End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)REFRAME-MPNCT07585890
Establishing a Reference Framework for Outcomes After Machine-Preserved Liver Transplantation in Europe
An observational study of End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD) and Acute Liver Failure, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 37 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
Machine perfusion (MP) has become routine clinical practice in liver transplantation. However, as the field has matured, direct randomized comparisons between distinct MP modalities have become increasingly impractical, given that donor and graft characteristics often predetermine the optimal preservation strategy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Acute Liver Failure, Liver Cirrhosis
- What is being tested?
- Endischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (any device), Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion (any device) and Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion (any device)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 10,000 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Apr 2026to 31 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All postmortal livers accepted (transplanted and not-transplanted after machine perfusion) upon organ offer between 01.01.2021 and 31.12.2025 for patients >18 years at the time of liver transplantation.
Who may be able to join
- All postmortal livers accepted (transplanted and not-transplanted after machine perfusion) upon organ offer for patients >18 years at the time of liver transplantation.
- All donor types (DBD, DCD)
- Preservation either with static cold storage alone or combined with machine perfusion (MP).
- Donor livers underwent MP as part of routine clinical practice and the choice of perfusion protocol was made according to institutional standard practice.
- Eligible MP protocols are:
- end-ischemic single- or dual hypothermic oxygenated MP [e(D)HOPE],
Show all 12Show fewer
- end-ischemic (back-to-base) normothermic MP [eNMP],
- continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic MP [cNMP],
- e(D)HOPE followed by controlled oxygenated rewarming and normothermic MP [e(D)HOPE-COR-NMP)],
- e(D)HOPE followed by normothermic MP [e(D)HOPE-NMP], or
- Normothermic regional perfusion followed by SCS or an ex situ MP protocol.
- A minimum follow-up of 12 months after liver transplantation is required.
Who cannot join
- Livers that were allocated to a MP protocol as part of a prospective randomized or interventional clinical trial comparing different preservation techniques or any other invention.
- Living donor liver transplantation
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 10 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
37 sites in 10 countries
Germany10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Aachen University Hospital
Aachen
Florian Vondran, MD, PhD, +49241800, fvondran@ukaachen.de
Florian Vondran, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin
Nathanael Raschzok, MD, PhD, +493045050, nathanael.raschzok@charite.de
Nathanael Raschzok, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Bonn
Bonn
Christiane Pillny, MD, +492282870, christiane.pillny@ukbonn.de
Christiane Pillny, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospital Essen
Essen
Zoltan Czigany, MD, PhD, +492017230, zoltan.czigany@uk-essen.de
Ulf Neumann, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Frankfurt University Hospital
Frankfurt
Tamás Benkö, MD, PhD, +496963010, tamas.benkoe@unimedizin-ffm.de
Tamás Benkö, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hannover Medical School
Hanover
Moritz Schmelzle, MD, PhD, +495115320, schmelzle.moritz@mh-hannover.de
Moritz Schmelzle, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Heidelberg
Heidelberg
Peri Husen, MD, PhD, +496221560, peri.husen@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Peri Husen, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Kiel
Felix Braun, MD, PhD, +494315000, felix.braun@uksh.de
Felix Braun, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Magdeburg
Magdeburg
Roland Croner, MD, PhD, +493917601, roland.croner@med.ovgu.de
Roland Croner, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Muenster
Münster
Philipp Houben, MD, PhD, +492518355555, philipp.houben@ukmuenster.de
Philipp Houben, MD, PhD
Italy7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
A.O.U Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
Bari
Francesco Tandoi, MD, PhD, +390805591111, francesco.tandoi@uniba.it
Francesco Tandoi, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo
Stefania Camagni, MD, +39035267111, stefania.camagni@asst-pg23.it
Stefania Camagni, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna
Matteo Cescon, MD, PhD, +390512141111, matteo.cescon@unibo.it
Matteo Cescon, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan
Marco Angelo MD, MSc, Bongini, +390223901, marco.bongini@istitutotumori.mi.it
Vincenzo Mazzaferro, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
A.O.U. Pisana - Ospedale Cisanello
Pisa
Davide Ghinolfi, MD, PhD, +39050992111, d.ghinolfi@ao-pisa.toscana.it
Davide Ghinolfi, MD, PhD
- Recruiting
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
Torino
Damiano Patrono, MD, PhD, +39011693 3111, damiano.patrono@gmail.com
Damiano Patrono, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
A.O.U. Integrata Verona
Verona
Amedeo Carraro, MD, PhD, +390458121111, amedeo.carraro@aovr.veneto.it
Amedeo Carraro, MD, PhD
Belgium4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels
Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani, MD, PhD, +3227641111, Eliano.Bonaccorsi@saintluc.uclouvain.be
Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
UZ Ghent
Ghent
Hasan Eker, MD, PhD, +3293322111, hasan.eker@uzgent.be
Hasan Eker, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven
Diethard Monbaliu, MD, PhD, +3216332211, diethard.monbaliu@uzleuven.be
Diethard Monbaliu, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU de Liège
Liège
Nicholas Gilbo, MD, PhD, +3243230000, nicholas.gilbo@chuliege.be
Nicholas Gilbo, MD, PhD
France3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Beaujon Hospital
Clichy
Mickaël Lesurtel, MD, PhD, +33140875000, mickael.lesurtel@aphp.fr
Mickaël Lesurtel, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hautepierre Hospital
Strasbourg
Pietro Francesco Addeo, MD, PhD, +33388116768, pietrofrancesco.addeo@chru-strasbourg.fr
Pietro Francesco Addeo, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Paul-Brousse Ap-Hp
Villejuif
Marc-Antoine Allard, MD, PhD, +33145593000, marcantoine.allard@aphp.fr
Marc-Antoine Allard, MD, PhD
Spain3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Cruces University Hospital
Barakaldo
Mikel Gastaca, MD, PhD, +34946006000, mikel.gastacamateo@osakidetza.eus
Mikel Gastaca, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Yiliam Fundora Suárez, MD, PhD, +34932275400, FUNDORA@clinic.cat
Yiliam Fundora Suárez, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville
Sheila Pereira Arenas, +34955012000, spereira-ibis@us.es
Miguel Angel Gómez Bravo, MD, PhD
United Kingdom3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds
Dhakshina Vijayanand, MD, PhD, +441132433144, dhakshina.vijayanand@nhs.net
Dhakshina Vijayanand, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London
Miriam Cortes Cerisuelo, MD, PhD, +442032999000, m.cortescerisuelo@nhs.net
Miriam Cortes Cerisuelo, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
London
David Nasralla, MD, PhD, +442077940500, david.nasralla@nhs.net
David Nasralla, MD, PhD
Austria2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck
Stefan Schneeberger, MD, PhD, +4351290030, stefan.schneeberger@i-med.ac.at
Stefan Schneeberger, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna
Deniz Uluk, MD, +431401600, deniz.uluk@meduniwien.ac.at
Deniz Uluk, MD
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen
Sabrina Stimmeder, MD, +31503612896, s.stimmeder@umcg.nl
Vincent E de Meijer, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden
Ian Alwayn, MD, PhD, +31715269111, i.p.j.alwayn@lumc.nl
Ian Alwayn, MD, PhD
Switzerland2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Bern University Hospital
Bern
Philipp Dutkowski, MD, PhD, +41316322111, philipp.dutkowski@insel.ch
Philipp Dutkowski, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva
Philippe Compagnon, MD, PhD, +41223723311, philippe.compagnon@hug.ch
Philippe Compagnon, MD, PhD
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm
Gabriel Oniscu, MD, PhD, +46852480000, gabriel.oniscu@ki.se
Gabriel Oniscu, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Establishing a Reference Framework for Outcomes After Machine-Preserved Liver Transplantation in Europe (REFRAME-MP)
Machine perfusion (MP) has become routine clinical practice in liver transplantation. However, as the field has matured, direct randomized comparisons between distinct MP modalities have become increasingly impractical, given that donor and graft characteristics often predetermine the optimal preservation strategy. Consequently, many studies continue to reference historical benchmark cohorts from the pre-perfusion era, or use risk scores developed before routine utilization of MP. These cohorts, while once valuable, fail to account for the paradigm shift that MP has introduced. Likewise, commonly used donor- and recipient-based risk scores were developed prior to the adoption of MP. While these scores aim to assess survival or morbidity after transplantation, none of them guide decisions about MP use or the most suitable perfusion protocol. As MP technologies continue to evolve there is a critical need for an updated reference framework that accurately reflects current clinical practice and captures the best achievable outcomes across all MP modalities.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to establish a reference framework for liver transplantation outcomes in the era of routine clinical machine perfusion. In addition, based on the collected real-world observational data, a target trial emulation approach will be applied.
- Conditions
- End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Acute Liver Failure, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Transplantation
- Being tested
- Endischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (any device), Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion (any device), Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion (any device), Endischemic HOPE-COR-NMP (any device), Endischemic HOPE-NMP (any device)
- Keywords
- machine perfusion, liver transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion, normothermic machine perfusion, normothermic regional perfusion, organ preservation, machine preservation
- Medical subject headings
- End Stage Liver Disease, Liver Failure, Acute, Liver Cirrhosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (any device)Device
Endischemic single- or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to single- or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion.
Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion (any device)Device
Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion.
Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion (any device)Device
Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion.
Endischemic HOPE-COR-NMP (any device)Device
Endischemic single or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion followed by controlled oxygenated rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion.
Normothermic regional perfusion prior to HOPE-COR-NMP is eligible for inclusion.
Endischemic HOPE-NMP (any device)Device
Endischemic single or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion followed by normothermic machine perfusion.
Normothermic regional perfusion prior to HOPE-NMP is eligible for inclusion.
Normothermic regional perfusion (any device)Device
Normothermic regional perfusion followed by static cold storage or any ex situ machine perfusion protocol.
Static cold storageOther
Preservation with static cold storage only, not preceeded by NRP, nor followed by ex situ machine perfusion.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death-censored graft survival
Defined as the time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or death due to graft failure (analyzed using time-to-event methods).
Measured: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Overall patient survival
Defined as time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or all-cause death (analyzed using time-to-event methods).
Measured: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Secondary outcomes (13)
Overall graft survival
Defined as time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or all-cause death (analyzed using time-to-event methods)
Measured: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Incidence of major liver-related complications
Incidence of at least one biliary or vascular complication graded as Clavien-Dindo IIIb or higher, following the grading recommendations published: de Goeij FHC, Wehrle CJ, Abbassi F, et al. Mastering the narrative: Precision reporting of risk and outcomes in liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2025;82(4):729-743. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.013. Additionally, scoring accoring the Comprehensive Complication Index.
Measured: within the transplant-related admission, and 1 year post-transplantation
Incidence of graft loss due to complications
Graft loss as a result of complications assessed separately for biliary complications, vascular complications, and rejection.
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Total number of clinically significant biliary complications
Total number of any biliary complications requiring interventions (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher).
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of biliary complications
Biliary complications include:
- Post-transplant cholangiopathy
- Anastomotic strictures
- Biliary leakage
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of vascular complications
Vascular complications include:
- Hepatic artery thrombosis
- Portal vein thrombosis
- Venous outflow tract obstruction
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of re-transplantation
Re-transplantation for any cause.
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of acute rejection
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of chronic rejection
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of recurrence of primary disease
Histologically or radiologically confirmed recurrence, including recurrence of malignancies
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of kidney injury
Kidney injury includes:
- Acute kidney injury
- New-onset chronic kidney disease
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of primary non-function
Liver graft failure within the first 7 days of transplantation with patent liver vessels leading to re-transplantation or patient death
Measured: up to 1 week post-transplantation
Patient-centered outcomes (measure of recovery and healthcare utilization)
Length of intensive care unit stay and length of initial hospital stay (starting at day of transplantation until day of discharge, measured in days)
Measured: within 1 year post-transplantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2026
- Study start21 Apr 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vincent E de Meijer, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07585890
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMCG_REFRAME-MP
- Other IDs
- METc 2026/180
- Acronym
- REFRAME-MP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Establishing a Reference Framework for Outcomes After Machine-Preserved Liver Transplantation in Europe (REFRAME-MP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07585890
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REFRAME-MP / UMCG_REFRAME-MP
- Conditions
- End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Acute Liver Failure, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Transplantation
- Keywords
- machine perfusion, liver transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion, normothermic machine perfusion, normothermic regional perfusion, organ preservation, machine preservation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
- Study start
- 21 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Machine perfusion (MP) has become routine clinical practice in liver transplantation. However, as the field has matured, direct randomized comparisons between distinct MP modalities have become increasingly impractical, given that donor and graft characteristics often predetermine the optimal preservation strategy. Consequently, many studies continue to reference historical benchmark cohorts from the pre-perfusion era, or use risk scores developed before routine utilization of MP. These cohorts, while once valuable, fail to account for the paradigm shift that MP has introduced. Likewise, commonly used donor- and recipient-based risk scores were developed prior to the adoption of MP. While these scores aim to assess survival or morbidity after transplantation, none of them guide decisions about MP use or the most suitable perfusion protocol. As MP technologies continue to evolve there is a critical need for an updated reference framework that accurately reflects current clinical practice and captures the best achievable outcomes across all MP modalities.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to establish a reference framework for liver transplantation outcomes in the era of routine clinical machine perfusion. In addition, based on the collected real-world observational data, a target trial emulation approach will be applied.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All postmortal livers accepted (transplanted and not-transplanted after machine perfusion) upon organ offer between 01.01.2021 and 31.12.2025 for patients >18 years at the time of liver transplantation.
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- All postmortal livers accepted (transplanted and not-transplanted after machine perfusion) upon organ offer for patients >18 years at the time of liver transplantation.
- All donor types (DBD, DCD)
- Preservation either with static cold storage alone or combined with machine perfusion (MP).
- Donor livers underwent MP as part of routine clinical practice and the choice of perfusion protocol was made according to institutional standard practice.
- Eligible MP protocols are:
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Livers that were allocated to a MP protocol as part of a prospective randomized or interventional clinical trial comparing different preservation techniques or any other invention.
- Living donor liver transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (any device)Endischemic single- or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to single- or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion. | Device | – |
| Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion (any device)Endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to endischemic (back-to-base) normothermic machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion. | Device | – |
| Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion (any device)Continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to continuous (device-to-donor) normothermic machine perfusion is eligible for inclusion. | Device | – |
| Endischemic HOPE-COR-NMP (any device)Endischemic single or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion followed by controlled oxygenated rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to HOPE-COR-NMP is eligible for inclusion. | Device | – |
| Endischemic HOPE-NMP (any device)Endischemic single or dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion followed by normothermic machine perfusion. Normothermic regional perfusion prior to HOPE-NMP is eligible for inclusion. | Device | – |
| Normothermic regional perfusion (any device)Normothermic regional perfusion followed by static cold storage or any ex situ machine perfusion protocol. | Device | – |
| Static cold storagePreservation with static cold storage only, not preceeded by NRP, nor followed by ex situ machine perfusion. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Death-censored graft survival
Time frame: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Defined as the time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or death due to graft failure (analyzed using time-to-event methods).
Overall patient survival
Time frame: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Defined as time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or all-cause death (analyzed using time-to-event methods).
13 secondary outcomes
Overall graft survival
Time frame: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation
Incidence of major liver-related complications
Time frame: within the transplant-related admission, and 1 year post-transplantation
Incidence of graft loss due to complications
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Total number of clinically significant biliary complications
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of biliary complications
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of vascular complications
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of re-transplantation
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of acute rejection
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of chronic rejection
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of recurrence of primary disease
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of kidney injury
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation, up to 5 years post-transplantation
Incidence of primary non-function
Time frame: up to 1 week post-transplantation
Patient-centered outcomes (measure of recovery and healthcare utilization)
Time frame: within 1 year post-transplantation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
RTX001 Autologous Engineered Macrophages for Liver Cirrhosis
End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Cirrhosis, Liver
Active, not recruiting
Human Umbilical Cord-mesenchymal Stem Cells Via Different Transplantation Routes in ESLD
End-Stage Liver Diseases
Recruiting
Restrictive Fluid Management In Liver Transplantation (REFIL)
Liver Transplantation (LT), End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
Active, not recruiting
Restrictive Fluid Management In Liver Transplantation (REFIL) - Pilot
Liver Transplantation, End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
View of Cerebral Perfusion in Liver Transplantation
End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Liver Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Vincent E de Meijer, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Medical Center Groningen
37 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD) and Acute Liver Failure, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 37 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Germany, Italy, Belgium, France, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sabrina Stimmeder, MD (+31503612896, s.stimmeder@umcg.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death-censored graft survival (time frame: Actuarial survival 1-5 year post-transplantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.