Implant DentistryNCT07606456
Different Drilling Techniques in Posterior Maxilla
A study testing Magnetic Mallet Technique and Conventional Drilling Technique in people with Implant Dentistry and Implant Loading, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The study aimed to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet technique versus Conventional Drilling technique on early loaded implant in posterior maxilla. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Implant Dentistry, Implant Loading, Osteotomy Protocols
- What is being tested?
- Magnetic Mallet Technique and Conventional Drilling Technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 May 2025to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with missing one or more posterior maxillary teeth.
- Patients in the age group between 18 and 50 years old.
- 10 mm or more vertical bone height is present.
- No gender preface in selection of the patients.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Non-smokers.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients willing to be present during the study follow up intervals.
- Patients free from any systemic diseases.
- 6 mm or more ridge width is present.
- Crown height space of at least 8 mm. •!Patients without any para-functional habits (bruxism and clenching).
Who cannot join
- Patients with any pathological lesion or root tips at the planned surgical site.
- Patients with systemic diseases that contra-indicate the surgical procedure or affect bone healing process such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders.
- serious osseous disorders, and mental disorders.
- Patient taking drugs that could affect bone healing process as in
- Immunosuppressive drugs and bisphosphonates.
- Alcoholism.
- Untreated periodontal disease or bad oral hygiene.
- Pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516
About this study
Official title: Magnetic Mallet Technique Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Early Loaded Implant in Posterior Maxilla
The study aimed to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet technique versus Conventional Drilling technique on early loaded implant in posterior maxilla.
- Conditions
- Implant Dentistry, Implant Loading, Osteotomy Protocols
- Being tested
- Magnetic Mallet Technique, Conventional Drilling Technique
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnetic Mallet TechniqueProcedure or surgery
Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using a magneto-dynamic device (Magnetic Mallet) that delivers controlled percussive forces to condense bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.
Conventional Drilling TechniqueProcedure or surgery
Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using traditional drilling technique in bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Mallet Group | Experimental | osteotomy site preparation using magnetic mallet Receives: Procedure: Magnetic Mallet Technique |
| Conventional Drilling Group | Experimental | osteotomy site preparation using conventional drilling technique Receives: Procedure: Conventional Drilling Technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant stability
The analysis of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) w made using an Osstell Mentor apparatus
Measured: 9 months
Bone Density measurement
Relative bone density records will be collected from the bucco-palatal view of the cross sectional plane using the Hounsfield unit
Measured: 9 months
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)
For the calculation of marginal bone loss (MBL), the implant was used as a reference
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2026
- Study start1 May 2025
- Primary completion1 May 2026
- Study completion1 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Implant DentistryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07606456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A0101025OS
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 19 May 2026
- Last updated
- 27 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Magnetic Mallet Technique Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Early Loaded Implant in Posterior Maxilla
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07606456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A0101025OS
- Conditions
- Implant Dentistry, Implant Loading, Osteotomy Protocols
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aimed to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet technique versus Conventional Drilling technique on early loaded implant in posterior maxilla.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Mallet Group | Experimental | Procedure: Magnetic Mallet Techniqueosteotomy site preparation using magnetic mallet |
| Conventional Drilling Group | Experimental | Procedure: Conventional Drilling Techniqueosteotomy site preparation using conventional drilling technique |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient with missing one or more posterior maxillary teeth.
- Patients in the age group between 18 and 50 years old.
- 10 mm or more vertical bone height is present.
- No gender preface in selection of the patients.
- Good oral hygiene.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with any pathological lesion or root tips at the planned surgical site.
- Patients with systemic diseases that contra-indicate the surgical procedure or affect bone healing process such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders.
- serious osseous disorders, and mental disorders.
- Patient taking drugs that could affect bone healing process as in
- Immunosuppressive drugs and bisphosphonates.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Mallet TechniqueOsteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using a magneto-dynamic device (Magnetic Mallet) that delivers controlled percussive forces to condense bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months. | Procedure or surgery | Magnetic Mallet Group |
| Conventional Drilling TechniqueOsteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using traditional drilling technique in bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Drilling Group |
Primary outcome
Implant stability
Time frame: 9 months
The analysis of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) w made using an Osstell Mentor apparatus
Bone Density measurement
Time frame: 9 months
Relative bone density records will be collected from the bucco-palatal view of the cross sectional plane using the Hounsfield unit
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)
Time frame: 9 months
For the calculation of marginal bone loss (MBL), the implant was used as a reference
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Implant Dentistry
Recruiting
Evaluation of Different Grafting Technique of Thin Gingival Phenotype With Delayed Dental Implants
Implant Dentistry, Connective Tissue Graft
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The General Aim is to Implement Clinical Assessment of Overload by Voluntary Bite Force Registration to Enable Future Simple But Precise Risk Assessment to Provide Individualized Treatment Plans.
Dental Implant, Bruxism
Not yet recruiting
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
Peri Implant Mucositis, Dental Implant Rehabilitation
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing Current Clinical Concepts in Dental Practice
Dental Implant
Recruiting
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Intra Oral Full Arch Scan (A Cross-over Study)
Edentulism, Dental Implants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Magnetic Mallet Technique and Conventional Drilling Technique in people with Implant Dentistry and Implant Loading, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant stability (time frame: 9 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2026.