Patient With Low Denisty BoneNCT07586475
Comparative Assessment of Primary Stability by Osseodensification Using Densah Burs Conventional Drilling Methods.
A study testing osseodensification using densah burs and convetional Driiling technique in people with Patient With Low Denisty Bone, run by Suez Canal University.
Trial summary
This clinical study evaluates and compares the primary stability of dental implants placed using osseodensification with Densah burs versus conventional drilling methods. The goal is to determine whether osseodensification improves implant stability and bone density, especially in areas with low bone quality Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient With Low Denisty Bone
- What is being tested?
- osseodensification using densah burs and convetional Driiling technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2026to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients
- Patients requiring dental implant placement in areas with varying bone quality
- Patients without systemic diseases that interfere with bone healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis)
Who cannot join
- Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism
- Presence of large periapical radiographic lesions related to the tooth to be extracted (abscess, granuloma, or cyst)
- Teeth requiring transalveolar extraction
- Patients with contraindications to surgical treatment
- Patients with psychological disorders
- Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions
About this study
This clinical study evaluates and compares the primary stability of dental implants placed using osseodensification with Densah burs versus conventional drilling methods. The goal is to determine whether osseodensification improves implant stability and bone density, especially in areas with low bone quality
- Conditions
- Patient With Low Denisty Bone
- Being tested
- osseodensification using densah burs, convetional Driiling technique
- Keywords
- dental impant, primary stability, ossseodensfication, densah burs, conventional osteotomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
osseodensification using densah bursProcedure or surgery
Participants will be divided into two groups. The first group will undergo implant site preparation using the osseodensification technique with Densah burs, which compacts bone and enhances primary stability without removing bone. The second group will undergo conventional drilling, where bone is removed in a stepwise manner to prepare the implant site according to standard surgical protocols."
convetional Driiling techniqueProcedure or surgery
"This group will receive implant site preparation using the conventional drilling technique, where bone is gradually removed to create space for the implant, as per standard implantology protocols."
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| controlled group conventional drilling group | Active comparator | Participants in this group will receive dental implants using the traditional drilling technique, which removes bone to create space for the implant. Receives: Procedure: convetional Driiling technique |
| study group of osseodensification Group | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive dental implants using the osseodensification technique with Densah burs, which preserves and compacts bone to enhance primary stability. Receives: Procedure: osseodensification using densah burs |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Implant Stability Measured by Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Using the Osstell Device
Description:
Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) obtained from the Osstell device. The ISQ scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater implant stability.
Measured: Immediately after implant placement (within minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2026
- Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patient With Low Denisty BoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07586475
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1003/2025
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Assessment of Primary Stability by Osseodensification Using Densah Burs Conventional Drilling Methods.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07586475
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1003/2025
- Conditions
- Patient With Low Denisty Bone
- Keywords
- dental impant, primary stability, ossseodensfication, densah burs, conventional osteotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical study evaluates and compares the primary stability of dental implants placed using osseodensification with Densah burs versus conventional drilling methods. The goal is to determine whether osseodensification improves implant stability and bone density, especially in areas with low bone quality
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| controlled group conventional drilling group | Active comparator | Procedure: convetional Driiling techniqueParticipants in this group will receive dental implants using the traditional drilling technique, which removes bone to create space for the implant. |
| study group of osseodensification Group | Experimental | Procedure: osseodensification using densah bursParticipants in this group will receive dental implants using the osseodensification technique with Densah burs, which preserves and compacts bone to enhance primary stability. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male and female patients
- Patients requiring dental implant placement in areas with varying bone quality
- Patients without systemic diseases that interfere with bone healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism
- Presence of large periapical radiographic lesions related to the tooth to be extracted (abscess, granuloma, or cyst)
- Teeth requiring transalveolar extraction
- Patients with contraindications to surgical treatment
- Patients with psychological disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| osseodensification using densah bursParticipants will be divided into two groups. The first group will undergo implant site preparation using the osseodensification technique with Densah burs, which compacts bone and enhances primary stability without removing bone. The second group will undergo conventional drilling, where bone is removed in a stepwise manner to prepare the implant site according to standard surgical protocols." | Procedure or surgery | study group of osseodensification Group |
| convetional Driiling technique"This group will receive implant site preparation using the conventional drilling technique, where bone is gradually removed to create space for the implant, as per standard implantology protocols." | Procedure or surgery | controlled group conventional drilling group |
Primary outcome
Primary Implant Stability Measured by Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Using the Osstell Device
Time frame: Immediately after implant placement (within minutes)
Description: Primary implant stability will be assessed immediately after implant placement using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) obtained from the Osstell device. The ISQ scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater implant stability.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing osseodensification using densah burs and convetional Driiling technique in people with Patient With Low Denisty Bone, run by Suez Canal University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Implant Stability Measured by Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Using the Osstell Device (time frame: Immediately after implant placement (within minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.