AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingE-WALKNCT07633093

Effects of a Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton on Walking Performance in Older Adults

A study testing Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton in people with Aging and Walking, run by Hunan Normal University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a powered wearable lower-limb exoskeleton can improve walking performance in independently ambulatory older adults aged 65 to 75 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aging, Walking, Physical Function
What is being tested?
Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jul 2026to 16 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older adults aged 65 to 75 years who are community-dwelling, independently ambulatory, able to walk independently on level ground, able to maintain standing balance without personal assistance, and able to understand study instructions.
  • Young-adult reference participants aged 18 to 22 years who are healthy university students without known conditions affecting walking or balance.

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported neurological disease affecting gait or balance.
  • Major musculoskeletal injury or surgery affecting walking within the previous 6 months.
  • Uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Severe visual or vestibular impairment affecting safe walking.
  • Current lower-limb pain that limits walking.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent or protocol adherence.
  • Any condition judged by the study team to make participation unsafe.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Hunan Normal University

    Changsha, 81000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Acute Effects of a Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton on Walking Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Crossover Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a powered wearable lower-limb exoskeleton can improve walking performance in independently ambulatory older adults aged 65 to 75 years.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does use of a powered lower-limb exoskeleton increase comfortable walking speed over 10 meters?
  • Does use of a powered lower-limb exoskeleton increase average walking speed during a 400-meter walk?

Researchers will compare walking performance in older adults during walking with the powered exoskeleton and walking without the device to determine whether the exoskeleton improves mobility. Young-adult reference participants will also complete walking assessments to provide reference values for walking performance.

Participants will:

  • Attend a screening and familiarization visit.
  • Complete walking assessments with and without the powered exoskeleton in randomized order (older adults only).
  • Perform a 10-meter walk test, a 400-meter walk test, and other physical performance assessments.
  • Complete questionnaires about balance confidence, fear of falling, and device usability.
  • Be monitored for safety events during testing.
Read the detailed description

Age-related decline in mobility is associated with reduced independence, lower quality of life, and increased risk of disability and adverse health outcomes. Walking performance is a clinically meaningful indicator of functional status in older adults, and preservation of mobility is a major goal of healthy aging. Although exercise and rehabilitation interventions can improve mobility, their benefits typically require repeated training and sustained adherence. Technologies that provide immediate assistance during walking may offer a complementary approach to supporting mobility in older adults.

Powered wearable lower-limb exoskeletons are designed to provide external mechanical assistance during locomotion. Previous studies have shown that lower-limb exoskeletons can reduce the metabolic cost of walking and improve walking performance under laboratory conditions. However, less is known about the acute effects of commercially available exoskeleton systems on clinically relevant walking outcomes in independently ambulatory older adults.

This study will evaluate the acute effects of a commercially available powered lower-limb exoskeleton on walking performance in community-dwelling older adults. The primary outcomes are comfortable gait speed during a 10-meter walk test and average walking speed during a 400-meter walk test. Secondary outcomes include lower-extremity physical performance, physiological responses during walking, perceived exertion, balance confidence, fear of falling, device usability, participant satisfaction, and safety outcomes.

The study uses a randomized crossover design. Older adult participants will complete two experimental conditions in randomized order: walking without the exoskeleton and walking with the powered exoskeleton. Participants will attend a screening and familiarization visit followed by two trial visits separated by at least 48 hours. During the familiarization visit, participants will receive device fitting and supervised practice with the exoskeleton. At each trial visit, participants will complete standardized walking and physical performance assessments under the assigned condition.

A young-adult reference group will complete no-device walking assessments to provide reference values for walking performance. Exploratory analyses will examine whether exoskeleton-assisted walking reduces the performance gap between older adults and young adults.

The study hypothesis is that use of the powered exoskeleton will improve both short-distance and sustained walking performance in older adults and partially reduce the mobility performance gap between older and young adults.

Being tested
Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Keywords
Exoskeleton, Wearable Robotics, Gait Speed, Assistive Technology, Mobility Assistance
Medical subject headings
Mobility Limitation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Powered Lower-Limb ExoskeletonDevice

    A commercially available powered wearable lower-limb exoskeleton (VIATRIX; ULS Robotics Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) designed to provide bilateral lower-limb assistance during walking. The device is worn around the pelvis and lower limbs and provides powered assistance through bilateral actuation. During powered-device assessments, participants use the adaptive assistive walking mode following device fitting and familiarization procedures.

Study groups in NCT07633093
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Older AdultsExperimentalCommunity-dwelling older adults aged 65-75 years who complete walking assessments under both no-device and powered-exoskeleton conditions in randomized order using a crossover design. Participants attend a screening and familiarization visit followed by two trial visits.
Receives: Device: Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Young Adult Reference ParticipantsNo interventionHealthy young adults aged 18-22 years who complete no-device walking assessments to provide reference values for walking performance. Participants are not randomized and do not receive the powered exoskeleton intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 10-Meter Comfortable Gait Speed

    Comfortable gait speed (m/s) measured during a 10-meter walk test. Participants walk at their usual comfortable speed along a flat indoor walkway. Two trials are completed, and the mean gait speed is used for analysis.

    Measured: During each trial visit following completion of the assigned study condition (up to 5 days)

  2. 400-Meter Average Walking Speed

    Average walking speed (m/s) measured during a 400-meter walk test. Participants walk 400 meters at a self-selected comfortable speed on an indoor walkway. Average walking speed is calculated as total walking distance divided by total completion time.

    Measured: During each trial visit following completion of the assigned study condition (up to 5 days)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Short Physical Performance Battery Score

    Lower-extremity physical performance assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. The test includes standing balance, short-distance gait speed, and repeated chair-stand performance. Component scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better physical performance.

    Measured: During each trial visit following the assigned study condition, up to 5 days.

  2. Mean Heart Rate During the 400-Meter Walk

    Mean heart rate recorded continuously during the 400-meter walk test using a wrist-worn optical heart-rate monitor.

    Measured: During each trial visit following the assigned study condition, up to 5 days.

  3. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion

    Perceived exertion is assessed immediately after the 400-meter walk test using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale. Scores range from 6 to 20, where 6 indicates "no exertion at all" and 20 indicates "maximal exertion." Higher scores indicate greater perceived exertion and a worse outcome.

    Measured: Immediately after the 400-meter walk test during each trial visit, up to 5 days.

  4. Fear of Falling 10-Rating Scale Score

    Immediate fear of falling will be assessed after each trial condition using the single-item Fear of Falling 10-Point Rating Scale. Participants will rate how concerned they were about falling during the walking and physical performance tests completed during that visit. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not concerned at all" and 10 indicates "extremely concerned." Higher scores indicate greater fear of falling and a worse outcome.

    Measured: After physical performance testing during each trial visit, up to 5 days.

  5. Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale Score

    Balance confidence will be assessed after each trial condition using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale. The scale includes 16 activities, each rated from 0%, indicating no confidence in maintaining balance, to 100%, indicating complete confidence in maintaining balance. The total score is calculated as the mean of the 16 item scores and ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater balance confidence and a better outcome.

    Measured: After physical performance testing during each trial visit, up to 5 days.

  6. System Usability Scale Score

    Perceived usability of the powered lower-limb exoskeleton will be assessed after the powered-device condition using the 10-item System Usability Scale. Item responses are converted and summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability of the exoskeleton and a better outcome.

    Measured: After completion of the powered-device trial visit, up to 5 days.

  7. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology 2.0 Device Subscale Score

    Participant satisfaction with the powered lower-limb exoskeleton will be assessed after the powered-device condition using the eight-item device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology 2.0. Each item is rated from 1, indicating "not satisfied at all," to 5, indicating "very satisfied." The device-subscale score is calculated as the mean of the valid device-item ratings and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the exoskeleton and a better outcome.

    Measured: After completion of the powered-device trial visit, up to 5 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion16 Aug 2026
  4. Study completion16 Aug 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Older adult participants complete two experimental conditions in randomized order across separate trial visits: walking without the powered exoskeleton and walking with the powered exoskeleton. Young-adult reference participants complete no-device walking assessments only and are not randomized to intervention conditions.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07633093
Sponsor's protocol ID
HNU-2026-408
Acronym
E-WALK
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
2 Jun 2026
Last updated
18 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeleton in people with Aging and Walking, run by Hunan Normal University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

10-Meter Comfortable Gait Speed (time frame: During each trial visit following completion of the assigned study condition (up to 5 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in