Obstructive Airway DiseasesNCT07611409
Physiological Effects of External PEEP in Controlled Mechanical Ventiated Patients With autoPEEP
A study testing PEEP titration in people with Obstructive Airway Diseases, run by Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
This experimental physiologic study is conducted to determine the effect of different mechanical ventilation settings (in terms of positive end-expiratory pressure) on patients receiving mechanical ventilation with expiratory flow obstruction and autoPEEP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstructive Airway Diseases
- What is being tested?
- PEEP titration
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 10 Sep 2025to 10 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 17 years. Invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy) in controlled mode, with SpO2 > 90%, for more than 12 hours.
- No contraindications for abdominal compression. AutoPEEP greater than 3 cmH2O measured during mechanical ventilation with full support and ZEEP.
- Full mechanical respiratory support, with no respiratory muscle activity (inspiratory or expiratory).
- -
Who cannot join
- Cardiovascular instability: Hypotension (MAP < 60 mmHg), hypertension (SBP > 180 mmHg), heart rate < 40 bpm or > 150 bpm.
- Refusal to participate in the study by a family member (without signed informed consent).
- Evidence of air leak: Pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum. Intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg). Pregnant patient. Body Mass Index greater than 40 kg/m².
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of External PEEP in Controlled Mechanical Ventiated Patients With autoPEEP. A Physiological Study
This experimental physiologic study is conducted to determine the effect of different mechanical ventilation settings (in terms of positive end-expiratory pressure) on patients receiving mechanical ventilation with expiratory flow obstruction and autoPEEP. The main question it aims to answer In patients with autoPEEP, what is the effect of applying external PEEP on gas exchange and the lung emptying pattern in patients with total ventilatory support? Participants must comply:
- Age > 17 years.
- Invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy) in controlled mode, with SpO2 > 90%, for more than 12 hours.
- No contraindications for abdominal compression.
- Presence of autoPEEP greater than 3 cmH2O measured in mechanical ventilation with total support and ZEEP.
- Total mechanical respiratory support, without respiratory muscle activity (inspiratory or expiratory).
Read the detailed description
The study includes patients with controlled mechanical ventilation and autoPEEP. By programming different levels of external PEEP, its effect on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and pulmonary emptying constants will be determined. Once included in the study, participants remain on the established mechanical ventilation schedule.Subsequently, they will remain for 5 minutes at each programmed PEEP level, during which the variables under study will be recorded. They will remain at 3 PEEP levels for 15 minutes before taking arterial blood gas samples. The variables under study will be recorded and stored in a respiratory monitor and an electrical impedance tomograph, and subsequently analyzed offline.
- Conditions
- Obstructive Airway Diseases
- Being tested
- PEEP titration
- Keywords
- External PEEP, intrinsic PEEP, controlled mechanical ventilation
- Medical subject headings
- Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEP titrationOther
External PEEP will be increased by 3 cmH₂O, from 0 to 15 cmH₂O.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP titration | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: PEEP titration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the expiratory time constant as a function of external PEEP.
Methodology: the expiratory pattern is defined through the expiratory time constant at different PEEP levels relative to the reference (ZEEP).
Measured: 1 hour
Secondary outcomes (1)
To evaluate thel effect of external PEEP in gas exchange respect to reference (ZEEP)
Gas exchange: Methodology: Arterial blood gas samples (PaO2 and PaCO2 in mmHg) are taken after a 15-minute stability period at three time points: without external PEEP (reference), and 3 cmH2O below and 3 cmH2O above final PEEP.
Measured: 1 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2026
- Study start10 Sep 2025
- Primary completion20 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obstructive Airway DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Guillermo Bezzi, Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07611409
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hospitalsantojanni.2
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 28 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lourens MS, van den Berg B, Aerts JG, Verbraak AF, Hoogsteden HC, Bogaard JM. Expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients with and without COPD. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Nov;26(11):1612-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340000632.
PubMed 11193266Roesthuis LH, van der Hoeven JG, Guerin C, Doorduin J, Heunks LMA. Three bedside techniques to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Dec 4;11(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00948-9.
PubMed 34862945Lemyze M, Favory R, Alves I, Perez T, Mathieu D. Manual compression of the abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2012 Feb;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
PubMed 21798707Pepe PE, Marini JJ. Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Jul;126(1):166-70. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.166.
PubMed 7046541Dawson SV, Elliott EA. Wave-speed limitation on expiratory flow-a unifying concept. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1977 Sep;43(3):498-515. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1977.43.3.498.
PubMed 914721Valta P, Corbeil C, Lavoie A, Campodonico R, Koulouris N, Chasse M, Braidy J, Milic-Emili J. Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1311-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558.
PubMed 7952558HYATT RE. The interrelationships of pressure, flow, and volume during various respiratory maneuvers in normal and emphysematous subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961 May;83:676-83. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.5.676. No abstract available.
PubMed 13717137Kimball WR, Leith DE, Robins AG. Dynamic hyperinflation and ventilator dependence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Dec;126(6):991-5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.6.991.
PubMed 6960747Jonson B, Nordstrom L, Olsson SG, Akerback D. Monitoring of ventilation and lung mechanics during automatic ventilation. A new device. Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy). 1975 Sep-Oct;11(5):729-43.
PubMed 1218293Bergman NA. Intrapulmonary gas trapping during mechanical ventilation at rapid frequencies. Anesthesiology. 1972 Dec;37(6):626-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197212000-00011. No abstract available.
PubMed 4652779
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of External PEEP in Controlled Mechanical Ventiated Patients With autoPEEP. A Physiological Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07611409
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hospitalsantojanni.2
- Conditions
- Obstructive Airway Diseases
- Keywords
- External PEEP, intrinsic PEEP, controlled mechanical ventilation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Donación Francisco SantojanniUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This experimental physiologic study is conducted to determine the effect of different mechanical ventilation settings (in terms of positive end-expiratory pressure) on patients receiving mechanical ventilation with expiratory flow obstruction and autoPEEP. The main question it aims to answer In patients with autoPEEP, what is the effect of applying external PEEP on gas exchange and the lung emptying pattern in patients with total ventilatory support? Participants must comply:
- Age > 17 years.
- Invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy) in controlled mode, with SpO2 > 90%, for more than 12 hours.
- No contraindications for abdominal compression.
- Presence of autoPEEP greater than 3 cmH2O measured in mechanical ventilation with total support and ZEEP.
- Total mechanical respiratory support, without respiratory muscle activity (inspiratory or expiratory).
Detailed description
The study includes patients with controlled mechanical ventilation and autoPEEP. By programming different levels of external PEEP, its effect on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and pulmonary emptying constants will be determined. Once included in the study, participants remain on the established mechanical ventilation schedule.Subsequently, they will remain for 5 minutes at each programmed PEEP level, during which the variables under study will be recorded. They will remain at 3 PEEP levels for 15 minutes before taking arterial blood gas samples. The variables under study will be recorded and stored in a respiratory monitor and an electrical impedance tomograph, and subsequently analyzed offline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP titration | Experimental | Other: PEEP titration |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age > 17 years. Invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy) in controlled mode, with SpO2 > 90%, for more than 12 hours.
- No contraindications for abdominal compression. AutoPEEP greater than 3 cmH2O measured during mechanical ventilation with full support and ZEEP.
- Full mechanical respiratory support, with no respiratory muscle activity (inspiratory or expiratory).
- -
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Cardiovascular instability: Hypotension (MAP < 60 mmHg), hypertension (SBP > 180 mmHg), heart rate < 40 bpm or > 150 bpm.
- Refusal to participate in the study by a family member (without signed informed consent).
- Evidence of air leak: Pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum. Intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mmHg). Pregnant patient. Body Mass Index greater than 40 kg/m².
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP titrationExternal PEEP will be increased by 3 cmH₂O, from 0 to 15 cmH₂O. | Other | PEEP titration |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the expiratory time constant as a function of external PEEP.
Time frame: 1 hour
Methodology: the expiratory pattern is defined through the expiratory time constant at different PEEP levels relative to the reference (ZEEP).
1 secondary outcome
To evaluate thel effect of external PEEP in gas exchange respect to reference (ZEEP)
Time frame: 1 hour
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 11193266Lourens MS, van den Berg B, Aerts JG, Verbraak AF, Hoogsteden HC, Bogaard JM. Expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients with and without COPD. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Nov;26(11):1612-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340000632.
- Background: PubMed 34862945Roesthuis LH, van der Hoeven JG, Guerin C, Doorduin J, Heunks LMA. Three bedside techniques to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Dec 4;11(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00948-9.
- Background: PubMed 21798707Lemyze M, Favory R, Alves I, Perez T, Mathieu D. Manual compression of the abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2012 Feb;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 7046541Pepe PE, Marini JJ. Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Jul;126(1):166-70. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.166.
- Background: PubMed 914721Dawson SV, Elliott EA. Wave-speed limitation on expiratory flow-a unifying concept. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1977 Sep;43(3):498-515. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1977.43.3.498.
- Background: PubMed 7952558Valta P, Corbeil C, Lavoie A, Campodonico R, Koulouris N, Chasse M, Braidy J, Milic-Emili J. Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1311-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558.
- Background: PubMed 13717137HYATT RE. The interrelationships of pressure, flow, and volume during various respiratory maneuvers in normal and emphysematous subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961 May;83:676-83. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.5.676. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6960747Kimball WR, Leith DE, Robins AG. Dynamic hyperinflation and ventilator dependence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Dec;126(6):991-5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.6.991.
- Background: PubMed 1218293Jonson B, Nordstrom L, Olsson SG, Akerback D. Monitoring of ventilation and lung mechanics during automatic ventilation. A new device. Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy). 1975 Sep-Oct;11(5):729-43.
- Background: PubMed 4652779Bergman NA. Intrapulmonary gas trapping during mechanical ventilation at rapid frequencies. Anesthesiology. 1972 Dec;37(6):626-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197212000-00011. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obstructive Airway Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Novel Method for Removal of Orally Deposited Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEP titration in people with Obstructive Airway Diseases, run by Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the expiratory time constant as a function of external PEEP. (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07611409, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.