AzTrials
AzTrials

BelongingBridgesNCT07634432

Bridges: A Digital Intervention to Increase Workplace Belonging

A study testing Bridges in people with Belonging and Mental Health, run by Pro-Change Behavior Systems at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Bridges, a digital program designed to support workplace belonging among LGBTQ+ employees. Belonging is an important part of health and well-being. People who feel accepted, valued, connected, and included often experience better mental and physical health. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Belonging, Mental Health, LGBTQ
What is being tested?
Bridges
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Aug 2025to 22 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to speak and read English
  • Lives in the U.S.
  • Employed
  • Works 32+ hours per week
  • Works for an organization that provides health or human services
  • Identity aligns with study/program purpose (i.e., identifies as LGBTQ+)
  • Low to moderate level of belonging (as assessed by the IOWA-B)

Who cannot join

  • Only employee of the organization
  • Unwilling to receive program text messages

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Pro-Change Behavior Systems

    Narragansett, Rhode Island, 02882-3468

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Bridges, a digital program designed to support workplace belonging among LGBTQ+ employees.

Belonging is an important part of health and well-being. People who feel accepted, valued, connected, and included often experience better mental and physical health. However, many LGBTQ+ individuals experience discrimination, stigma, exclusion, or isolation in workplace settings, which can negatively affect their sense of belonging and overall well-being.

Read more

Bridges was developed to help LGBTQ+ employees build a stronger sense of belonging at work. The program combines personalized text messages with online activities, self-reflection exercises, practical workplace strategies, and opportunities to learn skills that may support connection, inclusion, and well-being.

This study will enroll LGBTQ+ adults who are currently employed. Participants will use the Bridges program for approximately 30 days. During the study, participants will receive text messages and have access to online tools and activities. Participants will also complete surveys to assess their experiences, sense of workplace belonging, and feedback about the program.

The primary purpose of this pilot study is to determine whether the Bridges program is feasible and acceptable to participants. Researchers will examine participant engagement with the program and satisfaction with its content and usability. The study will also explore whether participation in Bridges is associated with improvements in workplace belonging, well-being, and related outcomes.

Information gathered from this study will be used to improve the program and guide future research on digital interventions designed to support belonging and well-being among LGBTQ+ employees.

Read the detailed description

Workplace belonging is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to employee well-being, engagement, and overall quality of life. Belonging refers to the experience of feeling accepted, valued, respected, supported, and connected to others. Individuals who experience low levels of belonging may report feelings of isolation, exclusion, loneliness, or disconnection, which can negatively affect mental health, physical health, workplace satisfaction, and professional fulfillment.

Changes in the workplace following the COVID-19 pandemic have altered how employees connect with one another. The growth of remote and hybrid work arrangements has created new opportunities for flexibility and autonomy, while also reducing opportunities for workplace interaction and social connection. As a result, many organizations are seeking innovative approaches to support employee well-being and foster a sense of belonging in increasingly digital work environments.

LGBTQ+ employees may face additional challenges related to workplace belonging. Experiences of discrimination, stigma, exclusion, or lack of organizational support can contribute to lower levels of belonging and well-being. Although many workplace wellness and diversity initiatives exist, few evidence-based programs have been developed specifically to address workplace belonging among LGBTQ+ employees.

To address this need, researchers developed Bridges, a digital intervention designed to promote workplace belonging and well-being among LGBTQ+ workers. Bridges combines personalized text messaging with web-based activities, self-reflection exercises, educational content, opportunities for self-appraisal, and practical workplace strategies designed to strengthen workplace belonging. The program is designed to help participants better understand belonging, reflect on their workplace experiences, develop skills that support connection and inclusion, and identify actionable steps that may strengthen their sense of belonging at work.

The Bridges intervention was developed using principles from behavior change science and a participatory design approach. LGBTQ+ worker advisors were actively involved in informing program content, design, usability, and overall user experience throughout development.

The purpose of this Phase I study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the Bridges intervention. A total of 136 LGBTQ+ employees participated in a 30-day pilot study. Of the 136 enrolled participants, 127 completed the one-month follow-up assessment. Participants received text messages and access to online program content and activities during the study period. Participants completed baseline and one-month follow-up assessments measuring workplace belonging, professional fulfillment, burnout, emotional well-being, resilience, confidence, anxiety, depression, and related psychosocial outcomes.

This study used a single-arm pre-post pilot design. Eligible participants completed a baseline assessment, received access to the Bridges intervention for approximately 30 days, and completed a follow-up assessment at the end of the intervention period. Feasibility and acceptability outcomes were evaluated alongside exploratory assessments of psychosocial and workplace well-being outcomes.

The primary objectives of the study were:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility of the Bridges intervention, as measured by participant engagement with text messaging and online program components during the 30-day pilot period.
  2. To evaluate the acceptability of the intervention, as measured through usability, satisfaction, and participant willingness to recommend the program to others.
  3. To explore preliminary changes in workplace belonging, professional fulfillment, burnout, emotional well-being, resilience, confidence, anxiety, depression, and related psychosocial outcomes following participation in the program.

Study findings will be used to refine the Bridges intervention and inform future research on digital interventions designed to promote workplace belonging and well-being for LGBTQ+ employees and other populations experiencing challenges related to workplace belonging and connection.

Being tested
Bridges
Keywords
Belonging, LGBTQ Health, Mental Health, well-being
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BridgesBehavioural

    Bridges is a digital behavioral intervention designed to support workplace belonging and well-being among LGBTQ+ employees. The program combines personalized text messaging with web-based educational content, self-reflection activities, self-assessment tools, and practical workplace strategies.

    Participants received tailored text messages throughout the 30-day intervention period and were provided access to an online platform containing interactive activities and resources. Program content focused on helping participants understand workplace belonging, reflect on workplace experiences, develop skills that support connection and inclusion, build confidence in addressing workplace challenges, and identify actionable steps to enhance belonging and well-being at work.

    The intervention was developed using behavior change science principles and a participatory design approach involving LGBTQ+ worker advisors.

Study groups in NCT07634432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bridges Intervention PilotExperimentalAfter completing the baseline assessment, all pilot participants will have access to the Bridges pilot program for 30 days. At the end of the 30 day pilot, they will be directed to the follow-up assessment.
Receives: Behavioral: Bridges

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants who continued receiving text messages

    Proportion of participants who continued receiving text messages throughout the intervention period. Range is 0-100, with 100% indicating everyone continued receiving messages.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Percentage rating program 7 or higher on the Net Promoter Score

    Percentage of participants providing a recommendation rating of 7 or higher. Range is 0-100% with 100% indicating everyone rated the program a 7 or higher.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Modified Professional Fulfillment Index-Professional Fulfillment Score

    Six items that assess positive intrinsic rewards and meaningfulness at work on a 5 point Likert scale. Scores are standardized to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on the fulfillment subscale signifying thriving occupational well-being.

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Modified Professional Fulfillment Index-Work Exhaustion

    Four items that assess physical and emotional fatigue on a 5 point Likert scale. Scores are standardized to a 0-100 scale with higher scores signifying higher levels of fatigue.

    Measured: 1 month

  5. Modified Professional Fulfillment Index-Interpersonal Disengagement

    Three items that assess a loss of empathy and connection with colleagues on a 5 point Likert Scale. Scores are standardized on a 0-100 scale with elevated scores indicating individuals at a high risk for burnout.

    Measured: 1 month

  6. Modified Professional Fulfillment Index-Burnout

    Combines items from work exhaustion and disengagement subscales. Scores are on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating high risk for burnout.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Duke Emotional Exhaustion

    Five items measure the frequency and severity of physical and emotional fatigue from work on a 5 point Likert scale with a range of 0-100. Higher scores function as a key diagnostic indicator for individuals or organizational units experiencing high rates of burnout.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Duke Emotional Thriving

    Four items measure psychological flourishing and the daily use of personal strengths on a 5 point Likert scale with a range 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher professional fulfillment and vitality.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

    The PHQ-2 is a 2-item screening measure of depressive symptoms that asks respondents to rate the frequency of depressed mood and loss of interest or pleasure over the past two weeks on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"), with higher total scores (range 0-6) indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2)

    The GAD-2 is a 2-item screening measure of anxiety symptoms that asks respondents to rate the frequency of feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge and inability to control worrying over the past two weeks on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"), with higher total scores (range 0-6) indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Measured: 1 month

  5. Iowa Workplace Belonging Scale (IOWA-B)

    The IOWA-B is a 3 item self-report measure of workplace belonging that assesses employees' perceptions of acceptance, inclusion, connection, and value within their workplace on a 5 point Likert scale; higher scores indicate greater workplace belonging on the 0-100 scale.

    Measured: 1 month

  6. Resilience Evaluation Measure-3 (REM-3)

    The REM-3 is a 3-item self-report measure that assesses key components of resilience, including positive thinking, meaning and purpose, and meaningful social connections. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2026
  2. Study start14 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion22 Nov 2025
  4. Study completion22 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07634432
Sponsor's protocol ID
Bridges 2024-2
Acronym
Bridges
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
4 Jun 2026
Last updated
10 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study, including derived scale scores, subscale scores, and associated data documentation.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bridges in people with Belonging and Mental Health, run by Pro-Change Behavior Systems at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants who continued receiving text messages (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in