AzTrials
AzTrials

Spine SurgeryROC-IONMNCT07627750

Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance During Spine Surgery With Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

A study testing Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance and Rocuronium in people with Spine Surgery and Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, run by Bach Mai Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare two strategies for rocuronium use during general anesthesia for spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Participants undergoing spine surgery under general anesthesia with motor evoked potential and/or somatosensory evoked potential monitoring will… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance and Rocuronium
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
7 Oct 2026to Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients scheduled for spine surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Patients undergoing spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, including motor evoked potentials and/or somatosensory evoked potentials.
  • Patients who agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing central or peripheral neurological disease that may affect intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, such as quadriplegia, persistent sensory disorder, sequelae of stroke, or polyneuropathy.
  • History of epilepsy or electroencephalographic disorder.
  • Use of neuropsychiatric drugs, strong sedatives, or drugs affecting neuromuscular or neurological conduction within 48 hours before surgery.
  • Decompensated cardiovascular disease or severe respiratory disease that may affect emergence or anesthetic drug metabolism.
  • Contraindication to intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.
  • Contraindication to rocuronium.
  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent at any time.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Vietnam1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Bach Mai Hospital

    Hanoi, Hanoi, 100000

    Duc Minh Tran, MD, +84869319291, tdminh1312@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance Versus Discontinuation After Induction on Motor Evoked Potential Quality During Spine Surgery With Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

This randomized controlled trial will compare two strategies for rocuronium use during general anesthesia for spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Participants undergoing spine surgery under general anesthesia with motor evoked potential and/or somatosensory evoked potential monitoring will be randomized to either low-dose rocuronium maintenance targeting a train-of-four ratio of 0.60 to less than 0.90, or no rocuronium maintenance after induction.

The main objective is to compare the effects of these two strategies on the quality of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, especially motor evoked potential signals. Secondary objectives include comparing surgical field conditions, unwanted patient movement, emergence and extubation times, early respiratory events, and new postoperative neurological deficits.

The study will be conducted at the Center for Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. The planned sample size is 62 participants, with 31 participants in each group.

Read the detailed description

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is commonly used during complex spine surgery to help detect early neurological injury. Motor evoked potentials are particularly sensitive to neuromuscular blockade. Avoiding maintenance neuromuscular blockade may improve motor evoked potential signal quality, but may increase the risk of unwanted patient movement and suboptimal surgical field conditions. Conversely, low-dose rocuronium maintenance may improve surgical conditions, but may reduce motor evoked potential amplitude if neuromuscular blockade is excessive.

This trial will evaluate whether low-dose rocuronium maintenance, titrated by quantitative neuromuscular monitoring, can preserve intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring quality while improving surgical field conditions compared with discontinuation of rocuronium after induction.

All participants will receive standardized total intravenous anesthesia with propofol-based maintenance, bispectral index monitoring, quantitative train-of-four monitoring, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Rocuronium will be administered for tracheal intubation in both groups. In the low-dose maintenance group, rocuronium will be titrated to maintain a train-of-four ratio from 0.60 to less than 0.90. In the no-maintenance group, no additional rocuronium will be given after induction unless predefined safety rescue is required.

The primary outcome will be intraoperative motor evoked potential signal quality, including mean motor evoked potential amplitude. Secondary outcomes will include successful motor evoked potential recording, motor evoked potential warning events, somatosensory evoked potential stability, surgical field condition, unwanted patient movement, time to emergence, time to extubation, early postoperative respiratory events, and new postoperative neurological deficits.

Being tested
Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance, Rocuronium
Keywords
Rocuronium, Motor Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, Train-of-Four Ratio, Spine Surgery, Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Total Intravenous Anesthesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low-Dose Rocuronium MaintenanceDrug

    Rocuronium will be administered for tracheal intubation and then maintained at a low dose during surgery. The infusion will be titrated according to quantitative train-of-four monitoring to maintain a train-of-four ratio from 0.60 to less than 0.90.

  • RocuroniumDrug

    Also called Rocuronium for Intubation Only

    Rocuronium will be administered only for tracheal intubation during induction of anesthesia. No maintenance rocuronium will be administered after induction, except for predefined safety rescue if clinically necessary.

Study groups in NCT07627750
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Low-Dose Rocuronium MaintenanceExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive rocuronium for tracheal intubation followed by low-dose rocuronium maintenance during surgery. Rocuronium will be titrated using quantitative train-of-four monitoring to maintain a train-of-four ratio from 0.60 to less than 0.90. All participants will receive standardized total intravenous anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.
Receives: Drug: Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance
No Rocuronium Maintenance After InductionActive comparatorParticipants in this group will receive rocuronium for tracheal intubation only. No maintenance rocuronium will be administered after induction. Additional rocuronium may be given only as predefined safety rescue if clinically necessary. All participants will receive standardized total intravenous anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.
Receives: Drug: Rocuronium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude

    Mean intraoperative motor evoked potential amplitude, measured in microvolts, recorded from predefined target muscles during spine surgery. The mean of three consecutive technically acceptable responses will be used at standardized intraoperative time points after stabilization of anesthesia and physiologic parameters.

    Measured: From baseline intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring after patient positioning to the final intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring recording before wound closure

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Successful Motor Evoked Potential Recording

    Proportion of participants with successful intraoperative motor evoked potential recording from at least one predefined target muscle.

    Measured: During surgery

  2. Motor Evoked Potential Warning Events

    Number of intraoperative motor evoked potential warning events, defined as a decrease of 50 percent or more in amplitude from baseline lasting more than 5 minutes and not attributable to surgical manipulation after correction of physiologic and technical factors.

    Measured: During surgery

  3. Surgical Field Condition

    Surgical field condition assessed using the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better surgical conditions.

    Measured: During surgery

  4. Unwanted Patient Movement

    Occurrence and number of unwanted patient movement events that affect surgical manipulation or require anesthetic or neuromuscular blockade adjustment.

    Measured: During surgery

  5. Time to Extubation

    Time from discontinuation of maintenance anesthetic infusion to safe tracheal extubation, measured in minutes.

    Measured: From discontinuation of maintenance anesthesia to tracheal extubation

  6. New Postoperative Neurological Deficit

    Occurrence of new postoperative motor or sensory neurological deficit assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit and within 24 to 48 hours after surgery.

    Measured: Post-anesthesia care unit and 24 to 48 hours after surgery

  7. Somatosensory Evoked Potential Stability

    Proportion of intraoperative monitoring time without significant somatosensory evoked potential changes, defined as latency increase of 10 percent or more or amplitude decrease of 50 percent or more from baseline lasting more than 5 minutes and not attributable to surgical manipulation.

    Measured: During surgery

  8. Time to Emergence

    Time from discontinuation of maintenance anesthetic infusion to eye opening on verbal command, measured in minutes.

    Measured: From discontinuation of maintenance anesthesia to eye opening on verbal command

  9. Early Postoperative Respiratory Events

    Occurrence of early respiratory events, including oxygen desaturation below 92 percent, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, sputum obstruction, or delayed extubation due to respiratory muscle weakness.

    Measured: During emergence and within 60 minutes after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2026
  2. Study start7 Oct 2026
  3. Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel groups: low-dose rocuronium maintenance targeting a train-of-four ratio of 0.60 to less than 0.90, or no rocuronium maintenance after induction.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07627750
Sponsor's protocol ID
HMU-BMH-ROC-IONM-2025-01
Other IDs
225/BM-HDDD, 6513/QD-DHYHN
Acronym
ROC-IONM
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
30 May 2026
Last updated
16 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be publicly shared because the study involves sensitive clinical and perioperative data. Data are protected by privacy and ethical restrictions. De-identified aggregate data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with approval from the relevant ethics committee.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in