Healthy Adult MalesNCT07612969
Comparing The Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) When Coupled With Dry Needling (DN), Acupuncture (AN) or Sham Needling (SN) on Knee Range of Motion (ROM), Jump Height and Unipedal Balance
A study testing Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in people with Healthy Adult Males and Healthy Subjects, run by Mohamad Karam at 1 site in Lebanon.
Trial summary
Muscle tightness was found to increase injury risks. Muscle relaese techniques and needling were known to reduce muscle tightness, their specific influence on functional muscle performance remains inconclusive. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 28 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Adult Males, Healthy Subjects
- What is being tested?
- Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLebanon
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2023to 27 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 28 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- moderately active men (Perform at least 60 min of any sport activity on at least 3 days per week)
- aged between 18 and 28 years old
- having muscular tightness in both hamstrings and quadriceps muscles in both lower limbs
Who cannot join
- men who received any surgical, dry needling or acupuncture treatment in the last 6 months prior to the experimentation.
- Participants who had suffered from any injuries at the level of the hips, knees or ankles in the 12 months before the study.
- participants under anticoagulant medications or suffering from bleeding disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Lebanon1 site
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut
Beirut, Beirut
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men: A Randomized Control Single Blinded Study
Muscle tightness was found to increase injury risks. Muscle relaese techniques and needling were known to reduce muscle tightness, their specific influence on functional muscle performance remains inconclusive. We hypothesized that (1) combining needling modalities with muscle release techniques (PNF) would significantly improve range of motion, unipedal balance, and jump height compared to a sham intervention; and (2) the specific combination of dry needling and PNF would demonstrate superior functional progression compared to the acupuncture and PNF protocol over a 5-week timeframe.
Read the detailed description
Active men with confirmed hamstring and quadriceps tightness in both legs were included. Unipedal balance and jump height were evaluated using Kinetisense®. Subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group1: Dry needling; Group2: Acupuncture and Group3: Sham needling. All subjects also received PNF application after needling modality. Each participant received 1 session per week for 5 weeks.
- Conditions
- Healthy Adult Males, Healthy Subjects
- Being tested
- Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry NeedlingOther
In addition to Dry needling, subjects also recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with AcupunctureOther
In addition to Acupuncture needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular facilitation.
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needlingOther
In addition to Sham needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationOther
All subjects recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in addition to the 3 needling types
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling | Experimental | Its a needling technique that is inserted in the muscle in order to reduce muscle tightness Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling |
| Acupuncture | Experimental | It is a needling technique based on Chinese medicine Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture |
| Sham needling | Experimental | It is a placebo needling technique Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling |
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation | Experimental | Its a physiotherapy technique that aims to reduce muscle tightness Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Range of motion
Knee range of motion was evaluated using a Goniometer
Measured: 1 week before protocol application and 5 weeks after
Secondary outcomes (2)
Jump height
was evaluated using Kinetisence
Measured: 1 week prior to the protocol application and 5 weeks after
Unipedal balance
Was evaluated using Kinetisense
Measured: 1 week prior to the protocol and 5 weeks after
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2026
- Study start16 Jan 2023
- Primary completion20 Feb 2023
- Study completion27 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthy Adult MalesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mohamad Karam
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mohamad Karam, St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07612969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USJ-2023-10
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 17 May 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kuzdzal A, Trybulski R, Muracki J, Klich S, Clemente FM, Kawczynski A. Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map. Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):811-844. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02175-9. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
PubMed 39928077Forogh B, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Jebeli Fard R, Mirghaderi P, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Nakhostin-Ansari N, Bahari H, Hoveidaei AH. Efficacy of trigger point dry needling on pain and function of the hip joint: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Acupunct Med. 2024 Apr;42(2):63-75. doi: 10.1177/09645284231207870. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
PubMed 38149616Zhu F, Chen Y, Zhu Y, Bai Z, Yan H. Acupuncture Therapy for Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinically Focused Evidence Synthesis with Therapeutic Implications. J Pain Res. 2025 Oct 24;18:5541-5554. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S551446. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41164823Reiner MM, Tilp M, Nakamura M, Konrad A. Is muscle stiffness a determinant for range of motion in the leg muscles? Biol Sport. 2024 Mar;41(2):115-121. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.131821. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
PubMed 38524826
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men: A Randomized Control Single Blinded Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07612969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- USJ-2023-10
- Conditions
- Healthy Adult Males, Healthy Subjects
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mohamad KaramUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Muscle tightness was found to increase injury risks. Muscle relaese techniques and needling were known to reduce muscle tightness, their specific influence on functional muscle performance remains inconclusive. We hypothesized that (1) combining needling modalities with muscle release techniques (PNF) would significantly improve range of motion, unipedal balance, and jump height compared to a sham intervention; and (2) the specific combination of dry needling and PNF would demonstrate superior functional progression compared to the acupuncture and PNF protocol over a 5-week timeframe.
Detailed description
Active men with confirmed hamstring and quadriceps tightness in both legs were included. Unipedal balance and jump height were evaluated using Kinetisense®. Subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group1: Dry needling; Group2: Acupuncture and Group3: Sham needling. All subjects also received PNF application after needling modality. Each participant received 1 session per week for 5 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling | Experimental | Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry NeedlingIts a needling technique that is inserted in the muscle in order to reduce muscle tightness |
| Acupuncture | Experimental | Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with AcupunctureIt is a needling technique based on Chinese medicine |
| Sham needling | Experimental | Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needlingIt is a placebo needling technique |
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation | Experimental | Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture, Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling, Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationIts a physiotherapy technique that aims to reduce muscle tightness |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 28 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- moderately active men (Perform at least 60 min of any sport activity on at least 3 days per week)
- aged between 18 and 28 years old
- having muscular tightness in both hamstrings and quadriceps muscles in both lower limbs
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- men who received any surgical, dry needling or acupuncture treatment in the last 6 months prior to the experimentation.
- Participants who had suffered from any injuries at the level of the hips, knees or ankles in the 12 months before the study.
- participants under anticoagulant medications or suffering from bleeding disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry NeedlingIn addition to Dry needling, subjects also recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation | Other | Dry needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation |
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with AcupunctureIn addition to Acupuncture needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular facilitation. | Other | Acupuncture, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation |
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needlingIn addition to Sham needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation | Other | Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Sham needling |
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationAll subjects recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in addition to the 3 needling types | Other | Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation |
Primary outcome
Range of motion
Time frame: 1 week before protocol application and 5 weeks after
Knee range of motion was evaluated using a Goniometer
2 secondary outcomes
Jump height
Time frame: 1 week prior to the protocol application and 5 weeks after
Unipedal balance
Time frame: 1 week prior to the protocol and 5 weeks after
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39928077Kuzdzal A, Trybulski R, Muracki J, Klich S, Clemente FM, Kawczynski A. Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map. Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):811-844. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02175-9. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 38149616Forogh B, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Jebeli Fard R, Mirghaderi P, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Nakhostin-Ansari N, Bahari H, Hoveidaei AH. Efficacy of trigger point dry needling on pain and function of the hip joint: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Acupunct Med. 2024 Apr;42(2):63-75. doi: 10.1177/09645284231207870. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 41164823Zhu F, Chen Y, Zhu Y, Bai Z, Yan H. Acupuncture Therapy for Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinically Focused Evidence Synthesis with Therapeutic Implications. J Pain Res. 2025 Oct 24;18:5541-5554. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S551446. eCollection 2025.
- Background: PubMed 38524826Reiner MM, Tilp M, Nakamura M, Konrad A. Is muscle stiffness a determinant for range of motion in the leg muscles? Biol Sport. 2024 Mar;41(2):115-121. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.131821. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy Adult Males
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Cannabidiol Capsules (AVAT-121) and Epidyolex® in Healthy Adults
Focal Onset Seizure
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate AZD7760 Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults (Phase I) and Adults With End-stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis With a Central Venous Catheter (Phase IIa)
Staphylococcus Aureus
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of ABS-201 Evaluating Single and Multiple Ascending Doses in Adults With and Without Androgenetic Alopecia
Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA), Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
Recruiting
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Phytochemicals in Whole Grains (WGs)- Brown Rice
Healthy Adult Males, Healthy Adult Females
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess the Plasma Concentration of Rilzabrutinib Given as a Tablet to Adult Participants With Severe Renal Impairment Compared to Matched Participants With Normal Renal Function
Renal Impairment, Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in people with Healthy Adult Males and Healthy Subjects, run by Mohamad Karam at 1 site in Lebanon.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Range of motion (time frame: 1 week before protocol application and 5 weeks after). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07612969, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.