Mandibular Parasymphyseal FracturesNCT07651033
3D Titanium Plates for Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture Fixation
A study testing 3D Titanium Plates in people with Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Mandibular fractures pose significant challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to their frequency, potential for functional impairment, and aesthetic concerns. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have revolutionized the management of mandibular fractures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures
- What is being tested?
- 3D Titanium Plates
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2024to 15 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ranging between 20-60 years.
- Patients with mandibular parasymphyseal fractures requiring open reduction and fixation..
- Patients with good health (ASA -I and ASA- II) without any contraindication for surgery or anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Patients with pre existing neurological or musculoskeletal disease.
- Patients with infected fractures.
- Patients with simultaneous condylar fracture.
- Patients with regional malignancy.
- Medically compromised patients.
- Patients with blood diseases or severe renal disorders.
- Patients refuse to share in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Use of 3d Titanium Plates With Two Different Profile Thickness for Open Reduction and Rigid Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture:Randomised Clinical Trial
Mandibular fractures pose significant challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to their frequency, potential for functional impairment, and aesthetic concerns. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have revolutionized the management of mandibular fractures.
The advent of 3D printing technology has ushered in a new era of patient-specific implants, offering improved adaptation to individual anatomy and potentially enhancing surgical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
The face is the window through which we perceive the world around us, and the world noted us. It serves a crucial role in human interaction and injuries to it result in devastating emotional sequelae. The human face constitutes the first contact point in several human interactions, thus injuries and/or mutilation of the facial structures may have a disastrous influence on the affected person.
The facial area is one of the most frequently injured parts of the body, and the mandible is one of the most commonly fractured maxillofacial bones. For the past decades, there has been a significant increase in maxillofacial traumas involving mandible. They are mainly caused by vehicular accidents, sport activities, penetrating injuries, physical assault, work-related accident, metabolic diseases or tumors.
The position, prominence, anatomic configuration, mobility and less bone support of the mandible make it one of the most frequent facial bones to be fractured. The mandibular fracture accounts for 36% to 54% of all fractures in the maxillofacial region. Mandible is the 10th most fractured bone in the whole body. They may occur alone or in combination with other facial bone fractures.
It plays a major role in mastication, speech, and deglutition. Its fractures result in severe loss of function and disfigurement. Fractures through the mandible at the level of the Symphysis and or parasymphysis are relatively common and account for approximately 20% of mandibular fractures. These fractures are often associated with a second fracture of the mandible, especially in the subcondylar region.
Fractures of the symphyseal region are often associated with the clinical findings of a widened intragonial distance with resultant malocclusion. Fractures of the anterior mandible lack two of the stabilizing factors provided to fractures of the posterior tooth-bearing mandible: the splinting effects of the masseter and internal pterygoid muscles, which form a natural sling, and the interlocking cusps and fossae of bicuspid and molar teeth.
Internal fixation in long bones has been adapted with particular modifications for the mandible. The disadvantage with these rigid plates was movement of the fracture fragment while tightening the screws resulting in malocclusion. Also, these plates could only be minimally adapted to the fracture fragments and produced more tension on the bone resulting in loosening of screws. They also require an extraoral approach and are highly technique sensitive.
The introduction of the 3-dimension (3D) system for the treatment of mandibular fractures has offered certain advantages over other plating systems. These plates function as internal fixator, achieving stability by 3D plates. A unique advantage of 3D system is that there is no need to adapt plate over the underlying bone, making plate adaptation easier.
Theoretical advantages proposed include close approximation, greater stability across the fracture site, less precision required in plate adaptation because of the internal/external fixator, less alteration in osseous or occlusal relationship upon screw tightening and, and less time required.
Although several materials can be used for manufacture of small plates, generally titanium is used because of its excellent biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion and pliability. Champy's miniplates require intra oral approach, less technique sensitive and produce consistently good results with regard to occlusion and also avoid the need for intermaxillary fixation
- Conditions
- Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures
- Being tested
- 3D Titanium Plates
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D Titanium PlatesDevice
Also called Open Reduction and Rigid Internal Fixation
to compare 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and rigid fixation of mandibular parasymphyseal fracture.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (3d titanium plates of 2 mm): | Active comparator | About 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 2 mm thickness. Receives: Device: 3D Titanium Plates |
| Group B (3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm): | Active comparator | About 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm thickness. Receives: Device: 3D Titanium Plates |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment of Postoperative pain
Treatment of the pain resulted from using 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular Parasymphyseal fracture by using a standardized pain scale.
Measured: 48 Hours from the operation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of postoperative Complications
Secondary outcomes will be evaluated to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of using 3D titanium plates with different profile thicknesses in the fixation of mandibular body fractures (as infection, malocclusion, and hardwarerelated complications).
Measured: from1 week to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2026
- Study start15 Dec 2024
- Primary completion15 Dec 2025
- Study completion15 Feb 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mandibular Parasymphyseal FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hala Omar Elmoursey, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Mohamed Atef, Professor, Study chair, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kasr Al-Aini
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07651033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Mandibular Fracture
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of 3d Titanium Plates With Two Different Profile Thickness for Open Reduction and Rigid Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture:Randomised Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07651033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Mandibular Fracture
- Conditions
- Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mandibular fractures pose significant challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to their frequency, potential for functional impairment, and aesthetic concerns. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have revolutionized the management of mandibular fractures.
The advent of 3D printing technology has ushered in a new era of patient-specific implants, offering improved adaptation to individual anatomy and potentially enhancing surgical outcomes.
Detailed description
The face is the window through which we perceive the world around us, and the world noted us. It serves a crucial role in human interaction and injuries to it result in devastating emotional sequelae. The human face constitutes the first contact point in several human interactions, thus injuries and/or mutilation of the facial structures may have a disastrous influence on the affected person.
The facial area is one of the most frequently injured parts of the body, and the mandible is one of the most commonly fractured maxillofacial bones. For the past decades, there has been a significant increase in maxillofacial traumas involving mandible. They are mainly caused by vehicular accidents, sport activities, penetrating injuries, physical assault, work-related accident, metabolic diseases or tumors.
The position, prominence, anatomic configuration, mobility and less bone support of the mandible make it one of the most frequent facial bones to be fractured. The mandibular fracture accounts for 36% to 54% of all fractures in the maxillofacial region. Mandible is the 10th most fractured bone in the whole body. They may occur alone or in combination with other facial bone fractures.
It plays a major role in mastication, speech, and deglutition. Its fractures result in severe loss of function and disfigurement. Fractures through the mandible at the level of the Symphysis and or parasymphysis are relatively common and account for approximately 20% of mandibular fractures. These fractures are often associated with a second fracture of the mandible, especially in the subcondylar region.
Fractures of the symphyseal region are often associated with the clinical findings of a widened intragonial distance with resultant malocclusion. Fractures of the anterior mandible lack two of the stabilizing factors provided to fractures of the posterior tooth-bearing mandible: the splinting effects of the masseter and internal pterygoid muscles, which form a natural sling, and the interlocking cusps and fossae of bicuspid and molar teeth.
Internal fixation in long bones has been adapted with particular modifications for the mandible. The disadvantage with these rigid plates was movement of the fracture fragment while tightening the screws resulting in malocclusion. Also, these plates could only be minimally adapted to the fracture fragments and produced more tension on the bone resulting in loosening of screws. They also require an extraoral approach and are highly technique sensitive.
The introduction of the 3-dimension (3D) system for the treatment of mandibular fractures has offered certain advantages over other plating systems. These plates function as internal fixator, achieving stability by 3D plates. A unique advantage of 3D system is that there is no need to adapt plate over the underlying bone, making plate adaptation easier.
Theoretical advantages proposed include close approximation, greater stability across the fracture site, less precision required in plate adaptation because of the internal/external fixator, less alteration in osseous or occlusal relationship upon screw tightening and, and less time required.
Although several materials can be used for manufacture of small plates, generally titanium is used because of its excellent biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion and pliability. Champy's miniplates require intra oral approach, less technique sensitive and produce consistently good results with regard to occlusion and also avoid the need for intermaxillary fixation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (3d titanium plates of 2 mm): | Active comparator | Device: 3D Titanium PlatesAbout 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 2 mm thickness. |
| Group B (3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm): | Active comparator | Device: 3D Titanium PlatesAbout 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm thickness. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ranging between 20-60 years.
- Patients with mandibular parasymphyseal fractures requiring open reduction and fixation..
- Patients with good health (ASA -I and ASA- II) without any contraindication for surgery or anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with pre existing neurological or musculoskeletal disease.
- Patients with infected fractures.
- Patients with simultaneous condylar fracture.
- Patients with regional malignancy.
- Medically compromised patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D Titanium PlatesAlso: Open Reduction and Rigid Internal Fixationto compare 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and rigid fixation of mandibular parasymphyseal fracture. | Device | Group A (3d titanium plates of 2 mm):, Group B (3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm): |
Primary outcome
Treatment of Postoperative pain
Time frame: 48 Hours from the operation
Treatment of the pain resulted from using 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular Parasymphyseal fracture by using a standardized pain scale.
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of postoperative Complications
Time frame: from1 week to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Finite Element and z Shap Mini Plate With Lingual Extension
Mandible Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamed Atef, Professor study chair
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kasr Al-Aini
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3D Titanium Plates in people with Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment of Postoperative pain (time frame: 48 Hours from the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2026.