AzTrials
AzTrials

Enlarged Prostate (BPH)NCT07631286

Ejaculatory-Sparing HoLEP vs Standard HoLEP

A study testing Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEP in people with Enlarged Prostate (BPH) and Enlarged Prostate With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to compare a new surgical technique for HoLEP that will allow for sparing of ejaculation post-HoLEP. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Jun 2026to May 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are sexually active with antegrade ejaculation who are undergoing HoLEP for the treatment of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with pre-existing retrograde ejaculation
  • Patients who are not sexually active
  • Patients with indwelling urinary catheter prior to surgery, neurological disease, or history of prior prostatic/urethral surgery that may impact ejaculation
  • Patients who lack decisional capacity
  • Patients unable to read/speak English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

    Amy E Krambeck, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Ejaculatory-sparing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs Standard HoLEP: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to compare a new surgical technique for HoLEP that will allow for sparing of ejaculation post-HoLEP.

Read the detailed description

The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of ejaculatory-sparing HoLEP (ES-HoLEP) in preserving ejaculation while also maintaining good urinary outcomes.

Being tested
Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEP
Keywords
HoLEP
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEPOther

    The ejaculatory sparing technique involves sparing the distal apex of the prostate in particular the anterior portion of the prostate which will allow for coaptation necessary for antegrade ejaculation.

Study groups in NCT07631286
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard HoLEPNo interventionHoLEP procedure performed using standard care technique.
ES-HoLEPActive comparatorHoLEP procedure performed using ejaculatory-sparing HoLEP technique.
Receives: Other: Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of retrograde ejaculation

    Patient reported incidence of experiencing retrograde ejaculation

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Ejaculatory satisfaction

    Patient reported satisfaction of ejaculation using Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) questionnaire. The MSHQ-EjD-SF evaluates the following parameters in regards to ejaculation: Frequency, Force, Volume and Bother (How much are you bothered by any ejaculation difficulties) on a 6-point Likert scale (typically scored 0 to 5).

    Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better ejaculatory function, while lower scores denote dysfunction and a greater level of personal distress regarding one's ejaculatory function.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Sexual satisfaction

    Patient reported sexual satisfaction using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire.

    The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) contains 5 questions that is individually scored on a scale of 0 to 5. The SHIM score is calculated by adding up the scores of the 5 individual questions.

    Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better erectile function, while lower scores denote erectile dysfunction. A total score of 21 or less indicates that erectile dysfunction is present and should be addressed with a healthcare provider.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Urinary satisfaction

    Patient reported urinary satisfaction using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire.

    The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is calculated by asking patients to rate 7 urinary symptoms over the past month on a scale from 0 to 5. These scores are simply added together to yield a total symptom severity score ranging from 0 to 35.

    An 8th question measures overall Quality of Life (QoL) but is not factored into the numerical total.

    Interpretation: the total score range is from 0 to 35.

    The total score indicates symptom severity:

    0-7: Mildly symptomatic 8-19: Moderately symptomatic 20-35: Severely symptomatic

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Urinary satisfaction

    Patient reported urinary satisfaction using the Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI) questionnaires.

    The M-ISI (Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index) questionnaire is a 10-item clinical tool used to evaluate the severity of urinary incontinence and how much it bothers the patient. It is calculated by assigning scores (0 to 4) to each answer and summing them across two primary domains.

    Total M-ISI Severity Domain (Items 1-8): Sum of the scores for the first 8 questions. This evaluates incontinence subdomains (Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urgency Urinary Incontinence, and Pad Use). Possible score range 0 to 32.

    Bother Domain (Items 9-10): Sum of the scores for questions 9 and 10. This measures the emotional and physical impact of the leakage. Possible score range 0 to 8.

    Interpretation: Higher scores indicate the individual is likely incontinent or has experience with incontinence.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2026
  2. Study start15 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completionMay 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07631286
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00225807
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
26 Apr 2026
Last updated
20 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ejaculatory-sparing (ES-sparing) HoLEP in people with Enlarged Prostate (BPH) and Enlarged Prostate With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alyssa McDonald, MPH (312-695-8146, alyssa.mcdonald@northwestern.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of retrograde ejaculation (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in