AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental HealthRoT-CRTNCT07621731

Pathway-Matched Resilience-Oriented Therapy in Rwanda

A study testing Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation Variant, Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development Variant and Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management Variant in people with Mental Health and Psychological Trauma, run by Alexandros Lordos, PhD at 5 sites in Rwanda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pragmatic, pathway-stratified, cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled trial evaluated Resilience-Oriented Therapy (RoT), a culturally adapted group-based psychosocial intervention for post-genocide Rwanda. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation Variant, Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development Variant and Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management Variant
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
427 participants
Where
5 sitesRwanda
Study dates
28 Apr 2023to 15 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participant aged 18 years or older.
  • Living in or connected to a selected RoT-eligible cluster in one of the five study districts in Rwanda.
  • Screened through the wider societal-healing screening process and assigned to one of the RoT variant pathways based on presenting mental-health or socioemotional profile.
  • Able and willing to complete baseline assessment and, if allocated to immediate RoT, participate in group sessions.
  • Written informed consent obtained according to local ethics requirements.

Who cannot join

  • Acute clinical risk, including suicidality or other indication requiring more intensive clinical or hospital referral as first-line response.
  • Primary needs better matched to another intervention pathway after staged screening, including family-level healing or community sociotherapy.
  • Unable to provide informed consent or safely participate in group sessions.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Rwanda5 sites
  • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Ngoma District

    Ngoma, Eastern Province

  • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyabihu District

    Nyabihu, Western Province

  • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyagatare District

    Nyagatare, Eastern Province

  • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Nyamagabe District

    Nyamagabe, Southern Province

  • Community and Health-Centre Settings, Musanze District

    Ruhengeri, Northern Province

Other trials in Rwanda

About this study

Official title: A Pragmatic, Pathway-Stratified Cluster-Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial of Three Variants of Resilience-Oriented Therapy in Rwanda

This pragmatic, pathway-stratified, cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled trial evaluated Resilience-Oriented Therapy (RoT), a culturally adapted group-based psychosocial intervention for post-genocide Rwanda. Community screening assigned eligible adults to one of three RoT variant pathways based on presenting profile: emotion regulation, identity development, or behavioural self-management. Within each pathway, local clusters were randomized to immediate RoT or waitlist control. The baseline cohort included 427 participants across 52 clusters in five Rwandan districts. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediate post-intervention endline from April to September 2023.

Read the detailed description

Resilience-Oriented Therapy (RoT) is a structured, trauma-informed, resilience-oriented group intervention developed for psychosocial recovery in post-genocide Rwanda. The intervention is organized around six broad phases: engagement and hope-building; psychoeducation about trauma, distress, and resilience; strengthening self-care and resilience practices; socioemotional skills acquisition; relational, socio-economic, and civic reintegration work; and follow-up or maintenance. Sessions were delivered by trained facilitators or mental-health practitioners.

The study used a pragmatic, pathway-stratified, cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled design. Participants were identified through a wider societal-healing screening process across five districts in Rwanda. Individuals with acute clinical risk were referred for appropriate clinical or hospital support. Remaining eligible adults were screened for intervention fit and routed to one of three RoT variants. The emotion-regulation variant (RoT-ER) targeted internalizing distress, including depression, anxiety, rumination, emotion dysregulation, and social withdrawal. The identity-development variant (RoT-ID) targeted alienation, shame, emptiness, identity disturbance, and belonging-related difficulties. The behavioural self-management variant (RoT-BSM) targeted aggression, alcohol or substance misuse, impulse regulation, and interpersonal responsibility.

Within each variant pathway, clusters were randomized to immediate RoT or waitlist control. Waitlist-control participants did not receive the assigned RoT variant during the baseline-to-endline evaluation period and were to be invited to participate after the evaluation exercise where feasible. The baseline cohort included 427 participants across 52 clusters: 173 in the RoT-ER pathway, 120 in the RoT-ID pathway, and 134 in the RoT-BSM pathway. Endline data were observed for 394 participants; missing endline records were handled in the manuscript analysis using multiple imputation.

The trial evaluated whether pathway-matched RoT improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes from baseline to immediate post-intervention endline. General outcomes included post-traumatic stress symptoms and resilience across all pathways. Variant-specific outcomes included depression and anxiety/cross-diagnostic symptoms in RoT-ER, borderline/identity disturbance symptoms in RoT-ID, and aggression, alcohol abuse/dependence, and drug abuse/dependence in RoT-BSM. Secondary outcomes included socioemotional difficulties, hopefulness/agency, forgiveness of others, stigma, social cohesion, perceived community threat, economic security, food insecurity, and food security.

Being tested
Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation Variant, Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development Variant, Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management Variant
Keywords
Rwanda, genocide against the Tutsi, Resilience-Oriented Therapy, societal healing, pathway stratification, cluster randomized trial, waitlist control, group psychotherapy, transdiagnostic intervention, resilience
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being, Psychological Trauma, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Aggression, Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation VariantBehavioural

    Also called RoT-ER, RoT Emotion-Regulation Variant

    RoT-ER is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on internalizing distress. Sessions emphasize psychoeducation, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, self-care and resilience practices, hope and agency, and group-based social support.

  • Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development VariantBehavioural

    Also called RoT-ID, RoT Identity-Development Variant

    RoT-ID is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on alienation, shame, emptiness, identity disturbance, and belonging-related difficulties. Sessions emphasize coherent self-understanding, constructive social identity, relational repair, and resilience practices.

  • Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management VariantBehavioural

    Also called RoT-BSM, RoT Behavioral Self-Management Variant

    RoT-BSM is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on aggression, alcohol or substance misuse, impulse regulation, accountability, and interpersonal responsibility. Sessions emphasize self-management, responsible relationships, and reintegration into family and community life.

Study groups in NCT07621731
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Emotion Regulation ImmediateExperimentalParticipants in clusters randomized to receive the emotion-regulation variant of Resilience-Oriented Therapy during the evaluation period.
Receives: Behavioral: Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation Variant
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Emotion Regulation Waitlist ControlNo interventionParticipants in emotion-regulation pathway clusters randomized to waitlist control during the evaluation period; offered RoT after endline where feasible.
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Identity Development ImmediateExperimentalParticipants in clusters randomized to receive the identity-development variant of Resilience-Oriented Therapy during the evaluation period.
Receives: Behavioral: Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development Variant
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Identity Development Waitlist ControlNo interventionParticipants in identity-development pathway clusters randomized to waitlist control during the evaluation period; offered RoT after endline where feasible.
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Behavioral Self-Management ImmediateExperimentalParticipants in clusters randomized to receive the behavioural self-management variant of Resilience-Oriented Therapy during the evaluation period.
Receives: Behavioral: Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management Variant
Resilience-Oriented Therapy for Behavioral Self-Management Waitlist ControlNo interventionParticipants in behavioural self-management pathway clusters randomized to waitlist control during the evaluation period; offered RoT after endline where feasible.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in post-traumatic stress symptoms across Resilience-Oriented Therapy pathways

    Post-traumatic stress symptoms were measured with a genocide-adapted four-item mean score from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Items were rated from 0 to 4; the mean score ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating worse post-traumatic stress symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months

  2. Change in resilience across Resilience-Oriented Therapy pathways

    Resilience was measured with the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Items were summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  3. Change in depression symptoms in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy emotional-regulation pathway

    Depression symptoms were measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form cognitive-affective subscale. The 13 items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  4. Change in anxiety and related symptoms in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy emotional-regulation pathway

    Anxiety and related cross-diagnostic symptoms were measured with a 10-item cross-diagnostic symptom severity scale. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety and related internalizing symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  5. Change in borderline and identity-disturbance symptoms in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy identity-development pathway

    Borderline and identity-disturbance symptoms were measured with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder. The 10 yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more borderline and identity-disturbance symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  6. Change in aggression in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy behavioural self-management pathway

    Aggression was measured with 13 retained items from the Aggression Questionnaire. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater aggression.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  7. Change in alcohol abuse or dependence risk in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy behavioural self-management pathway

    Alcohol abuse or dependence risk was measured with the six alcohol-use items from the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol abuse or dependence risk.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  8. Change in drug abuse or dependence risk in the Resilience-Oriented Therapy behavioural self-management pathway

    Drug abuse or dependence risk was measured with the six drug-use items from the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater drug abuse or dependence risk.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change in emotional wellbeing difficulties

    Emotional wellbeing difficulties were measured with the emotional-wellbeing subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater emotional-wellbeing difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  2. Change in collaboration difficulties

    Collaboration difficulties were measured with the collaboration subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater collaboration difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  3. Change in self-management difficulties

    Self-management difficulties were measured with the self-management subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater self-management difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  4. Change in hopefulness/agency

    Hopefulness and agency were measured with four agency-oriented hope items. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater hopefulness and agency.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  5. Change in forgiveness of others

    Forgiveness of others was measured with a retained two-item mean score derived from the Heartland Forgiveness Scale after reliability review. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater forgiveness of others.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  6. Change in perceived stigma of mental illness

    Perceived stigma was measured with a five-item perceived stigma of mental illness scale adapted for the programme. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stigma.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  7. Change in social cohesion

    Social cohesion was measured with seven retained items from the Social Cohesion Scale used in the Rwanda societal-healing programme. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater social cohesion.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  8. Change in perceived community threat

    Perceived community threat was measured with four items from the Social Cohesion Scale. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived community threat.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  9. Change in economic security

    Economic security was measured with programme items assessing whether the household had enough money for basic needs. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater economic security.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  10. Change in short-term food insecurity

    Short-term food insecurity was measured with Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index items covering the previous seven days. Scores range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating worse short-term food insecurity.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  11. Change in long-term food insecurity

    Long-term food insecurity was measured with Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index items covering the previous 12 months. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating worse long-term food insecurity.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

  12. Change in food security

    Food security was measured with programme food-security items derived from the food-consumption coping strategy indicators. Scores range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating greater food security.

    Measured: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2026
  2. Study start28 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This was a pragmatic, pathway-stratified cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled study. Screening assigned participants to one of three Resilience-Oriented Therapy variant pathways based on clinical profile: emotion regulation, identity development, or behavioural self-management. Within each pathway, local clusters were randomized to immediate RoT or waitlist control. Primary comparisons were pathway-specific.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
427 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07621731
Sponsor's protocol ID
ROT-CRT-RWA-2023
Other IDs
122/RNEC/2023
Acronym
RoT-CRT
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
21 May 2026
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified participant-level data underlying the manuscript analyses.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Emotion-Regulation Variant, Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Identity-Development Variant and Resilience-Oriented Therapy - Behavioural Self-Management Variant in people with Mental Health and Psychological Trauma, run by Alexandros Lordos, PhD at 5 sites in Rwanda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Rwanda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in post-traumatic stress symptoms across Resilience-Oriented Therapy pathways (time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in