Prostate CancerPhase 2NCT07635524
A Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-NU101 PET/CT Compared Against Current Standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat (Pylarify®) PET/CT.
A Phase 2 study testing Cu-NU101 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research is to test whether a new investigational Molecular Imaging (MI) agent called 61Cu-NU101 is equal to or better than a currently used MI agent, Pylarify, for the detection of prostate cancer metastases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cu-NU101
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2026to 1 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECOG 0 or 2 4 .Oligometastatic disease (1-5 radiotracer avid disease sites) on 18F- piflufolastat PET/CT within 30 days of trial recruitment
Who cannot join
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to PSMA-targeted imaging agents
- Other active malignancy, other than the known prostate cancer
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites
Hoag Family Cancer Institute
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Beth Thomsen, CNMT, CRC, 949-557-0285, beth.thomsen@hoag.org
Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD
Washington Univeristy School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Vikas Prasad
About this study
Official title: A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T (61Cu-NU101) for Patients With Prostate Cancer
The purpose of this research is to test whether a new investigational Molecular Imaging (MI) agent called 61Cu-NU101 is equal to or better than a currently used MI agent, Pylarify, for the detection of prostate cancer metastases.
34 participants with biopsy-proven prostate cancer and cancer seen on a Pylarify PET scan will be enrolled in this study.
The investigational 61Cu-NU101 PET/CT will be perfromed. If there is a difference between the standard Pylarify exam and the investigational 61Cu-NU101 exam, a biopsy of one lesion that is different between the two exams may be performed.
Read the detailed description
This is an open, phase 2, two center, non-randomized trial. Total of 34 subjects are planned, based on a statistical analysis to provide 80% power to determine non-inferiority of 61Cu-NU101 as compared to 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT. Each participant will have biopsy-proven prostate cancer visualized on standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT performed within 30 days of trial accrual. If participants have not had a diagnostic quality CT and/or a bone scan within 30 days of trial accrual, then will undergo a diagnostic quality CT and/or bone scan, as needed. Participants will undergo a research 61Cu-NU101 PET/CT, as follows: Each subject will receive a single administration of 61Cu-NU101, followed by PET/CT imaging at 1 and 4 hours. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection. Safety of 61Cu-NU101 will be evaluated by monitoring for unlikely adverse events. Ability of 61Cu-NU101to visualize malignant lesions will be evaluated by comparing the number of suspicious lesions demonstrated on the standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT with the number of suspicious lesions demonstrated on the experimental 61Cu-NU101PET/CT. Positive lesions will be considered to be foci greater than local background that are not physiologic/benign by location. If there is a discrepancy between the number of lesions detected by 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and 61Cu-NU101PET/CT, then a discrepant lesion will be selected for biopsy to provide pathologic proof as a reference standard, if possible.
Determination of lesions suspicious for malignancy on 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and 61Cu-NU101: The previously performed standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and the on-trial research 61Cu-NU101will be evaluated using the same methodology, by radiologists with expertise in the interpretation of PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging. Abnormal tracer accumulation will be defined as areas of uptake outside of sites considered physiologic or inflammatory. The locations of focal tracer abnormalities will be recorded. Radiotracer uptake will be graded on a scale of 1-5 where 1 = definitely normal, 2 = probably normal, 3 = equivocal, 4 = probably abnormal, and 5 = definitely abnormal. Semiquantitative analysis of tracer uptake will be performed for grade 4 and 5 lesions. Three-dimensional regions of interest (ROIs) will be placed in areas of tracer uptake and used for quantification of standardized uptake value (SUV), calculated as: SUV = decay-corrected mean ROI activity (μCi/ml) / (injected dose (μCi)/ body weight (g)). SUVmax will be recorded. Lesions graded as 4 (probably abnormal) or 5 (definitely abnormal) for malignancy will be counted and included in the number on lesions suspicious for malignancy in each examination.
Determination of lesions suspicious for malignancy on CT and bone scan: As a secondary objective, the number of lesions suspicious for malignancy will be compared between 61Cu-NU101and standard-of-care CT/bone scan. CT and bone scan will be interpreted by radiologists with expertise in the interpretation in CT and bone scans. Abnormal findings on CT and bone scan will be graded on a scale of 1-5 where 1 = definitely normal, 2 = probably normal, 3 = equivocal, 4 = probably abnormal, and 5 = definitely abnormal. No quantitative measurements will be made on CT and bone scan. For osseous lesions, a corresponding lesion on CT and bone scan will be counted as only 1 lesion. Lesions graded as 4 (probably abnormal) or 5 (definitely abnormal) for malignancy will be counted and included in the number on lesions suspicious for malignancy.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Cu-NU101
- Keywords
- prostate, cancer, metastatic, radiotracer, metastases
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cu-NU101Drug
Subjects will receive a single dose of 61Cu-NU101, administered as a slow intravenous bolus over 10 seconds, with a dosage of 148 MBq (4 mCi) +/-10% , followed by PET/CT imaging 1 hour (+/- 10 minutes) and 4 hours (+/- 30 minutes) post radiotracer administration. There are no specific restrictions that should apply when administering 61Cu-NU101. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cu-NU101 | Experimental | Subjects will receive a single dose of 61Cu-NU101, administered as a slow intravenous bolus over 10 seconds, with a dosage of 148 MBq (4 mCi) +/-10% , followed by PET/CT imaging 1 hour (+/- 10 minutes) and 4 hours (+/- 30 minutes) post radiotracer administration. There are no specific restrictions that should apply when administering 61Cu-NU101. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection. Receives: Drug: Cu-NU101 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity of imaging with 61Cu- NU101,
Demonstrate the sensitivity of imaging with 61Cu- NU101, as compared to a currently standard of care PSMA-targeted imaging agent, 18F-piflufolastat.
Measured: 4 hours post-administration
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assessing the sensitivity of the 61Cu-NU101 scan
Sensitivity will be determined by comparing the lesions identified with 61Cu-NU101 against those identified with standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat, with histology as the reference standard.
Measured: 1 hour post-administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicine, Nuclidium
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gary Ulaner, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07635524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 149-25-CA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Jan;20(1):23-47. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
PubMed 36473945Ulaner GA, Bassett JC, Reddy R, Thomsen B, Reynolds D, Jerjian KJ, Wolfe R, Benjamin DJ, Fani M, O'Donoghue J, Baier M, Schubert N, Pais B, De Rose F, Jaafar L. 61Cu-NODAGA Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging and Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Phase 1 Trial of a New Class of 61Cu-labeled PET Radiotracers. Radiology. 2025 Dec;317(3):e251151. doi: 10.1148/radiol.251151.
PubMed 41363974van der Gaag S, Bartelink IH, Vis AN, Burchell GL, Oprea-Lager DE, Hendrikse H. Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy. Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 23;10(12):3020. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123020.
PubMed 36551776Chatalic KL, Heskamp S, Konijnenberg M, Molkenboer-Kuenen JD, Franssen GM, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Schottelius M, Wester HJ, van Weerden WM, Boerman OC, de Jong M. Towards Personalized Treatment of Prostate Cancer: PSMA I&T, a Promising Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Theranostic Agent. Theranostics. 2016 Apr 12;6(6):849-61. doi: 10.7150/thno.14744. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27162555Lawhn-Heath C, Salavati A, Behr SC, Rowe SP, Calais J, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Emmett L, Hofman MS, Hope TA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET in Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):248-260. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202771. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
PubMed 33787338Yilmaz U, Komek H, Can C, Altindag S. The role of (68Ga)PSMA I&T in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: detection rate and the correlation between the level of PSA, Gleason score, and the SUVmax. Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Aug;33(8):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01360-x. Epub 2019 May 8.
PubMed 31069696Komek H, Can C, Yilmaz U, Altindag S. Prognostic value of 68 Ga PSMA I&T PET/CT SUV parameters on survival outcome in advanced prostat cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;32(8):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1277-5. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
PubMed 30006752Cytawa W, Seitz AK, Kircher S, Fukushima K, Tran-Gia J, Schirbel A, Bandurski T, Lass P, Krebs M, Polom W, Matuszewski M, Wester HJ, Buck AK, Kubler H, Lapa C. 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jan;47(1):168-177. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04524-z. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
PubMed 31529265Follacchio GA, De Feo MS, De Vincentis G, Monteleone F, Liberatore M. Radiopharmaceuticals Labelled with Copper Radionuclides: Clinical Results in Human Beings. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11(1):22-33. doi: 10.2174/1874471011666171211161851.
PubMed 29231149Amanuel FK. Nuclear model prediction for production of medical 22Na, 51Cr, 60Co, 61Cu, 64Cu, 65Zn, 67, 68Ga, 88Y and 99Mo radionuclides: Comparison of experimental and theoretical data. Appl Radiat Isot. 2021 Jun;172:109674. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109674. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
PubMed 33684656Ulaner GA, Thomsen B, Bassett J, Torrey R, Cox C, Lin K, Patel T, Techasith T, Mauguen A, Rowe SP, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Choyke P, Yoshida J. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for Initially Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Prospective Trial with Pathologic Confirmation. Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):419-428. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220218. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
PubMed 35852431Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, Hofman M, Koontz BF, Lin DW, Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Royce TJ, Salami S, Savir-Baruch B, Srinivas S, Hope TA. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;63(1):59-68. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263262. Epub 2021 Sep 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 34593595Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Saperstein L, Pouliot F, Josephson D, Wong JYC, Pantel AR, Cho SY, Gage KL, Piert M, Iagaru A, Pollard JH, Wong V, Jensen J, Lin T, Stambler N, Carroll PR, Siegel BA; CONDOR Study Group. Diagnostic Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from the CONDOR Phase III, Multicenter Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 1;27(13):3674-3682. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4573. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PubMed 33622706Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, Carroll PR, Pouliot F, Probst S, Saperstein L, Preston MA, Alva AS, Patnaik A, Durack JC, Stambler N, Lin T, Jensen J, Wong V, Siegel BA, Morris MJ. A Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL in Prostate Cancer Patients (OSPREY). J Urol. 2021 Jul;206(1):52-61. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001698. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
PubMed 33634707Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenbock SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):1635-1642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3771.
PubMed 34529005
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T (61Cu-NU101) for Patients With Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07635524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 149-25-CA
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- prostate, cancer, metastatic, radiotracer, metastases
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicine, Nuclidium
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research is to test whether a new investigational Molecular Imaging (MI) agent called 61Cu-NU101 is equal to or better than a currently used MI agent, Pylarify, for the detection of prostate cancer metastases.
34 participants with biopsy-proven prostate cancer and cancer seen on a Pylarify PET scan will be enrolled in this study.
The investigational 61Cu-NU101 PET/CT will be perfromed. If there is a difference between the standard Pylarify exam and the investigational 61Cu-NU101 exam, a biopsy of one lesion that is different between the two exams may be performed.
Detailed description
This is an open, phase 2, two center, non-randomized trial. Total of 34 subjects are planned, based on a statistical analysis to provide 80% power to determine non-inferiority of 61Cu-NU101 as compared to 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT. Each participant will have biopsy-proven prostate cancer visualized on standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT performed within 30 days of trial accrual. If participants have not had a diagnostic quality CT and/or a bone scan within 30 days of trial accrual, then will undergo a diagnostic quality CT and/or bone scan, as needed. Participants will undergo a research 61Cu-NU101 PET/CT, as follows: Each subject will receive a single administration of 61Cu-NU101, followed by PET/CT imaging at 1 and 4 hours. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection. Safety of 61Cu-NU101 will be evaluated by monitoring for unlikely adverse events. Ability of 61Cu-NU101to visualize malignant lesions will be evaluated by comparing the number of suspicious lesions demonstrated on the standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT with the number of suspicious lesions demonstrated on the experimental 61Cu-NU101PET/CT. Positive lesions will be considered to be foci greater than local background that are not physiologic/benign by location. If there is a discrepancy between the number of lesions detected by 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and 61Cu-NU101PET/CT, then a discrepant lesion will be selected for biopsy to provide pathologic proof as a reference standard, if possible.
Determination of lesions suspicious for malignancy on 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and 61Cu-NU101: The previously performed standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT and the on-trial research 61Cu-NU101will be evaluated using the same methodology, by radiologists with expertise in the interpretation of PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging. Abnormal tracer accumulation will be defined as areas of uptake outside of sites considered physiologic or inflammatory. The locations of focal tracer abnormalities will be recorded. Radiotracer uptake will be graded on a scale of 1-5 where 1 = definitely normal, 2 = probably normal, 3 = equivocal, 4 = probably abnormal, and 5 = definitely abnormal. Semiquantitative analysis of tracer uptake will be performed for grade 4 and 5 lesions. Three-dimensional regions of interest (ROIs) will be placed in areas of tracer uptake and used for quantification of standardized uptake value (SUV), calculated as: SUV = decay-corrected mean ROI activity (μCi/ml) / (injected dose (μCi)/ body weight (g)). SUVmax will be recorded. Lesions graded as 4 (probably abnormal) or 5 (definitely abnormal) for malignancy will be counted and included in the number on lesions suspicious for malignancy in each examination.
Determination of lesions suspicious for malignancy on CT and bone scan: As a secondary objective, the number of lesions suspicious for malignancy will be compared between 61Cu-NU101and standard-of-care CT/bone scan. CT and bone scan will be interpreted by radiologists with expertise in the interpretation in CT and bone scans. Abnormal findings on CT and bone scan will be graded on a scale of 1-5 where 1 = definitely normal, 2 = probably normal, 3 = equivocal, 4 = probably abnormal, and 5 = definitely abnormal. No quantitative measurements will be made on CT and bone scan. For osseous lesions, a corresponding lesion on CT and bone scan will be counted as only 1 lesion. Lesions graded as 4 (probably abnormal) or 5 (definitely abnormal) for malignancy will be counted and included in the number on lesions suspicious for malignancy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cu-NU101 | Experimental | Drug: Cu-NU101Subjects will receive a single dose of 61Cu-NU101, administered as a slow intravenous bolus over 10 seconds, with a dosage of 148 MBq (4 mCi) +/-10% , followed by PET/CT imaging 1 hour (+/- 10 minutes) and 4 hours (+/- 30 minutes) post radiotracer administration. There are no specific restrictions that should apply when administering 61Cu-NU101. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECOG 0 or 2 4 .Oligometastatic disease (1-5 radiotracer avid disease sites) on 18F- piflufolastat PET/CT within 30 days of trial recruitment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to PSMA-targeted imaging agents
- Other active malignancy, other than the known prostate cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cu-NU101Subjects will receive a single dose of 61Cu-NU101, administered as a slow intravenous bolus over 10 seconds, with a dosage of 148 MBq (4 mCi) +/-10% , followed by PET/CT imaging 1 hour (+/- 10 minutes) and 4 hours (+/- 30 minutes) post radiotracer administration. There are no specific restrictions that should apply when administering 61Cu-NU101. There will be optional 5-minute dynamic scans at tracer administration and 20- and 40-minutes post injection. | Drug | Cu-NU101 |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of imaging with 61Cu- NU101,
Time frame: 4 hours post-administration
Demonstrate the sensitivity of imaging with 61Cu- NU101, as compared to a currently standard of care PSMA-targeted imaging agent, 18F-piflufolastat.
1 secondary outcome
Assessing the sensitivity of the 61Cu-NU101 scan
Time frame: 1 hour post-administration
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36473945Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Jan;20(1):23-47. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 41363974Ulaner GA, Bassett JC, Reddy R, Thomsen B, Reynolds D, Jerjian KJ, Wolfe R, Benjamin DJ, Fani M, O'Donoghue J, Baier M, Schubert N, Pais B, De Rose F, Jaafar L. 61Cu-NODAGA Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging and Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Phase 1 Trial of a New Class of 61Cu-labeled PET Radiotracers. Radiology. 2025 Dec;317(3):e251151. doi: 10.1148/radiol.251151.
- Background: PubMed 36551776van der Gaag S, Bartelink IH, Vis AN, Burchell GL, Oprea-Lager DE, Hendrikse H. Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy. Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 23;10(12):3020. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123020.
- Background: PubMed 27162555Chatalic KL, Heskamp S, Konijnenberg M, Molkenboer-Kuenen JD, Franssen GM, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Schottelius M, Wester HJ, van Weerden WM, Boerman OC, de Jong M. Towards Personalized Treatment of Prostate Cancer: PSMA I&T, a Promising Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Theranostic Agent. Theranostics. 2016 Apr 12;6(6):849-61. doi: 10.7150/thno.14744. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 33787338Lawhn-Heath C, Salavati A, Behr SC, Rowe SP, Calais J, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Emmett L, Hofman MS, Hope TA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET in Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):248-260. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202771. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 31069696Yilmaz U, Komek H, Can C, Altindag S. The role of (68Ga)PSMA I&T in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: detection rate and the correlation between the level of PSA, Gleason score, and the SUVmax. Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Aug;33(8):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01360-x. Epub 2019 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 30006752Komek H, Can C, Yilmaz U, Altindag S. Prognostic value of 68 Ga PSMA I&T PET/CT SUV parameters on survival outcome in advanced prostat cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;32(8):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1277-5. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 31529265Cytawa W, Seitz AK, Kircher S, Fukushima K, Tran-Gia J, Schirbel A, Bandurski T, Lass P, Krebs M, Polom W, Matuszewski M, Wester HJ, Buck AK, Kubler H, Lapa C. 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jan;47(1):168-177. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04524-z. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 29231149Follacchio GA, De Feo MS, De Vincentis G, Monteleone F, Liberatore M. Radiopharmaceuticals Labelled with Copper Radionuclides: Clinical Results in Human Beings. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11(1):22-33. doi: 10.2174/1874471011666171211161851.
- Background: PubMed 33684656Amanuel FK. Nuclear model prediction for production of medical 22Na, 51Cr, 60Co, 61Cu, 64Cu, 65Zn, 67, 68Ga, 88Y and 99Mo radionuclides: Comparison of experimental and theoretical data. Appl Radiat Isot. 2021 Jun;172:109674. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109674. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 35852431Ulaner GA, Thomsen B, Bassett J, Torrey R, Cox C, Lin K, Patel T, Techasith T, Mauguen A, Rowe SP, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Choyke P, Yoshida J. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for Initially Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Prospective Trial with Pathologic Confirmation. Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):419-428. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220218. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 34593595Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, Hofman M, Koontz BF, Lin DW, Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Royce TJ, Salami S, Savir-Baruch B, Srinivas S, Hope TA. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;63(1):59-68. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263262. Epub 2021 Sep 30. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cu-NU101 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gary Ulaner, MD, PhD (949-557-0285, gary.ulaner@hoag.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity of imaging with 61Cu- NU101, (time frame: 4 hours post-administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07635524, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2026.