Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeTRACE-CPENCT07663110
Tackling Resistance And HealthCare Economics Through CPE Screening
A study testing Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification in people with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Colonisation, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital. CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Colonisation
- What is being tested?
- Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16,000 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2026to 31 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All adult (18 years or older) medical patients admitted to the acute medical unit during the implementation period who undergo routine rectal CPE testing as per local Trust policy and test positive for CPE colonisation through either the rapid test or culture-based methods.
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal for rectal screening or
- Clinical contraindication to rectal swab collection
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom2 sites
Charing Cross Hospital
London
Medicine & Integrated Care research office, +442033111234, imperial.admin_trustresearchcontracts@nhs.net
St Thomas' hospital
London
R&D Governance team, +442071887188, gstt.randd@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: Multi-centre Evaluation of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Prevalence and Transmission Dynamics, Recommendations on Screening Strategies, and Health Economics Outcomes Research Impact to Inform Policy Change
The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital.
CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Normally when patients come into hospital, they may undergo a swab test on their bottom to see if CPEs can be grown. This test can take up to 24 hours to produce a result.
Read more
The investigators want to use a faster test which takes 2 hours to produce a result, and whether this can make a difference to CPE spread between person to person.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Why do people carry, transmit or get infected with CPE?
- If a faster test was used to look for CPE, would this be better at reducing patient spread in hospital?
- Is a faster test also more cost effective?
Participants will:
- Be tested by both the usual and faster test when they come into hospital by a swab on their bottom
- Where they test positive for CPE they will be asked to answer some questions about their health
Read the detailed description
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are a significant threat to healthcare through their ability to cause drug-resistant infections. These group of bacteria posses enzymes which break down and inactivate carbapenems, a broad spectrum class of antibiotics reserved for severe infections. Transmission of CPEs between patients occur through proximity / contact within their environment in hospital - and is therefore preventable.
Within the individual, initial colonisation with CPE is an important risk factor for development of multi-drug resistant infections which are associated with significant mortality and high hospital costs. The in-hospital transmission of CPE exerts a complex burden across almost all healthcare domains - for example, CPE infection or colonisation renders common surgical antibiotic prophylaxis ineffective, increases morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patient groups such as intensive care, places burdens on the use of single occupancy beds and imposes considerable cost and disruption to care pathways through outbreaks.
Existing microbiological diagnoses of CPEs vary, but commonly involve bacterial culture of a sample such as a rectal swab in laboratory settings followed by phenotypic testing and characterisation of common antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) through molecular or immunochromatographic approaches, mostly focusing on the "big 5" mechanisms of CPE. Such testing pathways can however be time-consuming, with the median result turnaround time to be between 24-48 hours. Rapid molecular testing for CPE bypasses the bacterial culture step and may allow for robust IPC measures to be implemented in a near real-time fashion including rapid risk stratification of CPE carriage status. Where transmission is suspected, contact tracing using rapid testing early in the transmission cascade could reduce unwanted impact and be cost-effective.
The proposed study examines the utility, cost-benefit in adoption of a rapid based screening approach using rapid CPE testing coupled with an enhanced reporting workflow operating 24 hours a day, compared with existing standard practice. Given the complex interactions of AMR and CPE acquisition and transmission within hospital settings, a comprehensive approach including clinical, epidemiological and health economic costings will be utilised and modelled in order to accurately understand impact. Rapid CPE screening will be incorporated into clinical processes to minimise adverse impact and the research conducted as a pragmatic study.
The rapid test for use in this study is the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R which can detect genes in 5 most prevalent Carbapenemase gene families (including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA classes) directly from a rectal swab sample in 50 minutes - this technology is CE-mark approved as an in vitro diagnostic and has undergone NICE technological appraisal
Research hypotheses to be addressed through the study:
- The implementation of rapid molecular CPE detection through the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R with an enhanced reporting workflow is associated with greater effectiveness and timeliness in IPC interventions, compared with the existing use of culture-based screening strategies alone. This will lead to reductions in in-hospital transmission of CPE and result in downstream effects for organisation and individuals.
- In-hospital screening strategies through rapid molecular CPE testing can be cost-effective from a health economic perspective and acceptable to patient and stakeholders, given particular clinical settings and baseline local CPE prevalence.
This is a multi-centre mixed methods research study consisting of:
- A pragmatic prospective interventional interrupted time series study to examine impact of rapid Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) diagnostics and an enhanced reporting workflow in parallel with screening on clinical practice and transmission.
- A clinical observational cohort study to characterise individual risk factors for CPE colonisation, epidemiology of colonisation including point-prevalence, and subsequent in-hospital transmission dynamics.
- A health economic modelling study utilising hospital and national data to estimate medical costs, patient experience and systems level impact of screening, CPE colonisation and acquisition
The study will take place across two hospital Trusts:
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICNHT), London ii) Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London
Project 1 will implement the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R rapid test in parallel to routine culture for CPE screening at two hospital sites to understand impact on IPC practice.
Project 2 will capture transmission dynamics, healthcare cost, patient acceptability and quality of life metrics using national datasets, and de-identified healthcare data collected from Project 1. Modelling using health economics outcome research methods will be performed to evaluate CPE screening strategies for a range of scenarios and settings with a view of informing policy. Health economic costings will utilise routinely available clinical data as well as costings metrics and health related grouping code from NHS Hospital Episode Statistics.
- Being tested
- Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification
- Keywords
- infection prevention and control, health economics, rapid molecular diagnostics, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, CPEs, CROs, MDROs, hospital transmission
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identificationDiagnostic test
Participants will undergo a rectal swab and undergo rapid molecular testing for CPE colonisation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid molecular screening | Experimental | During the study period all eligible patients will undergo the intervention Receives: Diagnostic Test: Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-hospital secondary transmission of CPE colonisation
The primary outcome measure is the change in secondary in-hospital CPE transmission risk with the introduction of rapid rectal CPE screening. Quantification of transmission risk will be done using transmission dynamics modelling informed by collected clinical and epidemiological data.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Health economic outcomes of CPE colonisation, infection and screening approaches
Direct, indirect and opportunity costs associated with CPE colonisation and infection using health economic cost analysis
Measured: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Laboratory measures of diagnostic comparison
Concordance metrics between CPE rapid testing and culture including rate, genotype and species.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Epidemiological measures of CPE colonisation
Patient level risk factors for CPE acquisition, colonisation, and transmission.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Qualitative measures including public, stakeholder understanding and acceptability
Perspectives on CPE diagnostic implementation, patient and provider acceptability of CPE screening through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and workshops.
Measured: 24 months
Qualitative study on CPE perspectives through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and focused workshops
This will be an adjunctive study with separate approvals process involving interviews with stakeholders to understand views and approaches to the management of CPE and detection. These findings will feed back into the main TRACE-CPE project.
Measured: 24 months
Point prevalence of CPE
Prevalence of CPE colonisation derived from the number of positive CPE cases divided by the number of individuals undergoing screening.
Measured: Over the point prevalence period of 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jon Otter, Principal investigator, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07663110
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 361309
- Acronym
- TRACE-CPE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual patient data is recorded under the General Data Protection Regulation framework and will not be shared outside the research and clinical teams. Aggregated data will be presented and can be shared under such approvals.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-centre Evaluation of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Prevalence and Transmission Dynamics, Recommendations on Screening Strategies, and Health Economics Outcomes Research Impact to Inform Policy Change
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07663110
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRACE-CPE / 361309
- Keywords
- infection prevention and control, health economics, rapid molecular diagnostics, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, CPEs, CROs, MDROs, hospital transmission
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 16,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital.
CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Normally when patients come into hospital, they may undergo a swab test on their bottom to see if CPEs can be grown. This test can take up to 24 hours to produce a result.
The investigators want to use a faster test which takes 2 hours to produce a result, and whether this can make a difference to CPE spread between person to person.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Why do people carry, transmit or get infected with CPE?
- If a faster test was used to look for CPE, would this be better at reducing patient spread in hospital?
- Is a faster test also more cost effective?
Participants will:
- Be tested by both the usual and faster test when they come into hospital by a swab on their bottom
- Where they test positive for CPE they will be asked to answer some questions about their health
Detailed description
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are a significant threat to healthcare through their ability to cause drug-resistant infections. These group of bacteria posses enzymes which break down and inactivate carbapenems, a broad spectrum class of antibiotics reserved for severe infections. Transmission of CPEs between patients occur through proximity / contact within their environment in hospital - and is therefore preventable.
Within the individual, initial colonisation with CPE is an important risk factor for development of multi-drug resistant infections which are associated with significant mortality and high hospital costs. The in-hospital transmission of CPE exerts a complex burden across almost all healthcare domains - for example, CPE infection or colonisation renders common surgical antibiotic prophylaxis ineffective, increases morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patient groups such as intensive care, places burdens on the use of single occupancy beds and imposes considerable cost and disruption to care pathways through outbreaks.
Existing microbiological diagnoses of CPEs vary, but commonly involve bacterial culture of a sample such as a rectal swab in laboratory settings followed by phenotypic testing and characterisation of common antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) through molecular or immunochromatographic approaches, mostly focusing on the "big 5" mechanisms of CPE. Such testing pathways can however be time-consuming, with the median result turnaround time to be between 24-48 hours. Rapid molecular testing for CPE bypasses the bacterial culture step and may allow for robust IPC measures to be implemented in a near real-time fashion including rapid risk stratification of CPE carriage status. Where transmission is suspected, contact tracing using rapid testing early in the transmission cascade could reduce unwanted impact and be cost-effective.
The proposed study examines the utility, cost-benefit in adoption of a rapid based screening approach using rapid CPE testing coupled with an enhanced reporting workflow operating 24 hours a day, compared with existing standard practice. Given the complex interactions of AMR and CPE acquisition and transmission within hospital settings, a comprehensive approach including clinical, epidemiological and health economic costings will be utilised and modelled in order to accurately understand impact. Rapid CPE screening will be incorporated into clinical processes to minimise adverse impact and the research conducted as a pragmatic study.
The rapid test for use in this study is the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R which can detect genes in 5 most prevalent Carbapenemase gene families (including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA classes) directly from a rectal swab sample in 50 minutes - this technology is CE-mark approved as an in vitro diagnostic and has undergone NICE technological appraisal
Research hypotheses to be addressed through the study:
- The implementation of rapid molecular CPE detection through the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R with an enhanced reporting workflow is associated with greater effectiveness and timeliness in IPC interventions, compared with the existing use of culture-based screening strategies alone. This will lead to reductions in in-hospital transmission of CPE and result in downstream effects for organisation and individuals.
- In-hospital screening strategies through rapid molecular CPE testing can be cost-effective from a health economic perspective and acceptable to patient and stakeholders, given particular clinical settings and baseline local CPE prevalence.
This is a multi-centre mixed methods research study consisting of:
- A pragmatic prospective interventional interrupted time series study to examine impact of rapid Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) diagnostics and an enhanced reporting workflow in parallel with screening on clinical practice and transmission.
- A clinical observational cohort study to characterise individual risk factors for CPE colonisation, epidemiology of colonisation including point-prevalence, and subsequent in-hospital transmission dynamics.
- A health economic modelling study utilising hospital and national data to estimate medical costs, patient experience and systems level impact of screening, CPE colonisation and acquisition
The study will take place across two hospital Trusts:
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICNHT), London ii) Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London
Project 1 will implement the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R rapid test in parallel to routine culture for CPE screening at two hospital sites to understand impact on IPC practice.
Project 2 will capture transmission dynamics, healthcare cost, patient acceptability and quality of life metrics using national datasets, and de-identified healthcare data collected from Project 1. Modelling using health economics outcome research methods will be performed to evaluate CPE screening strategies for a range of scenarios and settings with a view of informing policy. Health economic costings will utilise routinely available clinical data as well as costings metrics and health related grouping code from NHS Hospital Episode Statistics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid molecular screening | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identificationDuring the study period all eligible patients will undergo the intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All adult (18 years or older) medical patients admitted to the acute medical unit during the implementation period who undergo routine rectal CPE testing as per local Trust policy and test positive for CPE colonisation through either the rapid test or culture-based methods.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient refusal for rectal screening or
- Clinical contraindication to rectal swab collection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identificationParticipants will undergo a rectal swab and undergo rapid molecular testing for CPE colonisation | Diagnostic test | Rapid molecular screening |
Primary outcome
In-hospital secondary transmission of CPE colonisation
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
The primary outcome measure is the change in secondary in-hospital CPE transmission risk with the introduction of rapid rectal CPE screening. Quantification of transmission risk will be done using transmission dynamics modelling informed by collected clinical and epidemiological data.
6 secondary outcomes
Health economic outcomes of CPE colonisation, infection and screening approaches
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Laboratory measures of diagnostic comparison
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Epidemiological measures of CPE colonisation
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
Qualitative measures including public, stakeholder understanding and acceptability
Time frame: 24 months
Qualitative study on CPE perspectives through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and focused workshops
Time frame: 24 months
Point prevalence of CPE
Time frame: Over the point prevalence period of 1 week
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual patient data is recorded under the General Data Protection Regulation framework and will not be shared outside the research and clinical teams. Aggregated data will be presented and can be shared under such approvals.
Related trials for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
RecruitingObservational study
Aztreonam-Avibactam in Immunocompromised Hosts
Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
EaRly impAct theraPy With Ceftazidime-avibactam Via rapID Diagnostics
Blood Stream Infections, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
One Health Determinants of Rectal Colonization by ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales in the Community
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), ESBL
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Predictive Score in Patients With Hematological Malignancies Colonized by Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Hemato-oncologic Patients, Colonization
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of Resistant Potato Starch for Gut MDRO Decolonization
Clostridium Infections, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jon Otter principal investigator
Guy's and St Thomas NHS Trust
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rapid molecular diagnostic test for CPE identification in people with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Colonisation, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Research Governance and Integrity (020 7594 9832, RGIT@imperial.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-hospital secondary transmission of CPE colonisation (time frame: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.