AzTrials
AzTrials

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB)Mel73NCT07653087

Evaluating a Decision Aid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Intermediate-Risk Melanoma

A study testing Decision Aid in people with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research study is testing a decision aid to help patients think through whether to have sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be a difficult decision for some patients because the potential benefits and risks may not be clear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Decision Aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2026to Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (≥18 years old) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.
  • Clinical stage I or II disease, for whom sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is being considered.
  • Patients with either:
  • An estimated risk of sentinel lymph node metastasis between 5 and 10 percent based on the MIA risk calculator, or
  • A discordant risk scenario will be defined as a case in which the individualized probability of sentinel lymph node metastasis predicted by the MIA model falls into a different risk category (<5%, 5-10%, or >10%) than the category suggested by clinicopathologic staging features used in NCCN guideline-based counseling.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations are not specifically excluded unless they meet other exclusion criteria; the study presents minimal risk.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with clinical evidence of nodal or distant metastatic disease at the time of consultation.
  • Patients with prior sentinel lymph node biopsy or nodal surgery for the current melanoma diagnosis.
  • Inability to speak or read English.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
  • Prisoners

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Evelyn Villalobos contact

434-297-4579

ev4pd@uvahealth.org

United States1 site
  • University of Virginia Health System

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

Other trials in United States

About this study

This research study is testing a decision aid to help patients think through whether to have sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be a difficult decision for some patients because the potential benefits and risks may not be clear. This study is being done to learn whether providing structured, easy-to-understand information helps patients feel more informed and less uncertain about their decision.

Patients in this study will be given a paper decision aid (DA). Patients will be given other short questionnaires to complete before and after the decision aid.

Read the detailed description

The melanoma-specific decision aid (DA) is a structured, evidence-based informational tool designed to support shared decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The DA includes: (1) a plain-language explanation of melanoma staging and the purpose of SLNB; (2) individualized estimates of SLNB positivity risk based on the MIA risk model; (3) a balanced presentation of the potential benefits, risks, and uncertainties associated with SLNB; and (4) a values clarification component prompting patients to reflect on personal preferences related to risk tolerance, diagnostic certainty, and potential downstream treatment implications. The decision aid is provided to patients prior to surgical consultation and is reviewed during the clinic visit to facilitate structured discussion between the patient and surgeon. The decision aid does not provide treatment recommendations and does not replace physician counseling.

Immediately after written informed consent and before reviewing the decision aid, patients will complete baseline questionnaires reflecting their understanding and feelings following standard-of-care counseling alone. These baseline measures include:

  • Decisional conflict questionnaire: A validated multi-item questionnaire that assesses uncertainty, clarity of values, feeling informed, and confidence in decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy.
  • Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire: A brief study-specific knowledge assessment evaluating patient understanding of the purpose of sentinel lymph node biopsy, potential benefits, risks, and areas of uncertainty.
  • Anxiety questionnaire: (State Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI-6]) A validated short-form questionnaire assessing situational anxiety related to the clinical consultation and upcoming decision.
  • Health literacy assessment: A brief validated word-recognition screening tool to assess health literacy.
  • Demographic and contextual factors: Including residential zip code (for rurality and travel distance), insurance category, and basic socioeconomic indicators.

After reviewing the decision aid and participating in a brief follow-up discussion with the clinician, patients will complete post-decision aid questionnaires, including:

  • Decisional conflict questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess change in decisional conflict following use of the decision aid.
  • Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess change in knowledge.
  • Anxiety questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess whether use of the decision aid increases, decreases, or does not change anxiety levels.
  • Final decision regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy: Documented as proceeding with or declining the procedure.
  • Decision Aid Evaluation form: a brief written questionnaire assessing usability, clarity, perceived value of the DA.

A 30-day chart review will document whether SLNB was ultimately performed.

Being tested
Decision Aid
Keywords
SLNB, Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Decision Aid
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Decision AidOther

    The melanoma-specific decision aid is a structured, evidence-based informational tool designed to support shared decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. The DA is a paper based tool that includes: (1) a plain-language explanation of melanoma staging and the purpose of SLNB; (2) individualized estimates of SLNB positivity risk based on the MIA risk model; (3) a balanced presentation of the potential benefits, risks, and uncertainties associated with SLNB; and (4) a values clarification component prompting patients to reflect on personal preferences related to risk tolerance, diagnostic certainty, and potential downstream treatment implications. The decision aid is provided to patients prior to surgical consultation and is reviewed during the clinic visit to facilitate structured discussion between the patient and surgeon. The decision aid does not provide treatment recommendations and does not replace physician counseling.

Study groups in NCT07653087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Decision Aid ArmExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive the Decision Aid intervention. Participants will be asked to complete pre- and post- intervention questionnaires. All participants will be assigned to this arm.
Receives: Other: Decision Aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decisional conflict score

    Change in decisional conflict score from pre-decision aid to post-decision aid, measured using a validated questionnaire (Decisional Conflict Scale - DCS).

    Measured: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire

    Change in patient knowledge regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy.

    Measured: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

  2. Consultation-related anxiety (STAI-6 questionnaire)

    Change in consultation-related anxiety using the STAI-6 validated questionnaire

    Measured: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

  3. Sentinel lymph node biopsy decision

    The proportion of patient participants who elect to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy after decision aid-supported consultation

    Measured: 30 days post-clinic visit

  4. Patient-reported acceptability of the Decision Aid

    The Decision Aid Evaluation Form will be used to describe patient-reported acceptability of the decision aid. This questionnaire utilizes Likert-scale items and an optional, written, free-text response section.

    Measured: Within 48 hours of the intervention on Day 1

  5. Feasibility of Decision Aid implementation in the clinic workflow

    Proportion of eligible patients successfully completing review of the decision aid during the clinic visit

    Measured: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2026
  2. Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
66 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07653087
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSR302710
Acronym
Mel73
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
8 Jun 2026
Last updated
17 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Decision Aid in people with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) and Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Evelyn Villalobos (434-297-4579, ev4pd@uvahealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decisional conflict score (time frame: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in