Asthma in ChildrenNCT07642388
Scaling up the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma to All Osakidetza Pediatric Services Through a Cluster-randomized SMART Design
A study testing Internal + External Facilitation for Implementation, Internal + External Facilitation for Sustainability and Internal Facilitation in people with Asthma in Children, run by Basque Health Service at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive sequential implementation strategies based on facilitation in promoting the sustainable and widespread adoption and scaling up of the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma - ASMAbat across all Primary Care and Hospital Pediatric Services of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma in Children
- What is being tested?
- Internal + External Facilitation for Implementation, Internal + External Facilitation for Sustainability and Internal Facilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,680 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 28 Feb 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Eligibility for healthcare settings:
- All Pediatric Services (Primary Care n=108 and Hospital Care n=9) from 11 of the 13 Osakidetza Integrated Healthcare Organizations that are not currently implementing the ASMAbat Pathway.
Eligibility for professionals:
- Primary Care pediatricians and nurses
- Pediatricians and nurses in the Pediatric Emergency Department
- Pediatricians and nurses on the inpatient ward
- Pediatric Intensive Care pediatricians and nurses
- Pediatric Pneumology pediatricians and nurses
Eligibility for patients:
Patients between 2 and 14 years that have being attended between the 1st of July 2026 and the 28th of February 2029, and with an acute episode of asthma, defined as:
- an episode of wheezing and a previous diagnosis of asthma or with a previous episode of wheezing
- a first episode in a child older than 2 years with a personal/family history of atopy and/or with an objective response to bronchodilators as assessed by a severity Score
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Scaling up the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma to All Osakidetza Pediatric Services Through a Cluster-randomized Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) Design
The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive sequential implementation strategies based on facilitation in promoting the sustainable and widespread adoption and scaling up of the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma - ASMAbat across all Primary Care and Hospital Pediatric Services of Osakidetza - Basque Health Service.
Read the detailed description
Although evidence-based, multidisciplinary approaches have demonstrated efficacy in the management of pediatric asthma, substantial variability persists in the quality and outcomes of care for children experiencing acute asthma exacerbations. The Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma - ASMAbat is a structured, evidence-informed framework designed to standardize care for patients presenting mild to moderate asthma attacks. It delineates the essential steps in clinical assessment, pharmacological management, and interprofessional coordination of care. Additionally, it incorporates quality indicators relative to diagnostic accuracy, assessment of disease severity, appropriateness of medication prescription, and the experiences of families and healthcare professionals. These indicators were refined through iterative consultations with key stakeholders (clinicians, families, and implementation partners) to ensure both clinical relevance and contextual feasibility.
The current study will be conducted across all Integrated Healthcare Organizations (IHOs) within the Osakidetza-Basque Health Service. This initiative builds on previous development and validation of the ASMAbat pathway in two IHOs, where implementation was evaluated using principles of implementation science. The expanded phase aims to systematically scale and adapt the pathway across diverse organizational settings within the Basque health system to enhance the quality, consistency, and sustainability of asthma care.
Three facilitation strategies have been developed to support implementation: (1) Internal Facilitation alone (Standard Scaling); (2) combined Internal and External Implementation Facilitation (IF); and (3) combined Internal and External Sustainability Facilitation (SF). Internal Facilitation is led by Clinical Leaders, professionals embedded within the health system who promote adoption and integration of evidence-based practices among their peers. External Facilitation is provided by experts with established experience in implementation science and quality improvement. External Implementation Facilitation focuses on supporting Clinical Leaders in diagnosing and addressing barriers to practice change using the Behavior Change Wheel framework, a theoretically grounded model for analyzing determinants of individual and collective behavioral change. In contrast, External Sustainability Facilitation emphasizes the identification and reinforcement of organizational, team-level, and individual factors necessary to achieve the long-term, system-wide institutionalization of the ASMAbat pathway into routine pediatric asthma management.
The overarching objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of scaling the implementation of the ASMAbat pathway across the Basque Health Service, with the overall goal of improving clinical management of acute asthma in children in accordance to recommended care and reducing variability across professionals and care settings. The primary scientific aim is to determine, among Pediatric Services demonstrating suboptimal response to the Standard Scaling (SS) strategy, the incremental effect of adding an Implementation Facilitation component on the appropriateness of the management of acute asthma episodes, which includes: a) the recording of the severity score, b) the assessment and recording of persistent asthma symptoms using the Pediatric Asthma Control Tool (M-PACT), c) the initiation or adjustment of maintenance treatment in cases of persistent asthma symptoms, and d) the administration of bronchodilator treatment via MDI with a spacer device. Secondary aims include evaluating, among services achieving adequate initial adoption through SS, the effect of introducing a Sustainability Facilitation strategy compared with maintaining SS alone during the subsequent phase, on the indicators of adequacy in the management of acute asthma episodes.
A Cluster-randomized Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design will be employed to test adaptive implementation strategies. All pediatric professionals belonging to 11 IHOs from Osakidetza-Basque Health Service and all acute asthma episodes in children aged 2-14 years during the study period will be included. During the first 8 months, all centers will receive the universal components of the ASMAbat Pathway and will be exposed to a standard scaling strategy (SS) composed of training for Clinical Leaders and pediatric professionals, electronic health record decision-support tools, audit and feedback, multichannel dissemination, and email reminders.
At month 8, based on the achieved implementation response (success criterion = Pulmonary Score recording rate exceeding 40% of all acute asthma episodes managed during the observation), external facilitation may be sequentially and randomly added as an adaptive strategy: for sites with poor adoption, facilitation will target barrier identification, problem-solving, and behavioural determinants; for sites with successful adoption, it will focus on sustainability by integrating the pathway into routine care. A second random reassignment will be conducted at month 16 based on response status, followed by an 8-month maintenance period, with a total follow-up of 32 months across all centers. Changes between periods by strategy in the rates of mild-to-moderate acute asthma episodes in which recommended treatment administration is recorded will be analysed using generalised linear mixed models. Implementation outcomes of reach and adoption of recommended care at patient and professional levels, fidelity of the clinical and implementation strategies, professionals' perceived feasibility, and user-reported care satisfaction will also be assessed.
This present study's design aims to maximize efficiency by first deploying the least complex, resource-intensive strategy and sequentially intensifying or modifying facilitation for sites demonstrating limited response, while maintaining existing strategies for successful sites. Such an adaptive approach minimizes costs by tailoring the level of implementation support to each site's readiness and observed progress. Furthermore, this design enhances the potential for scalability and generalizability across multiple contexts, including different clinical settings, patient subpopulations, and organizational environments. Ultimately, the project seeks to advance system-wide adoption and sustainability of evidence-based clinical practice for pediatric asthma management within Osakidetza, contributing to the broader field of implementation science and healthcare quality improvement.
- Conditions
- Asthma in Children
- Being tested
- Internal + External Facilitation for Implementation, Internal + External Facilitation for Sustainability, Internal Facilitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Internal + External Facilitation for ImplementationBehavioural
Non-responding sites randomized to receive both internal and external facilitation focused on addressing determinants (barriers) of low adoption
Internal + External Facilitation for SustainabilityBehavioural
Responding sites randomized to receive both internal and external facilitation focused on consolidate factors required for sustained adoption
Internal FacilitationBehavioural
Both responding and non-responding randomized to receive the standard scaling
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation facilitation (IF) strategy | Experimental | Standard scaling up of the clinical pathway augmented with Implementation Facilitation Receives: Behavioral: Internal + External Facilitation for Implementation |
| Sustainability facilitation (SF) strategy | Experimental | Standard scaling up of the clinical pathway augmented with Sustainability Facilitation Receives: Behavioral: Internal + External Facilitation for Sustainability |
| Standard scaling (SS) strategy | Active comparator | Standard scaling up of the clinical pathway Receives: Behavioral: Internal Facilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the registration rate of bronchodilator treatment
Between-period change by strategy (e.g., the change from month 8 to month 16 under one strategy compared with the corresponding change under another strategy) in the rates of mild-to-moderate acute asthma episodes with documented administration of bronchodilator therapy delivered via MDI with spacer device.
Measured: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in the registration rate of Pulmonary Score
Between-period change by strategy in the rates of registration of Pulmonary Score in children diagnosed with mild-moderate asthma attacks. The Pulmonary Score has a scale range of 0-9 with lower values representing better outcomes.
Measured: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Change in the registration rate of persistent asthma symptoms
Between-period change by strategy in the rate of registration of persistent asthma symptoms in children diagnosed with mild-moderate asthma attacks using the M-PACT form (Mini-Pediatric Asthma Control Tool).
Measured: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Change in the registration rate of the initiation of background treatment in children with persistent asthma symptoms
Between-period change by strategy in the rate of registration of initiation of background treatment in children with persistent asthma symptoms.
Measured: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026
- Primary completion28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Asthma in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Cluster-randomized Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART)
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 4,680 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Basque Health Service
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Basque Government Department of Public Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marta Montejo Fernandez, Basque Health Service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07642388
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI2026062
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data will be shared that underlie results reported in the publication, after deidentification.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Scaling up the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma to All Osakidetza Pediatric Services Through a Cluster-randomized Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) Design
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07642388
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI2026062
- Conditions
- Asthma in Children
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 4,680 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Basque Health ServiceOther government
- Collaborators
- Basque Government Department of Public Health
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive sequential implementation strategies based on facilitation in promoting the sustainable and widespread adoption and scaling up of the Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma - ASMAbat across all Primary Care and Hospital Pediatric Services of Osakidetza - Basque Health Service.
Detailed description
Although evidence-based, multidisciplinary approaches have demonstrated efficacy in the management of pediatric asthma, substantial variability persists in the quality and outcomes of care for children experiencing acute asthma exacerbations. The Integrated Care Pathway for Acute Asthma - ASMAbat is a structured, evidence-informed framework designed to standardize care for patients presenting mild to moderate asthma attacks. It delineates the essential steps in clinical assessment, pharmacological management, and interprofessional coordination of care. Additionally, it incorporates quality indicators relative to diagnostic accuracy, assessment of disease severity, appropriateness of medication prescription, and the experiences of families and healthcare professionals. These indicators were refined through iterative consultations with key stakeholders (clinicians, families, and implementation partners) to ensure both clinical relevance and contextual feasibility.
The current study will be conducted across all Integrated Healthcare Organizations (IHOs) within the Osakidetza-Basque Health Service. This initiative builds on previous development and validation of the ASMAbat pathway in two IHOs, where implementation was evaluated using principles of implementation science. The expanded phase aims to systematically scale and adapt the pathway across diverse organizational settings within the Basque health system to enhance the quality, consistency, and sustainability of asthma care.
Three facilitation strategies have been developed to support implementation: (1) Internal Facilitation alone (Standard Scaling); (2) combined Internal and External Implementation Facilitation (IF); and (3) combined Internal and External Sustainability Facilitation (SF). Internal Facilitation is led by Clinical Leaders, professionals embedded within the health system who promote adoption and integration of evidence-based practices among their peers. External Facilitation is provided by experts with established experience in implementation science and quality improvement. External Implementation Facilitation focuses on supporting Clinical Leaders in diagnosing and addressing barriers to practice change using the Behavior Change Wheel framework, a theoretically grounded model for analyzing determinants of individual and collective behavioral change. In contrast, External Sustainability Facilitation emphasizes the identification and reinforcement of organizational, team-level, and individual factors necessary to achieve the long-term, system-wide institutionalization of the ASMAbat pathway into routine pediatric asthma management.
The overarching objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of scaling the implementation of the ASMAbat pathway across the Basque Health Service, with the overall goal of improving clinical management of acute asthma in children in accordance to recommended care and reducing variability across professionals and care settings. The primary scientific aim is to determine, among Pediatric Services demonstrating suboptimal response to the Standard Scaling (SS) strategy, the incremental effect of adding an Implementation Facilitation component on the appropriateness of the management of acute asthma episodes, which includes: a) the recording of the severity score, b) the assessment and recording of persistent asthma symptoms using the Pediatric Asthma Control Tool (M-PACT), c) the initiation or adjustment of maintenance treatment in cases of persistent asthma symptoms, and d) the administration of bronchodilator treatment via MDI with a spacer device. Secondary aims include evaluating, among services achieving adequate initial adoption through SS, the effect of introducing a Sustainability Facilitation strategy compared with maintaining SS alone during the subsequent phase, on the indicators of adequacy in the management of acute asthma episodes.
A Cluster-randomized Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design will be employed to test adaptive implementation strategies. All pediatric professionals belonging to 11 IHOs from Osakidetza-Basque Health Service and all acute asthma episodes in children aged 2-14 years during the study period will be included. During the first 8 months, all centers will receive the universal components of the ASMAbat Pathway and will be exposed to a standard scaling strategy (SS) composed of training for Clinical Leaders and pediatric professionals, electronic health record decision-support tools, audit and feedback, multichannel dissemination, and email reminders.
At month 8, based on the achieved implementation response (success criterion = Pulmonary Score recording rate exceeding 40% of all acute asthma episodes managed during the observation), external facilitation may be sequentially and randomly added as an adaptive strategy: for sites with poor adoption, facilitation will target barrier identification, problem-solving, and behavioural determinants; for sites with successful adoption, it will focus on sustainability by integrating the pathway into routine care. A second random reassignment will be conducted at month 16 based on response status, followed by an 8-month maintenance period, with a total follow-up of 32 months across all centers. Changes between periods by strategy in the rates of mild-to-moderate acute asthma episodes in which recommended treatment administration is recorded will be analysed using generalised linear mixed models. Implementation outcomes of reach and adoption of recommended care at patient and professional levels, fidelity of the clinical and implementation strategies, professionals' perceived feasibility, and user-reported care satisfaction will also be assessed.
This present study's design aims to maximize efficiency by first deploying the least complex, resource-intensive strategy and sequentially intensifying or modifying facilitation for sites demonstrating limited response, while maintaining existing strategies for successful sites. Such an adaptive approach minimizes costs by tailoring the level of implementation support to each site's readiness and observed progress. Furthermore, this design enhances the potential for scalability and generalizability across multiple contexts, including different clinical settings, patient subpopulations, and organizational environments. Ultimately, the project seeks to advance system-wide adoption and sustainability of evidence-based clinical practice for pediatric asthma management within Osakidetza, contributing to the broader field of implementation science and healthcare quality improvement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Cluster-randomized Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation facilitation (IF) strategy | Experimental | Behavioral: Internal + External Facilitation for ImplementationStandard scaling up of the clinical pathway augmented with Implementation Facilitation |
| Sustainability facilitation (SF) strategy | Experimental | Behavioral: Internal + External Facilitation for SustainabilityStandard scaling up of the clinical pathway augmented with Sustainability Facilitation |
| Standard scaling (SS) strategy | Active comparator | Behavioral: Internal FacilitationStandard scaling up of the clinical pathway |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Internal + External Facilitation for ImplementationNon-responding sites randomized to receive both internal and external facilitation focused on addressing determinants (barriers) of low adoption | Behavioural | Implementation facilitation (IF) strategy |
| Internal + External Facilitation for SustainabilityResponding sites randomized to receive both internal and external facilitation focused on consolidate factors required for sustained adoption | Behavioural | Sustainability facilitation (SF) strategy |
| Internal FacilitationBoth responding and non-responding randomized to receive the standard scaling | Behavioural | Standard scaling (SS) strategy |
Primary outcome
Change in the registration rate of bronchodilator treatment
Time frame: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Between-period change by strategy (e.g., the change from month 8 to month 16 under one strategy compared with the corresponding change under another strategy) in the rates of mild-to-moderate acute asthma episodes with documented administration of bronchodilator therapy delivered via MDI with spacer device.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in the registration rate of Pulmonary Score
Time frame: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Change in the registration rate of persistent asthma symptoms
Time frame: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Change in the registration rate of the initiation of background treatment in children with persistent asthma symptoms
Time frame: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data will be shared that underlie results reported in the publication, after deidentification.
Related trials for Asthma in Children
Not yet recruiting
Asthma Ctrl SMART Trial
Asthma in Children, Asthma Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Artificially Intelligent Robot Control
Asthma in Children, Artificial Intelligence
Not yet recruiting
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BPAP) for Severe Asthma
Pediatric Asthma, Acute Asthma
Recruiting
Effects of Tele-rehabilitation-Guided Qigong on Children and Adolescents With Asthma
Asthma Childhood
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Investigating Novel Strategies in Pediatric Immune Responses and Microbiome Environment: Comprehensive Lung Disease Investigation in Children.
Lung Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Internal + External Facilitation for Implementation, Internal + External Facilitation for Sustainability and Internal Facilitation in people with Asthma in Children, run by Basque Health Service at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the registration rate of bronchodilator treatment (time frame: Change from period 1 (baseline to 8 months) to period 2 (8 to 16 months); from period 1 or 2 to period 3 (16 to 24 months); and from period 3 to period 4 (24 to 32 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.