Socioemotional DevelopmentNCT07609342
Optimizing a School-Based Therapeutic Play Intervention for Preschool Students
A study testing Individual play sessions, Peer play sessions and Classroom push-in sessions in people with Socioemotional Development, run by The Children's Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to optimize a school-based therapeutic play intervention in preschool students with mild to moderate school adjustment difficulties. The aims are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 6 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Socioemotional Development
- What is being tested?
- Individual play sessions, Peer play sessions and Classroom push-in sessions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 225 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Oct 2024to Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 6 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Inclusion Criteria: Children will be eligible if they are enrolled in preschool classrooms at participating schools and identified as appropriate for intervention through universal screening. Screening will be conducted using the Teacher-Child Rating Scale (T-CRS; Hightower et al., 1986), a teacher-completed measure of social-emotional adjustment. Children who score in the target range indicating emerging adjustment difficulties (i.e., 15th to 30th percentile) will be eligible for participation in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria: Children will be excluded if they demonstrate severe developmental impairments that would prevent participation in the intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Children's Institute
Rochester, New York, 14604
Erinn B Duprey, Ph.D., (585) 295-1000, eduprey@childrensinstitute.net
Joseph McFall, Ph.D., jmcfall@childrensinstitute.net
About this study
Official title: Optimizing a School-Based Therapeutic Play Intervention for Preschool Students: A Factorial Experiment Protocol
The goal of this clinical trial is to optimize a school-based therapeutic play intervention in preschool students with mild to moderate school adjustment difficulties. The aims are:
- Determine the independent and combined effects of three intervention components (individual play, peer play, and classroom push-in sessions) on preschool children's social and emotional competence, using a factorial experimental design.
- Use a community-engaged approach to identify and disseminate the optimized version of Primary Project for preschool implementation
Read more
Researchers will compare the main and interactive effects of three components on children's social-emotional competencies.
Participants will take part in a therapeutic play intervention in the school setting, and their teachers and caregivers will complete assessment instruments on children's social and emotional functioning.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale:
There are a growing number of children in the United States with mental, emotional, or behavioral health concerns (Perou et al., 2013; SAMHSA, 2022). Left untreated, these difficulties may persist through development and contribute to a wide range of negative outcomes in adolescence and adulthood. Consequently, there is a critical need to identify effective strategies that promote protective factors, enhance resiliency, and disrupt the causal processes that facilitate the emergence of subsequent mental health problems. Prevention programs that enhance young children's social and emotional competencies can both alleviate present difficulties and protect youth against future mental health problems (Greenberg et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 2017).
Early childhood is a critical developmental period for social and emotional growth, with key developmental milestones including the growth of peer social skills and self-regulation abilities. Educational settings are important contexts for fostering young children's social and emotional development. Children who adjust well to the school setting are more apt to thrive in terms of their social and emotional skill development, whereas children who struggle with the transition to the early school years may face challenges across multiple domains (Alzahrani et al., 2019). It is these elevated symptoms detected within the general student population, not diagnoses of specific childhood disorders, that best predict adult mental health outcomes (Mulraney et al., 2021). Consequently, preventive interventions that include universal screening and encourage social and emotional skill development, while also facilitating a positive transition to the educational environment, are ideal.
School-based interventions are well positioned to strengthen children's social and emotional competencies and reduce future risk (National Research Council \& Institute of Medicine, 2009). Schools serve as a context for growth in multiple domains of socioemotional development, including interpersonal skill development with peers and adult figures, intrapersonal awareness of academic and non-academic skills, coping with difficulties, and managing the simultaneous demands of curricular and extracurricular activities (Aviles et al., 2006). Further, recent evidence indicates that school-based interventions grounded in child-centered play therapy (CCPT) are related to reductions in children's behavioral, emotional, and academic problems (Ray et al., 2015). There is also some growing evidence that non-clinical preventive interventions grounded in the tenets of CCPT (i.e., Child-Centered Play Interventions; CCPIs) are effective for children's social and emotional development (Perryman \& Bowers, 2018). CCPIs are often more feasible and sustainable for schools - for instance, they are facilitated by a specially trained school-based paraprofessional (i.e., child associate) who is supervised by a licensed school-based mental health professional (Peabody et al., 2018). However, research based on CCPIs is limited.
Primary Project is a long-standing CCPI that targets children in kindergarten through third grade (approximately ages 5 - 9) who are having school adjustment difficulties (Johnson et al., 2005; Peabody et al., 2018). The program provides structured play sessions with trained paraprofessional child associates under the supervision of mental health professionals to support children with early school adjustment difficulties. The goals of Primary Project are to enhance school-related social and emotional competencies (e.g., task orientation and peer social skills) while reducing behavioral and interpersonal adjustment difficulties in children.
Prior research has established the effectiveness of Primary Project in improving school adjustment outcomes in young children (see Cowen et al., 1996 for a review) and a recent study demonstrated positive effects on children's school attendance (Lotyczewski et al., 2024). A recent randomized controlled trial supported the program's effectiveness for improving children's social skills and self-regulation (Aaron et al., forthcoming).
Building on this foundation, Primary Project was adapted for preschool-aged children (approximately age 4) by adding developmentally appropriate components, including a greater focus on peer-play skills. The Pre-K Primary Project model includes three core components: individual play sessions, structured peer play sessions, and classroom push-in sessions wherein the paraprofessional child associate provides individual support to the child in a classroom setting. Conceptually, these three components act upon proximal mediators (e.g., increasing emotion regulation skills and self-efficacy; facilitating positive peer relationships; and promoting school connectedness) to enhance children's overall social-emotional adjustment (Figure 1).
However, despite increasing implementation, the Pre-K Primary Project model has not undergone systematic evaluation to understand which components, and in what combination, are most effective. This represents a critical gap given the Pre-K model's multi-component nature. Understanding the individual and combined effects of its components is essential to guide schools towards efficient and sustainable program goals.
The current trial addresses this gap by using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), an innovative translational framework (Guastaferro \& Pfammatter, 2023) to develop and evaluate multi-component interventions (Collins et al., 2024; Guastaferro \& Collins, 2019). MOST involves three phases: preparation, optimization, and evaluation. In the preparation phase, investigators establish a conceptual model, identify candidate intervention components, and define an optimization objective that balances effectiveness with practical constraints. In the optimization phase, the goal is to empirically identify the optimized intervention via a randomized controlled trial (RCT), often using a factorial experimental design. The optimized intervention is the combination of candidate intervention components that achieves the best balance of intervention effectiveness with affordability, scalability, and efficiency (i.e., intervention EASE; Collins et al., 2021) Finally, in the evaluation phase, the optimized intervention package is tested in a RCT, usually in a 2-arm trial, to confirm its effectiveness under real-world conditions compared to a suitable control.
The present trial represents the optimization phase of MOST. The specific optimization goal is to identify the combination of components that are most effective for improving children's social-emotional outcomes and school adjustment, while also being feasible in terms of program timing and resource constraints (e.g., ability to offer two full cycles per school year without incurring additional staffing costs). In sum, this trial examines whether individual play sessions, peer play sessions, and classroom push-ins, independently and in combination, improve preschool children's social-emotional adjustment. The overall goal is to develop an optimized program model for broader dissemination.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this trial is to optimize the Pre-K Primary Project intervention for strengthening preschool children's social-emotional adjustment. The first specific aim of this study is to determine the independent and combined effects of three intervention components (individual play, peer play, and classroom push-in sessions) on preschool children's social and emotional competence, using a factorial experimental design.
As an exploratory sub-aim, we also seek to explore the impact of intervention components on identified mediators including children's level of school connectedness, emotion regulation, and peer relationships. These exploratory analyses will inform iterative revisions to the conceptual model and future research studies.
Our second specific aim is to use a community-engaged approach to identify and disseminate the optimized version of Primary Project for preschool implementation. Specifically, we will work with school partners to consider the results from the optimization trial, balanced with the feasibility, sustainability, and affordability of different intervention packages (e.g., ability to offer two cycles per school year without incurring additional costs from staffing or other resources). These results will be disseminated via a new program manual and other materials targeted to both academic and non-academic audiences.
- Conditions
- Socioemotional Development
- Being tested
- Individual play sessions, Peer play sessions, Classroom push-in sessions
- Keywords
- Factorial trial, Social emotional learning, Multiphase optimization strategy, Preschool, Early childhood, Play therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Individual play sessionsBehavioural
All children will receive individual play sessions with a child associate in a designated playroom within the school. Sessions will last 20-30 minutes and occur twice per week. All sessions are grounded in child-centered play therapy (CCPT) principles. Child associates use a non-directive approach, allowing children to choose from a range of developmentally appropriate toys and play materials (e.g., art supplies, blocks, puppets, and imaginative play sets) that encourage expression, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. The role of the child associate is to create a safe and supportive environment, verbally reflect on children's actions and feelings, and facilitate their self-directed play in ways that promote social and emotional growth. In the factorial design, children will be randomized to receive either 8 or 12 individual play sessions.
Peer play sessionsBehavioural
Children randomized to this condition will participate in structured play pairs, consisting of six, biweekly, 30-minute sessions with a peer and the child associate. Peers are non-study children who exhibit excellent social and emotional competencies, as observed and rated by their teachers during universal screening. Pairings will be determined collaboratively with teachers to ensure compatibility and opportunities for skill-building. Parents of play pairs give permission for their child to participate in regular Primary Project implementation. The sessions will be designed to promote social competence, cooperation, and peer connectedness by providing guided opportunities to practice skills such as sharing, turn-taking, communication, and conflict resolution. While maintaining a child-directed approach, the child associate will actively scaffold interactions by reflecting and reinforcing positive peer behaviors, providing gentle redirection when difficulties arise, and offering a vari
Classroom push-in sessionsBehavioural
Children randomized to this condition will receive four, bi-weekly, classroom push-in sessions facilitated by the child associate. Push-in sessions will be scheduled weekly during regular classroom activities (e.g., circle time, free play, or small-group learning). During classroom push-in times, the child associate uses child-led therapeutic play techniques to help foster classroom engagement, positive peer interaction, and a sense of belonging for the target child. Child associates will coordinate with classroom teachers to integrate push-ins smoothly and to reinforce skills across settings.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (8 weeks), Peer play pairs, Classroom sessions Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Peer play sessions; Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessions |
| Condition 2 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (8 weeks), Peer play pairs Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Peer play sessions |
| Condition 3 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (8 weeks), Classroom sessions Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessions |
| Condition 4 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (8 weeks) Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions |
| Condition 5 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (12 weeks), Peer play pairs, Classroom sessions Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Peer play sessions; Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessions |
| Condition 6 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (12 weeks), Peer play pairs Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Peer play sessions |
| Condition 7 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (12 weeks), Classroom sessions Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions; Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessions |
| Condition 8 | Experimental | Individual play sessions (12 weeks) Receives: Behavioral: Individual play sessions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Social-emotional adjustment
The primary outcome is children's social-emotional adjustment, assessed using teacher reports on the Teacher-Child Rating Scale, short-form (T-CRS-sf; Weber et al., 2017). The key analysis metric will be change in T-CRS scores from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention.
Measured: Teachers will complete the T-CRS prior to study enrollment and randomization, and will complete a second T-CRS form for participants within 2 weeks of intervention completion.
Secondary outcomes (3)
School connectedness
School connectedness will be assessed through a pilot Preschool School Connectedness Measure, a parent reported measure developed by researchers at Children's Institute, which captures children's sense of belonging and connectedness at school
Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (within 1 week)
School anxiety
Parents will complete the Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale (Preschool Version), a validated parent-reported scale assessing children's anxiety symptoms related to school contexts.
Measured: Pre- and post-intervention (within 1 week)
Emotion Regulation
Parents will complete the Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC), which assesses children's regulatory skills and emotional lability (Shields \& Cicchetti, 1997).
Measured: Pre- and post-intervention (within 1 week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 May 2026
- Study start18 Oct 2024
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Socioemotional DevelopmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Children's Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erinn Duprey, The Children's Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07609342
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1376935
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 19 May 2026
- Last updated
- 27 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The study will protect the confidentiality of all data at all stages. Parents are informed during the consent process that all responses are confidential and are only for research purposes. Only the investigator and authorized study personnel will have access to identifiable information. Data is stored on password-protected servers compliant with FERPA and all personal identifiers will be removed prior to analysis. Each participant will be assigned an anonymized study identifier.After data collection is complete, only deidentified data will be retained for analysis and long-term storage. These deidentified datasets will be stored on encrypted cloud-based servers with access restricted to the study team. Data will be reported on in the aggregate, and we will not report on any subgroups with fewer than 10 individuals.
Publications
Little RJ. Missing Data Analysis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):149-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051727. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
PubMed 38346291Baraldi AN, Enders CK. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):5-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
PubMed 20006986Marik PE, Hooper MH. Adjuvant Vitamin C in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy: What's the right dose? Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2190-y. No abstract available.
PubMed 30466487Gongye R, Duprey EB, Hightower AD, McFall JP. Measuring adverse and protective experiences in early childhood: development and initial validation of the child and family experiences survey (CAFES). BMC Public Health. 2025 Oct 24;25(1):3590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24881-9.
PubMed 41137087Shields A, Cicchetti D. Emotion regulation among school-age children: the development and validation of a new criterion Q-sort scale. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):906-16. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.906.
PubMed 9383613Gilbertson TJ, Morgan AJ, Rapee RM, Lyneham HJ, Bayer JK. Psychometric properties of the Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale - Preschool Version. J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Dec;52:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
PubMed 29053989Collins LM, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ. One view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control: intervention optimization. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1998-2008. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab087.
PubMed 34850927Guastaferro K, Collins LM. Achieving the Goals of Translational Science in Public Health Intervention Research: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(S2):S128-S129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304874. No abstract available.
PubMed 30785800Collins LM, Nahum-Shani I, Guastaferro K, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ, Murphy SA. Intervention Optimization: A Paradigm Shift and Its Potential Implications for Clinical Psychology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051119. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
PubMed 38316143Guastaferro K, Pfammatter AF. Guidance on selecting a translational framework for intervention development: Optimizing interventions for impact. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e119. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.546. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37313386Johnson DB, Pedro-Carroll JL, Demanchick SP. The Primary Mental Health Project: A Play Intervention for School-Age Children. 2005.
Peabody MA, Perryman KL, Hannah M, Smith L, Sanyshyn SM. Improving Mental Health Outcomes for Young Children through the Implementation of the Primary Project. Journal of School-Based Counseling Policy and Evaluation. 2018;1(1):40-50.
Perryman KL, Bowers L. Turning the focus to behavioral, emotional, and social well-being: The impact of child-centered play therapy. International Journal of Play Therapy. 2018;27(4):227-41. doi:10.1037/pla0000078
Ray DC, Armstrong SA, Balkin RS, Jayne KM. Child-centered play therapy in the schools: Review and meta-analysis. Psychol Sch. 2015 Feb 1;52(2):107-23. doi:10.1002/pits.21798
Aviles AM, Anderson TR, Davila ER. Child and Adolescent Social-Emotional Development Within the Context of School. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2006 Feb;11(1):32-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2005.00365.x.
PubMed 32811063
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing a School-Based Therapeutic Play Intervention for Preschool Students: A Factorial Experiment Protocol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07609342
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1376935
- Conditions
- Socioemotional Development
- Keywords
- Factorial trial, Social emotional learning, Multiphase optimization strategy, Preschool, Early childhood, Play therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Children's InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to optimize a school-based therapeutic play intervention in preschool students with mild to moderate school adjustment difficulties. The aims are:
- Determine the independent and combined effects of three intervention components (individual play, peer play, and classroom push-in sessions) on preschool children's social and emotional competence, using a factorial experimental design.
- Use a community-engaged approach to identify and disseminate the optimized version of Primary Project for preschool implementation
Researchers will compare the main and interactive effects of three components on children's social-emotional competencies.
Participants will take part in a therapeutic play intervention in the school setting, and their teachers and caregivers will complete assessment instruments on children's social and emotional functioning.
Detailed description
Background and rationale:
There are a growing number of children in the United States with mental, emotional, or behavioral health concerns (Perou et al., 2013; SAMHSA, 2022). Left untreated, these difficulties may persist through development and contribute to a wide range of negative outcomes in adolescence and adulthood. Consequently, there is a critical need to identify effective strategies that promote protective factors, enhance resiliency, and disrupt the causal processes that facilitate the emergence of subsequent mental health problems. Prevention programs that enhance young children's social and emotional competencies can both alleviate present difficulties and protect youth against future mental health problems (Greenberg et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 2017).
Early childhood is a critical developmental period for social and emotional growth, with key developmental milestones including the growth of peer social skills and self-regulation abilities. Educational settings are important contexts for fostering young children's social and emotional development. Children who adjust well to the school setting are more apt to thrive in terms of their social and emotional skill development, whereas children who struggle with the transition to the early school years may face challenges across multiple domains (Alzahrani et al., 2019). It is these elevated symptoms detected within the general student population, not diagnoses of specific childhood disorders, that best predict adult mental health outcomes (Mulraney et al., 2021). Consequently, preventive interventions that include universal screening and encourage social and emotional skill development, while also facilitating a positive transition to the educational environment, are ideal.
School-based interventions are well positioned to strengthen children's social and emotional competencies and reduce future risk (National Research Council \& Institute of Medicine, 2009). Schools serve as a context for growth in multiple domains of socioemotional development, including interpersonal skill development with peers and adult figures, intrapersonal awareness of academic and non-academic skills, coping with difficulties, and managing the simultaneous demands of curricular and extracurricular activities (Aviles et al., 2006). Further, recent evidence indicates that school-based interventions grounded in child-centered play therapy (CCPT) are related to reductions in children's behavioral, emotional, and academic problems (Ray et al., 2015). There is also some growing evidence that non-clinical preventive interventions grounded in the tenets of CCPT (i.e., Child-Centered Play Interventions; CCPIs) are effective for children's social and emotional development (Perryman \& Bowers, 2018). CCPIs are often more feasible and sustainable for schools - for instance, they are facilitated by a specially trained school-based paraprofessional (i.e., child associate) who is supervised by a licensed school-based mental health professional (Peabody et al., 2018). However, research based on CCPIs is limited.
Primary Project is a long-standing CCPI that targets children in kindergarten through third grade (approximately ages 5 - 9) who are having school adjustment difficulties (Johnson et al., 2005; Peabody et al., 2018). The program provides structured play sessions with trained paraprofessional child associates under the supervision of mental health professionals to support children with early school adjustment difficulties. The goals of Primary Project are to enhance school-related social and emotional competencies (e.g., task orientation and peer social skills) while reducing behavioral and interpersonal adjustment difficulties in children.
Prior research has established the effectiveness of Primary Project in improving school adjustment outcomes in young children (see Cowen et al., 1996 for a review) and a recent study demonstrated positive effects on children's school attendance (Lotyczewski et al., 2024). A recent randomized controlled trial supported the program's effectiveness for improving children's social skills and self-regulation (Aaron et al., forthcoming).
Building on this foundation, Primary Project was adapted for preschool-aged children (approximately age 4) by adding developmentally appropriate components, including a greater focus on peer-play skills. The Pre-K Primary Project model includes three core components: individual play sessions, structured peer play sessions, and classroom push-in sessions wherein the paraprofessional child associate provides individual support to the child in a classroom setting. Conceptually, these three components act upon proximal mediators (e.g., increasing emotion regulation skills and self-efficacy; facilitating positive peer relationships; and promoting school connectedness) to enhance children's overall social-emotional adjustment (Figure 1).
However, despite increasing implementation, the Pre-K Primary Project model has not undergone systematic evaluation to understand which components, and in what combination, are most effective. This represents a critical gap given the Pre-K model's multi-component nature. Understanding the individual and combined effects of its components is essential to guide schools towards efficient and sustainable program goals.
The current trial addresses this gap by using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), an innovative translational framework (Guastaferro \& Pfammatter, 2023) to develop and evaluate multi-component interventions (Collins et al., 2024; Guastaferro \& Collins, 2019). MOST involves three phases: preparation, optimization, and evaluation. In the preparation phase, investigators establish a conceptual model, identify candidate intervention components, and define an optimization objective that balances effectiveness with practical constraints. In the optimization phase, the goal is to empirically identify the optimized intervention via a randomized controlled trial (RCT), often using a factorial experimental design. The optimized intervention is the combination of candidate intervention components that achieves the best balance of intervention effectiveness with affordability, scalability, and efficiency (i.e., intervention EASE; Collins et al., 2021) Finally, in the evaluation phase, the optimized intervention package is tested in a RCT, usually in a 2-arm trial, to confirm its effectiveness under real-world conditions compared to a suitable control.
The present trial represents the optimization phase of MOST. The specific optimization goal is to identify the combination of components that are most effective for improving children's social-emotional outcomes and school adjustment, while also being feasible in terms of program timing and resource constraints (e.g., ability to offer two full cycles per school year without incurring additional staffing costs). In sum, this trial examines whether individual play sessions, peer play sessions, and classroom push-ins, independently and in combination, improve preschool children's social-emotional adjustment. The overall goal is to develop an optimized program model for broader dissemination.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this trial is to optimize the Pre-K Primary Project intervention for strengthening preschool children's social-emotional adjustment. The first specific aim of this study is to determine the independent and combined effects of three intervention components (individual play, peer play, and classroom push-in sessions) on preschool children's social and emotional competence, using a factorial experimental design.
As an exploratory sub-aim, we also seek to explore the impact of intervention components on identified mediators including children's level of school connectedness, emotion regulation, and peer relationships. These exploratory analyses will inform iterative revisions to the conceptual model and future research studies.
Our second specific aim is to use a community-engaged approach to identify and disseminate the optimized version of Primary Project for preschool implementation. Specifically, we will work with school partners to consider the results from the optimization trial, balanced with the feasibility, sustainability, and affordability of different intervention packages (e.g., ability to offer two cycles per school year without incurring additional costs from staffing or other resources). These results will be disseminated via a new program manual and other materials targeted to both academic and non-academic audiences.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Peer play sessions, Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessionsIndividual play sessions (8 weeks), Peer play pairs, Classroom sessions |
| Condition 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Peer play sessionsIndividual play sessions (8 weeks), Peer play pairs |
| Condition 3 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessionsIndividual play sessions (8 weeks), Classroom sessions |
| Condition 4 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessionsIndividual play sessions (8 weeks) |
| Condition 5 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Peer play sessions, Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessionsIndividual play sessions (12 weeks), Peer play pairs, Classroom sessions |
| Condition 6 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Peer play sessionsIndividual play sessions (12 weeks), Peer play pairs |
| Condition 7 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessions, Behavioral: Classroom push-in sessionsIndividual play sessions (12 weeks), Classroom sessions |
| Condition 8 | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual play sessionsIndividual play sessions (12 weeks) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Individual play sessionsAll children will receive individual play sessions with a child associate in a designated playroom within the school. Sessions will last 20-30 minutes and occur twice per week. All sessions are grounded in child-centered play therapy (CCPT) principles. Child associates use a non-directive approach, allowing children to choose from a range of developmentally appropriate toys and play materials (e.g., art supplies, blocks, puppets, and imaginative play sets) that encourage expression, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. The role of the child associate is to create a safe and supportive environment, verbally reflect on children's actions and feelings, and facilitate their self-directed play in ways that promote social and emotional growth. In the factorial design, children will be randomized to receive either 8 or 12 individual play sessions. | Behavioural | Condition 1, Condition 2, Condition 3, Condition 4, Condition 5, Condition 6, Condition 7, Condition 8 |
| Peer play sessionsChildren randomized to this condition will participate in structured play pairs, consisting of six, biweekly, 30-minute sessions with a peer and the child associate. Peers are non-study children who exhibit excellent social and emotional competencies, as observed and rated by their teachers during universal screening. Pairings will be determined collaboratively with teachers to ensure compatibility and opportunities for skill-building. Parents of play pairs give permission for their child to participate in regular Primary Project implementation. The sessions will be designed to promote social competence, cooperation, and peer connectedness by providing guided opportunities to practice skills such as sharing, turn-taking, communication, and conflict resolution. While maintaining a child-directed approach, the child associate will actively scaffold interactions by reflecting and reinforcing positive peer behaviors, providing gentle redirection when difficulties arise, and offering a vari | Behavioural | Condition 1, Condition 2, Condition 5, Condition 6 |
| Classroom push-in sessionsChildren randomized to this condition will receive four, bi-weekly, classroom push-in sessions facilitated by the child associate. Push-in sessions will be scheduled weekly during regular classroom activities (e.g., circle time, free play, or small-group learning). During classroom push-in times, the child associate uses child-led therapeutic play techniques to help foster classroom engagement, positive peer interaction, and a sense of belonging for the target child. Child associates will coordinate with classroom teachers to integrate push-ins smoothly and to reinforce skills across settings. | Behavioural | Condition 1, Condition 3, Condition 5, Condition 7 |
Primary outcome
Social-emotional adjustment
Time frame: Teachers will complete the T-CRS prior to study enrollment and randomization, and will complete a second T-CRS form for participants within 2 weeks of intervention completion.
The primary outcome is children's social-emotional adjustment, assessed using teacher reports on the Teacher-Child Rating Scale, short-form (T-CRS-sf; Weber et al., 2017). The key analysis metric will be change in T-CRS scores from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention.
3 secondary outcomes
School connectedness
Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (within 1 week)
School anxiety
Time frame: Pre- and post-intervention (within 1 week)
Emotion Regulation
Time frame: Pre- and post-intervention (within 1 week)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38346291Little RJ. Missing Data Analysis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):149-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051727. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 20006986Baraldi AN, Enders CK. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):5-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
- Background: PubMed 30466487Marik PE, Hooper MH. Adjuvant Vitamin C in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy: What's the right dose? Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2190-y. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 41137087Gongye R, Duprey EB, Hightower AD, McFall JP. Measuring adverse and protective experiences in early childhood: development and initial validation of the child and family experiences survey (CAFES). BMC Public Health. 2025 Oct 24;25(1):3590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24881-9.
- Background: PubMed 9383613Shields A, Cicchetti D. Emotion regulation among school-age children: the development and validation of a new criterion Q-sort scale. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):906-16. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.906.
- Background: PubMed 29053989Gilbertson TJ, Morgan AJ, Rapee RM, Lyneham HJ, Bayer JK. Psychometric properties of the Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale - Preschool Version. J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Dec;52:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 34850927Collins LM, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ. One view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control: intervention optimization. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1998-2008. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab087.
- Background: PubMed 30785800Guastaferro K, Collins LM. Achieving the Goals of Translational Science in Public Health Intervention Research: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(S2):S128-S129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304874. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 38316143Collins LM, Nahum-Shani I, Guastaferro K, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ, Murphy SA. Intervention Optimization: A Paradigm Shift and Its Potential Implications for Clinical Psychology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051119. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 37313386Guastaferro K, Pfammatter AF. Guidance on selecting a translational framework for intervention development: Optimizing interventions for impact. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e119. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.546. eCollection 2023.
- BackgroundJohnson DB, Pedro-Carroll JL, Demanchick SP. The Primary Mental Health Project: A Play Intervention for School-Age Children. 2005.
- BackgroundPeabody MA, Perryman KL, Hannah M, Smith L, Sanyshyn SM. Improving Mental Health Outcomes for Young Children through the Implementation of the Primary Project. Journal of School-Based Counseling Policy and Evaluation. 2018;1(1):40-50.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The study will protect the confidentiality of all data at all stages. Parents are informed during the consent process that all responses are confidential and are only for research purposes. Only the investigator and authorized study personnel will have access to identifiable information. Data is stored on password-protected servers compliant with FERPA and all personal identifiers will be removed prior to analysis. Each participant will be assigned an anonymized study identifier.After data collection is complete, only deidentified data will be retained for analysis and long-term storage. These deidentified datasets will be stored on encrypted cloud-based servers with access restricted to the study team. Data will be reported on in the aggregate, and we will not report on any subgroups with fewer than 10 individuals.
Related trials for Socioemotional Development
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of a School-Based Physical Activity Intervention on 24-Hour Movement Behaviours and Motor Development in Preschool Children - Study Protocol
Physical Inactivity, Sedentariness
Not yet recruiting
Newenkantun: a Play-based Program to Promote Socioemotional Learning in Early Childhood Education in Chile.
Socioemotional Development, Physical Activity
Recruiting
Online Emotion Regulation and Parenting Program for Parents of Children Aged 2-6 Years
Parent Emotion Regulation, Parenting
Recruiting
The Playful Learning in Infancy Program
Parent-Child Relations, Infant Development
Recruiting
EmoTIChealth: Promoting Adolescent Health Through a Serious Game.
Type 1 Diabetes, Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Individual play sessions, Peer play sessions and Classroom push-in sessions in people with Socioemotional Development, run by The Children's Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Erinn B Duprey, Ph.D. ((585) 295-1000, eduprey@childrensinstitute.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Social-emotional adjustment (time frame: Teachers will complete the T-CRS prior to study enrollment and randomization, and will complete a second T-CRS form for participants within 2 weeks of intervention completion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07609342, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2026.