Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)NCT07602413
Portuguese Mobile App Version of the ICIQ Bladder Diary for Adults With Urinary Symptoms: Development and Feasibility Study
An observational study of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), run by Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Oporto.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a mobile app version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary (ICIQ-Bladder Diary) in Portuguese adults with urinary symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 25 May 2026to 31 Aug 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Month
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with OAB and/or urinary incontinence and experience with paper bladder diary
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of overactive bladder and/or urinary incontinence for at least 6 months
- Previous experience completing a paper bladder diary
- Own and regularly use a smartphone
- Able to understand and use the My São João App and the Diário da Bexiga VD mobile application
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Unable to understand, read, speak, or write Portuguese
- No regular access to the internet during the study period
- Unable to use a smartphone application independently
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Development and Feasibility of the Portuguese Version of the ICIQ-bladder Diary as a Mobile Application
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a mobile app version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary (ICIQ-Bladder Diary) in Portuguese adults with urinary symptoms. The study aims to learn whether an electronic bladder diary is feasible, easy to use, and well accepted by participants and physicians.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Is the mobile app feasible, based on the percentage of participants who completely fill in the diary over 1 month? Do participants consider the app to be high quality and easy to use? Do participants and physicians prefer the electronic diary over paper formats?
Participants will:
Use the mobile app version of the ICIQ-Bladder Diary for 1 month; Complete questionnaires about app quality, usability, and preference, including the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS).
Six rehabilitation physicians will review the completed diaries and answer questions about ease of interpretation and preferred diary format.
The investigators expect the app to be feasible and well accepted by both participants and physicians. If successful, the app may support wider use of electronic bladder diaries in clinical practice in Portugal.
Read the detailed description
Lower urinary tract symptoms, including overactive bladder and urinary incontinence, are commonly assessed using bladder diaries. These diaries provide structured information on urinary frequency, voided volumes, fluid intake, urgency episodes, and incontinence events, supporting clinical assessment and treatment monitoring. Paper bladder diaries may be difficult to complete and interpret, which can limit their use in routine clinical practice. Electronic versions may improve completion, data quality, and interpretation efficiency.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of a Portuguese electronic version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary (ICIQ-Bladder Diary) developed as a mobile application integrated into the My São João App. The electronic diary follows the structure of the validated Portuguese version of the ICIQ-Bladder Diary and records information over a 3-day period, including fluid intake, urinary frequency, voided volumes, urgency, incontinence episodes, and pad use.
The study will be conducted at the Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Unit of ULS São João as a single-arm feasibility study. Adult participants with overactive bladder and/or urinary incontinence who have previous experience completing paper bladder diaries and who use smartphones in daily life will be recruited consecutively during routine consultations.
At the baseline visit, the investigators will collect demographic and clinical information, including previous experience with smartphone use and health-related mobile applications. Participants will complete condition-specific questionnaires and health-related quality-of-life measures. The investigators will provide training on installation and use of the electronic bladder diary application. Participants will then complete the diary for 3 consecutive days.
At the follow-up visit, the investigators will assess diary completion and collect participant feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and preference for the electronic diary format. Application quality will be evaluated using the Portuguese version of the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS).
The primary objective is to evaluate feasibility, measured by the percentage of participants who completely fill in the diary during the study period. Secondary objectives include evaluation of participant acceptability, usability, and preference regarding the electronic format.
In addition, six physicians with experience interpreting paper bladder diaries will review the electronic reports generated by the application. The physicians will evaluate ease of interpretation, preferences regarding diary format, and suggestions for improvement.
The electronic diary automatically generates structured reports containing clinically relevant variables related to fluid intake, urinary frequency, urgency episodes, incontinence episodes, and pad use. Data are transferred to a secure institutional server. Personal identifiers will be removed before analysis, and access to clinical information will be restricted to the investigators directly involved in participant care.
A sample size of 40 participants was considered adequate for this feasibility study. Statistical analysis will include descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical variables and exploratory subgroup analyses according to clinical and demographic characteristics and smartphone use experience.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation will be voluntary, and all participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. The investigators expect that the electronic bladder diary will be feasible and well accepted by both participants and physicians and may support broader use of electronic bladder diaries in clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
- Keywords
- Bladder diary, incontinence, smartphone, mobile app, electronic diary
- Medical subject headings
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with LUTS | Patients with with previous diagnosis of OAB and/or UI and experience with paper bladder diary, consecutively attending rehabilitation consult |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participant diary completion rate
Percentage of participants who complete all required entries in the electronic bladder diary during the study period, assessed using diary data recorded in the mobile application.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Participant preference and usability assessment of bladder diary format
Percentage of participants selecting the electronic or paper bladder diary as easier to use, more convenient, and preferred overall, assessed using a 3-item study-specific questionnaire comparing diary formats.
Measured: 1 month
Participant assessment of mobile application quality using the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS)
Mean total score and subscale scores of the Portuguese version of the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS), assessed after use of the electronic ICIQ-Bladder Diary mobile application. The uMARS is a 20-item questionnaire evaluating mobile app quality across 4 objective quality domains (Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality) and 1 subjective quality domain. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 ("Inadequate") to 5 ("Excellent"). Higher scores indicate better perceived app quality and user experience. Questions marked as "Not applicable" are excluded from score calculation.
Measured: 1 month
Physician preference and ease of interpretation of the electronic bladder diary
Percentage of physicians reporting preferences regarding the electronic versus paper bladder diary format and rating ease of interpretation of the electronic diary reports, assessed using a study-specific physician questionnaire.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2026
- Study start25 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Month
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Oporto
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Susana Moreira, Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Oporto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07602413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ULSSaoJoao
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 12 May 2026
- Last updated
- 22 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Feasibility of the Portuguese Version of the ICIQ-bladder Diary as a Mobile Application
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07602413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ULSSaoJoao
- Conditions
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
- Keywords
- Bladder diary, incontinence, smartphone, mobile app, electronic diary
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Unidade Local de Saúde São João, OportoOther government
- Study start
- 25 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a mobile app version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary (ICIQ-Bladder Diary) in Portuguese adults with urinary symptoms. The study aims to learn whether an electronic bladder diary is feasible, easy to use, and well accepted by participants and physicians.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the mobile app feasible, based on the percentage of participants who completely fill in the diary over 1 month? Do participants consider the app to be high quality and easy to use? Do participants and physicians prefer the electronic diary over paper formats?
Participants will:
Use the mobile app version of the ICIQ-Bladder Diary for 1 month; Complete questionnaires about app quality, usability, and preference, including the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS).
Six rehabilitation physicians will review the completed diaries and answer questions about ease of interpretation and preferred diary format.
The investigators expect the app to be feasible and well accepted by both participants and physicians. If successful, the app may support wider use of electronic bladder diaries in clinical practice in Portugal.
Detailed description
Lower urinary tract symptoms, including overactive bladder and urinary incontinence, are commonly assessed using bladder diaries. These diaries provide structured information on urinary frequency, voided volumes, fluid intake, urgency episodes, and incontinence events, supporting clinical assessment and treatment monitoring. Paper bladder diaries may be difficult to complete and interpret, which can limit their use in routine clinical practice. Electronic versions may improve completion, data quality, and interpretation efficiency.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of a Portuguese electronic version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary (ICIQ-Bladder Diary) developed as a mobile application integrated into the My São João App. The electronic diary follows the structure of the validated Portuguese version of the ICIQ-Bladder Diary and records information over a 3-day period, including fluid intake, urinary frequency, voided volumes, urgency, incontinence episodes, and pad use.
The study will be conducted at the Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Unit of ULS São João as a single-arm feasibility study. Adult participants with overactive bladder and/or urinary incontinence who have previous experience completing paper bladder diaries and who use smartphones in daily life will be recruited consecutively during routine consultations.
At the baseline visit, the investigators will collect demographic and clinical information, including previous experience with smartphone use and health-related mobile applications. Participants will complete condition-specific questionnaires and health-related quality-of-life measures. The investigators will provide training on installation and use of the electronic bladder diary application. Participants will then complete the diary for 3 consecutive days.
At the follow-up visit, the investigators will assess diary completion and collect participant feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and preference for the electronic diary format. Application quality will be evaluated using the Portuguese version of the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS).
The primary objective is to evaluate feasibility, measured by the percentage of participants who completely fill in the diary during the study period. Secondary objectives include evaluation of participant acceptability, usability, and preference regarding the electronic format.
In addition, six physicians with experience interpreting paper bladder diaries will review the electronic reports generated by the application. The physicians will evaluate ease of interpretation, preferences regarding diary format, and suggestions for improvement.
The electronic diary automatically generates structured reports containing clinically relevant variables related to fluid intake, urinary frequency, urgency episodes, incontinence episodes, and pad use. Data are transferred to a secure institutional server. Personal identifiers will be removed before analysis, and access to clinical information will be restricted to the investigators directly involved in participant care.
A sample size of 40 participants was considered adequate for this feasibility study. Statistical analysis will include descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical variables and exploratory subgroup analyses according to clinical and demographic characteristics and smartphone use experience.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation will be voluntary, and all participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. The investigators expect that the electronic bladder diary will be feasible and well accepted by both participants and physicians and may support broader use of electronic bladder diaries in clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Month
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with LUTS | – | –Patients with with previous diagnosis of OAB and/or UI and experience with paper bladder diary, consecutively attending rehabilitation consult |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with OAB and/or urinary incontinence and experience with paper bladder diary
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of overactive bladder and/or urinary incontinence for at least 6 months
- Previous experience completing a paper bladder diary
- Own and regularly use a smartphone
- Able to understand and use the My São João App and the Diário da Bexiga VD mobile application
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unable to understand, read, speak, or write Portuguese
- No regular access to the internet during the study period
- Unable to use a smartphone application independently
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Participant diary completion rate
Time frame: 1 month
Percentage of participants who complete all required entries in the electronic bladder diary during the study period, assessed using diary data recorded in the mobile application.
3 secondary outcomes
Participant preference and usability assessment of bladder diary format
Time frame: 1 month
Participant assessment of mobile application quality using the User Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS)
Time frame: 1 month
Physician preference and ease of interpretation of the electronic bladder diary
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
RecruitingObservational study
ProVIDE Studies Post Exit Analysis
BPH With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Recruiting
Establishing Normative Urodynamics Parameters for the Glean Urodynamics System in Healthy Adults
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
RT-310 Dose Escalation BPH Study
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
RT-310 Safety and Feasibility BPH Study
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Macanity on Urinary Health in Males With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), run by Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Oporto.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Susana A Moreira, PMR specialist (+351917210578, s.moreira@ulssjoao.min-saude.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participant diary completion rate (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.