Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)REMRABIT-PlusNCT07678112
Medical Device for Sustained Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biological Therapy
A study testing Predictive Model-Guided Decision Strategy in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Francisco J. Blanco at 9 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate a new tool designed to help doctors decide whether it is safe to reduce medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in remission. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- What is being tested?
- Predictive Model-Guided Decision Strategy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 184 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2025to Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged ≥18 years.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to either the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.
- Clinical remission for at least 6 months prior to the baseline visit, defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6.
- Receiving biological anti-TNF therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, or certolizumab).
- Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients in whom biological therapy was prescribed due to systemic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and any known associated condition that may interfere with the assessment of study outcomes (e.g., fibromyalgia or concomitant chronic inflammatory diseases).
- Patients receiving chronic anti-TNF biological therapy who are already undergoing treatment tapering or are on reduced or extended dosing regimens prior to study inclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
9 sites in 1 country
Spain9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Recruiting
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
A Coruña, A Coruña, 15006
Francisco J. Blanco, +34981178000, expediente.coruna@sergas.es
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario Araba
Alava, Alava, 01009
Susana Gil, +34945 00 70 00, sapu.txagorritxu@osakidetza.eus
- Recruiting
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08003
Jordi Monfort, +34932483000, webinfo@hmar.cat
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Isidoro González, +34915 20 22 00, atepac.hlpr@salud.madrid.org
- Recruiting
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, Madrid, 28007
Jose María Álvaro-Gracia, +34915860000, gcomunicacion.hgugm@salud.madrid.org
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, 28040
Luis Rodríguez, MD, PhD, +34917043002, buzgen.hcsc@salud.madrid.org
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Jose Luis Pablos, +34913 90 80 00, gerent.hdoc@salud.madrid.org
- Recruiting
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
Málaga, Málaga, 29010
Natalia Mena, +34951 29 00 00, fblagar@sergas.es
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320
Jose Federico Díaz, +34922 67 80 00, fblagar@sergas.es
About this study
Official title: Efficacy, Safety and Cost-effectiveness of a Biomarker-based Predictive Model for Persistent Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing Biological Therapy Optimization
This study aims to evaluate a new tool designed to help doctors decide whether it is safe to reduce medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in remission.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Many patients receive long-term treatment with biological drugs to control the disease. When the disease is well controlled (remission), doctors may gradually reduce the medication dose. However, deciding when and in whom to reduce treatment is currently based on experience and trial-and-error.
Read more
The study evaluates a predictive tool (called OPTIBIO) that uses information from blood samples, genetic data, and clinical characteristics to estimate the risk that the disease will flare up if treatment is reduced.
Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
- In one group, the decision to reduce medication will be made by their usual doctor.
- In the other group, the decision will be guided by the predictive tool.
The study lasts 12 months and includes several hospital visits. During these visits, participants will:
- Answer questionnaires about their health and quality of life
- Have physical examinations
- Provide blood samples for routine tests and additional research purposes
- Possibly undergo joint ultrasound (if they consent) Some additional blood samples may be stored in authorized biobanks for future research related to rheumatoid arthritis, but only if participants explicitly agree. These samples will be coded to protect personal identity and will only be used in ethically approved research projects.
Participation in the study is entirely voluntary. Participants can choose which procedures they agree to and may withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care.
The study may not provide direct benefit to participants, but it could help improve future treatment decisions and the overall management of rheumatoid arthritis.
Read the detailed description
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by persistent synovitis, progressive joint damage, and reduced quality of life. The introduction of biological therapies, particularly tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), has substantially improved disease outcomes, allowing many patients to achieve sustained remission.
In patients who reach remission, clinical guidelines recommend considering treatment optimization strategies, including dose tapering or discontinuation. However, in routine clinical practice, such decisions remain largely empirical and are primarily based on physician judgment. This approach introduces clinical uncertainty, as treatment reduction may lead to disease reactivation in a subset of patients, while continued treatment may expose patients to unnecessary risks and increase healthcare costs.
Rationale There is a clear unmet need for tools that support personalized treatment decisions in patients with RA in remission. A reliable method to predict the risk of disease flare could enable clinicians to better identify patients in whom treatment reduction can be safely implemented.
The OPTIBIO model has been developed as a predictive tool to address this need. It integrates clinical variables with biomarker data derived from peripheral blood, including protein expression, cellular components, and genetic information. By combining these data sources, the model aims to provide individualized risk predictions of disease reactivation following treatment optimization.
Study Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of the OPTIBIO predictive model when incorporated into routine clinical decision-making, compared with standard practice.
The study assesses whether use of the model can support safer and more effective treatment optimization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission receiving TNFi therapy.
Scientific and Clinical Contribution In addition to its clinical focus, the study includes the prospective collection of clinical data and biological samples to further investigate biomarkers associated with disease activity and relapse. These data will contribute to improving the predictive performance of the OPTIBIO model and to identifying novel molecular and cellular signatures associated with disease reactivation.
With participant consent, residual biological samples may be stored in authorized biobanks for future research. These samples may be used in ethically approved studies related to rheumatoid arthritis, contributing to a better understanding of disease mechanisms and to the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Health and Economic Relevance The study also addresses the broader impact of treatment optimization strategies on healthcare systems. By collecting data on healthcare resource utilization, it aims to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of incorporating predictive tools into routine care.
This is particularly relevant in chronic diseases such as RA, where long-term treatment costs and resource utilization are significant, and where more efficient, personalized treatment strategies could have substantial clinical and economic benefits.
Expected Impact This study is expected to generate evidence on the usefulness of a biomarker-based predictive approach to guide treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis. The implementation of such tools has the potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce the risk of disease flare, minimize unnecessary treatment exposure, and support more efficient use of healthcare resources.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Being tested
- Predictive Model-Guided Decision Strategy
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Treatment Optimization, TNF Inhibitors (TNFi), Biologic Therapy, Personalized Medicine, Precision Medicine
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Predictive Model-Guided Decision StrategyDevice
Treatment optimization decisions are guided by the OPTIBIO predictive model, which integrates clinical variables with biomarker data derived from peripheral blood, including protein expression and genetic information. The model provides an individualized estimation of the risk of disease flare associated with treatment reduction and generates a recommendation on whether to maintain or taper biological therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of care | No intervention | Treatment optimization decisions are made by the treating physician according to routine clinical practice. |
| OPTIBIO-guided decision | Experimental | Treatment optimization decisions are guided by the OPTIBIO predictive model, which integrates clinical and biomarker data to estimate the risk of disease flare. Receives: Device: Predictive Model-Guided Decision Strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients maintaining sustained remission.
Proportion of patients who remain in sustained remission throughout the entire follow-up period, defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6 based on tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), C-reactive protein levels, and patient global assessment
Measured: Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events, including serious infections requiring systemic antibiotics or hospitalization, serious treatment-related adverse events, and specific adverse reactions (e.g., infusion or injection reactions), including severity.
Measured: Baseline to 70 days after last dose
Secondary outcomes (18)
Proportion of patients achieving sustained acceptable therapeutic target
Proportion of patients maintaining an acceptable therapeutic target throughout follow-up, defined as low disease activity (DAS28-CRP < 3.2) and absence of persistent inflammation in major joints (shoulders, elbows, hips, and knees).
Measured: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare (0-6 months).
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare during the first 6 months of follow-up, defined as DAS28-CRP > 2.6.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare (6-12 months)
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare between months 6 and 12 of follow-up, defined as DAS28-CRP > 2.6.
Measured: 6 to 12 months
Number of disease flares (0-6 months)
Total number of disease flares occurring during the first 6 months of follow-up.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Number of disease flares (6-12 months)
Total number of disease flares occurring between months 6 and 12 of follow-up.
Measured: 6 to 12 months
Proportion of patients achieving acceptable therapeutic target at final visit
Proportion of patients meeting the acceptable therapeutic target definition at the last study visit.
Measured: At 12 months
Proportion of patients in remission at final visit
Proportion of patients in remission at the last study visit, defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6.
Measured: At 12 months
Time to disease flare
Time from baseline to the first occurrence of disease flare, defined as DAS28-CRP > 2.6.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (joint count)
Changes over time in clinical parameters: tender joint count (28 joints).
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (joint count)
Changes over time in clinical parameters: swollen joint count (28 joints).
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters: patient and physician global assessment
Changes over time in clinical parameters: patient and physician global assessment (0-100 mm scale).
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters: CRP
Changes over time in clinical parameters: acute phase reactants, CRP (mg/L)
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Change in health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 represents perfect health
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Change in functional disability (HAQ)
Change in functional disability assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The HAQ score can range from 0 (no disability) to 3 (maximum disability).
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Direct and indirect healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness
Assessment of direct and indirect healthcare costs and incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Use of concomitant medication
Use of analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids, including route of administration.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Radiographic structural damage progression
Progression of structural damage assessed by blinded independent evaluators using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method on radiographs of hands, wrists, and feet.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (ESR)
Changes over time in clinical parameters: acute phase reactants, ESR (mm/h).
Measured: Baseline to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2026
- Study start28 Aug 2025
- Primary completionAug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Francisco J. Blanco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Francisco J. Blanco, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
- Investigators
- Francisco J. Blanco, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07678112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REMRABIT-Plus
- Acronym
- REMRABIT-Plus
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy, Safety and Cost-effectiveness of a Biomarker-based Predictive Model for Persistent Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing Biological Therapy Optimization
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07678112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMRABIT-Plus / REMRABIT-Plus
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Treatment Optimization, TNF Inhibitors (TNFi), Biologic Therapy, Personalized Medicine, Precision Medicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Francisco J. BlancoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate a new tool designed to help doctors decide whether it is safe to reduce medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in remission.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Many patients receive long-term treatment with biological drugs to control the disease. When the disease is well controlled (remission), doctors may gradually reduce the medication dose. However, deciding when and in whom to reduce treatment is currently based on experience and trial-and-error.
The study evaluates a predictive tool (called OPTIBIO) that uses information from blood samples, genetic data, and clinical characteristics to estimate the risk that the disease will flare up if treatment is reduced.
Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
- In one group, the decision to reduce medication will be made by their usual doctor.
- In the other group, the decision will be guided by the predictive tool.
The study lasts 12 months and includes several hospital visits. During these visits, participants will:
- Answer questionnaires about their health and quality of life
- Have physical examinations
- Provide blood samples for routine tests and additional research purposes
- Possibly undergo joint ultrasound (if they consent) Some additional blood samples may be stored in authorized biobanks for future research related to rheumatoid arthritis, but only if participants explicitly agree. These samples will be coded to protect personal identity and will only be used in ethically approved research projects.
Participation in the study is entirely voluntary. Participants can choose which procedures they agree to and may withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care.
The study may not provide direct benefit to participants, but it could help improve future treatment decisions and the overall management of rheumatoid arthritis.
Detailed description
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by persistent synovitis, progressive joint damage, and reduced quality of life. The introduction of biological therapies, particularly tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), has substantially improved disease outcomes, allowing many patients to achieve sustained remission.
In patients who reach remission, clinical guidelines recommend considering treatment optimization strategies, including dose tapering or discontinuation. However, in routine clinical practice, such decisions remain largely empirical and are primarily based on physician judgment. This approach introduces clinical uncertainty, as treatment reduction may lead to disease reactivation in a subset of patients, while continued treatment may expose patients to unnecessary risks and increase healthcare costs.
Rationale There is a clear unmet need for tools that support personalized treatment decisions in patients with RA in remission. A reliable method to predict the risk of disease flare could enable clinicians to better identify patients in whom treatment reduction can be safely implemented.
The OPTIBIO model has been developed as a predictive tool to address this need. It integrates clinical variables with biomarker data derived from peripheral blood, including protein expression, cellular components, and genetic information. By combining these data sources, the model aims to provide individualized risk predictions of disease reactivation following treatment optimization.
Study Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of the OPTIBIO predictive model when incorporated into routine clinical decision-making, compared with standard practice.
The study assesses whether use of the model can support safer and more effective treatment optimization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission receiving TNFi therapy.
Scientific and Clinical Contribution In addition to its clinical focus, the study includes the prospective collection of clinical data and biological samples to further investigate biomarkers associated with disease activity and relapse. These data will contribute to improving the predictive performance of the OPTIBIO model and to identifying novel molecular and cellular signatures associated with disease reactivation.
With participant consent, residual biological samples may be stored in authorized biobanks for future research. These samples may be used in ethically approved studies related to rheumatoid arthritis, contributing to a better understanding of disease mechanisms and to the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Health and Economic Relevance The study also addresses the broader impact of treatment optimization strategies on healthcare systems. By collecting data on healthcare resource utilization, it aims to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of incorporating predictive tools into routine care.
This is particularly relevant in chronic diseases such as RA, where long-term treatment costs and resource utilization are significant, and where more efficient, personalized treatment strategies could have substantial clinical and economic benefits.
Expected Impact This study is expected to generate evidence on the usefulness of a biomarker-based predictive approach to guide treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis. The implementation of such tools has the potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce the risk of disease flare, minimize unnecessary treatment exposure, and support more efficient use of healthcare resources.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of care | No intervention | –Treatment optimization decisions are made by the treating physician according to routine clinical practice. |
| OPTIBIO-guided decision | Experimental | Device: Predictive Model-Guided Decision StrategyTreatment optimization decisions are guided by the OPTIBIO predictive model, which integrates clinical and biomarker data to estimate the risk of disease flare. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adults aged ≥18 years.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to either the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.
- Clinical remission for at least 6 months prior to the baseline visit, defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6.
- Receiving biological anti-TNF therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, or certolizumab).
- Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients in whom biological therapy was prescribed due to systemic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and any known associated condition that may interfere with the assessment of study outcomes (e.g., fibromyalgia or concomitant chronic inflammatory diseases).
- Patients receiving chronic anti-TNF biological therapy who are already undergoing treatment tapering or are on reduced or extended dosing regimens prior to study inclusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Model-Guided Decision StrategyTreatment optimization decisions are guided by the OPTIBIO predictive model, which integrates clinical variables with biomarker data derived from peripheral blood, including protein expression and genetic information. The model provides an individualized estimation of the risk of disease flare associated with treatment reduction and generates a recommendation on whether to maintain or taper biological therapy. | Device | OPTIBIO-guided decision |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients maintaining sustained remission.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients who remain in sustained remission throughout the entire follow-up period, defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6 based on tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), C-reactive protein levels, and patient global assessment
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Baseline to 70 days after last dose
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events, including serious infections requiring systemic antibiotics or hospitalization, serious treatment-related adverse events, and specific adverse reactions (e.g., infusion or injection reactions), including severity.
18 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients achieving sustained acceptable therapeutic target
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare (0-6 months).
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Proportion of patients experiencing disease flare (6-12 months)
Time frame: 6 to 12 months
Number of disease flares (0-6 months)
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Number of disease flares (6-12 months)
Time frame: 6 to 12 months
Proportion of patients achieving acceptable therapeutic target at final visit
Time frame: At 12 months
Proportion of patients in remission at final visit
Time frame: At 12 months
Time to disease flare
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (joint count)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (joint count)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters: patient and physician global assessment
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters: CRP
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in functional disability (HAQ)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Direct and indirect healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Use of concomitant medication
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Radiographic structural damage progression
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in clinical disease activity parameters (ESR)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Recruiting
GenAI-Assisted Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Assessment and DMARD Selection
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments on the Modulation of Extracellular Vesicles and Other Biomarkers Involved in the Development of Lung Cancer
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Lung Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Francisco J. Blanco, MD, PhD principal investigator
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Predictive Model-Guided Decision Strategy in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Francisco J. Blanco at 9 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Francisco J. Blanco, MD, PhD (+34981176399, fblagar@sergas.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients maintaining sustained remission. (time frame: Up to 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2026.