AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer Disease (AD)CoCoA-PADNCT07598617

The Co-Production and Evaluation of the Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease (CoCoA-PAD)

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease (AD), run by University of Plymouth at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background. Healthcare professionals can now diagnose the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease (early-AD) and new drugs are effective at slowing the disease. The National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom has started to develop plans for how to implement these key achievements into clinical practice, so… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Alzheimer Disease (AD)
How many people
120 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
5 May 2026to 30 Sep 2028
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a research descriptor used to refer to people who believe that their cognitive functioning has deteriorated despite performing in the 'normal' range on objective measures of cognitive functioning. People with SCD are at increased risk of developing dementia, and therefore SCD is considered a potential early clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a descriptor used to refer to people who report experiencing a decline in cognitive functioning and demonstrate cognitive impairment on objective testing. It is thought to be a transitional phase between normal aging and dementia.

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Cognitive impairment, i.e., performance ≥1 SD below demographically adjusted norms (PROTECT) OR
  • ≤17 on the telephone MoCA (non-PROTECT) AND
  • Lacks mental capacity to consent to research
  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Sensory impairment that cannot be corrected for with sensory aids, e.g., blindness.
  • Previous neurological injury (stroke, traumatic brain injury, severe epilepsy, brain tumour)
Show all 33Show fewer
  • Other neurodegenerative syndrome (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc)
  • Diagnosis of learning disability
  • Severe depression (PHQ-9≥15 OR score ≥1 on PHQ-9 suicide question
  • Current severe psychiatric disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or psychotic disorders)
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • Untreated diagnosis of sleep apnoea.
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment Inclusion Criteria
  • >3.38 on IQCODE Self-Report items 1-7 (PROTECT)
  • Cognitive impairment, i.e., performance ≥1 SD below demographically adjusted norms (PROTECT) OR
  • ≥4 on SCD-Q9 (non-PROTECT)
  • ≤17 on the telephone MoCA (non-PROTECT) OR
  • MCI diagnosis according to DSM or ICD-11 criteria through an NHS memory clinic. AND
  • Age ≥65 years
  • Onset of SCD within the last 5 years
  • English as a first language
  • Specific Race and Education (using stratified sampling approach)
  • A score of ≥3 on any item on the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, subject to clinical judgement.
  • Lacks mental capacity to consent to research
  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Sensory impairment that cannot be corrected for with sensory aids, e.g., blindness.
  • Previous neurological injury (stroke, traumatic brain injury, severe epilepsy, brain tumour)
  • Other neurodegenerative syndrome (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc)
  • Diagnosis of learning disability
  • Severe depression (PHQ-9≥15 OR score ≥1 on PHQ-9 suicide question
  • Current severe psychiatric disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or psychotic disorders)
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • Untreated diagnosis of sleep apnoea.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Donnchadh Murphy, D.Clin.Psy contact

+44 1752 585858

donnchadh.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk

United Kingdom3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Research Delivery Team

    Exeter

    Angela Holland, RN, angela.holland5@nhs.net

    Recruiting
  • North East London NHS Foundation Trust

    London

    Jane Burgess, 0300 300 1748, Jane.Burgess@nelft.nhs.uk

    Not yet recruiting
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust

    Plymouth, Devon, Plymouth PL6 8BU

    Donnchadh Murphy, D.Clin.Psy, +44 1752 585858, donnchadh.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk

    donnchadh.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Background. Healthcare professionals can now diagnose the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease (early-AD) and new drugs are effective at slowing the disease. The National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom has started to develop plans for how to implement these key achievements into clinical practice, so that patients can receive timely diagnosis and treatment. Cognitive assessments measure someone's memory and thinking skills and are required for an early-AD diagnosis. There are concerns that the NHS does not have the workforce to deliver cognitive assessments, and that this will delay early-AD diagnosis and treatment.

Memory nurses are the largest staffing group in memory services. I have developed a plan for memory nurses to deliver full cognitive assessments. This would prevent delays to early diagnosis and treatment.

Read more

Research Aims. This research will use a co-design approach. This involves working with service users and memory nurses to co-develop and evaluate a new cognitive assessment and cognitive training course for nurses.

Research Methods. The cognitive assessment and training course will be evaluated using service-user and nurse feedback. 120 older adults with subjective memory complaints will be asked to complete a cognitive assessment, a brain scan, and a blood test. We will use this information to tell us if the cognitive assessment is good enough.

Patient and Public Involvement. This proposal was co-developed with older adults and memory nurses. The adapted cognitive assessment and the cognitive training will be co-created with ten older adults and five memory-nurses, who will consult on all stages of the project.

Dissemination. The research findings will be published in academic journals and conferences, and an information-sheet will be created for the public. The cognitive training resources will be made freely available. We will use the results of this research to request funding to translate the cognitive assessment into an NHS approved health-technology.

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) healthcare is on the verge of significant change. Healthcare providers can now diagnose people with pre-dementia AD (i.e., preclinical and prodromal AD), and new disease modifying medications can slow cognitive decline. Health services are now faced with the challenge of implementing these developments into clinical practice. National Health Service (NHS) England and the National Dementia Team have developed an initial implementation strategy. It states that diagnostic assessments will be delivered in newly commissioned neurology and neuropsychology clinics, and that the completion of a 'comprehensive cognitive assessment' is required to diagnose the AD clinical syndrome, and stage the disease severity.

While AD biomarker assessments, such as plasma and cerebrospinal fluid assessments, provide information on the presence of AD pathology (Amyloid and Tau), they are not predictive of future dementia, i.e., only a proportion of 65-year-olds with preclinical AD biomarkers will develop Alzheimer's dementia in their lifetime. As such, the International Working Group (IWG) provide clear recommendations that the use of AD biomarkers in isolation in cognitive unimpaired older adults is not advisable and in fact may lead to harm. In contrast, meta-analytic research has demonstrated that the combination of biomarkers and cognitive assessments improves predictive accuracy for future AD dementia. The IWG have proposed that a clinical-biological definition of AD is adopted into clinical practice, and that the combination of plasma and sensitive cognitive markers of AD represent the most feasible strategy for a meaningful diagnosis of preclinical and prodromal AD.

The Implementation of Cognitive Assessment Pathways There are severe barriers to the implementation of comprehensive cognitive assessments for early AD into NHS practice. Most cognitive assessments are grossly insensitive to the early cognitive difficulties associated with AD and therefore not fit for purpose. Indeed, large scale research including over 5,000 participants, identified that traditional cognitive assessments do not add any predictive accuracy above demographic factors and genetics, to determine the risk of preclinical AD. There are some notable exceptions, but these rely on tests that can only be administered by practitioner psychologists, e.g., Logical Memory from Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS-IV). There is currently a national shortage of practitioner psychologists in the United Kingdom (UK). Two recent economic modelling studies demonstrate that the implementation of 'psychologist' delivered cognitive assessment onto early AD pathways would cost the NHS £4.2 billion to deliver, and without this investment, waiting lists would reach over 10 years by 2029. Therefore, the delivery of early AD cognitive assessment cannot be achieved by relying on existing cognitive tests or the existing workforce model. There is an urgent need for an implementation strategy for the delivery of large-scale cognitive assessment for early AD into the NHS, but there is no agreed upon strategy to achieve this.

Memory nurses are the largest staffing group in memory services and already have considerable experience administering and scoring brief cognitive screening tests, e.g., Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III). Additionally, there is an impetus to increase the psychological workforce in the NHS through the delivery of the clinical associate psychologist (CAP) profession. In my opinion, the most realistic option of delivering comprehensive cognitive assessments at a large scale is to develop an assessment that can be reliably and robustly delivered by memory nurses and CAPs. Following consultation with memory nurses and neuropsychologists, there are two identified barriers to achieve this: 1) a lack of a standardised training protocol for non-practitioner psychologists on how to deliver cognitive assessments; and 2) a lack of available cognitive assessments that nurses and CAPs can use. This proposal seeks to co-design a nurse or non-practitioner psychologist administered cognitive assessment for preclinical AD, and co-produce a robust training protocol for nurses and allied health professionals to deliver cognitive assessments. If successful, this will contribute to the widespread delivery of early AD diagnosis and treatment through the NHS.

CoCoA-PAD Assessment The long-term aim of the Co-Production and Evaluation of the Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease (CoCoA-PAD) project is to develop a validated assessment app which can be used in clinical practice. The CoCoA-PAD project seeks to collate the best experimental neuropsychological tests in the academic literature, and work with a team of stakeholders to co-produce these tests into a viable clinical assessment. In its current format, the CoCoA-PAD assessment is experimental, and none of the subtests have been validated previously. Therefore, the CoCoA-PAD assessment in its current form is not a medical device and does not require Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) registration.

CoCoA-PAD is comprised of 16 standalone subtests, which are used to generate seven index scores (premorbid intelligence, memory, language and fluency, spatial processing, perceptual discriminability, cognitive control and performance validity). The CoCoA-PAD subtests are organised according to a theorised hierarchical structure. CoCoA-PAD is designed based on an up-to-date understanding of the cognitive neurology of preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease and the temporal ordering of cognitive difficulties. The assessments have been designed to assess the cognitive sequelae of preclinical AD, and four preclinical syndromes.

CoCoA-PAD was designed to achieve two ambitions:

  • Maximise Efficiency. CoCoA-PAD includes automatic and timed stimuli presentation, and automated scoring and psychometric calculations. This includes embedded machine learning approaches to maximise classification accuracy without the need for labour intensive scoring procedures. These steps ensure accuracy and reduce clinical time.
  • Maximise Clinical Value. CoCoA-PAD incorporates many features that are designed to maximise clinical value, which do not exist in conventional neuropsychological assessments. This includes embedded measures of premorbid ability and performance validity, structured observational assessments of validity, functional cognitive disorder, and other cognitive difficulties, e.g., language.

2.3. Co-Production of CoCoA-PAD The CoCoA-PAD assessment battery, and indeed all aspects of this research study, have been developed using a coproduction methodology, as outlined by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The co-production group consists of five older adults (including two with neurological conditions, one from an ethnic minority background, and one with educational deprivation), five assistant psychologists, two memory nurses, and seven clinical psychologists and neuropsychologists. The older adult coproduction group are involved in ensuring the assessment is well tolerated, the instructions are clear, that the test does not unduly discriminate against people with low computer literacy. The assistant psychologist group are involved in coproducing the usability of the assessment for the examiner. The memory nurses are coproducing the clinical observation checklists. The clinical psychologist and neuropsychology group are involved in coproducing the assessment governance and training requirements. All aspects of the assessment have been or are currently being co-produced.

CoCoA-PAD is delivered using two platforms. Some subtests are delivered using the CoCoA-PAD web-based application, including Colour and Object Binding and Location Test (COBALT), Matching Animals Name Exam (MANE), Binding of Allocentric Spatial and Location Transformations (BASALT), Connected Speech, Clock Drawing. The remaining subtests are delivered using Gorilla Experiment Builder, an online platform for designing and running behavioural experiments. Gorilla Experiment Builder provides precise stimulus delivery, secure data collection, and easy remote access, making it well-suited for this research.

Keywords
Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07598617
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
At risk for Alzheimer's DiseaseA mixed cohort of participants with either subjective cognitive decline (SCD+) or mild cognitive impairment will be recruited to the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE)

    Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE) trial 2 learning score for both Set 1 and Set 2 stimuli. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better learning performance.

    Measured: 12 month follow up assessment

  2. Matching Animals and Names Exam - Total Binding Score

    Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE) binding scores. The task includes associative binding, temporal binding, and spatial binding scores. Each score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better binding performance. These scores are combined into a total binding score (0-36).

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  3. Colour and Object Binding and Location Test trial 3

    Colour and Object Binding and Location Test (COBALT) trial 3 object score. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better object recognition performance.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  4. Binding of Allocentric Spatial and Location Transformations (BASALT) total score

    Binding of Allocentric Spatial and Location Transformations (BASALT) total score. The score is calculated from four trials, each scored from 0 to 6. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better spatial binding and allocentric transformation performance.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  5. False Familiarity Task

    False Familiarity Task false positive score. Scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more false positive responses and poorer discrimination between previously presented and similar items. The primary outcome is the total number of mnemonic errors.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  6. Dichotic Sentence Identification score

    Dichotic Sentence Identification score. The task includes left ear, right ear, and ear discrepancy scores. Left ear and right ear scores each range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better sentence identification performance. The ear discrepancy score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater difference between left and right ear performance.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  7. Dichotic Digits Test score

    Dichotic Digits Test score. The task includes left ear, right ear, and ear discrepancy scores. Left ear and right ear scores each range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better digit identification performance. The ear discrepancy score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater difference between left and right ear performance.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  8. Odd-One-Out Test

    Odd-One-Out perceptual discrimination. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more errors and poorer perceptual discrimination performance. Additionally, we will be timing participants. Adjusted time to complete scores will also be recorded, with longer time associated with greater levels of difficulty.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  9. Verbal fluency semantic relatedness

    Verbal fluency semantic relatedness score. This score will quantify the semantic relatedness of words generated during the verbal fluency task using a pre-specified analysis pipeline. Higher scores indicate greater semantic relatedness between generated words.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  10. Structure-from-Motion coherence threshold

    Structure-from-Motion coherence threshold. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating a higher coherence threshold and poorer structure-from-motion perception.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

  11. Dynamic rotating Glass pattern coherence threshold

    Dynamic rotating Glass pattern coherence threshold. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating a higher coherence threshold and poorer dynamic form perception.

    Measured: Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2026
  2. Study start5 May 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07598617
Sponsor's protocol ID
6703
Other IDs
NIHR305222
Acronym
CoCoA-PAD
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
9 May 2026
Last updated
20 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Access to identifiable data, audio recordings or raw data will be limited to named members of the study team. This data will not be shared with any external partners, nor any members on the project team, unless explicitly stated in the study protocol. The CoCoA-PAD dataset will be shared in accordance with principles from the Open Science movement, supporting transparency, reproducibility, and wider scientific collaboration. The full research database will be deposited in a trusted institutional or subject-specific data repository, such as PEARL. Requests for access to the full anonymised database will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Access will be granted to qualified researchers who provide evidence of an appropriate data management plan, including commitments to ethical use, secure storage, and compliance with relevant data protection regulations. Requests for access will be reviewed by the sponsor and CI to ensure appropriate controls are in place. A data availability state

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease (AD), run by University of Plymouth at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Donnchadh Murphy, D.Clin.Psy (+44 1752 585858, donnchadh.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE) (time frame: 12 month follow up assessment). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in