Mental Health LiteracyPSPNCT07666542
Psychosocial Support Program for Public School Teachers
A study testing Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support Training and Supervision Sessions in people with Mental Health Literacy and School Mental Health Training of Teachers, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if different formats of a school-based psychosocial support training program can improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The study will include teachers working in public schools in Brazil. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Mental Health Literacy, School Mental Health Training of Teachers
- What is being tested?
- Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support Training and Supervision Sessions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,970 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2026to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- School-level inclusion criteria
- Schools must meet the eligibility criteria for at least one of the study implementation cycles:
- Rio Grande do Sul state-school implementation cycles:
- Public schools from the state education system of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, serving students in Ensino Fundamental and Ensino Médio (equivalent to grades 1-12), and belonging to Polo 1 or Polo 2, administrative groupings defined by the Rio Grande do Sul State Department of Education that include the following Regional Education Coordinators (Coordenadorias Regionais de Educação [CREs]): 1st, 2nd, 11th, 12th, 27th, and 28th CREs (Polo 1), and 4th, 7th, 15th, 16th, 23rd, 25th, and 39th CREs (Polo 2);
- Schools with 10 or more teachers on staff.
- Municipal-school implementation cycle:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Public schools belonging to municipal education systems in participating municipalities in Brazil and included in the municipal implementation cycle of the study.
- Participant-level inclusion criteria
- Rio Grande do Sul state-school implementation cycles:
- School staff currently working in participating public schools.
- Municipal-school implementation cycle:
- Teachers currently working in participating municipal public schools.
- For all implementation cycles:
- Able and willing to participate in all stages of the intervention and scheduled assessments;
- Provide informed consent prior to participation.
Who cannot join
- School-level exclusion criteria
- Rio Grande do Sul state-school implementation cycles:
- Schools with fewer than 10 teachers on staff;
- Youth and Adult Education Centers (Núcleos de Educação de Jovens e Adultos [EJA]);
- Schools that began operating as full-time schools in 2026;
- Schools not belonging to Polo 1 or Polo 2 of the state education system of Rio Grande do Sul;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Schools that do not serve students in grades 1-12.
- Municipal-school implementation cycle:
- Schools not belonging to a participating municipal education system or not included in the municipal implementation cycle of the study.
- Participant-level exclusion criteria
- Not currently working in a participating public school;
- For the municipal-school implementation cycle, not currently working as a teacher in a participating municipal public school;
- Unable to participate in the training on the planned date for the school in which the participant works;
- Decline or are unable to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Feasibility of Different Formats of a School-Based Psychosocial Support Program for Public School Teachers: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if different formats of a school-based psychosocial support training program can improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The study will include teachers working in public schools in Brazil.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Do teachers who receive the training improve their knowledge on how to better to identify and support students with mental health difficulties?
- Do different formats of training (synchronous online or self-paced) and the presence of supervision lead to different levels of improvement in this knowledge, in attitudes related to mental health, and helping behaviors?
Researchers will compare three versions of the program (synchronous online with supervision sessions, synchronous online without supervision sessions, and asynchronous format) to see which approach is more effective, acceptable, and feasible.
Participants will:
- Take part in a training program delivered online or through self-paced materials;
- In some groups, attend additional supervision sessions to discuss real-life cases;
- Receive brief follow-up materials through mobile messages after the training
- Complete online questionnaires at multiple time points (before the training, during the program, after completion, and at follow-up).
The study will measure changes in teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to supporting students' mental health, as well as satisfaction with the program and its feasibility for large-scale implementation.
It will include teachers from the state education system of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and public schools from municipal education systems in participating municipalities in the same country
- Being tested
- Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Supervision Sessions, Mobile-Based Reinforcement Materials
- Keywords
- School Mental Health, Psychosocial Support, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, Teacher Professional Development, Mental Health Promotion, Education Policy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online School-Based Psychosocial Support TrainingBehavioural
A structured training program designed to improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The intervention includes evidence-based content on mental health literacy, identification of emotional and behavioral difficulties, and appropriate support and referral strategies. The training is delivered trough synchronous videoconference in two weekly sessions.
Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support TrainingBehavioural
A structured training program designed to improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The intervention includes evidence-based content on mental health literacy, identification of emotional and behavioral difficulties, and appropriate support and referral strategies. The training is delivered through an asynchronous self-paced course in a digital platform.
Supervision SessionsBehavioural
Structured small-group supervision sessions conducted via audio calls, focused on discussion of real-life cases, clarification of concepts, and support for practical application of the training content.
Mobile-Based Reinforcement MaterialsBehavioural
Brief follow-up materials delivered via mobile messaging to reinforce key concepts covered in the training sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Online Training + Supervision | Experimental | Participants receive two synchronous online training sessions (via videoconference), followed by two supervision sessions (audio-based, small group) focused on case discussion and practical application. Participants also receive brief follow-up materials via mobile messages. Receives: Behavioral: Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training; Behavioral: Supervision Sessions; Behavioral: Mobile-Based Reinforcement Materials |
| Arm 2: Online Training Only | Experimental | Participants receive two synchronous online training sessions (via videoconference) without additional supervision. Participants also receive brief follow-up materials via mobile messages. Receives: Behavioral: Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training; Behavioral: Mobile-Based Reinforcement Materials |
| Arm 3: Asynchronous Training (Control Condition) | Active comparator | Participants receive the same training content delivered in a fully asynchronous, self-paced format through digital materials, without live sessions or supervision. Receives: Behavioral: Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the score in the Mental health Knowledge & Attitudes Questionnaire
Psychosocial support skills knowledge and attitudes will be assessed using a multiple choice instrument (Mental health Knowledge \& Attitudes Questionnaire) developed for this study and previously piloted in a sample of teachers. Scores will range from 0 to 100%, reflecting the percentage of correct responses.
Measured: Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Early and Sustained change in the score in the Mental health Knowledge & Attitudes Questionnaire
Same instrument used in the primary outcome
Measured: Baseline (T0) to after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); Baseline (T0) to 1-month follow-up (T3)
Appropriate Response to a Student Mental Health Concern: Open-Ended Classroom Scenario
Participants are asked to recall a recent situation in their classroom in which they noticed behaviors in a student that raised a possible concern about the student's mental health or psychosocial well-being. Participants provide an open-ended description of the situation and the behaviors they observed and describe what, if anything, they did to support the student.
Responses will be evaluated to determine whether the actions described by the participant are considered appropriate (1) or not (0) based on the principles taught in the training. This assessment will be blind to the allocation group. The percentage of responses classified as appropriate will be calculated and compared across the three intervention arms.
The recall period varies by assessment time point: at T1 and T2, situations occurring during the past week; and at T3, situations occurring during the past month.
Measured: after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Self-rated knowledge
Assessed using two self-report items developed for this study. One item assesses participants' perceived knowledge of mental health, rated on a five-point scale from very poor to excellent. A second item assesses participants' confidence in their ability to identify students with psychosocial or mental health difficulties, rated on a five-point scale from not at all confident to extremely confident. Higher scores indicate greater self-rated knowledge and confidence. Participants may also select prefer not to answer.
Measured: baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Changes in helping behaviors toward students
Assessed using a retrospective self-report scale developed to capture mental health-related helping behaviors toward students ("Helping Behaviors Scale"), including identifying emotional distress, providing support, and facilitating referral to appropriate services. The scale includes five items describing specific helping behaviors. Each item is rated as yes, no, or does not apply. Higher endorsement indicates a greater number of supportive actions taken by the respondent in the past week.
Measured: Baseline (T0) to after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); Baseline (T0) to 1-month follow-up (T3)
Change in the levels of teacher burnout
Teacher burnout will be assessed using the 12-item version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12), a self-report questionnaire developed to assess burnout as a multidimensional psychological syndrome. It evaluates four core dimensions of burnout: exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment, and emotional impairment. Each item is rated on a five-point frequency scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A total burnout score will be calculated as the mean of the 12 items, with higher scores indicating greater burnout symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Training acceptability & satisfaction
Assessed using a post-training self-report questionnaire developed for this study. The questionnaire includes one item assessing perceived adequacy of training length, rated as too short, about right, or too long; one item assessing whether the training included sufficient practice of the skills taught, rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Higher ratings indicate greater satisfaction with the training components. An optional open-ended item collects additional qualitative feedback about the training.
Measured: Post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention
Cost-effectiveness will be calculated as the cost per improvement unit in the Mental health Knowledge \& Attitudes Questionnaire described previously
Measured: Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Change in Proficiency in Discriminating Levels of Student Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Need
This outcome will be assessed only in the subsample of participants working as teachers. Participants will complete a 16-vignette form of the Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Vignette Bank (MHPS-VB). For each vignette, participants select the most appropriate response from four ordered levels of action: observe and remain available, provide school-based support and accommodations, refer to a mental health professional, or act immediately to ensure safety.
Proficiency is defined as the probability of correctly ordering two students one severity level apart. It is expressed as a probability, with higher values indicating greater ability to distinguish between students with different levels of mental health and psychosocial support need.
Measured: Baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after completion of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); and 1-month follow-up (T3).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2026
- Study start9 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mental Health LiteracyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized trial. Schools are the unit of randomization, with one to nine school staff members per school participating in the trial, including teachers and school management personnel. The three arms differ based on delivery format (synchronous online, or asynchronous) and the presence or absence of supervision. Two groups receive synchronous online training, with or without additional supervision sessions, while one group receives the same content delivered in an asynchronous format only. The intervention duration ranges from 2 to 4 weeks depending on the assigned condition. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, during the intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up (1 month after post-intervention assessment). The study is designed to compare the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of different delivery formats and supervision components.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,970 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Child Mind Institute, Secretaria da Educação do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (SEDUC-RS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giovanni Abrahao Salum Junior, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Investigators
- Giovanni A. Salum, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Child Mind Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07666542
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 95402126.0.0000.5327
- Acronym
- PSP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study (including data dictionaries) will be made available to qualified researchers. Data will be shared after publication of the primary results, upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the study investigators. Requests will be evaluated based on scientific merit, feasibility, and ethical considerations. Data will be provided in a de-identified format to ensure participant confidentiality and compliance with applicable data protection regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Feasibility of Different Formats of a School-Based Psychosocial Support Program for Public School Teachers: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07666542
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PSP / 95402126.0.0000.5327
- Keywords
- School Mental Health, Psychosocial Support, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, Teacher Professional Development, Mental Health Promotion, Education Policy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,970 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Child Mind Institute, Secretaria da Educação do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (SEDUC-RS)
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if different formats of a school-based psychosocial support training program can improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The study will include teachers working in public schools in Brazil.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do teachers who receive the training improve their knowledge on how to better to identify and support students with mental health difficulties?
- Do different formats of training (synchronous online or self-paced) and the presence of supervision lead to different levels of improvement in this knowledge, in attitudes related to mental health, and helping behaviors?
Researchers will compare three versions of the program (synchronous online with supervision sessions, synchronous online without supervision sessions, and asynchronous format) to see which approach is more effective, acceptable, and feasible.
Participants will:
- Take part in a training program delivered online or through self-paced materials;
- In some groups, attend additional supervision sessions to discuss real-life cases;
- Receive brief follow-up materials through mobile messages after the training
- Complete online questionnaires at multiple time points (before the training, during the program, after completion, and at follow-up).
The study will measure changes in teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to supporting students' mental health, as well as satisfaction with the program and its feasibility for large-scale implementation.
It will include teachers from the state education system of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and public schools from municipal education systems in participating municipalities in the same country
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a three-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized trial. Schools are the unit of randomization, with one to nine school staff members per school participating in the trial, including teachers and school management personnel. The three arms differ based on delivery format (synchronous online, or asynchronous) and the presence or absence of supervision. Two groups receive synchronous online training, with or without additional supervision sessions, while one group receives the same content delivered in an asynchronous format only. The intervention duration ranges from 2 to 4 weeks depending on the assigned condition. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, during the intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up (1 month after post-intervention assessment). The study is designed to compare the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of different delivery formats and supervision components.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Online Training + Supervision | Experimental | Behavioral: Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Behavioral: Supervision Sessions, Behavioral: Mobile-Based Reinforcement MaterialsParticipants receive two synchronous online training sessions (via videoconference), followed by two supervision sessions (audio-based, small group) focused on case discussion and practical application. Participants also receive brief follow-up materials via mobile messages. |
| Arm 2: Online Training Only | Experimental | Behavioral: Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Behavioral: Mobile-Based Reinforcement MaterialsParticipants receive two synchronous online training sessions (via videoconference) without additional supervision. Participants also receive brief follow-up materials via mobile messages. |
| Arm 3: Asynchronous Training (Control Condition) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support TrainingParticipants receive the same training content delivered in a fully asynchronous, self-paced format through digital materials, without live sessions or supervision. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- School-level inclusion criteria
- Schools must meet the eligibility criteria for at least one of the study implementation cycles:
- Rio Grande do Sul state-school implementation cycles:
- Public schools from the state education system of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, serving students in Ensino Fundamental and Ensino Médio (equivalent to grades 1-12), and belonging to Polo 1 or Polo 2, administrative groupings defined by the Rio Grande do Sul State Department of Education that include the following Regional Education Coordinators (Coordenadorias Regionais de Educação [CREs]): 1st, 2nd, 11th, 12th, 27th, and 28th CREs (Polo 1), and 4th, 7th, 15th, 16th, 23rd, 25th, and 39th CREs (Polo 2);
- Schools with 10 or more teachers on staff.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- School-level exclusion criteria
- Rio Grande do Sul state-school implementation cycles:
- Schools with fewer than 10 teachers on staff;
- Youth and Adult Education Centers (Núcleos de Educação de Jovens e Adultos [EJA]);
- Schools that began operating as full-time schools in 2026;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online School-Based Psychosocial Support TrainingA structured training program designed to improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The intervention includes evidence-based content on mental health literacy, identification of emotional and behavioral difficulties, and appropriate support and referral strategies. The training is delivered trough synchronous videoconference in two weekly sessions. | Behavioural | Arm 1: Online Training + Supervision, Arm 2: Online Training Only |
| Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support TrainingA structured training program designed to improve teachers' ability to recognize and respond to students' mental health needs. The intervention includes evidence-based content on mental health literacy, identification of emotional and behavioral difficulties, and appropriate support and referral strategies. The training is delivered through an asynchronous self-paced course in a digital platform. | Behavioural | Arm 3: Asynchronous Training (Control Condition) |
| Supervision SessionsStructured small-group supervision sessions conducted via audio calls, focused on discussion of real-life cases, clarification of concepts, and support for practical application of the training content. | Behavioural | Arm 1: Online Training + Supervision |
| Mobile-Based Reinforcement MaterialsBrief follow-up materials delivered via mobile messaging to reinforce key concepts covered in the training sessions. | Behavioural | Arm 1: Online Training + Supervision, Arm 2: Online Training Only |
Primary outcome
Change in the score in the Mental health Knowledge & Attitudes Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Psychosocial support skills knowledge and attitudes will be assessed using a multiple choice instrument (Mental health Knowledge \& Attitudes Questionnaire) developed for this study and previously piloted in a sample of teachers. Scores will range from 0 to 100%, reflecting the percentage of correct responses.
8 secondary outcomes
Early and Sustained change in the score in the Mental health Knowledge & Attitudes Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline (T0) to after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); Baseline (T0) to 1-month follow-up (T3)
Appropriate Response to a Student Mental Health Concern: Open-Ended Classroom Scenario
Time frame: after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Self-rated knowledge
Time frame: baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Changes in helping behaviors toward students
Time frame: Baseline (T0) to after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); Baseline (T0) to 1-month follow-up (T3)
Change in the levels of teacher burnout
Time frame: Baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after ending of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); 1-month follow-up (T3)
Training acceptability & satisfaction
Time frame: Post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention
Time frame: Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)
Change in Proficiency in Discriminating Levels of Student Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Need
Time frame: Baseline (T0); after the second training session (approximately 1 week after baseline)/after completion of the asynchronous training (T1); post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2); and 1-month follow-up (T3).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study (including data dictionaries) will be made available to qualified researchers. Data will be shared after publication of the primary results, upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the study investigators. Requests will be evaluated based on scientific merit, feasibility, and ethical considerations. Data will be provided in a de-identified format to ensure participant confidentiality and compliance with applicable data protection regulations.
Related trials for Mental Health Literacy
Not yet recruiting
The Health Literacy for Healthier Mind Study
Health Literacy, Occupational Health
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Effectiveness of the LifeSkills Training - Lombardia - Primary Shool Program ( Val3P-LST )
Well Being, Drug Addiction
RecruitingObservational study
Addressing Pregnant Women's First Trimester Worries and Information Needs With mHealth Solutions
Pregnancy Trimester, First, Anxiety
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Health Surveillance at Constructor University Bremen (CUB)
Social Isolation or Loneliness, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Using a School-Based Depression Literacy Psychoeducation Program With AI Chatbot to Improve Depression Literacy and Help-Seeking Among High School Students
Depressive Symptoms, Mental Health (Depression)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Giovanni A. Salum, MD, PhD principal investigator
Child Mind Institute
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Online School-Based Psychosocial Support Training, Asynchronous School-Based Psychosocial Support Training and Supervision Sessions in people with Mental Health Literacy and School Mental Health Training of Teachers, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Giovanni A. Salum, MD, PhD ((+55) 51 3359 8094, gsalum @hcpa.edu.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the score in the Mental health Knowledge & Attitudes Questionnaire (time frame: Baseline (T0) to post-intervention at 2-4 weeks (T2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.