AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian EndometriomaNCT07666412

Assessment of Ovarian Reserve in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma With Cystectomy or Argon Plasma Coagulation: A Aandomized Clinical Trial

A study testing Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablation in people with Ovarian Endometrioma, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endometriosis is a benign, chronic, and often recurrent gynecological disease affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Among the different manifestations of the disease, ovarian endometrioma represents one of the most common forms, occurring in up to 50% of affected patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Ovarian Endometrioma
What is being tested?
Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
146 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
8 Jun 2026to 8 Dec 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Symptomatic patients (pain and/or infertility) affected by ovarian endometriomas (unilateral or bilateral).
  • Age between 18 and 40 years.
  • Ultrasound diagnosis of one or more mono- or bilateral endometriotic cysts, with a maximum overall diameter (per ovary) ≤ 80 mm and at least one cyst diameter ≥ 20 mm.
  • Use of hormonal therapy for at least 1 month prior to surgery.
  • Willingness to undergo follow-up at 40-60 days and 12 months, according to clinical practice.
  • Willingness to receive postoperative hormonal therapy, according to clinical practice, to minimize the risk of recurrence.
  • Written informed consent obtained.

Who cannot join

  • History of unilateral ovariectomy/adnexectomy or hysterectomy.
  • Ultrasound evidence of other non-endometriotic ovarian cysts requiring surgical removal.
  • Atypical endometrioma or ultrasound suspicion of malignancy.
  • Previous surgery on one or both ovaries within 12 months prior to surgery.
  • Known or suspected active oncological disease.
  • Inability to undergo transvaginal ultrasound examination (patients with intact hymen).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Diego Raimondo, MD contact

+393290636618

die.raimondo@gmail.com

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

    Bologna, Bologna, 40138

    Diego Raimondo, MD, +393290636618, die.raimondo@gmail.com

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Endometriosis is a benign, chronic, and often recurrent gynecological disease affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Among the different manifestations of the disease, ovarian endometrioma represents one of the most common forms, occurring in up to 50% of affected patients. Endometriomas may cause progressive damage to ovarian tissue through both mechanical effects and direct toxic effects related to the inflammatory and oxidative content of the cyst, ultimately leading to a reduction in ovarian reserve.

When medical treatment is insufficient or not indicated, surgery represents a therapeutic option. The aim of surgery is to remove the cyst while minimizing the risk of recurrence and preserving as much healthy ovarian tissue as possible. Currently, the most widely used surgical technique is laparoscopic cystectomy performed by stripping the cyst capsule. However, this procedure may result in the inadvertent removal of healthy ovarian tissue and a consequent reduction in ovarian reserve.

Read more

In recent years, ablative surgical techniques have been developed with the aim of reducing damage to the ovarian parenchyma. Among these, Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) is a technique that uses a high-energy argon plasma jet to vaporize and coagulate superficial tissues. From a histological perspective, APC induces limited-depth tissue necrosis, generally confined to the cyst capsule, potentially reducing the risk of damage to the underlying ovarian tissue. In addition, this technology may offer practical and economic advantages.

Several studies suggest that ablative techniques may have a lower impact on ovarian reserve compared with cystectomy, as assessed by antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, a reliable biomarker of ovarian reserve. However, the available evidence mainly derives from observational studies or studies using ablative technologies different from the one investigated in the present study. Furthermore, the systematic use of ablative techniques remains controversial in clinical practice, partly because of the potential risk of recurrence associated with residual endometriotic tissue.

To date, no randomized clinical trials have directly compared the impact of APC versus cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian endometrioma. Moreover, data are lacking regarding recurrence risk, post-treatment ovarian ultrasound characteristics following APC ablation, and the histological effects of this technique on endometriotic cysts.

In light of these considerations, the present randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effect of cystectomy and Argon Plasma Coagulation ablation on the preservation of ovarian reserve in patients undergoing surgical treatment for ovarian endometrioma, while also evaluating ultrasound outcomes and recurrence risk during follow-up.

Being tested
Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablation
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablationProcedure or surgery

    Cyst opening and drainage, ablation of the inner surface of the cyst capsule using APC, and multiple biopsies of the cyst capsule.

Study groups in NCT07666412
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablationExperimentalCyst opening and drainage, ablation of the inner surface of the cyst capsule using APC, and multiple biopsies of the cyst capsule.
Receives: Procedure: Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablation
CystectomyNo interventionRemoval of the cyst capsule using the stripping technique, followed by ultra-selective hemostasis with bipolar energy and suturing of the ovarian parenchyma for hemostatic and reconstructive purposes (when indicated).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Late effects of APC or cystectomy on the AFC of the treated ovary

    Change in antral follicle count (ΔAFC) of the treated ovary between baseline (T0) and 12 months (T2).

    Measured: 12 months after surgery (T2).

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Early effects of APC or cystectomy on the AFC of the treated ovary

    Change in antral follicle count (ΔAFC) of the treated ovary between baseline (T0) and 40-60 days after surgery (T1).

    Measured: 40-60 days after surgery (T1).

  2. Late effects of APC or cystectomy on serum AMH levels

    Change in serum AMH levels (ΔAMH) between baseline (T0) and 12 months (T2).

    Measured: 12 months after surgery (T2).

  3. Early effects of APC or cystectomy on serum AMH levels

    Change in serum AMH levels (ΔAMH) between baseline (T0) and 40-60 days after surgery (T1).

    Measured: 40-60 days after surgery (T1).

  4. Temporal pattern of AFC variation

    Antral follicle count (AFC) values of the ovary treated with APC and cystectomy

    Measured: Baseline (T0), 40-60 days after surgery (T1), 12 months after surgery (T2)

  5. Temporal pattern of AMH variation

    Serum AMH levels in patients undergoing APC and cystectomy

    Measured: Baseline (T0), 40-60 days after surgery (T1), 12 months after surgery (T2)

  6. Ultrasound appearance of the ovary treated with APC

    Presence/absence of an ovarian cyst; cyst volume; cyst echogenicity (isoechoic, hyperechoic, hypoechoic, ground-glass appearance).

    Measured: 40-60 days after surgery (T1)

  7. Ultrasound recurrence rate of endometrioma

    Presence/absence of an ovarian cyst with ground-glass content ≥ 10 mm

    Measured: 12 months after surgery (T2)

  8. Histological appearance of the capsule of endometriomas treated with APC

    Maximum depth of necrosis; persistence of endometriotic foci

    Measured: 40-60 days after surgery (T1), (during histological analysis of surgical specimens)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2026
  2. Study start8 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion8 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion8 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Ovarian reserve assessment will be performed through pre- and post-operative ultrasound evaluation of the antral follicle count (AFC), carried out by an experienced blinded sonographer. To ensure blinding, the experienced sonographer will be assisted by a second physician responsible for conducting the clinical interview with the patient, in order to provide the sonographer with the necessary clinical information while omitting any details regarding the surgical technique used. For the present study, a stratified randomization design will be adopted. Stratification will be performed according to two clinically relevant variables: patient age (cut-off: 32 years) and maximum endometrioma diameter at preoperative ultrasound assessment (cut-off: 40 mm). These factors were selected because of their potential impact on ovarian reserve and surgical outcomes.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
146 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07666412
Sponsor's protocol ID
ARG-OMA
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
19 Jun 2026
Last updated
24 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) ablation in people with Ovarian Endometrioma, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Diego Raimondo, MD (+393290636618, die.raimondo@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Late effects of APC or cystectomy on the AFC of the treated ovary (time frame: 12 months after surgery (T2).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in