Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNCT07647900
Photography-Based Intervention for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
A study testing Photography-based psychoedication in people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
The aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the photography-based intervention in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in alleviating emotion recognition, attention, and impulsivity in this population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Photography-based psychoedication
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2026to 30 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- ethnic Chinese aged between 8-12 years old
- documented diagnosis of ADHD by a psychiatrist according to the ICD-10 HKD or DSM-5 criteria
- stable on current treatment for ADHD eight weeks before baseline
- ability to read Chinese and listen to Cantonese
- able to operate a camera; 8) willingness of
- their guardians to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- general intellectual functioning below the low-average range (estimated IQ < 80)
- unstable screened via parental declaration and medication review
- comorbid psychiatric disorder, severe physical or learning disability that prevents functional participation in photography tasks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Photography-Based Intervention to Improve Emotion Wellbeing and Symptoms in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
The aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the photography-based intervention in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in alleviating emotion recognition, attention, and impulsivity in this population. Photo-taking is a common daily activity that significantly impacts people's lives. Given the effectiveness of photography in addressing social skills, communication, and emotional well-being, and its ease of use, a photography-based intervention is proposed as an adjunct tool to teach children with ADHD emotional recognition and improve their ADHD symptoms. To the best of my knowledge, no previous study has adopted photography to teach emotional recognition in children with ADHD. This photography-based intervention not only teaches children with ADHD photography skills but also improves their ability to recognize and express emotions. Appropriate emotional processing and expression may have a positive impact on these children's confidence and ability to develop and maintain positive relationships with their peers, leading to better overall well-being and social integration.
Read the detailed description
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) remains one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, affecting a significant percentage of school-aged children across the globe. While the condition is primarily characterized by symptoms of inattention and impulsivity, there is a growing consensus that ADHD is fundamentally underpinned by profound impairments in emotional functioning. This emotional dysregulation is considered a transdiagnostic feature that significantly predicts long-term functional impairment in daily life. Specifically, children with ADHD exhibit marked deficits in emotion recognition and emotional awareness, which often manifests as an inability to accurately differentiate between various internal affective states. This socio-emotional dysregulation creates a cascading negative impact, not only exacerbating behavioral symptoms but also undermining subjective well-being, particularly within high-pressure educational ecologies such as Hong Kong.
Currently, the clinical landscape for ADHD emotional intervention is dominated by pharmacological treatments and behavioral modalities, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Social Skills Training. While research supports the efficacy of these traditional approaches in reducing overt behavioral disruptions, their impact on the core neurocognitive processing of emotions remains inconsistent. Meta-analytic evidence indicates that individuals with ADHD exhibit pervasive deficits in underlying emotional regulation and specific impairments in non-verbal emotional decoding-areas that standard interventions often fail to significantly improve, even when outward compliance is achieved. Furthermore, while creative arts therapies like art or play therapy have emerged as helpful adjunctive tools, much of the existing literature is constrained by methodological limitations, such as small sample sizes, a lack of rigorous control designs, and a reliance on unblinded informant reports. To date, there is no standardized psychoeducational modality that specifically targets the cognitive architecture of emotional processing in ADHD through a visual medium.
The practical implementation of traditional psychoeducation faces a critical theoretical bottleneck: the high cognitive load placed on participants. According to Cognitive Load Theory, human working memory has a strictly finite capacity. Traditional programs rely heavily on dense textual materials and didactic verbal instruction. For children with ADHD, whose neurocognitive profile is inherently compromised by deficits in executive functioning and sustained attention, this text-centric design imposes an overwhelming extraneous cognitive load. When a child's cognitive resources are exhausted by the effort of processing complex linguistic instructions, the available capacity for internalizing actual emotional regulation strategies is depleted. This leads to premature disengagement and poor adherence to the therapeutic process. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need for innovative modalities that optimize cognitive load by bypassing heavy linguistic processing in favor of more accessible formats.
- Conditions
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Being tested
- Photography-based psychoedication
- Keywords
- Photography-based intervention, Emotion recognition, Emotional wellbeing, Attention, Impulsivity, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Impulsive Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Photography-based psychoedicationBehavioural
The programme follows a structured progression across six sessions, each building upon previous learning whilst introducing new skills and concepts. For the first session, participants build rapport and introduce photography techniques (composition, lighting) alongside emotional awareness to capture basic emotional states.
For the second and third sessions, they explore personal emotions and triggers through self-portraits and visual documentation. For the fourth and fifth sessions, they focus on the ADHD journey via strength-based photo narratives and collaborative projects to enhance peer support and social learning. In the last session, they consolidated skills into personal visual toolkits for ongoing regulation, concluding with a final project presentation and maintenance planning.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Photography-based intervention group | Experimental | The participants in this group will have a six-weekly photography course. Each session is about 60 minutes. Four participants will be arranged together to conduct one session. In each session, a photographer will teach the participants basic photography skills and give a theme for the participants to take photos which will be used for sharing in the next session. Themes mainly are emotions and objects. In the sharing, the photographer will ask the participants to explain the reasons why take these photos and the photographer will explain the different types of emotions to the participants based on the themes. The participants can express their views and feelings regarding their photos. Receives: Behavioral: Photography-based psychoedication |
| Waitlist control group | No intervention | The participants maintained their Treatment-as-Usual (TAU). Participants in the waitlist group received the identical photography-based psychoeducation program immediately after the post-intervention assessment. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Emotional Awareness
Participants' emotional functioning was evaluated by a licensed clinical psychologist using an adapted version of the Emotion Awareness Questionnaire (EAQ). To fit the clinical evaluation context and focus specifically on the core processing stages of emotion identification and expression, the questionnaire was adapted into an informant-report format consisting of two selected subscales (10 items in total): Verbal Sharing of Emotions (3 items) and Differentiating Emotions (7 items). Items in this adapted version were rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always).
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (5)
Emotion Recognition
Participants' ability to accurately identify emotional states from non-verbal cues was evaluated using a customized, 7-item Facial Emotion Recognition Task (FERT) based on the universal emotional categories. Children were presented with seven distinct facial-expression stimuli, each representing a specific emotion category: happiness, surprise, anger, contempt, disgust, fear, and sadness. The facial stimuli were presented on a computer screen by a licensed clinical psychologist. For each item, participants were instructed to identify or label the displayed emotion. The performance was scored based on overall accuracy (total correct answers out of 7), with higher scores indicating a better capacity for facial emotion recognition.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Subjective well-being
The 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) was utilized to measure subjective happiness. Respondents rated items on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree 1=strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree 7=strongly agree).
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up
ADHD symptoms
The teacher-rated Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV (SNAP-IV-18) 18-item scale, which assesses inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity/ impulsivity (9 items). A 4-point Likert scale will be used, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much).
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Satisfaction of the intervention
Evaluated using a child-friendly, single-item 7-point visual facial Likert scale. Children were directly asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the photography-based program by selecting one of seven standardized facial expressions, ranging from 1 (a very unhappy/dissatisfied face) to 7 (a very happy/satisfied face).
Measured: At 6 weeks (post-intervention)
Feasibility of the study
Operationalized through intervention attendance, completion rates, and protocol adherence. Attendance was tracked weekly by group facilitators, with successful feasibility defined a priori as an overall session attendance rate of ≥ 80 % and a study completion/retention rate of ≥ 85 % across the 6-week intervention period.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2026
- Study start15 Jun 2026
- Primary completion18 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ka Po Wong, PhD, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07647900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSEARS20230714001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Photography-Based Intervention to Improve Emotion Wellbeing and Symptoms in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07647900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSEARS20230714001
- Conditions
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- Photography-based intervention, Emotion recognition, Emotional wellbeing, Attention, Impulsivity, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the photography-based intervention in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness in alleviating emotion recognition, attention, and impulsivity in this population. Photo-taking is a common daily activity that significantly impacts people's lives. Given the effectiveness of photography in addressing social skills, communication, and emotional well-being, and its ease of use, a photography-based intervention is proposed as an adjunct tool to teach children with ADHD emotional recognition and improve their ADHD symptoms. To the best of my knowledge, no previous study has adopted photography to teach emotional recognition in children with ADHD. This photography-based intervention not only teaches children with ADHD photography skills but also improves their ability to recognize and express emotions. Appropriate emotional processing and expression may have a positive impact on these children's confidence and ability to develop and maintain positive relationships with their peers, leading to better overall well-being and social integration.
Detailed description
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) remains one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, affecting a significant percentage of school-aged children across the globe. While the condition is primarily characterized by symptoms of inattention and impulsivity, there is a growing consensus that ADHD is fundamentally underpinned by profound impairments in emotional functioning. This emotional dysregulation is considered a transdiagnostic feature that significantly predicts long-term functional impairment in daily life. Specifically, children with ADHD exhibit marked deficits in emotion recognition and emotional awareness, which often manifests as an inability to accurately differentiate between various internal affective states. This socio-emotional dysregulation creates a cascading negative impact, not only exacerbating behavioral symptoms but also undermining subjective well-being, particularly within high-pressure educational ecologies such as Hong Kong.
Currently, the clinical landscape for ADHD emotional intervention is dominated by pharmacological treatments and behavioral modalities, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Social Skills Training. While research supports the efficacy of these traditional approaches in reducing overt behavioral disruptions, their impact on the core neurocognitive processing of emotions remains inconsistent. Meta-analytic evidence indicates that individuals with ADHD exhibit pervasive deficits in underlying emotional regulation and specific impairments in non-verbal emotional decoding-areas that standard interventions often fail to significantly improve, even when outward compliance is achieved. Furthermore, while creative arts therapies like art or play therapy have emerged as helpful adjunctive tools, much of the existing literature is constrained by methodological limitations, such as small sample sizes, a lack of rigorous control designs, and a reliance on unblinded informant reports. To date, there is no standardized psychoeducational modality that specifically targets the cognitive architecture of emotional processing in ADHD through a visual medium.
The practical implementation of traditional psychoeducation faces a critical theoretical bottleneck: the high cognitive load placed on participants. According to Cognitive Load Theory, human working memory has a strictly finite capacity. Traditional programs rely heavily on dense textual materials and didactic verbal instruction. For children with ADHD, whose neurocognitive profile is inherently compromised by deficits in executive functioning and sustained attention, this text-centric design imposes an overwhelming extraneous cognitive load. When a child's cognitive resources are exhausted by the effort of processing complex linguistic instructions, the available capacity for internalizing actual emotional regulation strategies is depleted. This leads to premature disengagement and poor adherence to the therapeutic process. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need for innovative modalities that optimize cognitive load by bypassing heavy linguistic processing in favor of more accessible formats.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Photography-based intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Photography-based psychoedicationThe participants in this group will have a six-weekly photography course. Each session is about 60 minutes. Four participants will be arranged together to conduct one session. In each session, a photographer will teach the participants basic photography skills and give a theme for the participants to take photos which will be used for sharing in the next session. Themes mainly are emotions and objects. In the sharing, the photographer will ask the participants to explain the reasons why take these photos and the photographer will explain the different types of emotions to the participants based on the themes. The participants can express their views and feelings regarding their photos. |
| Waitlist control group | No intervention | –The participants maintained their Treatment-as-Usual (TAU). Participants in the waitlist group received the identical photography-based psychoeducation program immediately after the post-intervention assessment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ethnic Chinese aged between 8-12 years old
- documented diagnosis of ADHD by a psychiatrist according to the ICD-10 HKD or DSM-5 criteria
- stable on current treatment for ADHD eight weeks before baseline
- ability to read Chinese and listen to Cantonese
- able to operate a camera; 8) willingness of
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- general intellectual functioning below the low-average range (estimated IQ < 80)
- unstable screened via parental declaration and medication review
- comorbid psychiatric disorder, severe physical or learning disability that prevents functional participation in photography tasks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Photography-based psychoedicationThe programme follows a structured progression across six sessions, each building upon previous learning whilst introducing new skills and concepts. For the first session, participants build rapport and introduce photography techniques (composition, lighting) alongside emotional awareness to capture basic emotional states. For the second and third sessions, they explore personal emotions and triggers through self-portraits and visual documentation. For the fourth and fifth sessions, they focus on the ADHD journey via strength-based photo narratives and collaborative projects to enhance peer support and social learning. In the last session, they consolidated skills into personal visual toolkits for ongoing regulation, concluding with a final project presentation and maintenance planning. | Behavioural | Photography-based intervention group |
Primary outcome
Emotional Awareness
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up
Participants' emotional functioning was evaluated by a licensed clinical psychologist using an adapted version of the Emotion Awareness Questionnaire (EAQ). To fit the clinical evaluation context and focus specifically on the core processing stages of emotion identification and expression, the questionnaire was adapted into an informant-report format consisting of two selected subscales (10 items in total): Verbal Sharing of Emotions (3 items) and Differentiating Emotions (7 items). Items in this adapted version were rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always).
5 secondary outcomes
Emotion Recognition
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Subjective well-being
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up
ADHD symptoms
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Satisfaction of the intervention
Time frame: At 6 weeks (post-intervention)
Feasibility of the study
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomics of Stimulant Treatment Response
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALKS 7290 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ALKS 7290-201)
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ka Po Wong, PhD principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Photography-based psychoedication in people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Emotional Awareness (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks and 3-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.