AzTrials
AzTrials

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNCT07647900

Photography-Based Intervention for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

A study testing Photography-based psychoedication in people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the photography-based intervention in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in alleviating emotion recognition, attention, and impulsivity in this population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
What is being tested?
Photography-based psychoedication
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
15 Jun 2026to 30 Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • ethnic Chinese aged between 8-12 years old
  • documented diagnosis of ADHD by a psychiatrist according to the ICD-10 HKD or DSM-5 criteria
  • stable on current treatment for ADHD eight weeks before baseline
  • ability to read Chinese and listen to Cantonese
  • able to operate a camera; 8) willingness of
  • their guardians to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • general intellectual functioning below the low-average range (estimated IQ < 80)
  • unstable screened via parental declaration and medication review
  • comorbid psychiatric disorder, severe physical or learning disability that prevents functional participation in photography tasks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Ka Po Wong

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Photography-Based Intervention to Improve Emotion Wellbeing and Symptoms in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

The aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the photography-based intervention in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in alleviating emotion recognition, attention, and impulsivity in this population. Photo-taking is a common daily activity that significantly impacts people's lives. Given the effectiveness of photography in addressing social skills, communication, and emotional well-being, and its ease of use, a photography-based intervention is proposed as an adjunct tool to teach children with ADHD emotional recognition and improve their ADHD symptoms. To the best of my knowledge, no previous study has adopted photography to teach emotional recognition in children with ADHD. This photography-based intervention not only teaches children with ADHD photography skills but also improves their ability to recognize and express emotions. Appropriate emotional processing and expression may have a positive impact on these children's confidence and ability to develop and maintain positive relationships with their peers, leading to better overall well-being and social integration.

Read the detailed description

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) remains one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, affecting a significant percentage of school-aged children across the globe. While the condition is primarily characterized by symptoms of inattention and impulsivity, there is a growing consensus that ADHD is fundamentally underpinned by profound impairments in emotional functioning. This emotional dysregulation is considered a transdiagnostic feature that significantly predicts long-term functional impairment in daily life. Specifically, children with ADHD exhibit marked deficits in emotion recognition and emotional awareness, which often manifests as an inability to accurately differentiate between various internal affective states. This socio-emotional dysregulation creates a cascading negative impact, not only exacerbating behavioral symptoms but also undermining subjective well-being, particularly within high-pressure educational ecologies such as Hong Kong.

Currently, the clinical landscape for ADHD emotional intervention is dominated by pharmacological treatments and behavioral modalities, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Social Skills Training. While research supports the efficacy of these traditional approaches in reducing overt behavioral disruptions, their impact on the core neurocognitive processing of emotions remains inconsistent. Meta-analytic evidence indicates that individuals with ADHD exhibit pervasive deficits in underlying emotional regulation and specific impairments in non-verbal emotional decoding-areas that standard interventions often fail to significantly improve, even when outward compliance is achieved. Furthermore, while creative arts therapies like art or play therapy have emerged as helpful adjunctive tools, much of the existing literature is constrained by methodological limitations, such as small sample sizes, a lack of rigorous control designs, and a reliance on unblinded informant reports. To date, there is no standardized psychoeducational modality that specifically targets the cognitive architecture of emotional processing in ADHD through a visual medium.

The practical implementation of traditional psychoeducation faces a critical theoretical bottleneck: the high cognitive load placed on participants. According to Cognitive Load Theory, human working memory has a strictly finite capacity. Traditional programs rely heavily on dense textual materials and didactic verbal instruction. For children with ADHD, whose neurocognitive profile is inherently compromised by deficits in executive functioning and sustained attention, this text-centric design imposes an overwhelming extraneous cognitive load. When a child's cognitive resources are exhausted by the effort of processing complex linguistic instructions, the available capacity for internalizing actual emotional regulation strategies is depleted. This leads to premature disengagement and poor adherence to the therapeutic process. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need for innovative modalities that optimize cognitive load by bypassing heavy linguistic processing in favor of more accessible formats.

Being tested
Photography-based psychoedication
Keywords
Photography-based intervention, Emotion recognition, Emotional wellbeing, Attention, Impulsivity, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Medical subject headings
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Impulsive Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Photography-based psychoedicationBehavioural

    The programme follows a structured progression across six sessions, each building upon previous learning whilst introducing new skills and concepts. For the first session, participants build rapport and introduce photography techniques (composition, lighting) alongside emotional awareness to capture basic emotional states.

    For the second and third sessions, they explore personal emotions and triggers through self-portraits and visual documentation. For the fourth and fifth sessions, they focus on the ADHD journey via strength-based photo narratives and collaborative projects to enhance peer support and social learning. In the last session, they consolidated skills into personal visual toolkits for ongoing regulation, concluding with a final project presentation and maintenance planning.

Study groups in NCT07647900
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Photography-based intervention groupExperimentalThe participants in this group will have a six-weekly photography course. Each session is about 60 minutes. Four participants will be arranged together to conduct one session. In each session, a photographer will teach the participants basic photography skills and give a theme for the participants to take photos which will be used for sharing in the next session. Themes mainly are emotions and objects. In the sharing, the photographer will ask the participants to explain the reasons why take these photos and the photographer will explain the different types of emotions to the participants based on the themes. The participants can express their views and feelings regarding their photos.
Receives: Behavioral: Photography-based psychoedication
Waitlist control groupNo interventionThe participants maintained their Treatment-as-Usual (TAU). Participants in the waitlist group received the identical photography-based psychoeducation program immediately after the post-intervention assessment.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Emotional Awareness

    Participants' emotional functioning was evaluated by a licensed clinical psychologist using an adapted version of the Emotion Awareness Questionnaire (EAQ). To fit the clinical evaluation context and focus specifically on the core processing stages of emotion identification and expression, the questionnaire was adapted into an informant-report format consisting of two selected subscales (10 items in total): Verbal Sharing of Emotions (3 items) and Differentiating Emotions (7 items). Items in this adapted version were rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Emotion Recognition

    Participants' ability to accurately identify emotional states from non-verbal cues was evaluated using a customized, 7-item Facial Emotion Recognition Task (FERT) based on the universal emotional categories. Children were presented with seven distinct facial-expression stimuli, each representing a specific emotion category: happiness, surprise, anger, contempt, disgust, fear, and sadness. The facial stimuli were presented on a computer screen by a licensed clinical psychologist. For each item, participants were instructed to identify or label the displayed emotion. The performance was scored based on overall accuracy (total correct answers out of 7), with higher scores indicating a better capacity for facial emotion recognition.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up

  2. Subjective well-being

    The 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) was utilized to measure subjective happiness. Respondents rated items on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree 1=strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree 7=strongly agree).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  3. ADHD symptoms

    The teacher-rated Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV (SNAP-IV-18) 18-item scale, which assesses inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity/ impulsivity (9 items). A 4-point Likert scale will be used, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up

  4. Satisfaction of the intervention

    Evaluated using a child-friendly, single-item 7-point visual facial Likert scale. Children were directly asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the photography-based program by selecting one of seven standardized facial expressions, ranging from 1 (a very unhappy/dissatisfied face) to 7 (a very happy/satisfied face).

    Measured: At 6 weeks (post-intervention)

  5. Feasibility of the study

    Operationalized through intervention attendance, completion rates, and protocol adherence. Attendance was tracked weekly by group facilitators, with successful feasibility defined a priori as an overall session attendance rate of ≥ 80 % and a study completion/retention rate of ≥ 85 % across the 6-week intervention period.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2026
  2. Study start15 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion18 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07647900
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSEARS20230714001
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
10 Jun 2026
Last updated
8 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Photography-based psychoedication in people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Emotional Awareness (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in