AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT07655557

Sexual Health Communication Skills Training Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer

A study testing Starting the Conversation (STC) and Time and Attention in people with Prostate Cancer, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot randomized controlled trial of a sexual health communication skills training multimedia intervention (Starting the Conversation [STC] adapted for patients with prostate cancer [PCa]) to improve patients' ability to communicate with providers about their sexual health concerns during PCa care compared… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Starting the Conversation (STC) and Time and Attention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2026to 31 Oct 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult male with PCa at least 18 years of age
  • Speak English
  • Reside in the U.S.
  • Have internet/web access, and
  • Report current bother due to sexual dysfunction
  • Capacity and willingness to provide consent
  • Have an appointment with a PCa provider at NYU Langone Health during the study accrual period

Who cannot join

  • Individual with impaired decision-making capacity.
  • Participation in another part of this study (prior aim)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Testing a Sexual Health Communication Skills Training Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer

This is a pilot randomized controlled trial of a sexual health communication skills training multimedia intervention (Starting the Conversation [STC] adapted for patients with prostate cancer [PCa]) to improve patients' ability to communicate with providers about their sexual health concerns during PCa care compared to a time and attention control arm.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will conduct a pilot RCT of STC adapted for PCa with 100 patients randomly assigned to the intervention or control arm in a 1:1 ratio. Primary feasibility outcomes are clinical trial metrics and feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of STC. Primary efficacy outcomes are self-efficacy for sexual health communication with providers and rates of sexual health communication with providers. Secondary efficacy outcomes are sexual health outcomes (use of therapies for sexual dysfunction, sexual activity, and sexual satisfaction). Measures of efficacy will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Starting the Conversation (STC), Time and Attention
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Sexual Health, Health Communication
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Starting the Conversation (STC)Behavioural

    20-minute slideshow, 5-page workbook, 2-page supportive care resource guide focused on sexual health and teaching communication skills to help patients with prostate cancer discuss their sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers.

  • Time and AttentionBehavioural

    2-page supportive care resource guide, as well as a 20-minute video slideshow and 5-page pamphlet on diet, sleep, and exercise for patients with prostate cancer.

Study groups in NCT07655557
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exposure to STC InterventionExperimentalParticipants will receive a multimedia intervention focused on teaching communication skills to help patients with prostate cancer discuss their sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers.
Receives: Behavioral: Starting the Conversation (STC)
Control ArmActive comparatorThe control arm will be exposed to a 2-page supportive care resource guide, as well as a video slideshow and pamphlet on diet, sleep, and exercise for patients with prostate cancer.
Receives: Behavioral: Time and Attention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Eligibility rate

    Proportion of screened individuals who are eligible

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Enrollment rate

    Proportion of eligible individuals who enroll

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Retention rate

    Proportion of enrolled participants who are not lost to follow-up

    Measured: Up to Month 2 Follow-Up

  4. Assessment process

    Proportion of participants who completed intervention and assessments

    Measured: Up to Month 2 Follow-Up

  5. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    FIM is a validated 4-item scale designed to evaluate whether a specific intervention or practice can be successfully implemented and carried out within a given setting. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of the responses and ranges from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater feasibility.

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  6. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    AIM is a validated 4-item scale used in implementation research to assess stakeholders' perception that a new program, treatment, or practice is agreeable and satisfactory. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of the responses and ranges from 1-5; a higher overall average indicates a greater level of acceptability for the intervention.

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  7. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a validated, 4-item tool used in implementation science to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of an intervention. Each item is rated on scale from 1-5; the total score is the average of responses and ranges from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  8. Number of patients who raised a sexual health topic during clinic visit

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  9. Number of patients who discussed sexual health concerns during clinic visit

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  10. Number of patients who asked a sexual health question during clinic visit

    Measured: Post-Appointment (Day 1)

  11. Self Efficacy - Talking about Sexual Health

    Self-efficacy for talking about sexual health with a healthcare provider, scored from 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up

  12. Self Efficacy - Asking about Sexual Health

    Self-efficacy for asking a healthcare provider about sexual health, scored from 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure (PROMIS SexFS v2.0)

    Questions from the domains of 1) engagement in sexual activity and 2) use of therapeutic aids for sexual activity will be converted into dichotomous variables; proportions will be evaluated at each time point as well as over time using a Z-test for differences in proportions between groups; higher scores indicate greater sexual function and satisfaction. The domain of global satisfaction with sex life will be assessed as the change over time and compared between groups using two-sample t-tests.

    Measured: Baseline, Post-Appointment (Day 1), Month 2 Follow-Up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07655557
Sponsor's protocol ID
26-00587
Other IDs
K08CA293275
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
11 Jun 2026
Last updated
1 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 to 36 months after publication or as required by a condition of awards or supporting agreements, provided the requesting investigator executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Datasets that can be shared will be deposited in open ICPSR. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be posted on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or supporting awards and agreements.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Starting the Conversation (STC) and Time and Attention in people with Prostate Cancer, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Natasha Gupta, MD (646-501-2599, Natasha.gupta@nyulangone.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Eligibility rate (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in