Sub-acute StrokeADLS PAC HBPNCT07613554
Home and Clinic Rehabilitation in Subacute Stroke
A study testing Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program in people with Sub-acute Stroke, run by University of Lahore.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding scheduled home-based rehabilitation to clinic-based rehabilitation improves walking ability and daily activities in people aged 40 to 50 with sub-acute stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sub-acute Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2026to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-50 years old Male and female Patients having stroke 3 months to 6 months prior to enrollment Able to comprehend and adhere to instructions Grade 1+ spasticity on Modified Ashworth Scale Modified Rankin Scale score of 3-4 with ability to maintain sitting balance for at least 1 hour
Who cannot join
- Myocardial infarction Other neurological deficits leading to disability Contractures Severe dysphasia and cognitive impairment Need for further surgery or medical care
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Clinical and Scheduled Home-based Rehabilitation in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding scheduled home-based rehabilitation to clinic-based rehabilitation improves walking ability and daily activities in people aged 40 to 50 with sub-acute stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does adding home exercises improve walking ability in people with sub-acute stroke?
- Does adding home exercises improve the ability to do daily activities in people with sub-acute stroke? Researchers will compare clinic-based rehabilitation plus home-based rehabilitation to clinic-based rehabilitation alone to see if adding home exercises leads to better recovery after stroke.
Read more
Participants will:
- Attend physical therapy at the hospital 3 days per week for 12 weeks
- Do walking practice, balance training, and leg exercises at the clinic
- Do home exercises including marching, step-ups, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises on non-clinic days (home exercise group only)
- Track home exercises using a weekly logbook
- Be tested at the start and after 12 weeks
Read the detailed description
Background:
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. The sub-acute phase of stroke, defined as 1 to 6 months following the stroke event, represents the most critical window for functional rehabilitation and neurological recovery. Physical therapy is a core component of stroke rehabilitation, focusing on helping people with stroke regain their ability to perform daily activities.
Common problems after stroke include weakness on one side of the body (hemiplegia), balance problems, difficulty walking, and reduced ability to perform daily activities. Approximately 15 to 30 out of 100 stroke survivors are left with lasting disabilities, and about 20 out of 100 require long-term care. More than half of people with stroke in the sub-acute phase are unable to walk independently.
Stroke rehabilitation has traditionally been provided in hospitals and rehabilitation centers. However, limited access to transportation, high costs of supervised rehabilitation, and shorter hospital stays have created a growing demand for home-based rehabilitation. Research has shown that structured home-based rehabilitation programs can significantly improve walking ability, balance, and daily activities in stroke survivors.
Despite this growing evidence, the comparative effectiveness of scheduled home-based rehabilitation versus clinic-based rehabilitation in the sub-acute phase remains unclear. There is a need for well-designed studies that directly compare these two approaches to guide rehabilitation planning and help healthcare systems use their resources effectively.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of clinic-based rehabilitation and scheduled home-based rehabilitation on gait performance and functional capacity in people with sub-acute stroke.
Study Design:
This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted at the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. The study duration is 9 months following synopsis approval.
Participants:
A total of 72 people with sub-acute stroke will be recruited and randomly placed into two equal groups of 36 participants each. This number includes a 20% dropout allowance. Participants must be aged 40 to 50 years, male or female, with a confirmed stroke diagnosis between 3 to 6 months prior to joining the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40 to 50 years
- Male and female
- Stroke confirmed between 3 to 6 months prior to enrollment
- Able to understand and follow instructions
- Grade 1+ spasticity on Modified Ashworth Scale
- Modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 4
- Able to maintain sitting balance for at least 1 hour
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial infarction
- Other neurological conditions causing disability
- Contractures
- Severe difficulty speaking or severe cognitive impairment
- Need for further surgery or medical care
Randomization and Blinding:
Participants will be randomly placed into treatment groups using the envelope concealment method. This is a single-blinded study in which the person measuring outcomes does not know which group each participant belongs to.
Interventions:
Group A - Clinic-based Rehabilitation (Control Group):**
Participants will attend hospital-based physiotherapy sessions on alternate days, 3 days per week, for 60 minutes per session over 12 weeks. The treatment program includes:
Gait Training:
- Weight shifting: stand with feet hip-width apart, shift weight side to side, hold 3 seconds per side, 2 sets of 10 repetitions
- Stepping drills: forward and side stepping, 2 sets of 10 repetitions each direction
- Assisted walking practice: walk 10 to 20 meters with walker, focusing on even step length and heel-to-toe motion, 10 to 15 minutes
Lower Limb Coordination:
- Heel-to-shin exercise: 10 repetitions per leg, 2 sets
- Alternate leg extensions: hold 2 to 3 seconds, 10 to 15 repetitions per leg, 2 to 3 sets
- Obstacle step-overs: 10 to 12 repetitions per leg
- Ball kicking: 10 to 15 times each leg
Balance and Mobility Tasks:
- Heel raises: 10 to 15 repetitions, 2 to 3 sets
- Toe walking: 10 to 20 steps, 2 to 3 sets
- Sit-to-stand: 10 to 12 repetitions, 2 to 3 sets
- Walking drills: 3 to 5 rounds focusing on heel-to-toe motion
Group B - Clinic-based plus Scheduled Home-based Rehabilitation (Experimental Group):**
Participants will receive the same clinic-based physiotherapy program as Group A. In addition, they will perform a structured home exercise program on non-clinic days, tracked using a weekly logbook. The home program includes:
- Supported marching: lift one knee at a time while holding walker, 10 to 20 repetitions per leg
- Step-up training: step up with weaker leg first, 10 repetitions per leg, 2 sets
- Sit-to-stand: 10 repetitions using walker for support
- Partial squats: sit on firm chair, lean forward slightly with straight back, hold for 10 minutes
- Balance and coordination exercises: weight shifting, single leg standing, and heel-to-toe walking while holding a chair, 10 repetitions each
Outcome Measures:
Data will be collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention.
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Timed Up and Go Test (TUG): measures walking ability, balance, and mobility. The participant stands up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. The time taken is recorded in seconds. A longer time indicates poorer mobility.
- Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL): measures the ability to perform daily activities including telephone use, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. Scores range from 0 (fully dependent) to 8 (fully independent) for women and 0 to 5 for men.
Data Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results for measurable variables will be shown as mean plus or minus standard deviation. Results for descriptive variables will be shown as frequency and percentage. Normality will be checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For normally distributed data, repeated measures ANOVA will be used for within-group analysis and independent samples t-test for between-group analysis. If data are not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used. A confidence interval of 95% and a p-value of 0.05 or less will be considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations:
This study has been approved by the Institute Research Ethics Board (IREB) of the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Lahore. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants in both English and Urdu. All participant information will be kept strictly confidential. Participation is entirely voluntary and participants may withdraw at any time without any effect on their care.
- Conditions
- Sub-acute Stroke
- Being tested
- Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program
- Keywords
- stroke rehabilitation, sub-acute stroke, home-based rehabilitation, clinical-based rehabilitation, functional capacity, balance, gait training, timed up and go test, Hemiplegia, Activities of daily living
- Medical subject headings
- Hemiplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physical Therapy Rehabilitation ProgramBehavioural
Also called Home-based Rehabilitation Program
A structured physical therapy program including gait training, lower limb coordination, balance and mobility tasks for clinic sessions, and home exercises including supported marching, step-ups, sit-to-stand, partial squats, and balance exercises.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Clinic-based Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Patients will receive clinic-based physiotherapy sessions three days per week, 60 minutes per session, over 12 weeks. Treatment includes gait training, lower limb coordination exercises, and balance and mobility tasks. Receives: Behavioral: Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program |
| Group B: Clinic-based plus Home-based Rehabilitation | Experimental | Patients will receive the same clinic-based physiotherapy program as Group A plus a structured scheduled home exercise program performed on remaining days, tracked via a weekly logbook over 12 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Assesses functional mobility, balance, and gait performance. The patient stands up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns, walks back and sits down. Time is recorded in seconds. Higher time indicates poorer mobility.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Assesses functional performance in daily living activities including telephone use, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. Scores range from 0 (fully dependent) to 8 (fully independent) for women and 0 to 5 for men."
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2026
- Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sub-acute StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of LahoreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- two parallel groups: Group A receiving clinic-based rehabilitation and Group B receiving clinic-based rehabilitation plus scheduled home-based rehabilitation, over 12 weeks.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Lahore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07613554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UOL/IREB/25/12/0044
- Acronym
- ADLS PAC HBP
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 21 May 2026
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Clinical and Scheduled Home-based Rehabilitation in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07613554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADLS PAC HBP / UOL/IREB/25/12/0044
- Conditions
- Sub-acute Stroke
- Keywords
- stroke rehabilitation, sub-acute stroke, home-based rehabilitation, clinical-based rehabilitation, functional capacity, balance, gait training, timed up and go test
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LahoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding scheduled home-based rehabilitation to clinic-based rehabilitation improves walking ability and daily activities in people aged 40 to 50 with sub-acute stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does adding home exercises improve walking ability in people with sub-acute stroke?
- Does adding home exercises improve the ability to do daily activities in people with sub-acute stroke? Researchers will compare clinic-based rehabilitation plus home-based rehabilitation to clinic-based rehabilitation alone to see if adding home exercises leads to better recovery after stroke.
Participants will:
- Attend physical therapy at the hospital 3 days per week for 12 weeks
- Do walking practice, balance training, and leg exercises at the clinic
- Do home exercises including marching, step-ups, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises on non-clinic days (home exercise group only)
- Track home exercises using a weekly logbook
- Be tested at the start and after 12 weeks
Detailed description
Background:
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. The sub-acute phase of stroke, defined as 1 to 6 months following the stroke event, represents the most critical window for functional rehabilitation and neurological recovery. Physical therapy is a core component of stroke rehabilitation, focusing on helping people with stroke regain their ability to perform daily activities.
Common problems after stroke include weakness on one side of the body (hemiplegia), balance problems, difficulty walking, and reduced ability to perform daily activities. Approximately 15 to 30 out of 100 stroke survivors are left with lasting disabilities, and about 20 out of 100 require long-term care. More than half of people with stroke in the sub-acute phase are unable to walk independently.
Stroke rehabilitation has traditionally been provided in hospitals and rehabilitation centers. However, limited access to transportation, high costs of supervised rehabilitation, and shorter hospital stays have created a growing demand for home-based rehabilitation. Research has shown that structured home-based rehabilitation programs can significantly improve walking ability, balance, and daily activities in stroke survivors.
Despite this growing evidence, the comparative effectiveness of scheduled home-based rehabilitation versus clinic-based rehabilitation in the sub-acute phase remains unclear. There is a need for well-designed studies that directly compare these two approaches to guide rehabilitation planning and help healthcare systems use their resources effectively.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of clinic-based rehabilitation and scheduled home-based rehabilitation on gait performance and functional capacity in people with sub-acute stroke.
Study Design:
This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted at the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. The study duration is 9 months following synopsis approval.
Participants:
A total of 72 people with sub-acute stroke will be recruited and randomly placed into two equal groups of 36 participants each. This number includes a 20% dropout allowance. Participants must be aged 40 to 50 years, male or female, with a confirmed stroke diagnosis between 3 to 6 months prior to joining the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40 to 50 years
- Male and female
- Stroke confirmed between 3 to 6 months prior to enrollment
- Able to understand and follow instructions
- Grade 1+ spasticity on Modified Ashworth Scale
- Modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 4
- Able to maintain sitting balance for at least 1 hour
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial infarction
- Other neurological conditions causing disability
- Contractures
- Severe difficulty speaking or severe cognitive impairment
- Need for further surgery or medical care
Randomization and Blinding:
Participants will be randomly placed into treatment groups using the envelope concealment method. This is a single-blinded study in which the person measuring outcomes does not know which group each participant belongs to.
Interventions:
Group A - Clinic-based Rehabilitation (Control Group):**
Participants will attend hospital-based physiotherapy sessions on alternate days, 3 days per week, for 60 minutes per session over 12 weeks. The treatment program includes:
Gait Training:
- Weight shifting: stand with feet hip-width apart, shift weight side to side, hold 3 seconds per side, 2 sets of 10 repetitions
- Stepping drills: forward and side stepping, 2 sets of 10 repetitions each direction
- Assisted walking practice: walk 10 to 20 meters with walker, focusing on even step length and heel-to-toe motion, 10 to 15 minutes
Lower Limb Coordination:
- Heel-to-shin exercise: 10 repetitions per leg, 2 sets
- Alternate leg extensions: hold 2 to 3 seconds, 10 to 15 repetitions per leg, 2 to 3 sets
- Obstacle step-overs: 10 to 12 repetitions per leg
- Ball kicking: 10 to 15 times each leg
Balance and Mobility Tasks:
- Heel raises: 10 to 15 repetitions, 2 to 3 sets
- Toe walking: 10 to 20 steps, 2 to 3 sets
- Sit-to-stand: 10 to 12 repetitions, 2 to 3 sets
- Walking drills: 3 to 5 rounds focusing on heel-to-toe motion
Group B - Clinic-based plus Scheduled Home-based Rehabilitation (Experimental Group):**
Participants will receive the same clinic-based physiotherapy program as Group A. In addition, they will perform a structured home exercise program on non-clinic days, tracked using a weekly logbook. The home program includes:
- Supported marching: lift one knee at a time while holding walker, 10 to 20 repetitions per leg
- Step-up training: step up with weaker leg first, 10 repetitions per leg, 2 sets
- Sit-to-stand: 10 repetitions using walker for support
- Partial squats: sit on firm chair, lean forward slightly with straight back, hold for 10 minutes
- Balance and coordination exercises: weight shifting, single leg standing, and heel-to-toe walking while holding a chair, 10 repetitions each
Outcome Measures:
Data will be collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention.
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Timed Up and Go Test (TUG): measures walking ability, balance, and mobility. The participant stands up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. The time taken is recorded in seconds. A longer time indicates poorer mobility.
- Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL): measures the ability to perform daily activities including telephone use, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. Scores range from 0 (fully dependent) to 8 (fully independent) for women and 0 to 5 for men.
Data Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results for measurable variables will be shown as mean plus or minus standard deviation. Results for descriptive variables will be shown as frequency and percentage. Normality will be checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For normally distributed data, repeated measures ANOVA will be used for within-group analysis and independent samples t-test for between-group analysis. If data are not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used. A confidence interval of 95% and a p-value of 0.05 or less will be considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations:
This study has been approved by the Institute Research Ethics Board (IREB) of the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Lahore. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants in both English and Urdu. All participant information will be kept strictly confidential. Participation is entirely voluntary and participants may withdraw at any time without any effect on their care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- two parallel groups: Group A receiving clinic-based rehabilitation and Group B receiving clinic-based rehabilitation plus scheduled home-based rehabilitation, over 12 weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Clinic-based Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Behavioral: Physical Therapy Rehabilitation ProgramPatients will receive clinic-based physiotherapy sessions three days per week, 60 minutes per session, over 12 weeks. Treatment includes gait training, lower limb coordination exercises, and balance and mobility tasks. |
| Group B: Clinic-based plus Home-based Rehabilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: Physical Therapy Rehabilitation ProgramPatients will receive the same clinic-based physiotherapy program as Group A plus a structured scheduled home exercise program performed on remaining days, tracked via a weekly logbook over 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age 40-50 years old Male and female Patients having stroke 3 months to 6 months prior to enrollment Able to comprehend and adhere to instructions Grade 1+ spasticity on Modified Ashworth Scale Modified Rankin Scale score of 3-4 with ability to maintain sitting balance for at least 1 hour
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Myocardial infarction Other neurological deficits leading to disability Contractures Severe dysphasia and cognitive impairment Need for further surgery or medical care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy Rehabilitation ProgramAlso: Home-based Rehabilitation ProgramA structured physical therapy program including gait training, lower limb coordination, balance and mobility tasks for clinic sessions, and home exercises including supported marching, step-ups, sit-to-stand, partial squats, and balance exercises. | Behavioural | Group A: Clinic-based Rehabilitation, Group B: Clinic-based plus Home-based Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Assesses functional mobility, balance, and gait performance. The patient stands up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns, walks back and sits down. Time is recorded in seconds. Higher time indicates poorer mobility.
Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Assesses functional performance in daily living activities including telephone use, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. Scores range from 0 (fully dependent) to 8 (fully independent) for women and 0 to 5 for men."
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
Related trials for Sub-acute Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Training and tACS on Upper Limb Function and Cervical Proprioception in Subacute Stroke
Sub-acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Different Transfer Models
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
Unknown Time of Onset Stroke RePerfusIon Without Advanced Imaging
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Tenecteplase
Recruiting
Neurodevelopmental Technique Versus Mirror Therapy in Sub-acute Stroke Patients
Hemiplegia, Subacute Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
rhTNK-tPA for Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Simplified Imaging in the Extended Time Window
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program in people with Sub-acute Stroke, run by University of Lahore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) (time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.