Lung CancerAPART-LUNGNCT07591376
A Reminder App to Improve Physical Activity During Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer - a Pre-study in Healthy Volunteers
A study testing Questionnaire in people with Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important. This may also be true for patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaire
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Mar 2026to 21 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Possession of and ability to use a smart phone plus a step counter
- Age ≥18 years
- Written informed consent
- Capacity of the participant to consent
Who cannot join
- 1. Expected non-compliance
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Denmark1 site
Department of Oncology Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Vejle, 7100
Germany1 site
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Luebeck
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23562
About this study
Physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important. This may also be true for patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. However, adherence to an exercise program sometimes may be challenging for the patients, particularly if they experience fatigue or other adverse events.
The question arose whether an easy-to-use mobile app installed on the patient's smart phone reminding patients several times daily to perform a certain number of steps will have a positive effect on their physical activity during a course of radiation therapy. Such an app has been developed within the Interreg project HeAT (Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly). However, before this app can be tested in a prospective trial involving patients, its usability should to be evaluated by healthy volunteers. In the present prospective study, 30 healthy volunteers test and rate ten aspects related to the usability of the app.
The healthy volunteers have to download a reminder app, which has been designed by the Lübeck based company Nextlabel Offene Handelsgesellschaft (OHG). After receiving the link for the download of the app from Nextlabel OHG by e-mail, the participants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section. In addition, iPhone and Android users are compared with respect to the satisfaction rates.
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer belongs to the most common types of solid cancer in Europe and Northern America. A considerable number of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) receive conventionally fractionated radiation therapy with or without systemic treatment. Radiation therapy may be associated with adverse events affecting healthy tissues within the radiation field but also with fatigue and a decreased level of physical activity or function. Patients who experience significant treatment-related toxicity may not be able to receive the complete radiation therapy as planned. Maintaining or even improving the level of activity by physical exercise or walking a certain number of steps per day may be helpful in this context. In a retrospective study of 184 cancer patients (including 31 patients with lung cancer), adherence to an exercise program was associated with fewer dose reductions and delays of chemotherapy. Moreover, several studies performed in patients with lung cancer suggested that physical activity had a positive effect on the patient's quality of live. Thus, physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important. This may also be true for patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. However, adherence to an exercise program sometimes may be challenging for the patients, particularly if they experience fatigue or other adverse events. The question arose whether an easy-to-use mobile app installed on the patient's smart phone reminding patients several times daily to perform a certain number of steps will have a positive effect on their physical activity during a course of radiation therapy. Such an app has been developed within the Interreg project HeAT (Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly). However, before this app can be tested in a prospective trial involving patients, its usability should to be evaluated by healthy volunteers. In the present prospective study, 30 healthy volunteers test and rate ten aspects related to the usability of the app. This study will be followed by a clinical trial in lung cancer patients.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the usability of a reminder app designed to improve physical activity during radiation therapy for lung cancer. This is a prospective multi-center study (one arm), which is performed in 30 healthy volunteers. The healthy volunteers have to download a reminder app, which has been designed by the Lübeck based company Nextlabel OHG. After receiving the link for the download of the app from Nextlabel OHG by e-mail, the participants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section. In addition, iPhone and Android users are compared with respect to the satisfaction rates (Fisher's exact tests).
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Questionnaire
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Radiotherapy, Reminder App
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionnaireOther
The participants evaluate a mobile app installed on their smart phone reminding them several times daily to perform a certain number of steps. the participants are asked to complete a questionnaire and to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the app.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers evaluating a reminder app | Other | Participants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. Receives: Other: Questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Satisfaction with the reminder app
The participants are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2026
- Study start19 Mar 2026
- Primary completion21 Apr 2026
- Study completion21 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This is a prospective multi-center study (one arm), which is performed in 30 healthy volunteers.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr. med., FASTRO, Principal investigator, University of Luebeck, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07591376
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APPAREL-HV
- Acronym
- APART-LUNG
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 5 May 2026
- Last updated
- 15 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Reminder App to Improve Physical Activity During Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer - a Pre-study in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07591376
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APART-LUNG / APPAREL-HV
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Radiotherapy, Reminder App
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important. This may also be true for patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. However, adherence to an exercise program sometimes may be challenging for the patients, particularly if they experience fatigue or other adverse events.
The question arose whether an easy-to-use mobile app installed on the patient's smart phone reminding patients several times daily to perform a certain number of steps will have a positive effect on their physical activity during a course of radiation therapy. Such an app has been developed within the Interreg project HeAT (Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly). However, before this app can be tested in a prospective trial involving patients, its usability should to be evaluated by healthy volunteers. In the present prospective study, 30 healthy volunteers test and rate ten aspects related to the usability of the app.
The healthy volunteers have to download a reminder app, which has been designed by the Lübeck based company Nextlabel Offene Handelsgesellschaft (OHG). After receiving the link for the download of the app from Nextlabel OHG by e-mail, the participants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section. In addition, iPhone and Android users are compared with respect to the satisfaction rates.
Detailed description
Lung cancer belongs to the most common types of solid cancer in Europe and Northern America. A considerable number of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) receive conventionally fractionated radiation therapy with or without systemic treatment. Radiation therapy may be associated with adverse events affecting healthy tissues within the radiation field but also with fatigue and a decreased level of physical activity or function. Patients who experience significant treatment-related toxicity may not be able to receive the complete radiation therapy as planned. Maintaining or even improving the level of activity by physical exercise or walking a certain number of steps per day may be helpful in this context. In a retrospective study of 184 cancer patients (including 31 patients with lung cancer), adherence to an exercise program was associated with fewer dose reductions and delays of chemotherapy. Moreover, several studies performed in patients with lung cancer suggested that physical activity had a positive effect on the patient's quality of live. Thus, physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important. This may also be true for patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy. However, adherence to an exercise program sometimes may be challenging for the patients, particularly if they experience fatigue or other adverse events. The question arose whether an easy-to-use mobile app installed on the patient's smart phone reminding patients several times daily to perform a certain number of steps will have a positive effect on their physical activity during a course of radiation therapy. Such an app has been developed within the Interreg project HeAT (Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly). However, before this app can be tested in a prospective trial involving patients, its usability should to be evaluated by healthy volunteers. In the present prospective study, 30 healthy volunteers test and rate ten aspects related to the usability of the app. This study will be followed by a clinical trial in lung cancer patients.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the usability of a reminder app designed to improve physical activity during radiation therapy for lung cancer. This is a prospective multi-center study (one arm), which is performed in 30 healthy volunteers. The healthy volunteers have to download a reminder app, which has been designed by the Lübeck based company Nextlabel OHG. After receiving the link for the download of the app from Nextlabel OHG by e-mail, the participants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section. In addition, iPhone and Android users are compared with respect to the satisfaction rates (Fisher's exact tests).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This is a prospective multi-center study (one arm), which is performed in 30 healthy volunteers.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers evaluating a reminder app | Other | Other: QuestionnaireParticipants are asked to test the app and complete a questionnaire. They are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Possession of and ability to use a smart phone plus a step counter
- Age ≥18 years
- Written informed consent
- Capacity of the participant to consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Expected non-compliance
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionnaireThe participants evaluate a mobile app installed on their smart phone reminding them several times daily to perform a certain number of steps. the participants are asked to complete a questionnaire and to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the app. | Other | Healthy volunteers evaluating a reminder app |
Primary outcome
Satisfaction with the reminder app
Time frame: Day 1
The participants are asked to affirm or negate ten statements in three sections (download and installation, navigation, and content/functions) regarding the usability of the reminder app. The satisfaction rate represents the rate of participants who affirmed a statement. If this rate was <60%, the reminder app was rated as not being useful. If the rate was between ≥60% but <80%, the app was regarded useful but required further optimization regarding the corresponding section.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Including Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Carcinoma, Non-small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
FiH Study to Investigate Safety, PK and Efficacy of the NaPi2b ADC TUB-040 in Patients With PROC or r/r Adenocarcinoma NSCLC
Ovarian Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Copper Cu 64-DOTA-Trastuzumab PET in Predicting Response to Treatment With Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
Bone Metastases, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments on the Modulation of Extracellular Vesicles and Other Biomarkers Involved in the Development of Lung Cancer
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Lung Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lazertinib With Subcutaneous Amivantamab Compared With Intravenous Amivantamab in Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr. med., FASTRO principal investigator
University of Luebeck, Germany
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Questionnaire in people with Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Satisfaction with the reminder app (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2026.