AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy Adult MalesNCT07612969

Comparing The Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) When Coupled With Dry Needling (DN), Acupuncture (AN) or Sham Needling (SN) on Knee Range of Motion (ROM), Jump Height and Unipedal Balance

A study testing Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in people with Healthy Adult Males and Healthy Subjects, run by Mohamad Karam at 1 site in Lebanon.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Muscle tightness was found to increase injury risks. Muscle relaese techniques and needling were known to reduce muscle tightness, their specific influence on functional muscle performance remains inconclusive. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 28 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Adult Males, Healthy Subjects
What is being tested?
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteLebanon
Study dates
16 Jan 2023to 27 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 28 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • moderately active men (Perform at least 60 min of any sport activity on at least 3 days per week)
  • aged between 18 and 28 years old
  • having muscular tightness in both hamstrings and quadriceps muscles in both lower limbs

Who cannot join

  • men who received any surgical, dry needling or acupuncture treatment in the last 6 months prior to the experimentation.
  • Participants who had suffered from any injuries at the level of the hips, knees or ankles in the 12 months before the study.
  • participants under anticoagulant medications or suffering from bleeding disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Lebanon1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut

    Beirut, Beirut

Other trials in Lebanon

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men: A Randomized Control Single Blinded Study

Muscle tightness was found to increase injury risks. Muscle relaese techniques and needling were known to reduce muscle tightness, their specific influence on functional muscle performance remains inconclusive. We hypothesized that (1) combining needling modalities with muscle release techniques (PNF) would significantly improve range of motion, unipedal balance, and jump height compared to a sham intervention; and (2) the specific combination of dry needling and PNF would demonstrate superior functional progression compared to the acupuncture and PNF protocol over a 5-week timeframe.

Read the detailed description

Active men with confirmed hamstring and quadriceps tightness in both legs were included. Unipedal balance and jump height were evaluated using Kinetisense®. Subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group1: Dry needling; Group2: Acupuncture and Group3: Sham needling. All subjects also received PNF application after needling modality. Each participant received 1 session per week for 5 weeks.

Being tested
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry NeedlingOther

    In addition to Dry needling, subjects also recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with AcupunctureOther

    In addition to Acupuncture needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular facilitation.

  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needlingOther

    In addition to Sham needling, subjects also received Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationOther

    All subjects recieved Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in addition to the 3 needling types

Study groups in NCT07612969
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry needlingExperimentalIts a needling technique that is inserted in the muscle in order to reduce muscle tightness
Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling
AcupunctureExperimentalIt is a needling technique based on Chinese medicine
Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture
Sham needlingExperimentalIt is a placebo needling technique
Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationExperimentalIts a physiotherapy technique that aims to reduce muscle tightness
Receives: Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling; Other: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of motion

    Knee range of motion was evaluated using a Goniometer

    Measured: 1 week before protocol application and 5 weeks after

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Jump height

    was evaluated using Kinetisence

    Measured: 1 week prior to the protocol application and 5 weeks after

  2. Unipedal balance

    Was evaluated using Kinetisense

    Measured: 1 week prior to the protocol and 5 weeks after

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2026
  2. Study start16 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion20 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion27 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07612969
Sponsor's protocol ID
USJ-2023-10
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
17 May 2026
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kuzdzal A, Trybulski R, Muracki J, Klich S, Clemente FM, Kawczynski A. Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map. Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):811-844. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02175-9. Epub 2025 Feb 10.

    PubMed 39928077
  • Forogh B, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Jebeli Fard R, Mirghaderi P, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Nakhostin-Ansari N, Bahari H, Hoveidaei AH. Efficacy of trigger point dry needling on pain and function of the hip joint: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Acupunct Med. 2024 Apr;42(2):63-75. doi: 10.1177/09645284231207870. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

    PubMed 38149616
  • Zhu F, Chen Y, Zhu Y, Bai Z, Yan H. Acupuncture Therapy for Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinically Focused Evidence Synthesis with Therapeutic Implications. J Pain Res. 2025 Oct 24;18:5541-5554. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S551446. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 41164823
  • Reiner MM, Tilp M, Nakamura M, Konrad A. Is muscle stiffness a determinant for range of motion in the leg muscles? Biol Sport. 2024 Mar;41(2):115-121. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.131821. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

    PubMed 38524826

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in people with Healthy Adult Males and Healthy Subjects, run by Mohamad Karam at 1 site in Lebanon.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of motion (time frame: 1 week before protocol application and 5 weeks after). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07612969, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in