Acute Ischemic StrokeRAPIDIMPROVENCT07598799
Rapid Local Ischemic Postconditioning on Stroke After Thrombectomy
A study testing High-dose RL-IPostC and Low-dose RL-IPostC in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital.
Trial summary
The main goal of this study is to find out if a new, quick "brain rescue" procedure can help people recover better from a severe stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion. When someone has this type of stroke, doctors often perform a procedure called an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- High-dose RL-IPostC and Low-dose RL-IPostC
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 448 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2026to 30 May 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-85 years
- Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke
- Pre-stroke mRS 0-1
- Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 6
- Time from symptom onset to start of endovascular procedure (puncture) < 24 hours; onset time defined as "last known well" time
- Imaging criteria: ASPECTS 3-5 on CT, or ASPECTS > 5 with acute ischemic core volume (defined as rCBF < 30% or ADC < 620) ≥ 50 mL
Show all 9Show fewer
- Occlusion of the intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery or the middle cerebral artery (M1/M2), confirmed as the symptomatic culprit vessel
- After thrombectomy, the culprit vessel is considered to be occluded by an embolus, and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3, i.e., ≥ 50% perfusion) is achieved
- Written informed consent signed by the patient or a legal representative
Who cannot join
- Presence of stenosis (≥ 50%) in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery, internal carotid artery, or common carotid artery proximal to the occlusion site
- Multiple emboli across different circulations (simultaneous anterior and posterior circulation emboli, or simultaneous left and right anterior circulation emboli)
- Evidence on CT of extensive cerebral edema, midline shift, significant mass effect, or signs of brain herniation
- Presence of a life-threatening disease with a prognosis < 6 months, making 3-month follow-up impossible
- Severe psychiatric disorder or heart failure
- Concurrent participation in another clinical drug or device study
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the subject unsuitable for this study
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Rapid Local Ischemic Postconditioning Following Successful Recanalization After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Large Ischemic Core Stroke
The main goal of this study is to find out if a new, quick "brain rescue" procedure can help people recover better from a severe stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion.
When someone has this type of stroke, doctors often perform a procedure called an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In EVT, they thread a thin tube through a blood vessel up to the brain to remove the clot and restore blood flow. This is a highly effective treatment.
Read more
However, for some patients, suddenly restoring blood flow can cause additional, unexpected injury to the brain. This is called "reperfusion injury." This study tests a technique called rapid local ischemic postconditioning (RL-IPostC) that might prevent this extra damage. It's a very simple additional step performed immediately after the clot is successfully removed.
The doctor would briefly inflate and deflate a tiny balloon inside the proximal brain artery after recanalization, creating very short, controlled "pauses" in blood flow. This is believed to give brain cells a gentler "wake-up" call, helping them tolerate the return of oxygen-rich blood.
The study will test two different "doses" of this procedure (meaning different numbers of inflation/deflation cycles) against the standard care (no additional procedure).
Phase IIb (the first part): Which dose of RL-IPostC (high or low) is more promising for reducing early brain swelling (measured by whether the brain's midline has shifted less than 3 mm on a 24-hour scan)? Phase III (the main part): Using the best dose from Phase IIb, does RL-IPostC improve a patient's functional recovery three months later, specifically enabling them to walk and manage daily activities without help? A total of 288 participants who have had a large-vessel occlusion stroke and successful clot removal will be enrolled. If early results look promising but not quite conclusive, the study can increase the total number of participants up to 448 to get a clearer answer.
If successful, this study could identify a simple, low-cost add-on procedure to a standard stroke treatment that improves long-term recovery and quality of life for thousands of stroke patients. It's a potential new tool to protect the brain after blood flow is restored. This is a carefully designed study testing a gentle "on/off" blood flow technique right after clot removal, to see if it can reduce brain injury and help people walk and live more independently after a severe stroke.
Read the detailed description
RAPID IMPROVE is a seamless design which integrates dose selection (Phase IIb) and confirmatory testing (Phase III) into a single continuous trial. This approach preserves study power, controls the overall type I error rate, and accelerates the evaluation of rapid local ischemic postconditioning (RL-IPostC) in patients with acute anterior circulation large-core ischemic stroke who achieve successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 after mechanical thrombectomy.
Randomization is performed centrally using a web-based system immediately after confirmation of successful recanalization. In Phase IIb, eligible patients are allocated 1:1:1 to high-dose RL-IPostC, low-dose RL-IPostC, or control (no postconditioning). After the dose selection decision at the end of Phase IIb, Phase III continues with a 1:1 randomization between the selected dose and control. Randomization is stratified by stroke onset to imaging time (<6 hours vs. 6-24 hours) and baseline NIHSS score (<17 vs. ≥17) to ensure balance of prognostic factors.
The treating interventionalist cannot be blinded due to the nature of the postconditioning procedure. However, all outcome assessors - including the investigators who perform follow-up mRS assessments, the imaging core laboratory personnel, and the clinical events committee - are blinded to treatment assignment. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has access to unblinded data for safety monitoring. An imaging core laboratory centrally evaluates all baseline and follow-up CT, CTA, CTP, MRI, and DSA images. Separate analysts interpret baseline eligibility images (ASPECTS, core volume) and post-procedure images (midline shift, infarct volume, net water uptake, CSF/ICV ratio), all blinded to treatment allocation.
RL-IPostC is performed using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) positioned at the C1-C2 segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery, carefully avoiding the carotid sinus. The intervention should be initiated as soon as possible after confirmation of successful recanalization, and no later than 5 minutes. All patients receive standard post-thrombectomy care in a stroke unit, including a mandatory repeat CT scan at 24 hours. Antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy is given according to local clinical practice and is recorded.
The trial uses a 3-arm, 2-stage multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design. The primary endpoint for stage 1 (Phase IIb) is the absence of midline shift (>3 mm at the level of the septum pellucidum) on 24 hours imaging (non-contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Based on the research team's cohort study, the control arm response rate (absence of midline shift) is assumed to be 40%, with an absolute improvement of 30% for an effective dose. One-sided α = 0.10, power = 95%.
The primary endpoint for stage 2 (Phase III) is the proportion of patients with mRS 0-3 at 90 days post-procedure. The control arm response rate is assumed to be 40% (derived from SELECT2 trial results), with an absolute improvement of 20% for the selected dose. One-sided α = 0.025, power = 85%.
Overall family-wise error rate (FWER) is controlled at one-sided 0.045. The overall pairwise α is 0.025 (one-sided) and the overall pairwise power is 80.7%. A positive predictive value (probability of mRS 0-3 given absence of midline shift) is prespecified as 0.36 for control and 0.60 for treatment, based on the same cohort study, to appropriately link the two stages.
Sample size was calculated using the nstagebin function (version 1.0.2) in Stata. The maximum planned sample size is 288 patients assuming 10% dropout across both stages. Stage 1 (Phase IIb) requires 48 patients per arm (144 total). Stage 2 (Phase III) adds 72 patients per arm (144 total for two arms), accumulating to 120 evaluable patients per arm for the selected dose and control.
An adaptive sample size increase is permitted in Phase III. At Interim Analysis #3 (84 patients enrolled per arm in Phase III, i.e., 168 patients), a blinded statistician will calculate the conditional power for the primary endpoint (mRS 0-3) using the method of Mehta and Pocock. If the conditional power falls within a prespecified "promising" range, the sample size may be increased up to a maximum of 200 patients per arm in Phase III, with the goal of raising conditional power to 0.80. The total sample size including this adaptation is capped at 448 patients (200 per arm in Phase III plus the non-selected arm patients from Phase IIb).
Three protocol-specified interim analyses are scheduled:
IA1 (72 patients, 24 per arm): early safety review. IA2 (144 patients, 48 per arm): end of Phase IIb - dose selection and safety assessment.
IA3 (216 patients: 84 control, 84 selected intervention, 48 from the non-selected arm): conditional power for sample size re-estimation.
Safety stopping rules follow a two-step frequentist confidence approach for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.
For sICH:
Step 1 - If the confidence that the sICH rate in an intervention arm exceeds 20% is >90%, proceed to Step 2.
Step 2 - If the confidence that the excess sICH rate over the control arm is ≥5% exceeds 90%, enrollment is placed on hold and the DSMB convenes to determine continuation.
For mortality:
Step 1 - Threshold 40% (confidence >90%). Step 2 - Excess over control ≥10% (confidence >90%).
Dose selection rules at end of Phase IIb (efficacy boundary p < 0.1, one-sided, for the imaging endpoint):
Only low dose crosses boundary → select low dose. Only high dose crosses boundary → select high dose. Both doses cross → select the dose with lower 3-month mortality. Neither cross → pause enrollment; DSMB meets to discuss possible trial termination.
A clinical events committee of three independent experts adjudicates all complications, including sICH (using the SITS-MOST definition: parenchymal hematoma type 2 with an NIHSS worsening of ≥ 4 points compared to the pre-deterioration assessment) and other serious adverse events.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- High-dose RL-IPostC, Low-dose RL-IPostC
- Keywords
- Ischemic postconditioning, Endovascular thrombectomy, Neuroprotection, Ischemic reperfusion injury
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-dose RL-IPostCProcedure or surgery
For acute anterior circulation with large core ischemic stroke patients who achieve successful vessel recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) after thrombectomy, within 5 minutes, the balloon guide catheter (BGC) is positioned in the straight segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery at the C1-C2 level, avoiding the carotid sinus. Repetitive balloon inflations (2 minutes) to block blood flow followed by deflations (2 minutes) to restore blood flow (for 4 cycles) are performed. After the first BGC inflation, confirmation of antegrade flow blockade in the internal carotid artery is required. At the end of the cycle, angiography is performed to confirm vessel patency.
Low-dose RL-IPostCProcedure or surgery
For acute anterior circulation with large core ischemic stroke patients who achieve successful vessel recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) after thrombectomy, within 5 minutes, the balloon guide catheter (BGC) is positioned in the straight segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery at the C1-C2 level, avoiding the carotid sinus. Repetitive balloon inflations (15 seconds) to block blood flow followed by deflations (15 seconds) to restore blood flow (for 5 cycles) are performed. After the first BGC inflation, confirmation of antegrade flow blockade in the internal carotid artery is required. At the end of the cycle, angiography is performed to confirm vessel patency.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-dose RL-IPostC | Experimental | Postconditioning intervention with 2 minutes of inflation / 2 minutes of deflation, for 4 cycles. Receives: Procedure: High-dose RL-IPostC |
| Low-dose RL-IPostC | Experimental | Postconditioning intervention with 15 seconds of inflation / 15 seconds of deflation, for 5 cycles. Receives: Procedure: Low-dose RL-IPostC |
| Control | No intervention | No postconditioning intervention after successful thrombectomy. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase IIb: proportion of subjects without midline shift ( >3mm)
Midline shift was measured at the level of the translucent septum in the follow-up NCCT or MRI at 24 hours.
Measured: 24 ± 6 hours after randomization
Phase III: Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-3 at 90 days.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (8)
Proportion of subjects with good outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
Distribution of mRS at 90 days
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-3 at 1 year
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-2 at 1 year
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Distribution of mRS at 1 year.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability.
0-No symptoms at all
- No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention
- Death
Measured: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Change in NIHSS score between day 5-7 or discharge
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a systematic, quantitative clinical assessment tool used to evaluate and document neurological deficits in patients with stroke. The scale is a 15-item neurological examination that evaluates the effect of an acute stroke. Each item is scored on a 3- to 5-point ordinal scale, with '0' typically indicating normal function. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological impairment.
Measured: Day 5-7 post-procedure.
EQ-5D-5L score at 90 days
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized generic measure of health-related quality of life, developed by the EuroQol Group. It comprises a descriptive system with five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each rated on five severity levels (no problems to extreme problems), generating 3,125 possible health states. An EQ visual analogue scale (0-100) records self-rated health. The five-digit profile converts to a utility index using population value sets, enabling quality-adjusted life-year calculation for cost-effectiveness analyses.
Measured: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
EQ-5D-5L score at 1 year
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized generic measure of health-related quality of life, developed by the EuroQol Group. It comprises a descriptive system with five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each rated on five severity levels (no problems to extreme problems), generating 3,125 possible health states. An EQ visual analogue scale (0-100) records self-rated health. The five-digit profile converts to a utility index using population value sets, enabling quality-adjusted life-year calculation for cost-effectiveness analyses.
Measured: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2026
- Study start15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yueqi Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
- Investigators
- Yueqi Zhu, MD, Principal investigator, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07598799
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RAPID IMPROVE
- Acronym
- RAPIDIMPROVE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 May 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rapid Local Ischemic Postconditioning Following Successful Recanalization After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Large Ischemic Core Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07598799
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAPIDIMPROVE / RAPID IMPROVE
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Keywords
- Ischemic postconditioning, Endovascular thrombectomy, Neuroprotection, Ischemic reperfusion injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of this study is to find out if a new, quick "brain rescue" procedure can help people recover better from a severe stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion.
When someone has this type of stroke, doctors often perform a procedure called an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In EVT, they thread a thin tube through a blood vessel up to the brain to remove the clot and restore blood flow. This is a highly effective treatment.
However, for some patients, suddenly restoring blood flow can cause additional, unexpected injury to the brain. This is called "reperfusion injury." This study tests a technique called rapid local ischemic postconditioning (RL-IPostC) that might prevent this extra damage. It's a very simple additional step performed immediately after the clot is successfully removed.
The doctor would briefly inflate and deflate a tiny balloon inside the proximal brain artery after recanalization, creating very short, controlled "pauses" in blood flow. This is believed to give brain cells a gentler "wake-up" call, helping them tolerate the return of oxygen-rich blood.
The study will test two different "doses" of this procedure (meaning different numbers of inflation/deflation cycles) against the standard care (no additional procedure).
Phase IIb (the first part): Which dose of RL-IPostC (high or low) is more promising for reducing early brain swelling (measured by whether the brain's midline has shifted less than 3 mm on a 24-hour scan)? Phase III (the main part): Using the best dose from Phase IIb, does RL-IPostC improve a patient's functional recovery three months later, specifically enabling them to walk and manage daily activities without help? A total of 288 participants who have had a large-vessel occlusion stroke and successful clot removal will be enrolled. If early results look promising but not quite conclusive, the study can increase the total number of participants up to 448 to get a clearer answer.
If successful, this study could identify a simple, low-cost add-on procedure to a standard stroke treatment that improves long-term recovery and quality of life for thousands of stroke patients. It's a potential new tool to protect the brain after blood flow is restored. This is a carefully designed study testing a gentle "on/off" blood flow technique right after clot removal, to see if it can reduce brain injury and help people walk and live more independently after a severe stroke.
Detailed description
RAPID IMPROVE is a seamless design which integrates dose selection (Phase IIb) and confirmatory testing (Phase III) into a single continuous trial. This approach preserves study power, controls the overall type I error rate, and accelerates the evaluation of rapid local ischemic postconditioning (RL-IPostC) in patients with acute anterior circulation large-core ischemic stroke who achieve successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 after mechanical thrombectomy.
Randomization is performed centrally using a web-based system immediately after confirmation of successful recanalization. In Phase IIb, eligible patients are allocated 1:1:1 to high-dose RL-IPostC, low-dose RL-IPostC, or control (no postconditioning). After the dose selection decision at the end of Phase IIb, Phase III continues with a 1:1 randomization between the selected dose and control. Randomization is stratified by stroke onset to imaging time (<6 hours vs. 6-24 hours) and baseline NIHSS score (<17 vs. ≥17) to ensure balance of prognostic factors.
The treating interventionalist cannot be blinded due to the nature of the postconditioning procedure. However, all outcome assessors - including the investigators who perform follow-up mRS assessments, the imaging core laboratory personnel, and the clinical events committee - are blinded to treatment assignment. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has access to unblinded data for safety monitoring. An imaging core laboratory centrally evaluates all baseline and follow-up CT, CTA, CTP, MRI, and DSA images. Separate analysts interpret baseline eligibility images (ASPECTS, core volume) and post-procedure images (midline shift, infarct volume, net water uptake, CSF/ICV ratio), all blinded to treatment allocation.
RL-IPostC is performed using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) positioned at the C1-C2 segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery, carefully avoiding the carotid sinus. The intervention should be initiated as soon as possible after confirmation of successful recanalization, and no later than 5 minutes. All patients receive standard post-thrombectomy care in a stroke unit, including a mandatory repeat CT scan at 24 hours. Antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy is given according to local clinical practice and is recorded.
The trial uses a 3-arm, 2-stage multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design. The primary endpoint for stage 1 (Phase IIb) is the absence of midline shift (>3 mm at the level of the septum pellucidum) on 24 hours imaging (non-contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Based on the research team's cohort study, the control arm response rate (absence of midline shift) is assumed to be 40%, with an absolute improvement of 30% for an effective dose. One-sided α = 0.10, power = 95%.
The primary endpoint for stage 2 (Phase III) is the proportion of patients with mRS 0-3 at 90 days post-procedure. The control arm response rate is assumed to be 40% (derived from SELECT2 trial results), with an absolute improvement of 20% for the selected dose. One-sided α = 0.025, power = 85%.
Overall family-wise error rate (FWER) is controlled at one-sided 0.045. The overall pairwise α is 0.025 (one-sided) and the overall pairwise power is 80.7%. A positive predictive value (probability of mRS 0-3 given absence of midline shift) is prespecified as 0.36 for control and 0.60 for treatment, based on the same cohort study, to appropriately link the two stages.
Sample size was calculated using the nstagebin function (version 1.0.2) in Stata. The maximum planned sample size is 288 patients assuming 10% dropout across both stages. Stage 1 (Phase IIb) requires 48 patients per arm (144 total). Stage 2 (Phase III) adds 72 patients per arm (144 total for two arms), accumulating to 120 evaluable patients per arm for the selected dose and control.
An adaptive sample size increase is permitted in Phase III. At Interim Analysis #3 (84 patients enrolled per arm in Phase III, i.e., 168 patients), a blinded statistician will calculate the conditional power for the primary endpoint (mRS 0-3) using the method of Mehta and Pocock. If the conditional power falls within a prespecified "promising" range, the sample size may be increased up to a maximum of 200 patients per arm in Phase III, with the goal of raising conditional power to 0.80. The total sample size including this adaptation is capped at 448 patients (200 per arm in Phase III plus the non-selected arm patients from Phase IIb).
Three protocol-specified interim analyses are scheduled:
IA1 (72 patients, 24 per arm): early safety review. IA2 (144 patients, 48 per arm): end of Phase IIb - dose selection and safety assessment.
IA3 (216 patients: 84 control, 84 selected intervention, 48 from the non-selected arm): conditional power for sample size re-estimation.
Safety stopping rules follow a two-step frequentist confidence approach for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.
For sICH:
Step 1 - If the confidence that the sICH rate in an intervention arm exceeds 20% is >90%, proceed to Step 2.
Step 2 - If the confidence that the excess sICH rate over the control arm is ≥5% exceeds 90%, enrollment is placed on hold and the DSMB convenes to determine continuation.
For mortality:
Step 1 - Threshold 40% (confidence >90%). Step 2 - Excess over control ≥10% (confidence >90%).
Dose selection rules at end of Phase IIb (efficacy boundary p < 0.1, one-sided, for the imaging endpoint):
Only low dose crosses boundary → select low dose. Only high dose crosses boundary → select high dose. Both doses cross → select the dose with lower 3-month mortality. Neither cross → pause enrollment; DSMB meets to discuss possible trial termination.
A clinical events committee of three independent experts adjudicates all complications, including sICH (using the SITS-MOST definition: parenchymal hematoma type 2 with an NIHSS worsening of ≥ 4 points compared to the pre-deterioration assessment) and other serious adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-dose RL-IPostC | Experimental | Procedure: High-dose RL-IPostCPostconditioning intervention with 2 minutes of inflation / 2 minutes of deflation, for 4 cycles. |
| Low-dose RL-IPostC | Experimental | Procedure: Low-dose RL-IPostCPostconditioning intervention with 15 seconds of inflation / 15 seconds of deflation, for 5 cycles. |
| Control | No intervention | –No postconditioning intervention after successful thrombectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age 18-85 years
- Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke
- Pre-stroke mRS 0-1
- Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 6
- Time from symptom onset to start of endovascular procedure (puncture) < 24 hours; onset time defined as "last known well" time
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Presence of stenosis (≥ 50%) in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery, internal carotid artery, or common carotid artery proximal to the occlusion site
- Multiple emboli across different circulations (simultaneous anterior and posterior circulation emboli, or simultaneous left and right anterior circulation emboli)
- Evidence on CT of extensive cerebral edema, midline shift, significant mass effect, or signs of brain herniation
- Presence of a life-threatening disease with a prognosis < 6 months, making 3-month follow-up impossible
- Severe psychiatric disorder or heart failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-dose RL-IPostCFor acute anterior circulation with large core ischemic stroke patients who achieve successful vessel recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) after thrombectomy, within 5 minutes, the balloon guide catheter (BGC) is positioned in the straight segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery at the C1-C2 level, avoiding the carotid sinus. Repetitive balloon inflations (2 minutes) to block blood flow followed by deflations (2 minutes) to restore blood flow (for 4 cycles) are performed. After the first BGC inflation, confirmation of antegrade flow blockade in the internal carotid artery is required. At the end of the cycle, angiography is performed to confirm vessel patency. | Procedure or surgery | High-dose RL-IPostC |
| Low-dose RL-IPostCFor acute anterior circulation with large core ischemic stroke patients who achieve successful vessel recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) after thrombectomy, within 5 minutes, the balloon guide catheter (BGC) is positioned in the straight segment of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery at the C1-C2 level, avoiding the carotid sinus. Repetitive balloon inflations (15 seconds) to block blood flow followed by deflations (15 seconds) to restore blood flow (for 5 cycles) are performed. After the first BGC inflation, confirmation of antegrade flow blockade in the internal carotid artery is required. At the end of the cycle, angiography is performed to confirm vessel patency. | Procedure or surgery | Low-dose RL-IPostC |
Primary outcome
Phase IIb: proportion of subjects without midline shift ( >3mm)
Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours after randomization
Midline shift was measured at the level of the translucent septum in the follow-up NCCT or MRI at 24 hours.
Phase III: Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-3 at 90 days.
Time frame: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a single-item, global outcome rating scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders. The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater disability. 0-No symptoms at all 1. No significant disability despite symptoms: able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. Slight disability:unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. Moderate disability:require some help, but able to walk without assistance 4. Moderate severe disability:unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. Severe disability:bedridden, incontinent, and require constant nursing care and attention 6. Death
8 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects with good outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days
Time frame: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
Distribution of mRS at 90 days
Time frame: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-3 at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Proportion of subjects with mRS 0-2 at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Distribution of mRS at 1 year.
Time frame: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Change in NIHSS score between day 5-7 or discharge
Time frame: Day 5-7 post-procedure.
EQ-5D-5L score at 90 days
Time frame: 90 ± 7 days post-procedure
EQ-5D-5L score at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year ± 15 days post-procedure.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Prehospital Response and Emergency Stroke Transport Optimisation
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion With Extended Time Window (ANGEL-BAO)
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingPhase 3
Tenecteplase or Reteplase as Bridging Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Intracranial Arterial Recanalization With Multiple Doses of LT3001 Drug Product in AIS Participant
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yueqi Zhu, MD principal investigator
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-dose RL-IPostC and Low-dose RL-IPostC in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yining Tao, MD (0086-021-64844183, yiningtao1001@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase IIb: proportion of subjects without midline shift ( >3mm) (time frame: 24 ± 6 hours after randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.