AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Back PainZeel LBPNCT07615816

Investigating Medical Massage Therapy for Patients With Sub-Acute Lower Back Pain

A study testing Medical Massage Therapy and Provider Directed Care in people with Lower Back Pain and Subacute Lower Back Pain, run by The Geneva Foundation at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a weekly regimen of Medical Massage Therapy (MMT) with provider-directed care shortens the duration of Medically Restricted Duty Days (MRDD) periods in Active-Duty Service Members with Subacute Lower Back Pain (LBP) compared to provider-directed care alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
What is being tested?
Medical Massage Therapy and Provider Directed Care
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
220 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 31 Jan 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Active-duty service member
  • 18-64 (inclusive) years of age
  • Medical evidence of subacute low back pain (as indicated by complications lasting 1-3 months)
  • Willingness to comply with treatment and follow-up schedule
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Current dx of any of the following:
  • Presence of significant comorbid pain (e.g., polytrauma)
  • Cancer - active/ongoing treatment for
  • Active Infections, including skin lesions and rashes
  • Flu or other severe cold virus or COVID
  • Severe depression or anxiety
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Symptomatic Inflammatory/Autoimmune diseases such as Rheumatoid
  • Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Acute exacerbation and not in remission
  • High Grade Spondylolisthesis (Grade III and Grade IV)
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Severe Osteoporosis (BMD with T-score of -2.5 or lower, along with the presence of one or more fragility fractures)
  • Neurogenic conditions
  • Spinal Stenosis with active neurogenic claudication
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome - acute
  • Radiating pain below the knee or in the presence of true Neurological signs (numbness/weakness)
  • Historical dx of any of the following:
  • Spinal Cord injuries with persisting neurogenic sensory or motor loss
  • Lumbar spine back surgery within the past year
  • Received spinal interventions (e.g., surgery, nerve ablations, steroid injections, etc.) within the past 6 months
  • Current use of blood thinners/anticoagulants
  • Is enrolled or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the patient's safety or results of this trial
  • [Females only] Currently pregnant (self-reported) or plans to become pregnant during the study intervention period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Janel Son, MPH contact

253-968-3288

json@genevausa.org

Brad M. Isaacson, PhD, MBA, MSF, PMP contact

brad.isaacson.ctr@usuhs.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Madigan Army Medical Center

    Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, 98431

    Janel Son, MPH, 253-968-3288, json@genevausa.org

    Ghena Grinshpun, DO, german.grinshpun.civ@health.mil

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a weekly regimen of Medical Massage Therapy (MMT) with provider-directed care shortens the duration of Medically Restricted Duty Days (MRDD) periods in Active-Duty Service Members with Subacute Lower Back Pain (LBP) compared to provider-directed care alone.

The main question the study aims to answer is, when used as an adjunct to provider-directed care, a consistent program of MMT provided by a qualified practitioner, will shorten the duration of MRDD periods, reduce pain, and decrease unnecessary healthcare utilization in patients with Subacute LBP compared to provider-directed care alone. Researchers will study this hypothesis through the comparison of Group #1 (provider-directed care alone) and Group #2 (provider-directed care and MMT).

Participants randomized into the two study groups will be following a 12-week study design (+/- 2 weeks) comprised of their compliance to their provider-directed care, the study intervention (if randomized to Group #2) and study case report forms (CRFs); with a final follow up visit (up to 4 weeks following their final treatment visit).

Read the detailed description

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) affect approximately 800,000 service members (SMs) annually and result in 25 million days of limited duty. These conditions account for 34% of medical evacuations from theatre, and are the primary reasons for medical separation. Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of MSKI amongst active-duty service members (ADSMs) with a lifetime prevalence rate of up to 80%. The burden of disease for LBP is reaching $100 billion annually in the United States and new methods for prevention and treatment are necessary.

At the present time, there is no "gold standard" for LBP management and strong evidence as to what is most beneficial is lacking. One of the most promising medical options for LBP is massage therapy (MT), given that no special equipment is needed, it can be delivered anywhere, it is non-habit forming, and the likelihood for serious harm is low. Massage therapy is unique in that it can naturally enhance local blood flow, thereby providing vital oxygen and nutrients to areas damaged by MSKI to promote healing, offers relaxation and normalization of soft tissue which reduces pain, lessens swelling, clears local pain mediators, improves cognitive/psychosocial complications (e.g., depression, anxiety, etc.), aids in sleep quality, and provides a positive hormone release. To date, however, there has not been a large randomized control trial (RCT) performed on patients with subacute LBP to demonstrate healing and preventing patients from becoming chronically injured.

To address this limitation, we will enroll a total of 200 patients to assess the efficacy of medical massage therapy (MMT) combined with standard of care (SoC) in ADSMs with subacute LBP (intervention) as compared to SoC only (control). Five specific aims have been designed to understand if weekly MMT can reduce medically restricted duty days (MRDD) (Aim #1), decrease pain/disability and improve sleep quality (Aim #2), and lessen the need for prescription medications (Aim #3). Data will be aggregated at the end of the study through survey tools and self-reported information to understand the economic impact of (Aim #4) and to understand which patient phenotypes are optimal for future care (Aim #5).

Being tested
Medical Massage Therapy, Provider Directed Care
Keywords
Medical Massage Therapy, Active Duty Service Members, Subacute Lower Back Pain, Lower Back Pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medical Massage TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Massage and educational treatment provided by a licensed massage therapist.

  • Provider Directed CareOther

    Provider directed care (i.e. Physical Therapy)

Study groups in NCT07615816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group #1Placebo comparatorProvider-directed care
Receives: Other: Provider Directed Care
Group #2Active comparatorProvider-directed care and Medical Massage Therapy
Receives: Procedure: Medical Massage Therapy; Other: Provider Directed Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (M-ODI)

    The M-ODI is the most commonly used aid for evaluating disability due to LBP This free instrument delivers medical provider information related to functional limitation and pain management.

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 6 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  2. Satisfaction and Treatment History Self-Reported Data

    Participants will self-report differences in healthcare utilization and prescription medication fulfillment, as well as satisfaction with care.

    Measured: Week 1-12 Visits, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  3. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI-LBP)

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Low Back Pain (LBP) questionnaire is an instrument used to assess the impact of low back pain on a person's ability to work and perform daily activities. The questionnaire focuses on absenteeism (missing work), presenteeism (reduced productivity at work), and limitations in non-work activities due to low back pain.

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1-12 Visits, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  4. Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)

    The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS 2.0) is a pain assessment tool that utilizes a numerical rating scale enhanced by functional word descriptors, color coding, and pictorial facial expressions matched to pain levels.

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1-12 Visits, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  5. Global Pain Scale (GPS)

    The GPS is a comprehensive assessment of pain evaluating pain, emotions, clinical outcomes, and daily activities,. This may be a valuable tool for evaluation and treatment planning for interventional pain management physicians.

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 6 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  6. Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC)

    The GRoC is a frequently used outcome measure that has ben used to independently score self-perceived improvement in a patient and has been used as an anchor method to determine minimal clinically important change scores. The GRoC is a single-item, recall-based questionnaire of well-being that is based on progress since an initial treatment encounter.

    Measured: Week 1 Visit, Week 6 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain.

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 6 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  8. Physical Therapy Appointment History

    How many PT appointments since last study visit, which body part(s) treated, what treatment modalities were performed?

    Measured: Week 1-12 Visits, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

  9. Military Specific Duty Status

    Measured: Baseline Visit, Week 1-12 Visits, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: provider-directed care, or provider-directed care plus medical massage therapy.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
220 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07615816
Sponsor's protocol ID
226029
Other IDs
HU00012520022
Acronym
Zeel LBP
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
1 May 2026
Last updated
5 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Medical Massage Therapy and Provider Directed Care in people with Lower Back Pain and Subacute Lower Back Pain, run by The Geneva Foundation at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Janel Son, MPH (253-968-3288, json@genevausa.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (M-ODI) (time frame: Baseline Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 6 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Final Follow-up Visit (up to 16 weeks after Baseline Visit)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in