CancerNCT07638163
EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAMME IN PAEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS
A study testing Supervised training and Home training in people with Cancer and Paediatric, run by University of Salamanca.
Trial summary
This project is made possible through the Pediatrics Department of the University Hospital of Salamanca, in collaboration with researchers specialized in therapeutic exercise from other clinical trials and research projects, alongside physical therapists experienced in designing, programming, and supervising… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Paediatric
- What is being tested?
- Supervised training and Home training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 May 2026to 30 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- People under the age of 18 who have been diagnosed with cancer and are currently undergoing treatment or living with the after-effects of the disease.
- People who have not engaged in regular physical activity in the last 8 weeks.
- Performance Status (ECOG) 0-1.
- Signing of the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Have any contraindications to physical exercise: severe musculoskeletal disorders, severe cardiovascular diseases, uncontrolled bone metastases, and other conditions as determined by a healthcare professional.
- Patients who are unable to undergo the initial assessment tests or who have difficulty performing basic exercises.
- Patients who must discontinue treatment due to intolerance to it.
- Other circumstances, at the discretion of the investigators, that may interfere with the purpose or conduct of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAMME ON QUALITY OF LIFE, FUNCTIONAL ABILITY AND MENTAL HEALTH IN PAEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS
This project is made possible through the Pediatrics Department of the University Hospital of Salamanca, in collaboration with researchers specialized in therapeutic exercise from other clinical trials and research projects, alongside physical therapists experienced in designing, programming, and supervising therapeutic exercise programs.
Furthermore, the project addresses current healthcare needs, as a significant portion of the patient population exhibits symptoms that impair functional capacity and overall quality of life-driven both by age and the oncological disease and its treatment. Consequently, this initiative aims to implement a strength training program to foster beneficial outcomes across various aspects of these patients' health, while sharing the findings with the scientific community.
Read the detailed description
Background and Current State of the Art Childhood cancer, although relatively rare compared to adult cancer, is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality due to disease in the pediatric population worldwide. It is estimated that more than 400,000 cases of cancer are diagnosed each year in children and adolescents under the age of 19, with leukemias, central nervous system tumors, and lymphomas being the most common types. Despite significant advances in diagnosis and treatment that have substantially increased survival rates in recent decades, many pediatric patients experience physical and psychological side effects derived from both the disease and oncological treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery.
Among the most frequent complications are cancer-related fatigue, muscle mass loss, decreased cardiorespiratory capacity, functional impairment, and psychological alterations such as anxiety, depression, or social adaptation difficulties. These effects can significantly impact the physical, cognitive, and emotional development of children, as well as their quality of life during and after treatment.
In this context, physical exercise has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention to improve the health and well-being of pediatric patients with chronic diseases, including cancer. Various studies in the adult population have shown that exercise can help reduce fatigue, preserve muscle mass, improve cardiorespiratory function, and promote psychological well-being during oncological treatment. In recent years, research in the pediatric population has begun to explore these benefits, showing positive preliminary results.
Physical exercise, when prescribed safely and adapted to the patient's clinical and functional characteristics, can contribute to enhancing functional capacity, promoting physical recovery, and fostering participation in daily and school activities. Furthermore, it has been observed that physical activity can play an important role in regulating relevant physiological processes in cancer patients, such as systemic inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune function.
Despite these promising findings, scientific evidence regarding the effects of physical exercise in the pediatric cancer population remains limited compared to that available for adults. In particular, there are significant gaps regarding optimal exercise prescription, including the most appropriate type of activity, intensity, frequency, and duration for different ages, tumor types, and treatment phases. Therefore, further research into the impact of physical exercise on children with cancer is necessary to develop evidence-based intervention programs that contribute to improving their recovery and quality of life.
Background and Current State of the Problem In recent years, interest in the role of physical exercise in pediatric cancer care has increased considerably. Several studies have shown that supervised physical activity is safe and feasible during different phases of cancer treatment in children and adolescents, and that it can contribute to improving cardiorespiratory capacity, muscle strength, and quality of life.
One of the main problems associated with cancer and its treatments in the pediatric population is the decline in physical fitness. Prolonged chemotherapy, frequent hospitalization, and the reduction of habitual physical activity promote the development of muscle weakness, loss of muscle mass, and decreased functional capacity. These alterations can have long-term consequences, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in survivors of childhood cancer.
In this regard, physical exercise-and particularly combined training that includes aerobic and strength components-has proven effective in improving muscle strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, and functionality in children with chronic diseases. In pediatric cancer patients, some studies have reported improvements in mobility, exercise tolerance, and the ability to perform daily activities following the implementation of supervised exercise programs.
In addition to physical benefits, exercise can have a positive impact on the psychological well-being of children with cancer. Participation in adapted physical activities can boost self-esteem, reduce anxiety levels, and improve mood, as well as promote social interaction and the maintenance of routines similar to those of other children their age.
Another relevant aspect is the potential effect of exercise on physiological processes involved in disease progression and patient recovery, such as systemic inflammation and immune function. Some studies have suggested that physical activity can modulate the release of inflammatory cytokines and improve the immune response, which could contribute to a better adaptation of the organism to oncological treatment [17].
However, despite advances in this field, research on physical exercise in pediatric cancer patients remains limited and heterogeneous. There are major methodological differences between studies regarding the design of exercise programs, the duration of interventions, and the variables evaluated, which makes it difficult to establish clear recommendations for clinical practice.
Therefore, it is fundamental to continue developing research that allows for a better understanding of the effects of physical exercise in this population and to establish safe, effective intervention protocols tailored to the specific needs of pediatric patients. Generating evidence in this area will contribute to integrating physical exercise as part of a multidisciplinary approach to childhood cancer care, aimed not only at survival but also at improving the quality of life and holistic development of affected children.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Paediatric
- Being tested
- Supervised training, Home training
- Keywords
- Cancer, Exercise, Paediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Supervised trainingOther
Supervised Strength Exercise Sessions: There will be two weekly sessions, each lasting 50 minutes. Each session consists of three well-defined parts:Warm-up: 10 minutes of global strength and aerobic exercises at an estimated 60% of VO2max, focusing on the primary areas to be worked on during that session.Strength Training: 6 strength exercises targeting the main muscle groups, with a duration of 30 minutes. The initial load will be set between 40-70% of the estimated 1-RM (to be assessed in the first session and based on the patient's individual characteristics). When the participant is able to complete 3 sets of 12 repetitions with the established weight in two consecutive sessions, the weight will be increased by 10%. Cool-down/Stretching: 10 minutes of a combination of breathing exercises and stretching of the main muscle groups.
Home trainingOther
Participants will complete four weekly home-based exercise sessions, which will not coincide with the supervised training days. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes, and they will complete two sets of five exercises-primarily light strength work-with one minute of work and one minute of rest. Additionally, all participants will be required to walk for 60 minutes every day of the week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised intervention group using therapeutic strength training | Experimental | Supervised Intervention Group (Therapeutic Strength Exercise Program): The therapeutic strength exercise program will focus on strength exercises, although daily aerobic exercises will also be included.The intervention group will perform a supervised therapeutic strength exercise program two days a week, combined with a physical activity promotion program to be completed at home four days a week. All supervised strength exercise sessions will be led by a physical therapist in a physical therapy clinic with appropriate space for the intervention. Receives: Other: Supervised training |
| Home-based intervention group without supervised exercise | Experimental | Patients in the home-based intervention group will only follow the physical activity promotion programme five days a week. This will be combined with a 60-minute walk every day of the week. Receives: Other: Home training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short Physical Performance Battery
Functional status: the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) will be used. It consists of three tests that assess balance, lower limb strength (using the 5-squat test) and walking speed over 4 metres. The maximum score is 12 points, and a score of ≤ 8 points indicates poor physical performance, although each of the three tests is also assessed independently. Minimum value 0, maximum value 12. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) is a standard 9-question self-report tool used by clinicians to screen for depression and measure its severity. It asks you to rate how often you have been bothered by specific symptoms over the past two weeks. Each of the 9 items is scored from 0 to 3 based on frequency: 0: Not at all 1: Several days 2: More than half the days 3: Nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher numbers indicating more severe depressive symptoms.0-4: Minimal or no depression5-9: Mild depression (monitor and use clinical judgment)10-14: Moderate depression15-19: Moderately severe depression (warrants active treatment)20-27: Severe depression.
Measured: 12 weeks
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
The GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) is a brief, 7-question clinical screening tool used to measure the severity of generalized anxiety and identify probable anxiety disorders based on symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Each of the 7 items is rated on a 4-point scale, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 21: Not at all: 0 points Several days: 1 point More than half the days: 2 points Nearly every day: 3 points Interpreting Your Results: Add the scores for all 7 questions together to find your severity level: 0-4: Minimal Anxiety 5-9: Mild Anxiety 10-14: Moderate Anxiety 15-21: Severe Anxiety
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength: This will be assessed using a dynamometer to measure grip strength. Grip strength values below 16 kg are considered indicative of possible sarcopenia. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: 12 weeks
5-squat test
5-squat test: The time taken to stand up and sit down 5 times on a chair without support is assessed. Times exceeding 15 seconds are considered positive, indicating probable sarcopenia. Higher values mean worse outcome
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2026
- Study start30 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups, in which paediatric patients with cancer will be recruited. Study participants will be assigned to one of the two study arms: 1) Supervised intervention group with therapeutic strength training; 2) Home-based intervention group without supervised exercise.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Salamanca
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, CARLOS MARTIN SANCHEZ, University of Salamanca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07638163
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PaediatricCancer
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 20 May 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Rustler V, Hagerty M, Daeggelmann J, Marjerrison S, Bloch W, Baumann FT. Exercise interventions for patients with pediatric cancer during inpatient acute care: A systematic review of literature. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Nov;64(11). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26567. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
PubMed 28423225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAMME ON QUALITY OF LIFE, FUNCTIONAL ABILITY AND MENTAL HEALTH IN PAEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07638163
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PaediatricCancer
- Conditions
- Cancer, Paediatric
- Keywords
- Cancer, Exercise, Paediatric
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SalamancaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project is made possible through the Pediatrics Department of the University Hospital of Salamanca, in collaboration with researchers specialized in therapeutic exercise from other clinical trials and research projects, alongside physical therapists experienced in designing, programming, and supervising therapeutic exercise programs.
Furthermore, the project addresses current healthcare needs, as a significant portion of the patient population exhibits symptoms that impair functional capacity and overall quality of life-driven both by age and the oncological disease and its treatment. Consequently, this initiative aims to implement a strength training program to foster beneficial outcomes across various aspects of these patients' health, while sharing the findings with the scientific community.
Detailed description
Background and Current State of the Art Childhood cancer, although relatively rare compared to adult cancer, is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality due to disease in the pediatric population worldwide. It is estimated that more than 400,000 cases of cancer are diagnosed each year in children and adolescents under the age of 19, with leukemias, central nervous system tumors, and lymphomas being the most common types. Despite significant advances in diagnosis and treatment that have substantially increased survival rates in recent decades, many pediatric patients experience physical and psychological side effects derived from both the disease and oncological treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery.
Among the most frequent complications are cancer-related fatigue, muscle mass loss, decreased cardiorespiratory capacity, functional impairment, and psychological alterations such as anxiety, depression, or social adaptation difficulties. These effects can significantly impact the physical, cognitive, and emotional development of children, as well as their quality of life during and after treatment.
In this context, physical exercise has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention to improve the health and well-being of pediatric patients with chronic diseases, including cancer. Various studies in the adult population have shown that exercise can help reduce fatigue, preserve muscle mass, improve cardiorespiratory function, and promote psychological well-being during oncological treatment. In recent years, research in the pediatric population has begun to explore these benefits, showing positive preliminary results.
Physical exercise, when prescribed safely and adapted to the patient's clinical and functional characteristics, can contribute to enhancing functional capacity, promoting physical recovery, and fostering participation in daily and school activities. Furthermore, it has been observed that physical activity can play an important role in regulating relevant physiological processes in cancer patients, such as systemic inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune function.
Despite these promising findings, scientific evidence regarding the effects of physical exercise in the pediatric cancer population remains limited compared to that available for adults. In particular, there are significant gaps regarding optimal exercise prescription, including the most appropriate type of activity, intensity, frequency, and duration for different ages, tumor types, and treatment phases. Therefore, further research into the impact of physical exercise on children with cancer is necessary to develop evidence-based intervention programs that contribute to improving their recovery and quality of life.
Background and Current State of the Problem In recent years, interest in the role of physical exercise in pediatric cancer care has increased considerably. Several studies have shown that supervised physical activity is safe and feasible during different phases of cancer treatment in children and adolescents, and that it can contribute to improving cardiorespiratory capacity, muscle strength, and quality of life.
One of the main problems associated with cancer and its treatments in the pediatric population is the decline in physical fitness. Prolonged chemotherapy, frequent hospitalization, and the reduction of habitual physical activity promote the development of muscle weakness, loss of muscle mass, and decreased functional capacity. These alterations can have long-term consequences, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in survivors of childhood cancer.
In this regard, physical exercise-and particularly combined training that includes aerobic and strength components-has proven effective in improving muscle strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, and functionality in children with chronic diseases. In pediatric cancer patients, some studies have reported improvements in mobility, exercise tolerance, and the ability to perform daily activities following the implementation of supervised exercise programs.
In addition to physical benefits, exercise can have a positive impact on the psychological well-being of children with cancer. Participation in adapted physical activities can boost self-esteem, reduce anxiety levels, and improve mood, as well as promote social interaction and the maintenance of routines similar to those of other children their age.
Another relevant aspect is the potential effect of exercise on physiological processes involved in disease progression and patient recovery, such as systemic inflammation and immune function. Some studies have suggested that physical activity can modulate the release of inflammatory cytokines and improve the immune response, which could contribute to a better adaptation of the organism to oncological treatment [17].
However, despite advances in this field, research on physical exercise in pediatric cancer patients remains limited and heterogeneous. There are major methodological differences between studies regarding the design of exercise programs, the duration of interventions, and the variables evaluated, which makes it difficult to establish clear recommendations for clinical practice.
Therefore, it is fundamental to continue developing research that allows for a better understanding of the effects of physical exercise in this population and to establish safe, effective intervention protocols tailored to the specific needs of pediatric patients. Generating evidence in this area will contribute to integrating physical exercise as part of a multidisciplinary approach to childhood cancer care, aimed not only at survival but also at improving the quality of life and holistic development of affected children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups, in which paediatric patients with cancer will be recruited. Study participants will be assigned to one of the two study arms: 1) Supervised intervention group with therapeutic strength training; 2) Home-based intervention group without supervised exercise.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised intervention group using therapeutic strength training | Experimental | Other: Supervised trainingSupervised Intervention Group (Therapeutic Strength Exercise Program): The therapeutic strength exercise program will focus on strength exercises, although daily aerobic exercises will also be included.The intervention group will perform a supervised therapeutic strength exercise program two days a week, combined with a physical activity promotion program to be completed at home four days a week. All supervised strength exercise sessions will be led by a physical therapist in a physical therapy clinic with appropriate space for the intervention. |
| Home-based intervention group without supervised exercise | Experimental | Other: Home trainingPatients in the home-based intervention group will only follow the physical activity promotion programme five days a week. This will be combined with a 60-minute walk every day of the week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- People under the age of 18 who have been diagnosed with cancer and are currently undergoing treatment or living with the after-effects of the disease.
- People who have not engaged in regular physical activity in the last 8 weeks.
- Performance Status (ECOG) 0-1.
- Signing of the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Have any contraindications to physical exercise: severe musculoskeletal disorders, severe cardiovascular diseases, uncontrolled bone metastases, and other conditions as determined by a healthcare professional.
- Patients who are unable to undergo the initial assessment tests or who have difficulty performing basic exercises.
- Patients who must discontinue treatment due to intolerance to it.
- Other circumstances, at the discretion of the investigators, that may interfere with the purpose or conduct of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Supervised trainingSupervised Strength Exercise Sessions: There will be two weekly sessions, each lasting 50 minutes. Each session consists of three well-defined parts:Warm-up: 10 minutes of global strength and aerobic exercises at an estimated 60% of VO2max, focusing on the primary areas to be worked on during that session.Strength Training: 6 strength exercises targeting the main muscle groups, with a duration of 30 minutes. The initial load will be set between 40-70% of the estimated 1-RM (to be assessed in the first session and based on the patient's individual characteristics). When the participant is able to complete 3 sets of 12 repetitions with the established weight in two consecutive sessions, the weight will be increased by 10%. Cool-down/Stretching: 10 minutes of a combination of breathing exercises and stretching of the main muscle groups. | Other | Supervised intervention group using therapeutic strength training |
| Home trainingParticipants will complete four weekly home-based exercise sessions, which will not coincide with the supervised training days. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes, and they will complete two sets of five exercises-primarily light strength work-with one minute of work and one minute of rest. Additionally, all participants will be required to walk for 60 minutes every day of the week. | Other | Home-based intervention group without supervised exercise |
Primary outcome
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Functional status: the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) will be used. It consists of three tests that assess balance, lower limb strength (using the 5-squat test) and walking speed over 4 metres. The maximum score is 12 points, and a score of ≤ 8 points indicates poor physical performance, although each of the three tests is also assessed independently. Minimum value 0, maximum value 12. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time frame: 12 weeks
The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) is a standard 9-question self-report tool used by clinicians to screen for depression and measure its severity. It asks you to rate how often you have been bothered by specific symptoms over the past two weeks. Each of the 9 items is scored from 0 to 3 based on frequency: 0: Not at all 1: Several days 2: More than half the days 3: Nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher numbers indicating more severe depressive symptoms.0-4: Minimal or no depression5-9: Mild depression (monitor and use clinical judgment)10-14: Moderate depression15-19: Moderately severe depression (warrants active treatment)20-27: Severe depression.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
Time frame: 12 weeks
The GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) is a brief, 7-question clinical screening tool used to measure the severity of generalized anxiety and identify probable anxiety disorders based on symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. Each of the 7 items is rated on a 4-point scale, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 21: Not at all: 0 points Several days: 1 point More than half the days: 2 points Nearly every day: 3 points Interpreting Your Results: Add the scores for all 7 questions together to find your severity level: 0-4: Minimal Anxiety 5-9: Mild Anxiety 10-14: Moderate Anxiety 15-21: Severe Anxiety
2 secondary outcomes
Handgrip strength
Time frame: 12 weeks
5-squat test
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28423225Rustler V, Hagerty M, Daeggelmann J, Marjerrison S, Bloch W, Baumann FT. Exercise interventions for patients with pediatric cancer during inpatient acute care: A systematic review of literature. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Nov;64(11). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26567. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Supervised training and Home training in people with Cancer and Paediatric, run by University of Salamanca.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carlos Martin-Sanchez, PhD (+34646774655, carlos_ms@usal.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short Physical Performance Battery (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07638163, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.