Neuromotor ImpairmentsAI-REMAPNCT07664033
AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study
A study testing Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring in people with Neuromotor Impairments, run by IRCCS Eugenio Medea at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
What is the purpose of this study? This study aims to evaluate the usability and feasibility of an artificial intelligence-based model designed to monitor in real-time the engagement and motor performance of pediatric patients during technology-assisted rehabilitation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromotor Impairments
- What is being tested?
- Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2026to 30 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Subjects aged between 5 and 17 years with neuromotor impairments who are undergoing rehabilitation therapy using the Lokomat and GRAIL devices, according to the existing clinical plan.
Who cannot join
- Uncooperative subjects.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Simone Costantini, MSc contact
Italy1 site
Scientific Institute IRCCS E.Medea
Bosisio Parini, 23842
Fabio Alexander Storm, PhD, +39 031877111, fabio.storm@lanostrafamiglia.it
Emilia Biffi, PhD, +39 031877111, emilia.biffi@lanostrafamiglia.it
About this study
Official title: AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients
What is the purpose of this study? This study aims to evaluate the usability and feasibility of an artificial intelligence-based model designed to monitor in real-time the engagement and motor performance of pediatric patients during technology-assisted rehabilitation.
Who can take part? 15 participants between 5 and 17 years old with neuromotor impairments will take part, along with at least 5 of their referring physiotherapists.
Read more
What will happen in the study? Each pediatric patient will take part in a single, 1-hour rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system, according to their standard clinical prescription. During the session, the physiotherapist will have access to a display showing real-time data from the AI model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement level, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will complete a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and provide direct feedback on how to improve the model.
Why is this study important? Assessing the usability of this real-time monitoring tool is a necessary step to understand if it is practical for clinical use. Providing therapists with objective, real-time insights into a child's psychological and physical state can ultimately help tailor therapy to the specific needs of each patient, improving the overall rehabilitation experience.
- Conditions
- Neuromotor Impairments
- Being tested
- Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring
- Keywords
- Engagement, Pediatric Rehabilitation, Neuromotor Impairments, Gait, Heart Rate Variability, Electrodermal Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement MonitoringDevice
The intervention consists of the deployment of a real-time AI-based monitoring system during a standard technology-assisted rehabilitation session. The physiotherapist is provided with a display showing continuous feedback on the patient's engagement levels, emotional state (pleasantness and activation), motor performance, and heart rate. The model processes physiological and inertial data collected via wearable sensors, acting purely as an observational support tool without altering the standard rehabilitation protocol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Engagement Monitoring | Experimental | Participants in this experimental arm, consisting of pediatric patients with neuromotor impairments, will undergo a single 1-hour technology-assisted rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system. During the session, the physiotherapist will use a display showing real-time outputs from the AI-based model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement levels, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. The model acts as an observational support tool and will not directly alter the standard rehabilitation protocol. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will evaluate the usability of the system. Receives: Device: Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score
This validated questionnaire is intended to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a system or product. It is composed of 10 items assessing factors such as system complexity, ease of use, and functionality integration. Each item is proposed on a 5-points Likert scale, with minimum value 1 and maximum value 5. Higher overall values stand for a higher degree of agreement with respect to the statement provided by the single item. For odd items, higher values stand for higher usability. For even items, higher values stand for lower usability.
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (2)
Service Provider-Rated Measure of Client Engagement (PRIME-SP)
This measure is intended to capture the therapist's observation of patient engagement. PRIME-SP is a validated self-reported questionnaire that is composed of three main parts: Part A, where the therapist can perform an overall evaluation of patient engagement according to a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4, with higher values corresponding to positive engagement); Part B, where the therapist can perform a domain-dependent (affective, cognitive, behavioral domains) evaluation of patient engagement according to a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4, with higher values corresponding to positive engagement); Part C, where the therapist can take free notes about factors and circumstances that he/she believes may have affected patient engagement in the session.
Measured: Baseline
AI Model-Inferred Engagement Level
This objective measure is intended to capture the patient's continuous engagement level during the rehabilitation session. The AI-based model infers the engagement state using feed-forward neural networks that process real-time physiological data (such as HRV and EDA) and inertial signals (IMU). The model provides a categorical evaluation of engagement (low vs high).
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2026
- Study start15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromotor ImpairmentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Eugenio MedeaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Eugenio Medea
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Politecnico di Milano
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07664033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- L2-246-F2
- Other IDs
- RC 2024-2026 to E. Biffi
- Acronym
- AI-REMAP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The results obtained at the end of this clinical trial will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed international journals. The raw data of the study will be published among the supplementary materials of scientific articles and/or uploaded to Zenodo, a multidisciplinary repository, managed by CERN in Geneva, which allows researchers to share and preserve research results in any size and form. Depositing data in ZENODO guarantees their compliance with the FAIR principles.
Publications
Bray L, Appleton V, Sharpe A. The information needs of children having clinical procedures in hospital: Will it hurt? Will I feel scared? What can I do to stay calm? Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Sep;45(5):737-743. doi: 10.1111/cch.12692. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
PubMed 31163093Flynn R, Walton S, Scott SD. Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 4;5:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31700676Graffigna G, Barello S, Riva G, Castelnuovo G, Corbo M, Coppola L, Daverio G, Fauci A, Iannone P, Ricciardi W, Bosio AC; CCIPE Working Group. [Recommandation for patient engagement promotion in care and cure for chronic conditions.]. Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Nov;108(11):455-475. doi: 10.1701/2812.28441. Italian.
PubMed 29149163Koenig A, Omlin X, Zimmerli L, Sapa M, Krewer C, Bolliger M, Muller F, Riener R. Psychological state estimation from physiological recordings during robot-assisted gait rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):367-85. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.03.0044.
PubMed 21674389Costantini S, Falivene A, Chiappini M, Malerba G, Dei C, Bellazzecca S, Storm FA, Andreoni G, Ambrosini E, Biffi E. Artificial intelligence tools for engagement prediction in neuromotor disorder patients during rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Dec 19;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01519-2.
PubMed 39702317
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07664033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI-REMAP / L2-246-F2
- Conditions
- Neuromotor Impairments
- Keywords
- Engagement, Pediatric Rehabilitation, Neuromotor Impairments, Gait, Heart Rate Variability, Electrodermal Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Eugenio MedeaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Politecnico di Milano
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
What is the purpose of this study? This study aims to evaluate the usability and feasibility of an artificial intelligence-based model designed to monitor in real-time the engagement and motor performance of pediatric patients during technology-assisted rehabilitation.
Who can take part? 15 participants between 5 and 17 years old with neuromotor impairments will take part, along with at least 5 of their referring physiotherapists.
What will happen in the study? Each pediatric patient will take part in a single, 1-hour rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system, according to their standard clinical prescription. During the session, the physiotherapist will have access to a display showing real-time data from the AI model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement level, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will complete a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and provide direct feedback on how to improve the model.
Why is this study important? Assessing the usability of this real-time monitoring tool is a necessary step to understand if it is practical for clinical use. Providing therapists with objective, real-time insights into a child's psychological and physical state can ultimately help tailor therapy to the specific needs of each patient, improving the overall rehabilitation experience.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Engagement Monitoring | Experimental | Device: Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement MonitoringParticipants in this experimental arm, consisting of pediatric patients with neuromotor impairments, will undergo a single 1-hour technology-assisted rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system. During the session, the physiotherapist will use a display showing real-time outputs from the AI-based model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement levels, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. The model acts as an observational support tool and will not directly alter the standard rehabilitation protocol. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will evaluate the usability of the system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects aged between 5 and 17 years with neuromotor impairments who are undergoing rehabilitation therapy using the Lokomat and GRAIL devices, according to the existing clinical plan.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Uncooperative subjects.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement MonitoringThe intervention consists of the deployment of a real-time AI-based monitoring system during a standard technology-assisted rehabilitation session. The physiotherapist is provided with a display showing continuous feedback on the patient's engagement levels, emotional state (pleasantness and activation), motor performance, and heart rate. The model processes physiological and inertial data collected via wearable sensors, acting purely as an observational support tool without altering the standard rehabilitation protocol. | Device | Real-Time Engagement Monitoring |
Primary outcome
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score
Time frame: Baseline
This validated questionnaire is intended to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a system or product. It is composed of 10 items assessing factors such as system complexity, ease of use, and functionality integration. Each item is proposed on a 5-points Likert scale, with minimum value 1 and maximum value 5. Higher overall values stand for a higher degree of agreement with respect to the statement provided by the single item. For odd items, higher values stand for higher usability. For even items, higher values stand for lower usability.
2 secondary outcomes
Service Provider-Rated Measure of Client Engagement (PRIME-SP)
Time frame: Baseline
AI Model-Inferred Engagement Level
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31163093Bray L, Appleton V, Sharpe A. The information needs of children having clinical procedures in hospital: Will it hurt? Will I feel scared? What can I do to stay calm? Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Sep;45(5):737-743. doi: 10.1111/cch.12692. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 31700676Flynn R, Walton S, Scott SD. Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 4;5:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 29149163Graffigna G, Barello S, Riva G, Castelnuovo G, Corbo M, Coppola L, Daverio G, Fauci A, Iannone P, Ricciardi W, Bosio AC; CCIPE Working Group. [Recommandation for patient engagement promotion in care and cure for chronic conditions.]. Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Nov;108(11):455-475. doi: 10.1701/2812.28441. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 21674389Koenig A, Omlin X, Zimmerli L, Sapa M, Krewer C, Bolliger M, Muller F, Riener R. Psychological state estimation from physiological recordings during robot-assisted gait rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):367-85. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.03.0044.
- Background: PubMed 39702317Costantini S, Falivene A, Chiappini M, Malerba G, Dei C, Bellazzecca S, Storm FA, Andreoni G, Ambrosini E, Biffi E. Artificial intelligence tools for engagement prediction in neuromotor disorder patients during rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Dec 19;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01519-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The results obtained at the end of this clinical trial will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed international journals. The raw data of the study will be published among the supplementary materials of scientific articles and/or uploaded to Zenodo, a multidisciplinary repository, managed by CERN in Geneva, which allows researchers to share and preserve research results in any size and form. Depositing data in ZENODO guarantees their compliance with the FAIR principles.
Related trials for Neuromotor Impairments
Not yet recruiting
PhiCube for Bilateral Upper Limb Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Adults
Stroke, Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Physical Therapy for Montana Children With NMD Using Hippotherapy and the Equine Environment
Neuromotor Impairments
Recruiting
A Story for Pepper & Nao
Children and Adolescents With Neuromotor Impairment
Recruiting
Clinical Impacts of Structured Robotic Gait Training Programs
Neuromotor Impairments, Walking Impairment
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness of Spatial StimelMD (SSMD) in Subjects With Upper Limb Neuromotor Impairments
Stroke, TBI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Simone Costantini, MSc contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring in people with Neuromotor Impairments, run by IRCCS Eugenio Medea at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fabio Alexander Storm, PhD (+39 031877111, fabio.storm@lanostrafamiglia.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07664033, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.