AzTrials
AzTrials

Physician-led Versus Peer NP-led POCUS TrainingNCT07660016

Peer-Learning Versus Physician-Led POCUS Training for Nurse Practitioners in Integrative Volume Status Assessment

A study testing Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training in people with Physician-led Versus Peer NP-led POCUS Training, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to develop and evaluate a peer-led training program specifically designed for Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to acquire Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) skills. POCUS, known for its non-invasive nature and real-time imaging capability, has been widely applied in clinical fluid status assessment and plays a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
2 Aug 2026to 30 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants aged 18 years or older. Licensed nurse practitioners or nurse practitioner trainees currently enrolled in an accredited nurse practitioner training program.
  • Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent. Able to participate in the complete training program and study assessments, including baseline, post-training, and 1-month follow-up assessments.
  • No prior formal POCUS training, or only limited basic exposure without systematic training experience.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who have previously completed a formal point-of-care ultrasound training program.
  • Participants who are unable to complete the full training program or study assessment procedures.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Chiang-Yi Chen, master contact

+886928124530

a865292@gmail.com

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, Taipei, 100

    Chiang-Yi Chen, master, 0928124530, a865292@gmail.com

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Feasibility of a Peer-Learning Ultrasound Program to Enhance Nurse Practitioners' Competence in Integrative Volume Status Assessment

This study aims to develop and evaluate a peer-led training program specifically designed for Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to acquire Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) skills. POCUS, known for its non-invasive nature and real-time imaging capability, has been widely applied in clinical fluid status assessment and plays a pivotal role in enhancing diagnostic efficiency and quality of care. However, current POCUS training resources for NPs in Taiwan remain insufficient, limiting their clinical application and professional visibility. Using a quasi-experimental design, this study investigates the effectiveness of peer-led instruction in strengthening image interpretation, clinical reasoning, and self-efficacy among NPs. The ultimate goal is to establish an evidence-based, nursing-oriented POCUS education model to fill existing gaps in the training system and elevate the role of NPs in multidisciplinary care.

Read the detailed description

This quasi-experimental study aims to compare two instructional models-physician-led versus peer NP-led POCUS training-and their effects on learners' outcomes and clinical skill performance.

Methods:

Sixty NPs, either in practice or under training, will be recruited and non-randomly assigned to either the experimental group (peer-led instruction) or the control group (physician-led instruction), based on their course availability, simulating real-world clinical education allocation:

  • Experimental group: Hands-on training led by NPs who have completed a structured POCUS curriculum and passed both teaching and practical assessments.
  • Control group: Hands-on training delivered by specialist physicians.

To ensure the quality and standardization of instructional delivery and operational procedures, two groups of nurse practitioners received the training program in separate cohorts. The educational intervention was structured into two phases: the first phase consisted of a two-hour online course covering fundamental ultrasound theory, relevant anatomical structures, and key points in clinical application; the second phase was a four-hour in-person hands-on workshop focusing on clinical scanning techniques and image interpretation skills. The instructional content encompassed five core structures: (1) inferior vena cava (IVC) assessment, (2) pleural effusion detection, (3) ascites identification, (4) hydronephrosis evaluation, and (5) bladder volume estimation and urinary retention interpretation.

Participants completed a pre-test prior to the training, a first post-test immediately after the course, and a second post-test three months later. The assessment tools included: (1) a POCUS knowledge questionnaire, (2) a self-confidence scale, (3) an image interpretation assessment, and (4) an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Being tested
Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training
Keywords
POCUS, peer learning, NP

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS TrainingBehavioural

    Participants will receive a structured point-of-care ultrasound training program delivered by trained nurse practitioner instructors. The program includes a 2-hour online lecture and a 4-hour hands-on practice session. Training focuses on integrative volume status assessment, including ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava, pleural effusion, ascites, hydronephrosis, and bladder volume or urinary retention.

Study groups in NCT07660016
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer Teaching GroupExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive a structured POCUS training program delivered by trained nurse practitioner instructors. The intervention includes a 2-hour online course covering basic ultrasound principles, relevant anatomy, and clinical applications, followed by a 4-hour hands-on practice session focused on integrative volume status assessment, including IVC, pleural effusion, ascites, hydronephrosis, and bladder assessment.
Receives: Behavioral: Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training
ExperimentalActive comparatorParticipants in this group will receive the same structured POCUS training program delivered by trained physician instructors. The program includes a 2-hour online lecture and a 4-hour hands-on practice session focused on integrative volume status assessment, including inferior vena cava, pleural effusion, ascites, hydronephrosis, and bladder assessment.
Receives: Behavioral: Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in POCUS Clinical Performance Score

    POCUS clinical performance will be assessed using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Participants will be evaluated on ultrasound probe positioning, image acquisition, anatomical identification, clinical interpretation, and integration of findings for volume status assessment, including inferior vena cava, pleural effusion, ascites, hydronephrosis, and bladder assessment. Higher scores indicate better clinical performance.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately after the training program, and 1 month after the training program

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in POCUS Knowledge Score

    POCUS knowledge will be assessed using a structured 10-item questionnaire covering basic ultrasound principles, organ identification, and clinical applications. Higher scores indicate better POCUS knowledge.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately after the training program, and 1 month after the training program

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2026
  2. Study start2 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07660016
Sponsor's protocol ID
202507102RINE
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
16 Jun 2026
Last updated
22 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nurse Practitioner-Led Peer POCUS Training in people with Physician-led Versus Peer NP-led POCUS Training, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chiang-Yi Chen, master (+886928124530, a865292@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in POCUS Clinical Performance Score (time frame: Baseline, immediately after the training program, and 1 month after the training program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in