AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT07626151

Electric Cardiometry-Guided Standard Versus Restricted Fluid Therapy In Robotic Prostaectomy

A study testing Liberal Fluid Therapy and Restricted Fluid Therapy in people with Prostate Cancer and Surgery, run by Nazmy Edward Seif at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fluid therapy during surgery is an important factor that is related to long term mortality and morbidity and it's directly related to tissue perfusion as well. The main target in any surgery is what is the optimum fluid therapy to maintain the tissue perfusion and the precise balance between hazardous effects of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer, Surgery, Fluid Overload
What is being tested?
Liberal Fluid Therapy and Restricted Fluid Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
5 Jun 2026to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male patient undergoing robotic assisted prostatectomy
  • ASA I-III

Who cannot join

  • ASA score more than III
  • BMI more than 40
  • Severe renal disease (GFR between 15 and 29)
  • Previous renal surgery.
  • Decompensated cardiac disease (NYHA class 3 or 4)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Mohamed M Mohamed, M.Sc. contact

+20 111 8370641

mandamembo0@gmail.com

Nazmy S Mikhael, M.D. contact

+20122 7400808

drnazmyseif@kasralainy.edu.eg

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Cairo University Hospitals

    Cairo

    Mohamed M Mohamed, M.Sc., +20 111 8370641, mandamembo0@gmail.com

    Nazmy S Mikhael, M.D., +201227400808, drnazmyseif@kasralainy.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Effect Of Standard Versus Restricted Fluid Therapy Guided By Electric Cardiometry On Tissue Perfuison In Robotic Prostaectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Fluid therapy during surgery is an important factor that is related to long term mortality and morbidity and it's directly related to tissue perfusion as well. The main target in any surgery is what is the optimum fluid therapy to maintain the tissue perfusion and the precise balance between hazardous effects of hypervolemia that may cause delayed wound healing due to surgical anastomosis disruption or being hypovolemic that may cause tissue ischemia as acute kidney injury.

Fluid management guidance changed from static methods like central venous pressure into dynamic methods like pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), which are now the most famous dynamic measures.

Read more

Electrical cardiometry is a non-invasive cardiac output monitor which uses electrical cardiometry, now a commonly used device, to measure SVV which can be used to guide fluid therapy during surgeries.

Now robotic assisted surgery is a common method in preforming many surgeries especially urological, since it's associated with numerous desirable outcomes including shorter post-operative stay and faster return to preoperative function.

With considerations related to severe Trendelenburg position and increased intra-abdominal pressure due to pneumo-peritoneum, robotic assisted surgeries are associated with many challenges in anesthesia especially the fluid therapy.

Fluid therapy in robotic surgeries is an area with growing research focus that need further exploration while there are established guidelines for fluid management in traditional surgeries, the optimal protocols for robotic surgeries are less well defined, needing more research.

We aim at this study to investigate the impact of liberal versus restricted fluid intake on the tissue perfusion reflected by serum lactate \& creatinine clearance, while guiding therapy through electrical cardiometry, to reach optimum fluid protocol in prostatic robotic surgeries.

Being tested
Liberal Fluid Therapy, Restricted Fluid Therapy
Keywords
Robotic, Prostatectomy, Sugery, Anesthesia, Fluid, Electric Cardiometry, Tissue Perfusion
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms, Edema, Hyperlactatemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Liberal Fluid TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Patients will receive 6 ml/kg/hour of lactated ringer for maintenance in addition to fasting hours compensation (2 ml/kg for each fasting hour, given as 50% in the first hour of surgery, then 25% during the second \& third hours). An additional bolus of 200 ml Lactated Ringer will be given if MAP is below 65 mmHg. In case of persistent hypotension despite proper fluid rescuistation, 10 mg of Ephedrine will be administered; if no response is achieved, norepinerhine infusion will start at initial dose 0.01mcg/kg/min if MAP is below 65 mmHg.

  • Restricted Fluid TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Patients will receive 2 ml/kg as fluid bolus then 2 ml/kg/hour for maintenance, aiming at a target SVV less than 13 %. Patients with SVV ≥ 13% will be considered fluid responder and will receive a fluid bolus of 200 ml Ringer Lactated Ringer over 10 minutes.The fluid bolus will be repeated until the SVV is less than 13%. In case of persistent hypotension (MAP less than 65mmHg), 10 mg of Ephedrine will be administered; if no response is achieved, norepinerhine infusion will be started at intial dose 0.01mcg/kg/min if MAP is below 65 mmHg.

Study groups in NCT07626151
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Liberal GroupActive comparatorLiberal Fluid Therapy Group
Receives: Procedure: Liberal Fluid Therapy
Restricted GroupActive comparatorRestricted Fluid Therapy Group
Receives: Procedure: Restricted Fluid Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serum Lactate level difference

    Serum Lactate level difference between pre-operative (baseline) value and post-operative (recovery) value in mmol/L

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2026
  2. Study start5 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07626151
Sponsor's protocol ID
ECGSVRFTRP
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
31 May 2026
Last updated
8 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Liberal Fluid Therapy and Restricted Fluid Therapy in people with Prostate Cancer and Surgery, run by Nazmy Edward Seif at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mohamed M Mohamed, M.Sc. (+20 111 8370641, mandamembo0@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serum Lactate level difference (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in