AzTrials
AzTrials

Obesity (BMI > 35)NCT07629102

Perioperative Respiratory Function in Sleeve Gastrectomy

A study testing PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP 5 cmH2O in people with Obesity (BMI > 35) and Sleeve Gastrectomy, run by Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective single-center cohort study aims to evaluate the effects of two intraoperative ventilation strategies on perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP 5 cmH2O
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 20 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who underwent elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Who cannot join

  • revision bariatric surgery
  • gastric bypass surgery
  • conversion to open surgery
  • incomplete perioperative records
  • missing arterial blood gas measurements
  • unavailable postoperative pulmonary function tests

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital

    Istanbul

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Perioperative Oxygenation and Respiratory Function in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This retrospective single-center cohort study aims to evaluate the effects of two intraoperative ventilation strategies on perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and ventilatory protocols with volume-controlled ventilation and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%). The study compares conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O versus a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation. Perioperative oxygenation is assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum establishment, and after extubation. Secondary outcomes include perioperative arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, ICU admission, and hospital length of stay. The study aims to determine whether escalation of intraoperative ventilatory support provides incremental respiratory benefit in contemporary bariatric anesthesia practice.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is associated with substantial alterations in respiratory physiology, including reduced functional residual capacity, decreased respiratory compliance, impaired diaphragmatic excursion, and increased susceptibility to perioperative atelectasis and hypoxemia. These physiologic changes become more pronounced during general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery because of positive-pressure ventilation and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Consequently, obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery represent a particularly vulnerable population for perioperative respiratory impairment.

Lung-protective ventilation strategies incorporating low tidal volume ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and recruitment maneuvers have been increasingly utilized in obese surgical patients to improve oxygenation and reduce atelectatic changes. However, despite improvements in intraoperative respiratory mechanics and oxygenation reported in previous studies, the clinical significance and incremental benefit of intensified ventilation strategies remain uncertain, particularly in contemporary bariatric anesthesia settings where protective ventilation principles are already routinely applied.

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluates perioperative oxygenation and respiratory outcomes in obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between January 2021 and January 2026. All patients were managed using standardized anesthetic and surgical protocols, including volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight and fixed inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂ 45%).

Patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative ventilation strategy. The first group received conventional ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers. The second group received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum establishment and before extubation.

Perioperative oxygenation was assessed using serial PaO₂/FiO₂ measurements obtained immediately after endotracheal intubation (T0), 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum establishment (T1), and 5 minutes after extubation (T2). Secondary outcomes included arterial blood gas variables, postoperative spirometric parameters, lactate levels, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether escalation from conventional PEEP 5 cmH₂O ventilation to PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with recruitment maneuvers provides incremental perioperative respiratory benefit in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy within a standardized contemporary bariatric anesthesia setting.

Being tested
PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment Maneuvers, PEEP 5 cmH2O
Keywords
Obesity, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, PEEP titration, perioperative oxygenation
Medical subject headings
Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment ManeuversOther

    Recruitment maneuvers were performed using a stepwise PEEP increase strategy. PEEP levels were gradually increased over consecutive respiratory cycles up to 15-20 cmH₂O and subsequently reduced to the assigned maintenance PEEP level.

  • PEEP 5 cmH2OOther

    Patients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers

Study groups in NCT07629102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PEEP 5/no recruitment maneuverOtherPatients were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O without recruitment maneuvers
Receives: Other: PEEP 5 cmH2O
PEEP 8/recruitment maneuverOtherPatients received a protective ventilation strategy consisting of PEEP 8 cmH₂O combined with repeated recruitment maneuvers performed after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and before extubation
Receives: Other: PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment Maneuvers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PaO2/FiO2 ratio

    The primary outcome of the study was perioperative oxygenation assessed by serial PaO2/FiO2 ratio measurements.

    Measured: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Postoperative pulmonary function tests

    forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio

    Measured: Were evaluated before the surgery and on the day of hospital discharge

  2. Intensive care unit admission

    Patients requiring intensive care admission

    Measured: Postoperative day 0

  3. PaCO₂, pH, oxygen saturation

    Blood gas analyses parameters

    Measured: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte

  4. Hospital length of stay

    How many days did the patient stay in the hospital?

    Measured: On which day the patients were discharged

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion20 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07629102
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026-134
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
22 May 2026
Last updated
5 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEEP 8 cmH2O + Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP 5 cmH2O in people with Obesity (BMI > 35) and Sleeve Gastrectomy, run by Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PaO2/FiO2 ratio (time frame: T0: immediately after endotracheal intubation • T1: 10 minutes after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and achievement of the target intra-abdominal pressure • T2: 5 minutes afte). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in