AzTrials
AzTrials

NephrolithiasisNCT07619456

Intrarenal Pressure in Suctioning vs. Non-suctioning Sheaths

A study testing Suctioning-UAS and Non-suctioning-UAS in people with Nephrolithiasis, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Interest in monitoring intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has grown, especially due to its potential association with improved postoperative efficiency and safety. A prominent technique for managing IRP during fURS is the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which are known to reduce IRP. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nephrolithiasis
What is being tested?
Suctioning-UAS and Non-suctioning-UAS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Apr 2025to 5 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 years and older.
  • Diagnosed with kidney stones and scheduled for fURS.
  • Stone burden > 1 cm and/or multiple stones will be eligible.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant persons as determined by pre-operative urine pregnancy test (standard of care at our institution)
  • Untreated UTI
  • Patients with urinary anomalies (e.g., urinary diversion, ureteral reconstruction, horseshoe kidney)
  • Single stone < 1 cm

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mount Sinai West

    New York, New York, 10019

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Intrarenal Pressure Between Suctioning and Non-Suctioning Access Sheaths Using the LithoVue Elite Ureteroscope System

Interest in monitoring intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has grown, especially due to its potential association with improved postoperative efficiency and safety. A prominent technique for managing IRP during fURS is the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which are known to reduce IRP. Suction-equipped access sheaths provide additional benefits by continuously evacuating dust and stone fragments during the procedure, potentially enhancing stone-free rates. However, IRP during suctioning procedures has yet to be thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study is to compare the IRP during fURS using UAS with and without suctioning technique.

Read the detailed description

Interest in monitoring intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has grown, especially due to its potential association with improved postoperative efficiency and safety. With advances in technology, precise tools like the LithoVue™ Elite now enables continuous IRP measurement, facilitating accurate data collection throughout the procedure. A prominent technique for managing IRP during fURS is the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which are known to reduce IRP. Suction-equipped access sheaths provide additional benefits by continuously evacuating dust and stone fragments during the procedure, potentially enhancing stone-free rates (SFR). However, IRP during suctioning procedures has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) using a suctioning ureteral access sheath (UAS) versus a non-suctioning UAS. The study will be conducted over an 18-month period and will include all patients over 18 years of age who are scheduled to undergo fURS for a stone burden greater than 1 cm and/or multiple stones. Patients who are pregnant, have an untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), urinary tract anomalies such as urinary diversion, ureteral reconstruction, or horseshoe kidney, or who have a single stone smaller than 1 cm will be excluded from participation. All procedures will take place at Mount Sinai West, with patients enrolled from the practices of two endourology-trained specialists, Dr. William Atallah and Dr. Mantu Gupta. Participants will be randomized to either the suctioning-UAS arm using the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS or the non-suctioning-UAS arm using the BSC Navigator device.

Conditions
Nephrolithiasis
Being tested
Suctioning-UAS, Non-suctioning-UAS
Medical subject headings
Nephrolithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Suctioning-UASDevice

    Participants undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) will receive a suctioning ureteral access sheath using the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS. Continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements will be recorded throughout the procedure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.

  • Non-suctioning-UASDevice

    Participants undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) will receive a standard non-suctioning ureteral access sheath using the BSC Navigator device. Continuous intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurements will be recorded throughout the procedure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.

Study groups in NCT07619456
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Suctioning-UASExperimentalPlacement of the ClearPETRA Flexible and Navigable Suction UAS during flexible ureteroscopy with continuous suction applied during stone treatment.
Receives: Device: Suctioning-UAS
Non-suctioning-UASActive comparatorPlacement of the BSC Navigator during flexible ureteroscopy without suction during stone treatment.
Receives: Device: Non-suctioning-UAS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) During Flexible Ureteroscopy

    Continuous measurement of intrarenal pressure using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.

    Measured: Intraoperative (during procedure)

  2. Time spent above Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) threshold during Flexible Ureteroscopy

    Time spent above Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) thresholds of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mmHg using the LithoVue Elite ureteroscope system.

    Measured: Intraoperative (during procedure)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Stone-Free Rate (SFR) on Postoperative CT Imaging

    Rate of stone-free status assessed by non-contrast CT scan using a 4-grade scale (Grade A: completely stone-free; Grade B: residual fragments <2 mm; Grade C: residual fragments 2-4 mm; Grade D: residual fragments >4 mm).

    Measured: 4-8 weeks postoperatively

  2. Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score. Scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Measured: In the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), prior to discharge on the day of surgery (on average 1.5 hours post operatively)

  3. Number of Postoperative Complications

    Number of any postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of the procedure (as defined by the study protocol and standard Clavien-Dindo classification or similar).

    Measured: 30 days postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2026
  2. Study start3 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion10 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion5 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07619456
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY-25-00111
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
26 May 2026
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: To to protect participant privacy

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Suctioning-UAS and Non-suctioning-UAS in people with Nephrolithiasis, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intrarenal Pressure (IRP) During Flexible Ureteroscopy (time frame: Intraoperative (during procedure)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in