brain model. Calf brains will be placed in a 3D-printed skull model to mimic a realistic human operative environment. The 3D-printed skull model was prototyped from a publicly available CT scan obtained from Embodi3D, an open-access medical imaging repository, and reconstructed in 3D using the open-source software 3D Slicer version 5.10.0. A 6-degree-of-freedom force/torque sensor (Nano17 IP68, ATI Industrial Automation Inc., North Carolina, USA) and a USB data acquisition board (NI-6210, National Instruments Inc., Texas, USA) will be used to measure real-time forces applied to the brain. Participants will use microscissors, bipolar forceps, and a SONOPET ultrasonic aspirator (Stryker, Portage, Michigan, USA) to perform each simulated procedure. All three surgical instruments will be continuously tracked using infrared cameras, allowing kinematic data (velocity, acceleration, and jerk) of each instrument to be derived. The tasks will be performed using an OPMI pico surgical microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) and video-recorded using a Blackfly S GigE embedded microscope camera (FLIR, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA), allowing a broader instrument view for evaluation of tracking data and postoperative performance. Before, during, and after the trial, all participants will self-report their emotions using Medical Emotions Scale (MES) and their stress using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) on 7-point Likert scales. All participants will also report their cognitive load after the trial using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) on 5-point Likert scales and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) on 7-point Likert scales. Expert participants will fill out questionnaires assessing the face and content validity of the ex vivo calf brain force detection setup on 7-point Likert scales. Blinded expert raters will watch the videos of each procedure and grade it using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rating scale to determine the simulation platform's construct and convergent validity.
Study Procedure: Upon arrival, participants will read and sign an informed consent form. They will then fill out a pre-trial questionnaire assessing their demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, gender, age, institutional affiliation, etc.) as well as their baseline emotions and stress. Each participant will receive standardized written instructions on instrument use and function and presented with an image outlining the location of the three subpial resections on the ex vivo calf brain in front of them. Participants will adjust the operating microscope according to their preferences. The resections will be performed using microscissors to make an initial incision in the pia mater, bipolar forceps to lift the pia, and an ultrasonic aspirator to remove the assigned cortical area. After the first and second tasks, participants will fill out questionnaires assessing their emotions and stress once more. Finally, after the third task, novice and trainee participants will fill out a post-trial questionnaire assessing their emotions, stress, and cognitive load. Expert participants will fill out face and content validity questionnaires, followed by the post-trial questionnaire.
Significance: This study will provide validity evidence to support the educational utility of a novel ex vivo calf brain force detection system using both traditional and contemporary frameworks. For the first time in a realistic operative environment, it will be possible to monitor the force applied on the brain. The force and kinematic data collected from this case series study will be used to build an intelligent tutoring system capable of monitoring performance and mitigating errors during human surgical procedures.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Staff neurosurgeons, neurosurgical fellows, neurosurgical residents, and medical students from four Quebec institutions.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from one of four Quebec institutions who do not fit the exclusion criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- For medical students, participation in a previous trial where they received training on the NeuroVR surgical simulator or the ex vivo calf brain simulation model.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ObservationalAs such, no interventions are provided. All participants will perform three subpial resections on an ex vivo calf brain. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure
Time frame: 1 day of study
Throughout each simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedure, forces applied to the brain during tool-tissue contact will be measured by the force/torque sensor in grams and Newtons. This will enable for the assessment of differences in force applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
7 secondary outcomes
Face validity questionnaire responses
Time frame: 1 day of study
Content validity questionnaire responses
Time frame: 1 day of study
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores for each simulated subpial resection procedure
Time frame: 1 day of study
Strength of emotions elicited
Time frame: 1 day of study
Levels of stress
Time frame: 1 day of study
Levels of cognitive load
Time frame: 1 day of study
Levels of cognitive load
Time frame: 1 day of study
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data obtained from primary and secondary outcomes may be shared if other researchers have an interest in this data.
Related trials for Surgical Education
Not yet recruiting
Generative AI-Assisted Personalized Feedback for Laparoscopic Skill Learning in Medical Undergraduates
Medical Education
RecruitingObservational study
Robotic Inflammatory Bowel Disease Development, Learning and Efficacy Study
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Intuition in Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery
Anastomotic Leaks
Not yet recruiting
AI-Assisted Education Before Surgery to Prevent Lung Complications in Older Surgical Patients
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mohammed Babgi, MD contact
Rolando F. Del Maestro, MD, PhD principal investigator
Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre, McGill University
Amir Hooshiar, PhD study director
Surgical Performance Enhancement and Robotics Centre, McGill University
Houssem-Eddine Gueziri, PhD study director
Laboratoire sur la science des données, Université TÉLUQ
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Surgical Education, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bianca Giglio, MSc (514-802-1608, bianca.giglio@mail.mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure (time frame: 1 day of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.