AzTrials
AzTrials

Oral Epithelial DysplasiaNCT07678281

The Relationship Between Interferon Status and HPV Infection in Patients With Oral Epithelial Dysplasia

A study testing Excision of the OED site with a fiber laser and Excision of the OED site with a scalpel in people with Oral Epithelial Dysplasia, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an interventional prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) in parallel groups. The sample size is 74 patients who were randomly divided into two groups depending on the surgical intervention used. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Oral Epithelial Dysplasia
What is being tested?
Excision of the OED site with a fiber laser and Excision of the OED site with a scalpel
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
28 Nov 2020to 5 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The patient's written informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Men and women aged 18-80 years;
  • Verified diagnoses K 13.2 "Leukoplakia and other changes in the oral epithelium", L 43 "Lichen planus" with pathohistological signs of epithelial dysplasia.
  • Patients who, after conservative treatment of lesions of the oral mucosa, have not achieved a therapeutic effect and have indications for surgery.
  • Non-inclusion criteria:
  • Patients who have achieved the therapeutic effect of the disease after conservative treatment;
  • Patients who have symptoms of malignant transformation and who could not / did not want to make all necessary visits to the doctor;
  • Pregnant women and during lactation, women who planned pregnancy during this study.

Who cannot join

  • Patient's refusal to continue participating in the study;
  • Pregnancy;
  • The onset of an exacerbation of concomitant pathology;
  • Allergic reaction to medications used;
  • A change in the state of health that, in the researcher's opinion, prevents the patient from continuing to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

    Moscow

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: The Use of Laser Technologies in the Surgical Treatment of Patients With Oral Epithelial Dysplasia

This is an interventional prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) in parallel groups. The sample size is 74 patients who were randomly divided into two groups depending on the surgical intervention used. First group - patients who underwent surgery to excise the affected oral mucosa with a fiber laser with a wavelength of 1.94 micrometers (LSP-IRE- Polyus, Moscow, Russia). Second group - patients who underwent surgery using the traditional scalpel technique (No. 15C). At the examination stage, patients were referred for evaluation of interferon status according to the following indicators: biological activity of serum interferon (IFN), spontaneous IFN, IFN-alpha/beta, IFN-gamma.

In the postoperative period the dynamics of postoperative epithelialization, the severity of edema, hyperemia and pain syndrome were evaluated. Also, the postoperative material was sent for a molecular genetic study of HPV infection by PCR diagnostics and pathohistological examination followed by immunohistochemical analysis to determine the expression of oncoproteins p16 and p53.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) through the use of laser technologies and monitoring of interferon status, human papillomavirus invasion and oncoprotein expression. Examination and treatment of patients will be carried out on the basis of the Department of Surgical Dentistry of the Borovsky Institute of Dentistry of Sechenov University. The object of the study will be patients with oral potentially malignant diseases with signs of epithelial dysplasia. All patients will be randomly divided into two groups depending on the surgical procedure. In the first group (n=37), areas of the affected oral mucosa will be excised by radiation from a fiber laser with a wavelength of 1.94 micrometers. Patients in the second group (n=37) will undergo surgery using the traditional scalpel technique (No. 15C). The groups will be comparable in terms of gender and age characteristics. Patients will be divided into two groups by random sampling with the same opportunity to receive treatment using a high-intensity laser and a surgical scalpel.

Patients of the first group will undergo excision of the affected oral mucosa within healthy tissues using a fiber laser with a wavelength of 1.94 micrometers in a pulsed-periodic mode with a pulse duration of 100 ms and a pause duration of 100 ms, with a power of 2.5-3.0 watts. The impact on the fabric will be carried out with a freshly split end of the optical fiber after its preliminary activation by short-term contact with a wooden spatula. With a defocused 1.5-watt coagulation laser beam, the wound surface will be treated non-contact until a coagulation film, a "laser bandage," is formed that will cover the entire postoperative area, thus achieving complete hemostasis.

In patients of the second group, excision of the affected oral mucosa will be performed with a scalpel No. 15C within healthy tissues, followed by suturing the surgical area or closing the wound surface with an iodoform swab, fixed sutures.

Postoperative material in both groups will be sent for pathohistological examination. In the postoperative period, it is necessary to prescribe standard antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy in combination with the use of local antiseptics for daily care in the early postoperative period.

Being tested
Excision of the OED site with a fiber laser, Excision of the OED site with a scalpel
Keywords
Oral potentially malignant diseases, oral epithelial dysplasia, laser, interferon status, human papillomavirus, oncoproteins p16, p53

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Excision of the OED site with a fiber laserProcedure or surgery

    1. Excision of the affected oral mucosa within healthy tissues using a fiber laser with a wavelength of 1.94 micrometers in a pulsed-periodic mode with a pulse duration of 100 ms and a pause duration of 100 ms, with a power of 2.5-3.0 watts.
    2. Using a defocused 1.5 W coagulation laser beam, non-contact laser treatment of the wound surface until a coagulation film or "laser bandage" is formed.
    3. Complete suturing of the wound or its open management.
  • Excision of the OED site with a scalpelProcedure or surgery

    1. Excision of the affected oral mucosa will be performed with a scalpel No. 15C within healthy tissues.
    2. Complete suturing of the surgical area or closure of the wound surface with an iodoform swab, fixed sutures.
Study groups in NCT07678281
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
first groupActive comparatorPatients undergoing surgery to excise the affected oral mucosa will be treated with a fiber laser with a wavelength of 1.94 micrometers.
Receives: Procedure: Excision of the OED site with a fiber laser
second groupExperimentalPatients who will have surgery to excise the affected oral mucosa with a scalpel (No. 15C).
Receives: Procedure: Excision of the OED site with a scalpel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of the reduction of the wound surface area

    The longitudinal and transverse dimensions of the wound surface will be measured using a dental micrometer. The area of the wound surface will be calculated as the area of the orthogonal projection of the three-dimensional figure onto the plane. Depending on the shape of the wound surface, its projection is considered either as a circle or as an ellipse.

    The area of the wound surface will be calculated using the formula:

    S= π R 2 (the area of the circle), S= πab (the area of the ellipse), where R - is the radius of the circle, a - is the major semi-axis, b - is the minor semi-axis of the ellipse, and the number π ≈3.14. The results are expressed in cm2.

    Measured: [Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Assessment of the reduction of the wound surface area

    The longitudinal and transverse dimensions of the wound surface will be measured using a dental micrometer. The area of the wound surface will be calculated as the area of the orthogonal projection of the three-dimensional figure onto the plane. Depending on the shape of the wound surface, its projection is considered either as a circle or as an ellipse.

    The area of the wound surface will be calculated using the formula:

    S= π R 2 (the area of the circle), S= πab (the area of the ellipse), where R - is the radius of the circle, a - is the major semi-axis, b - is the minor semi-axis of the ellipse, and the number π ≈3.14. The results are expressed in cm2.

    Measured: [Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

  2. Assessment of the reduction of the wound surface area

    The longitudinal and transverse dimensions of the wound surface will be measured using a dental micrometer. The area of the wound surface will be calculated as the area of the orthogonal projection of the three-dimensional figure onto the plane. Depending on the shape of the wound surface, its projection is considered either as a circle or as an ellipse.

    The area of the wound surface will be calculated using the formula:

    S= π R 2 (the area of the circle), S= πab (the area of the ellipse), where R - is the radius of the circle, a - is the major semi-axis, b - is the minor semi-axis of the ellipse, and the number π ≈3.14. The results are expressed in cm2.

    Measured: [Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

  3. Assessment of the collateral edema

    Edema will be clinically assessed by its volume (scores 0-2; 0 points - no edema, 1 point - moderate edema, 2 points - intense edema compared to the condition of adjacent tissues).

    Measured: [Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

  4. Assessment of the collateral edema

    Edema will be clinically assessed by its volume (scores 0-2; 0 points - no edema, 1 point - moderate edema, 2 points - intense edema compared to the condition of adjacent tissues).

    Measured: [Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

  5. Assessment of the collateral edema

    Edema will be clinically assessed by its volume (scores 0-2; 0 points - no edema, 1 point - moderate edema, 2 points - intense edema compared to the condition of adjacent tissues).

    Measured: [Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value).]

  6. Assessment of the collateral edema

    Edema will be clinically assessed by its volume (scores 0-2; 0 points - no edema, 1 point - moderate edema, 2 points - intense edema compared to the condition of adjacent tissues).

    Measured: [Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value).]

  7. Assessment of the severity of pain syndrome

    A simple descriptive pain intensity scale. Evaluation of the severity of pain syndrome is carried out after surgery using a questionnaire, where : 0 - absence of pain; 1- weak pain; 2 - moderate pain; 3 -severe pain; 4 - extreme pain; 5 - unbearable pain.

    Measured: [Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  8. Assessment of the severity of pain syndrome

    A simple descriptive pain intensity scale. Evaluation of the severity of pain syndrome is carried out after surgery using a questionnaire, where : 0 - absence of pain; 1- weak pain; 2 - moderate pain; 3 -severe pain; 4 - extreme pain; 5 - unbearable pain.

    Measured: [Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  9. Assessment of the severity of pain syndrome

    A simple descriptive pain intensity scale. Evaluation of the severity of pain syndrome is carried out after surgery using a questionnaire, where : 0 - absence of pain; 1- weak pain; 2 - moderate pain; 3 -severe pain; 4 - extreme pain; 5 - unbearable pain.

    Measured: [Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  10. Assessment of the severity of pain syndrome

    A simple descriptive pain intensity scale. Evaluation of the severity of pain syndrome is carried out after surgery using a questionnaire, where : 0 - absence of pain; 1- weak pain; 2 - moderate pain; 3 -severe pain; 4 - extreme pain; 5 - unbearable pain.

    Measured: [Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  11. Assessment of hyperemia

    Hyperemia will be clinically assessed by its severity (points 0-2, where 0 - absence of hyperemia, 1 point - moderate hyperemia, 2 points - pronounced hyperemia).

    Measured: [Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  12. Assessment of hyperemia

    Hyperemia will be clinically assessed by its severity (points 0-2, where 0 - absence of hyperemia, 1 point - moderate hyperemia, 2 points - pronounced hyperemia).

    Measured: [Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  13. Assessment of hyperemia

    Hyperemia will be clinically assessed by its severity (points 0-2, where 0 - absence of hyperemia, 1 point - moderate hyperemia, 2 points - pronounced hyperemia).

    Measured: [Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)].

  14. Assessment of hyperemia

    Hyperemia will be clinically assessed by its severity (points 0-2, where 0 - absence of hyperemia, 1 point - moderate hyperemia, 2 points - pronounced hyperemia).

    Measured: [Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2026
  2. Study start28 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion13 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion5 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07678281
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI-06
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
25 Jun 2026
Last updated
1 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Excision of the OED site with a fiber laser and Excision of the OED site with a scalpel in people with Oral Epithelial Dysplasia, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of the reduction of the wound surface area (time frame: [Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in