Post Myocardial InfarctionNCT07645040
Combined Arm-leg Ergometer Endurance Training Versus Cycle Ergometer Endurance Training in Myocardial Infarction
A study testing arm-leg ergometer training and traditional cycle ergometer training in people with Post Myocardial Infarction, run by Riphah International University.
Trial summary
Myocardial infarction (MI) often leads to reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, poor exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation mainly uses cycle ergometer training but may not adequately improve upper-limb function needed for daily activities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Post Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- arm-leg ergometer training and traditional cycle ergometer training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2026to 1 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and Females
- Patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
- Medically stable for at least 1 month post-MI
- Age between 40-70 years.
- Willingness and ability to participate in exercise training.
- Medically cleared for exercise by a cardiologist.
Who cannot join
- Unstable angina or uncontrolled hypertension.
- Orthopedic/neurological limitations affecting participants.
- Arrhythmias
- Fever
- Cognitive impairment or non-consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Combined Arm-leg Ergometer Endurance Training Versus Cycle Ergometer Endurance Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients With Post-myocardial Infarction
Myocardial infarction (MI) often leads to reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, poor exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation mainly uses cycle ergometer training but may not adequately improve upper-limb function needed for daily activities. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of combined arm-leg ergometer endurance training and cycle ergometer training on cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in post-MI patients. The study will be conducted in cardiac rehabilitation centers in Pakistan using 40 medically stable post-MI patients divided into two groups. Group A will receive combined arm-leg ergometer training, while Group B will receive cycle ergometer training. Sessions will be conducted 3 times weekly for 6 weeks. Outcomes will be measured using VO₂ peak, 6-minute walk test, and MacNew HRQOL questionnaire, with data analyzed through SPSS version 25.
Read the detailed description
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a primary contributor to long-term disability and cardiovascular death. After MI, patients typically experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, poor exercise tolerance, and diminished quality of life (QOL). Conventional rehabilitation using cycle ergometer training is well-established in improving VO₂ peak and functional capacity, yet it often neglects upper-limb reconditioning, which plays a crucial role in performing everyday tasks. Emerging evidence suggests that combining arm and leg ergometer endurance training offers a more comprehensive rehabilitation strategy by engaging a greater muscle mass, enhancing systemic oxygen delivery, and improving both upper- and lower-limb functionality. While upper-limb ergometry has demonstrated physiological benefits in COPD, coronary artery disease, and heart failure populations, it remains underutilized in post-MI rehabilitation protocols. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of combined arm leg ergometer endurance training versus cycle ergometer endurance training on cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in patients with post-myocardial infarction. This study will be a randomized clinical trial. A non-probability convenience sampling method will be used. The study will be conducted at the Cardiac Rehab Unit, Cardiac Centers, and Hospitals, Pakistan. Patients will be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Data will be collected by three primary outcomes: cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by VO₂ peak), exercise tolerance (6-minute walk test), and quality of life (MacNew HRQOL questionnaire). A total of 40 medically stable post-MI patients will be recruited and randomized into two groups. Group A will participate in Combined Arm-Leg Ergometer Training, while Group B will receive Cycle Ergometer Training. Each session will last 30 minutes with a warm-up and cool-down period, which will be held 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will be taken at baseline and week 6. Data analysis will be done bySPSS version 25.
- Conditions
- Post Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- arm-leg ergometer training, traditional cycle ergometer training
- Keywords
- Arm-Leg Ergometer, Cycle Ergometer, Myocardial infarction, Quality of Life
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
arm-leg ergometer trainingDevice
Each session will last between 30 minutes and will include a warm-up and cool-down period. The intensity of the training will be maintained at a moderate level, corresponding to 50-70% of the individuals heart rate reserve or a score of 11-14 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, which reflects "light to somewhat hard" exertion. This protocol involves the simultaneous use of both upper and lower limbs, which may elicit a higher cardiovascular demand and greater systemic oxygen consumption, thereby potentially enhancing improvements in VO₂ peak and overall cardiovascular efficiency
traditional cycle ergometer trainingDevice
same frequency, intensity, and duration of training as Group A, but the type of exercise will be limited to lower limb cycling on a standard stationary bike. This mode of training targets aerobic endurance primarily through leg muscles, which is the conventional method used in postmyocardial infarction rehabilitation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| arm-leg ergometer ergometer | Experimental | Group A, undergoing combined arm-leg ergometer training, will participate in exercise sessions three times per week for six weeks. Each session will last between 30 minutes and will include a warm-up and cool-down period. The intensity of the training will be maintained at a moderate level, corresponding to 50-70% of the individuals heart rate reserve or a score of 11-14 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, which reflects "light to somewhat hard" exertion. This protocol involves the simultaneous use of both upper and lower limbs, which may elicit a higher cardiovascular demand and greater systemic oxygen consumption Receives: Device: arm-leg ergometer training |
| traditional cycle ergometer | Experimental | traditional cycle ergometer training, will follow the same frequency, intensity, and duration of training as Group A, but the type of exercise will be limited to lower limb cycling on a standard stationary bike. This mode of training targets aerobic endurance primarily through leg muscles, which is the conventional method used in postmyocardial infarction rehabilitation exercise sessions three times per week for 6 weeks Receives: Device: traditional cycle ergometer training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cardiorespiratory fitness
measured by VO₂ peak. VO₂ peak is an objective measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, indicating the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize during intense exercise. It is typically recorded using a metabolic cart or estimated through submaximal or maximal exercise tests (e.g., using a cycle ergometer or treadmill). The higher the VO₂ peak, the more efficient the cardiovascular and respiratory systems are at transporting oxygen to working muscles
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
exercise tolerance
6-minute walk test. The 6MWT is a widely used functional exercise test to assess submaximal aerobic capacity and endurance. It measures the total distance an individual can walk on a flat surface in 6 minutes. The test is practical, cost-effective, and well-tolerated by cardiac patients. It reflects daily physical functioning and correlates with VO₂ peak in cardiac rehabilitation populations
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
individual quality of life
MacNew HRQOL questionnaire. The MacNew HRQOL questionnaire is a disease-specific, self-reported tool that assesses the emotional, physical, and social functioning of individuals with heart disease. It contains 27 items divided into 3 domains and is scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life. It is validated for post-MI and cardiac rehabilitation populations.
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2026
- Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Post Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A total of 40 medically stable post-MI patients will be recruited and randomized into two groups. Group A will participate in Combined Arm-Leg Ergometer Training, while Group B will receive Cycle Ergometer Training. Each session will last 30 minutes with a warm-up and cool-down period, which will be held 3 times per week for 6 weeks.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nimra Noor, MS-CPPT, Principal investigator, Riphah International University Lahore(Gulberg)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07645040
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCR & AHS/25/0311
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Combined Arm-leg Ergometer Endurance Training Versus Cycle Ergometer Endurance Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients With Post-myocardial Infarction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07645040
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCR & AHS/25/0311
- Conditions
- Post Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Arm-Leg Ergometer, Cycle Ergometer, Myocardial infarction, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myocardial infarction (MI) often leads to reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, poor exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation mainly uses cycle ergometer training but may not adequately improve upper-limb function needed for daily activities. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of combined arm-leg ergometer endurance training and cycle ergometer training on cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in post-MI patients. The study will be conducted in cardiac rehabilitation centers in Pakistan using 40 medically stable post-MI patients divided into two groups. Group A will receive combined arm-leg ergometer training, while Group B will receive cycle ergometer training. Sessions will be conducted 3 times weekly for 6 weeks. Outcomes will be measured using VO₂ peak, 6-minute walk test, and MacNew HRQOL questionnaire, with data analyzed through SPSS version 25.
Detailed description
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a primary contributor to long-term disability and cardiovascular death. After MI, patients typically experience reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, poor exercise tolerance, and diminished quality of life (QOL). Conventional rehabilitation using cycle ergometer training is well-established in improving VO₂ peak and functional capacity, yet it often neglects upper-limb reconditioning, which plays a crucial role in performing everyday tasks. Emerging evidence suggests that combining arm and leg ergometer endurance training offers a more comprehensive rehabilitation strategy by engaging a greater muscle mass, enhancing systemic oxygen delivery, and improving both upper- and lower-limb functionality. While upper-limb ergometry has demonstrated physiological benefits in COPD, coronary artery disease, and heart failure populations, it remains underutilized in post-MI rehabilitation protocols. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of combined arm leg ergometer endurance training versus cycle ergometer endurance training on cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in patients with post-myocardial infarction. This study will be a randomized clinical trial. A non-probability convenience sampling method will be used. The study will be conducted at the Cardiac Rehab Unit, Cardiac Centers, and Hospitals, Pakistan. Patients will be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Data will be collected by three primary outcomes: cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by VO₂ peak), exercise tolerance (6-minute walk test), and quality of life (MacNew HRQOL questionnaire). A total of 40 medically stable post-MI patients will be recruited and randomized into two groups. Group A will participate in Combined Arm-Leg Ergometer Training, while Group B will receive Cycle Ergometer Training. Each session will last 30 minutes with a warm-up and cool-down period, which will be held 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will be taken at baseline and week 6. Data analysis will be done bySPSS version 25.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A total of 40 medically stable post-MI patients will be recruited and randomized into two groups. Group A will participate in Combined Arm-Leg Ergometer Training, while Group B will receive Cycle Ergometer Training. Each session will last 30 minutes with a warm-up and cool-down period, which will be held 3 times per week for 6 weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| arm-leg ergometer ergometer | Experimental | Device: arm-leg ergometer trainingGroup A, undergoing combined arm-leg ergometer training, will participate in exercise sessions three times per week for six weeks. Each session will last between 30 minutes and will include a warm-up and cool-down period. The intensity of the training will be maintained at a moderate level, corresponding to 50-70% of the individuals heart rate reserve or a score of 11-14 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, which reflects "light to somewhat hard" exertion. This protocol involves the simultaneous use of both upper and lower limbs, which may elicit a higher cardiovascular demand and greater systemic oxygen consumption |
| traditional cycle ergometer | Experimental | Device: traditional cycle ergometer trainingtraditional cycle ergometer training, will follow the same frequency, intensity, and duration of training as Group A, but the type of exercise will be limited to lower limb cycling on a standard stationary bike. This mode of training targets aerobic endurance primarily through leg muscles, which is the conventional method used in postmyocardial infarction rehabilitation exercise sessions three times per week for 6 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Males and Females
- Patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
- Medically stable for at least 1 month post-MI
- Age between 40-70 years.
- Willingness and ability to participate in exercise training.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unstable angina or uncontrolled hypertension.
- Orthopedic/neurological limitations affecting participants.
- Arrhythmias
- Fever
- Cognitive impairment or non-consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| arm-leg ergometer trainingEach session will last between 30 minutes and will include a warm-up and cool-down period. The intensity of the training will be maintained at a moderate level, corresponding to 50-70% of the individuals heart rate reserve or a score of 11-14 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, which reflects "light to somewhat hard" exertion. This protocol involves the simultaneous use of both upper and lower limbs, which may elicit a higher cardiovascular demand and greater systemic oxygen consumption, thereby potentially enhancing improvements in VO₂ peak and overall cardiovascular efficiency | Device | arm-leg ergometer ergometer |
| traditional cycle ergometer trainingsame frequency, intensity, and duration of training as Group A, but the type of exercise will be limited to lower limb cycling on a standard stationary bike. This mode of training targets aerobic endurance primarily through leg muscles, which is the conventional method used in postmyocardial infarction rehabilitation | Device | traditional cycle ergometer |
Primary outcome
cardiorespiratory fitness
Time frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
measured by VO₂ peak. VO₂ peak is an objective measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, indicating the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize during intense exercise. It is typically recorded using a metabolic cart or estimated through submaximal or maximal exercise tests (e.g., using a cycle ergometer or treadmill). The higher the VO₂ peak, the more efficient the cardiovascular and respiratory systems are at transporting oxygen to working muscles
exercise tolerance
Time frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
6-minute walk test. The 6MWT is a widely used functional exercise test to assess submaximal aerobic capacity and endurance. It measures the total distance an individual can walk on a flat surface in 6 minutes. The test is practical, cost-effective, and well-tolerated by cardiac patients. It reflects daily physical functioning and correlates with VO₂ peak in cardiac rehabilitation populations
individual quality of life
Time frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
MacNew HRQOL questionnaire. The MacNew HRQOL questionnaire is a disease-specific, self-reported tool that assesses the emotional, physical, and social functioning of individuals with heart disease. It contains 27 items divided into 3 domains and is scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life. It is validated for post-MI and cardiac rehabilitation populations.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Post Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
Ezetimibe Utilization Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction, "EzAMI Trial"
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Dyslipidemias
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Metabolic Characteristics of Plasma OxPLs in STEMI Patients.
STEMI - ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Active, not recruiting
The Norwegian Trial of Physical Exercise After Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
Study on the Improvement of Myocardial Microcirculation After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction
Intravascular Imaging and Microvascular Obstruction
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Lipid Testing After Myocardial Infarction at the Montreal Heart Institute
Dyslipidemias, Lipid Testing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nimra Noor, MS-CPPT principal investigator
Riphah International University Lahore(Gulberg)
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing arm-leg ergometer training and traditional cycle ergometer training in people with Post Myocardial Infarction, run by Riphah International University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Muhammad Iqbal Tariq Tariq, Phd* (333826752, iqbal.tariq@riphah.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cardiorespiratory fitness (time frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.