AzTrials
AzTrials

CholangiocarcinomaEYE/SPYNCT07620080

EYEMAX® Versus SPYGLASS™ DS for Biliary Stricture Diagnosis

A study testing EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system and SPYGLASS™ DS system in people with Cholangiocarcinoma and Biliary Stricture, run by David KARSENTI.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cholangiocarcinoma remains difficult to diagnose because of the limited sensitivity of currently available endobiliary sampling techniques. Cholangioscopy-guided biopsies performed with the SPYGLASS™ DS system have improved tissue acquisition compared with conventional brushing techniques, but diagnostic sensitivity… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 84 years
Conditions the study is for
Cholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Stricture
What is being tested?
EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system and SPYGLASS™ DS system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2026to Sep 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 84 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Adult patients aged 18 to 84 years
  • 2. Patients requiring ERCP with cholangioscopy-guided biopsy for biliary stricture
  • 3. Absence of a mass easily accessible to EUS-guided fine needle aspiration
  • 4. ASA physical status 1-3
  • 5. No participation in another clinical trial
  • 6. Written informed consent obtained
  • 7. Patient affiliated with a social security system or equivalent

Who cannot join

  • 1. Lithiasic biliary obstruction
  • 2. Patients younger than 18 years
  • 3. ASA 4 or ASA 5 patients
  • 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • 5. Coagulation disorders preventing biopsy procedures
  • 6. Surgical anatomy preventing papillary access
Show all 13Show fewer
  • 7. Patients unable to provide informed consent
  • 8. Upper gastrointestinal obstruction
  • 9. Intolerance to endoscopy
  • 10. Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • 11. Acute pancreatitis or severe cholangitis
  • 12. Severe contrast agent allergy
  • 13. Patients under legal protection measures

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

MORENO MAIRA, PhD contact

rechercheclinique@sfed.org

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Study on the Quality of Biliary Biopsies: EYEMAX® vs SPYGLASS™ DS

Cholangiocarcinoma remains difficult to diagnose because of the limited sensitivity of currently available endobiliary sampling techniques. Cholangioscopy-guided biopsies performed with the SPYGLASS™ DS system have improved tissue acquisition compared with conventional brushing techniques, but diagnostic sensitivity remains suboptimal, partly because of the small diameter of the dedicated biopsy forceps.

The EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system has a larger working channel, potentially allowing the use of larger biopsy forceps and improved tissue acquisition. This multicenter randomized study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of EYEMAX® versus SPYGLASS™ DS for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

The primary objective is to compare the positive diagnostic yield of the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies obtained with each system in patients with adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.

Being tested
EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system, SPYGLASS™ DS system
Keywords
Cholangioscopy, ERCP, EYEMAX, SpyGlass DS, Biliary biopsy, Cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis
Medical subject headings
Cholangiocarcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EYEMAX® cholangioscopy systemDevice

    Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the EYEMAX® cholangioscope (Micro-Tech) during ERCP under general anesthesia. Following biliary cannulation and guidewire passage across the stricture, two series of four targeted biopsies are obtained using the dedicated biopsy forceps through the EYEMAX® working channel. Additional diagnostic sampling procedures, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling when clinically indicated, may also be performed according to local practice.

  • SPYGLASS™ DS systemDevice

    Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the SPYGLASS™ DS cholangioscopy system (Boston Scientific) during ERCP under general anesthesia. Following biliary cannulation and guidewire passage across the stricture, two series of four targeted biopsies are obtained using the dedicated biopsy forceps through the SPYGLASS™ DS working channel. Additional diagnostic sampling procedures, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling when clinically indicated, may also be performed according to local practice.

Study groups in NCT07620080
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the EYEMAX® cholangioscope (Micro-Tech).ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system
Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the SPYGLASS™ DS system (Boston Scientific).Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: SPYGLASS™ DS system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies

    The positive diagnostic yield will be assessed for the first four biopsies obtained under cholangioscopy in patients with adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures. This rate will be defined as the ratio between the number of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies and the total number of confirmed adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Positive diagnostic yield of all eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies

    This rate will be defined as the proportion of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from all eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies among all confirmed adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Histological cellularity classification of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy specimens

    Biopsy specimen cellularity will be assessed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists and classified into four predefined categories: acellular, low abundance, satisfactory abundance, or rich abundance.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. False negative rate of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies

    The false negative rate will be defined as the proportion of patients with negative biopsy results despite a final diagnosis of adenocarcinomatous biliary stricture confirmed during follow-up.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Negative predictive value of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies

    Negative predictive value will be calculated as the proportion of patients with negative biopsy results who do not have adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures at final diagnosis.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Percentage of technical failures during cholangioscopy-guided biopsy procedures

    Technical failure will be defined as the inability to access the biliary stricture with the cholangioscope or the inability to obtain biopsy material using the dedicated biopsy forceps.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  6. Diagnostic yield of additional biliary sampling techniques

    The diagnostic yield of additional biliary sampling techniques, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling, will be evaluated as the proportion of positive pathological diagnoses obtained using each technique.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Number of participants with procedure-related adverse events

    Procedure-related adverse events include abdominal pain, acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, hepatic abscess, perforation, bleeding, and death.

    Measured: Up to Day 30

  8. Mean duration of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy procedures

    The duration required to complete the eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies will be measured and compared between the two cholangioscopy systems.

    Measured: Periprocedural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2026
  2. Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07620080
Sponsor's protocol ID
SFED-160
Acronym
EYE/SPY
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
19 May 2026
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system and SPYGLASS™ DS system in people with Cholangiocarcinoma and Biliary Stricture, run by David KARSENTI.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact David KARSENTI, MD (+33 1 43 96 78 50, karsenti.paris@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in