Coronary Arteries DiseaseCT-PROVENCT07592312
Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion
A study testing CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in people with Coronary Arteries Disease and Chronic Coronary Syndrome, run by University of Galway.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided planning improves the efficiency and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in adults with coronary artery disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Arteries Disease, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
- What is being tested?
- CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 18 May 2026to 30 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 to 80 years
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for suspected coronary artery disease or for diagnostic work-up of stabilized acute coronary syndrome
- Presence of at least one target coronary lesion meeting one of the following CCTA criteria:
- Severe coronary diameter stenosis (70-99%) in one or more coronary arteries according to CAD-RADS 4A or 4B classification and at least one of the following:
- CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) ≤0.80
Show all 20Show fewer
- At least 2 high-risk plaque characteristics, including:
- Low attenuation plaque density <30 Hounsfield units
- Positive remodeling index >1.1
- Napkin-ring sign
- Spotty calcification
- Left main coronary artery stenosis ≥50%
- Ostial or proximal left anterior descending artery, dominant left circumflex artery, or dominant right coronary artery stenosis ≥50% and at least one of the following:
- CT-FFR ≤0.80
- At least 2 high-risk plaque characteristics, including:
- Low attenuation plaque density <30 Hounsfield units
- Positive remodeling index >1.1
- Napkin-ring sign
- Spotty calcification
- Planned clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with operator decision to proceed with PCI
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to iodinated contrast media, including severe allergy or contrast-induced nephropathy
- Poor-quality or non-diagnostic CCTA imaging
- Target lesions involving in-stent restenosis
- Chronic total occlusion target lesions
- Operator decision to treat a vessel not identified as a target vessel by the CCTA core laboratory analysis
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery after invasive coronary angiography
- Participation in another investigational drug or drug-coated device study
- Inability to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: CT-PROVE: Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided planning improves the efficiency and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in adults with coronary artery disease. It will also evaluate the feasibility and safety of using a CT-based "virtual PCI plan" during coronary interventions.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does CCTA-guided PCI reduce procedural time, radiation exposure, and contrast dye use compared with standard PCI?
- Does CCTA-guided PCI improve procedural outcomes and stent optimization?
- How often do operators follow or deviate from the CT-based procedural plan?
- What medical problems or complications occur during and after CCTA-guided PCI?
Researchers will compare CCTA-guided PCI with standard angiography-guided PCI to determine whether CT-derived procedural planning improves PCI efficiency and clinical outcomes.
Participants will:
- Undergo PCI guided either by a CCTA-based virtual planning strategy or by standard clinical practice
- Attend follow-up assessments at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year
- Undergo routine clinical evaluations and imaging assessments related to their PCI procedure
- Be monitored for procedural complications, symptoms, repeat procedures, and cardiovascular outcomes during follow-up
The study will also include a parallel observational registry for patients whose coronary lesions are deferred from PCI, to evaluate their long-term clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is routinely performed to treat obstructive CAD; however, conventional invasive coronary angiography provides limited information regarding plaque morphology, lesion composition, calcium distribution, vessel remodeling, and functional lesion significance. These limitations may affect procedural planning, device selection, procedural efficiency, and final PCI optimization.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved into a comprehensive non-invasive imaging modality capable of providing detailed anatomical and functional assessment of coronary lesions. In addition to defining stenosis severity, CCTA allows assessment of lesion length, vessel dimensions, plaque morphology, high-risk plaque characteristics, calcium burden, bifurcation anatomy, and vessel trajectory. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics enable the derivation of CT-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), providing a non-invasive estimation of lesion-specific ischemia.
The CT-PROVE trial (Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the implementation of a CCTA-derived virtual PCI planning strategy during invasive coronary intervention. The study aims to determine whether integrating a structured CT-based procedural planning workflow into PCI practice improves procedural efficiency and procedural outcomes compared with standard angiography-guided PCI.
Patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome who undergo clinically indicated CCTA and are subsequently referred for invasive coronary angiography will be screened for enrollment. Eligible patients presenting with at least one target lesion meeting predefined anatomical and/or functional criteria on CCTA will be considered for inclusion.
The study consists of two randomized groups:
- CCTA-Guided PCI Group (Interventional Arm)
- Standard PCI Group (Control Arm)
Patients randomized to the interventional arm will undergo PCI guided by a detailed pre-procedural CCTA-based virtual planning strategy. The virtual planning will be generated centrally by the core laboratory at Galway University Hospital using advanced anatomical and functional CT analysis software. The planning workflow includes evaluation of:
- Coronary anatomy and vessel course
- Optimal angiographic projections
- Lesion length
- Proximal and distal landing zones
- Reference vessel dimensions
- Calcium burden and distribution
- Plaque morphology and high-risk plaque features
- Bifurcation anatomy and side branch characteristics
- CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR)
Based on these analyses, operators will receive a structured procedural recommendation including suggested guiding catheter support, lesion preparation strategy, calcium modification techniques if necessary, stent sizing, landing zones, and bifurcation management approach.
Patients randomized to the control arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion. Operators in the control arm will remain blinded to the advanced CCTA-derived procedural planning throughout the intervention. Use of intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and adjunctive devices will be permitted according to standard care and operator judgment.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficiency and feasibility of integrating a CCTA-based PCI planning strategy into routine catheterization laboratory workflow.
Primary efficiency endpoints include:
- Procedural time
- Radiation exposure during PCI
- Contrast volume utilization
A co-primary feasibility endpoint will assess the rate of deviation between the recommended CCTA-based virtual procedural plan and the PCI procedure actually performed by the operator.
Secondary objectives include evaluating the effect of CCTA-guided PCI on:
- Procedural optimization
- Functional revascularization
- Angiographic outcomes
- Procedural complications
- Periprocedural myocardial infarction
- Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness
- Clinical outcomes during follow-up
- Symptom improvement and angina status
Secondary procedural endpoints include quantitative flow ratio (QFR), residual stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), device success, procedural complications, and final stent expansion measurements assessed by core laboratory analysis.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the index procedure. Follow-up assessments will include evaluation of adverse cardiovascular events, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, hospitalization, mortality, and angina status.
The trial also includes a parallel prospective observational registry (Def-CT-PROVE) enrolling patients with lesions identified as potentially significant by CCTA but deferred from PCI according to operator clinical judgment. This registry is intended to evaluate the natural history and clinical outcomes of deferred lesions adjudicated as hemodynamically or anatomically significant by the CCTA core laboratory analysis.
All CCTA analyses and virtual PCI planning will be performed centrally by the cardiovascular team at the Clinical Research Facility, Galway University Hospital, to ensure standardization and consistency across participating centers. The trial is designed to reflect real-world interventional practice across experienced European PCI centers while preserving operator autonomy in procedural decision-making.
The anticipated study duration for each participant is approximately 1 year. The planned sample size for the randomized CT-PROVE trial is 200 patients, with an additional prospective registry enrolling approximately 200 deferred lesions.
- Conditions
- Coronary Arteries Disease, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Myocardial Ischemia, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
- Being tested
- CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chronic Coronary Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Ischemia, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary InterventionProcedure or surgery
Participants undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by a structured coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based virtual procedural planning workflow. Pre-procedural centralized CCTA analysis provides information regarding lesion morphology, vessel dimensions, lesion length, calcium burden, bifurcation anatomy, optimal angiographic projections, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve to support procedural planning and PCI optimization.
Standard Percutaneous Coronary InterventionProcedure or surgery
Participants undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion without access to the advanced CCTA-derived virtual procedural planning. Operators may use intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and adjunctive devices according to routine practice and guideline-based care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CCTA-Guided PCI | Experimental | Participants randomized to this arm will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by a structured coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based virtual procedural planning strategy. Pre-procedural centralized CCTA analysis will provide information regarding lesion morphology, vessel dimensions, lesion length, calcium distribution, bifurcation anatomy, optimal angiographic projections, and CT-derived functional assessment. Operators will use this information during PCI planning and execution to guide lesion preparation, device selection, stent sizing, and procedural strategy. Receives: Procedure: CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| Standard PCI | Active comparator | Participants randomized to this arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion without access to the advanced CCTA-derived virtual procedural planning. Operators may use additional intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, or adjunctive devices according to routine practice. The CCTA-based procedural planning generated by the core laboratory will remain concealed from operators throughout the procedure. Receives: Procedure: Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiation dose during PCI
Radiation exposure during the invasive PCI procedure will be compared between the CCTA-guided PCI group and the standard PCI group. Radiation exposure will be quantified using dose-area product (DAP) or cumulative radiation dose recorded during the procedure.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Procedural time
Procedural time will be compared between the CCTA-guided PCI and standard PCI groups. Procedural time is defined as the interval between initial insertion of the guiding catheter into the arterial sheath and the final angiographic image.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Contrast volume used during PCI
Contrast volume used during the invasive PCI procedure will be compared between study groups. Contrast volume will be measured in millilitres and used to assess the impact of CCTA-guided planning on contrast utilization compared with standard PCI.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Deviation rate from CCTA-based virtual PCI planning
Feasibility will be assessed by recording the absolute number of deviations and relative deviation rate from the recommended CCTA-based virtual PCI planning steps. Deviations may include technical issues, clinically justified operator decisions, or unjustified deviations from the recommended plan. An overall deviation rate exceeding 10% will be considered clinically relevant.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Secondary outcomes (12)
Agreement between CCTA-based virtual PCI planning and operator standard planning
Degree of agreement between the PCI virtual planning based on CCTA and the operator's standard procedural planning, assessed in the control arm only.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Vessel-Oriented Procedural Outcome
Composite procedural endpoint including freedom from angiographic complications, final QFR greater than 0.91, successful delivery and deployment of the assigned stent, successful device withdrawal, and residual stenosis less than 20% within the implanted drug-eluting stent.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
Final minimal stent diameter
Final minimal stent diameter after PCI, assessed by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography.
Measured: Immediately after index PCI procedure
Degree of functional revascularization
Degree of functional revascularization assessed by post-PCI quantitative flow ratio values for each treated vessel and compared between the CCTA-guided PCI and standard PCI groups.
Measured: Immediately after index PCI procedure
Maximum device size/reference vessel diameter ratio
Ratio between the maximum device size, including stent or post-dilatation balloon, and reference vessel diameter obtained from CCTA analysis.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
PCI-related myocardial infarction rate
Rate of PCI-related myocardial infarction (Type 4a myocardial infarction) following the index PCI procedure, defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.
Measured: Up to 48 hours after index PCI
Number of devices used during PCI
Number of devices used during PCI, including guiding catheters, wires, angioplasty balloons, intravascular imaging catheters, and stents.
Measured: During index PCI procedure
In-hospital peri-procedural adverse events
In-hospital adverse events including all-cause death, ICU admission, need for mechanical circulatory support, acute kidney injury, additional invasive coronary angiography, spontaneous myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, and infection requiring antibiotic therapy.
Measured: Up to 30 days after index PCI
In-hospital resource utilization
Total cost of procedures and hospitalization-related resource utilization until discharge, expressed in Euros
Measured: Index hospitalization (average of 2 days)
Target vessel-oriented composite outcome
Composite endpoint including target vessel unplanned revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality.
Measured: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Occurrence or worsening of exertional angina
Occurrence or worsening of exertional angina assessed using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Grading Scale.
Measured: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Net adverse cardiovascular events
Composite endpoint including cardiovascular hospitalization, any unplanned revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality.
Measured: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2026
- Study start18 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion20 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Arteries DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial evaluating the impact of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-guided procedural planning during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eligible participants with obstructive coronary artery disease undergoing clinically indicated PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a CCTA-guided PCI strategy or standard angiography-guided PCI. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will undergo PCI using a structured pre-procedural virtual planning workflow derived from centralized CCTA analysis, including lesion characterization, vessel sizing, calcium assessment, and CT-derived functional evaluation. Participants randomized to the control arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice, with operators blinded to the advanced CCTA procedural planning data. A parallel observational registry will also follow deferred target lesions not treated with PCI.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Galway
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Faisal Sharif, University of Galway
- Investigators
- Faisal Sharif, MBBS, PhD, FRCPI, FESC, FACC, Principal investigator, University of Galway
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07592312
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MNA0805
- Acronym
- CT-PROVE
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 7 May 2026
- Last updated
- 18 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CT-PROVE: Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07592312
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CT-PROVE / MNA0805
- Conditions
- Coronary Arteries Disease, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Myocardial Ischemia, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chronic Coronary Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GalwayUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided planning improves the efficiency and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in adults with coronary artery disease. It will also evaluate the feasibility and safety of using a CT-based "virtual PCI plan" during coronary interventions.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does CCTA-guided PCI reduce procedural time, radiation exposure, and contrast dye use compared with standard PCI?
- Does CCTA-guided PCI improve procedural outcomes and stent optimization?
- How often do operators follow or deviate from the CT-based procedural plan?
- What medical problems or complications occur during and after CCTA-guided PCI?
Researchers will compare CCTA-guided PCI with standard angiography-guided PCI to determine whether CT-derived procedural planning improves PCI efficiency and clinical outcomes.
Participants will:
- Undergo PCI guided either by a CCTA-based virtual planning strategy or by standard clinical practice
- Attend follow-up assessments at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year
- Undergo routine clinical evaluations and imaging assessments related to their PCI procedure
- Be monitored for procedural complications, symptoms, repeat procedures, and cardiovascular outcomes during follow-up
The study will also include a parallel observational registry for patients whose coronary lesions are deferred from PCI, to evaluate their long-term clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is routinely performed to treat obstructive CAD; however, conventional invasive coronary angiography provides limited information regarding plaque morphology, lesion composition, calcium distribution, vessel remodeling, and functional lesion significance. These limitations may affect procedural planning, device selection, procedural efficiency, and final PCI optimization.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved into a comprehensive non-invasive imaging modality capable of providing detailed anatomical and functional assessment of coronary lesions. In addition to defining stenosis severity, CCTA allows assessment of lesion length, vessel dimensions, plaque morphology, high-risk plaque characteristics, calcium burden, bifurcation anatomy, and vessel trajectory. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics enable the derivation of CT-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), providing a non-invasive estimation of lesion-specific ischemia.
The CT-PROVE trial (Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the implementation of a CCTA-derived virtual PCI planning strategy during invasive coronary intervention. The study aims to determine whether integrating a structured CT-based procedural planning workflow into PCI practice improves procedural efficiency and procedural outcomes compared with standard angiography-guided PCI.
Patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome who undergo clinically indicated CCTA and are subsequently referred for invasive coronary angiography will be screened for enrollment. Eligible patients presenting with at least one target lesion meeting predefined anatomical and/or functional criteria on CCTA will be considered for inclusion.
The study consists of two randomized groups:
- CCTA-Guided PCI Group (Interventional Arm)
- Standard PCI Group (Control Arm)
Patients randomized to the interventional arm will undergo PCI guided by a detailed pre-procedural CCTA-based virtual planning strategy. The virtual planning will be generated centrally by the core laboratory at Galway University Hospital using advanced anatomical and functional CT analysis software. The planning workflow includes evaluation of:
- Coronary anatomy and vessel course
- Optimal angiographic projections
- Lesion length
- Proximal and distal landing zones
- Reference vessel dimensions
- Calcium burden and distribution
- Plaque morphology and high-risk plaque features
- Bifurcation anatomy and side branch characteristics
- CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR)
Based on these analyses, operators will receive a structured procedural recommendation including suggested guiding catheter support, lesion preparation strategy, calcium modification techniques if necessary, stent sizing, landing zones, and bifurcation management approach.
Patients randomized to the control arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion. Operators in the control arm will remain blinded to the advanced CCTA-derived procedural planning throughout the intervention. Use of intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and adjunctive devices will be permitted according to standard care and operator judgment.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficiency and feasibility of integrating a CCTA-based PCI planning strategy into routine catheterization laboratory workflow.
Primary efficiency endpoints include:
- Procedural time
- Radiation exposure during PCI
- Contrast volume utilization
A co-primary feasibility endpoint will assess the rate of deviation between the recommended CCTA-based virtual procedural plan and the PCI procedure actually performed by the operator.
Secondary objectives include evaluating the effect of CCTA-guided PCI on:
- Procedural optimization
- Functional revascularization
- Angiographic outcomes
- Procedural complications
- Periprocedural myocardial infarction
- Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness
- Clinical outcomes during follow-up
- Symptom improvement and angina status
Secondary procedural endpoints include quantitative flow ratio (QFR), residual stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), device success, procedural complications, and final stent expansion measurements assessed by core laboratory analysis.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the index procedure. Follow-up assessments will include evaluation of adverse cardiovascular events, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, hospitalization, mortality, and angina status.
The trial also includes a parallel prospective observational registry (Def-CT-PROVE) enrolling patients with lesions identified as potentially significant by CCTA but deferred from PCI according to operator clinical judgment. This registry is intended to evaluate the natural history and clinical outcomes of deferred lesions adjudicated as hemodynamically or anatomically significant by the CCTA core laboratory analysis.
All CCTA analyses and virtual PCI planning will be performed centrally by the cardiovascular team at the Clinical Research Facility, Galway University Hospital, to ensure standardization and consistency across participating centers. The trial is designed to reflect real-world interventional practice across experienced European PCI centers while preserving operator autonomy in procedural decision-making.
The anticipated study duration for each participant is approximately 1 year. The planned sample size for the randomized CT-PROVE trial is 200 patients, with an additional prospective registry enrolling approximately 200 deferred lesions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial evaluating the impact of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-guided procedural planning during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eligible participants with obstructive coronary artery disease undergoing clinically indicated PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a CCTA-guided PCI strategy or standard angiography-guided PCI. Participants assigned to the intervention arm will undergo PCI using a structured pre-procedural virtual planning workflow derived from centralized CCTA analysis, including lesion characterization, vessel sizing, calcium assessment, and CT-derived functional evaluation. Participants randomized to the control arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice, with operators blinded to the advanced CCTA procedural planning data. A parallel observational registry will also follow deferred target lesions not treated with PCI.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CCTA-Guided PCI | Experimental | Procedure: CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary InterventionParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by a structured coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based virtual procedural planning strategy. Pre-procedural centralized CCTA analysis will provide information regarding lesion morphology, vessel dimensions, lesion length, calcium distribution, bifurcation anatomy, optimal angiographic projections, and CT-derived functional assessment. Operators will use this information during PCI planning and execution to guide lesion preparation, device selection, stent sizing, and procedural strategy. |
| Standard PCI | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard Percutaneous Coronary InterventionParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion without access to the advanced CCTA-derived virtual procedural planning. Operators may use additional intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, or adjunctive devices according to routine practice. The CCTA-based procedural planning generated by the core laboratory will remain concealed from operators throughout the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Adults aged 18 to 80 years
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for suspected coronary artery disease or for diagnostic work-up of stabilized acute coronary syndrome
- Presence of at least one target coronary lesion meeting one of the following CCTA criteria:
- Planned clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with operator decision to proceed with PCI
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Contraindication to iodinated contrast media, including severe allergy or contrast-induced nephropathy
- Poor-quality or non-diagnostic CCTA imaging
- Target lesions involving in-stent restenosis
- Chronic total occlusion target lesions
- Operator decision to treat a vessel not identified as a target vessel by the CCTA core laboratory analysis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary InterventionParticipants undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by a structured coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based virtual procedural planning workflow. Pre-procedural centralized CCTA analysis provides information regarding lesion morphology, vessel dimensions, lesion length, calcium burden, bifurcation anatomy, optimal angiographic projections, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve to support procedural planning and PCI optimization. | Procedure or surgery | CCTA-Guided PCI |
| Standard Percutaneous Coronary InterventionParticipants undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion without access to the advanced CCTA-derived virtual procedural planning. Operators may use intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and adjunctive devices according to routine practice and guideline-based care. | Procedure or surgery | Standard PCI |
Primary outcome
Radiation dose during PCI
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Radiation exposure during the invasive PCI procedure will be compared between the CCTA-guided PCI group and the standard PCI group. Radiation exposure will be quantified using dose-area product (DAP) or cumulative radiation dose recorded during the procedure.
Procedural time
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Procedural time will be compared between the CCTA-guided PCI and standard PCI groups. Procedural time is defined as the interval between initial insertion of the guiding catheter into the arterial sheath and the final angiographic image.
Contrast volume used during PCI
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Contrast volume used during the invasive PCI procedure will be compared between study groups. Contrast volume will be measured in millilitres and used to assess the impact of CCTA-guided planning on contrast utilization compared with standard PCI.
Deviation rate from CCTA-based virtual PCI planning
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Feasibility will be assessed by recording the absolute number of deviations and relative deviation rate from the recommended CCTA-based virtual PCI planning steps. Deviations may include technical issues, clinically justified operator decisions, or unjustified deviations from the recommended plan. An overall deviation rate exceeding 10% will be considered clinically relevant.
12 secondary outcomes
Agreement between CCTA-based virtual PCI planning and operator standard planning
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Vessel-Oriented Procedural Outcome
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
Final minimal stent diameter
Time frame: Immediately after index PCI procedure
Degree of functional revascularization
Time frame: Immediately after index PCI procedure
Maximum device size/reference vessel diameter ratio
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
PCI-related myocardial infarction rate
Time frame: Up to 48 hours after index PCI
Number of devices used during PCI
Time frame: During index PCI procedure
In-hospital peri-procedural adverse events
Time frame: Up to 30 days after index PCI
In-hospital resource utilization
Time frame: Index hospitalization (average of 2 days)
Target vessel-oriented composite outcome
Time frame: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Occurrence or worsening of exertional angina
Time frame: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Net adverse cardiovascular events
Time frame: Up to 1 year after index PCI
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Coronary Arteries Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Propionic Acid Supplementation on Endothelial Function
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endothelial Dysfunction
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Faisal Sharif, MBBS, PhD, FRCPI, FESC, FACC principal investigator
University of Galway
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CCTA-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in people with Coronary Arteries Disease and Chronic Coronary Syndrome, run by University of Galway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Faisal Sharif, MBBS, PhD, FRCPI, FESC, FACC (+353 91524222, faisal.sharif@universityofgalway.ie), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiation dose during PCI (time frame: During index PCI procedure). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2026.