Scoliosis Idiopathic AdolescentScoliosisNCT07681739
Comparıson Of Dıfferent Exercıse Traınıng Programs In Adolescents Wıth Idıopathıc Scolıosıs Undergoıng Spınal Fusıon Surgery
A study testing Body Awareness Therapy, Core Stabilization Exercises and Classic Exercise in people with Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent, run by NURSİMA İNCE at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aimed to comparatively examine the effects of different exercise training programs on kinesiophobia, functional capacity, disability level, neck injury status, balance, body health, and quality of life in adolescent individuals diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and undergoing spinal fusion planning. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 months to 19 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
- What is being tested?
- Body Awareness Therapy, Core Stabilization Exercises and Classic Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 4 May 2025to 4 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 months to 19 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,
- Between the ages of 10-19,
- Operated on with Posterior Fusion and Instrumentation technique at least 3 months and at most 4 years ago,
- Individuals whose participation in the study was voluntary by themselves and their parents were included.
Who cannot join
- Operated on with Anterior or Combined Anteroposterior Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation, Thoracoscopic Vertebral Body Stretching or Stapling techniques,
- Previously undergone spinal surgery,
- Having advanced neuromuscular, rheumatological, or orthopedic diseases accompanying scoliosis,
- Presence of congenital deformity (leg shortening, limb agenesis, or hypoplasia),
- Having a history of serious psychiatric or psychological disorders,
- Undergoing a separate rehabilitation program with a physiotherapist,
- In the study Those who are unable to perform the required assessment and intervention methods or who are uncooperative.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi
Gaziantep, Gaziantep
About this study
This study aimed to comparatively examine the effects of different exercise training programs on kinesiophobia, functional capacity, disability level, neck injury status, balance, body health, and quality of life in adolescent individuals diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and undergoing spinal fusion planning.
A total of 42 individuals were included in the spinal fusion group and divided into three regular groups (Body Awareness Therapy + Core Stabilization: n=14, Core Stabilization: n=14, Control: n=14). Exercise programs were to be implemented twice a week for 8 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The classic exercise group received a home exercise program.
Assessments were conducted before and after the examination. The following questionnaires will be used to assess: pain (McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire), dynamic balance (Y Balance Test), disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), body care (Body Awareness Questionnaire), functional capacity (6-animal gait test), kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Questionnaire), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Association-30 (SRS-30) Questionnaire).
Read the detailed description
Comparison of the Effects of Different Exercise Training Programs on Pain, Balance, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis and Spinal Fusion Surgery
Hasan Kalyoncu University, Graduate School, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, PhD Thesis, Gaziantep (2025).
Body awareness refers to a holistic approach to human movement that considers the physical, physiological, psychological, and existential aspects of human existence. The aim of this study is to present, based on evidence, the effects of body awareness, applied as postoperative training, on pain, quality of life, body awareness, disability, lower extremity function, functional capacity, balance, and kinesiophobia in scoliosis patients undergoing fusion surgery. Because the study focuses on body awareness, a topic that has gained importance in recent years and continues to increase in significance each year, it is anticipated to shed light on future research. Furthermore, in addition to body awareness, since studies on exercise programs for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who have undergone surgical treatment are quite limited, this study aims to present, based on evidence, the effects of core stabilization exercises on pain, quality of life, body awareness, disability, lower extremity function, functional capacity, balance, and kinesiophobia in another group. This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to support the adaptation and healing of the fused spine in the post-discharge period after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
- Conditions
- Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
- Being tested
- Body Awareness Therapy, Core Stabilization Exercises, Classic Exercise
- Keywords
- Spinal Fusion, Exercise, Body Awareness, Balance, Quality of Life., Scoliosis
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Scoliosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Body Awareness TherapyProcedure or surgery
Also called Classic Exercise, Core Stabilization Exercises
Body awareness refers to a holistic approach to human movement, considering the physical, physiological, psychological, and existential aspects of human existence. The educational philosophy based on this holistic perspective includes fundamental functions such as postural stability, natural breathing, and awareness. Body awareness aims to normalize muscle tension experienced and visible in posture, balance, breathing, and movement behavior. The program begins with "journey within the body" exercises in a supine position on a mat, followed by breath focus, muscle contraction and relaxation, combined breathing exercises with sound, and full-body stretching exercises. In a seated position, the program focuses on finding the correct body alignment, stimulating the core through breathing and coordination exercises, and performing trunk movements while maintaining body alignment. In a standing position, the goal is to find the correct body alignment and functional posture.
Core Stabilization ExercisesProcedure or surgery
Also called Exercises
Patients in this group will undergo a classic physiotherapy program including posture and stabilization exercises. Stabilization exercises aim to strengthen trunk muscles, increase spinal stability, support the vertebral column, and improve postural control by increasing kinesthetic awareness. The program will begin with warm-up exercises, followed by supine straight leg raises, supine hip flexion, supine shoulder flexion, supine bridge, hip abduction, cat-camel exercises, stabilization exercises with pelvic tilt while sitting on a Pilates ball, posture training in front of a mirror, upper extremity exercises while sitting on a ball, and upper extremity exercises while standing. During the exercises, movements will be made easier in conjunction with breathing. The exercises will progress from simple exercises and patterns to more complex movement patterns as control improves.
Classic ExerciseProcedure or surgery
In the control group, which received classical exercise therapy, the program content consisted primarily of stretching exercises targeting the erector spinae and hamstring muscle groups, as well as strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles, thoracic and lumbar extensors, pelvis, and shoulder girdle muscles. In addition, training to increase postural awareness and deep breathing exercises were included in the program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Body Awareness Therapy and Core Stabilization Group | Active comparator | Participants in this group received Body Awareness Therapy in addition to core stabilization exercises. The intervention was administered twice weekly under the supervision of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of approximately 30 minutes of core stabilization exercises and an additional 30 minutes of Body Awareness Therapy. On the remaining days of the week, participants performed the prescribed exercise program independently at home. Body Awareness Therapy included a series of movements performed in different positions such as lying, sitting, standing, and walking. Considering the eight-week intervention period, the training program was structured to progress gradually on a weekly basis. Receives: Procedure: Body Awareness Therapy; Procedure: Core Stabilization Exercises |
| Core Stabilization Exercise Group | Active comparator | Participants in this group received a core stabilization exercise program. Prior to implementation, all exercises were demonstrated by the physiotherapist, and during the sessions, verbal and tactile feedback were provided to ensure correct movement patterns and exercise performance. Each session began with approximately 10 minutes of warm-up exercises and ended with a 10-minute cool-down period, resulting in a total session duration of approximately 60 minutes. Progression of the exercises was individualized according to each participant's functional capacity and tolerance level. The exercise program was designed to progress gradually from 1 to 3 sets and from 7-10 repetitions to 10-15 repetitions. In addition, exercise difficulty was progressively increased through modifications in body position, the use of body weight, resistance bands, and exercise balls. Receives: Procedure: Core Stabilization Exercises |
| Classic exercise group | Active comparator | In the control group undergoing classical exercise therapy, the program content consisted primarily of stretching exercises targeting the erector spinae and hamstring muscle groups, as well as strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles, thoracic and lumbar extensors, pelvis, and shoulder girdle muscles. In addition, training to improve postural awareness and deep breathing exercises were included in the program. Following the warm-up, exercises were initially selected from lower-difficulty movements performed in a supine position, gradually progressing to more complex and challenging exercises according to the individual's tolerance. Cool-down exercises were included at the end of each program. In the first session of treatment, individuals were shown exercises to perform at home. Receives: Procedure: Classic Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain assessment
Pain Assessment
McGill Pain Scale Short Form:
The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-McGill), developed by Melzack and Torgerson in 1975, was used to assess pain levels in the individuals. The primary component of the SF-McGill consists of 15 pain-descriptive items (11 sensory and 4 affective), rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The scale also includes a present pain intensity index (0 = no pain, 1 = mild, 2 = discomforting, 3 = distressing, 4 = horrible, 5 = excruciating) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Scores derived from the sensory and affective items in the first section of the scale were recorded both separately and as a total. The present pain intensity index was used to determine whether the individual was experiencing pain and, if so, to assess its severity. In the VAS section, the individual was asked to mark the severity of their pain on a 10-centimeter (cm) linear scale, which was then measured with a ruler and recorded.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Kinesiophobia assessment
- Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale Kinesiophobia is a condition characterized by an individual's avoidance of physical activities due to pain-related fear; it triggers illness behavior and is associated over time with a syndrome of functional impairment and a decline in cognitive and physical performance. It is a 17-item measurement tool. The scale includes dimensions that assess fear of injury and re-injury, as well as fear-avoidance behaviors, within the context of work-related activities. Utilizing a four-point Likert-type scoring system, responses range from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 4 ("Strongly agree"). Items 4, 8, 12, and 16 are reverse-scored, and the total score is calculated following this step. Participants can achieve a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 68. A higher total score indicates an increased level of kinesiophobia, and the use of the total score for assessment purposes is recommended in research.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Functional capacity assessment
6-Minute Walk Test
The Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal, indirect cardiovascular physical fitness test. Developed by Balke in 1963 to measure functional capacity, the test measures the distance covered in meters within 6 minutes. Because most daily living activities are performed at a submaximal level, the 6-Minute Walk Test can better reflect the level of functional exercise for everyday physical activities. Following the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, the test will be conducted for 6 minutes in a 30-meter corridor with brightly colored markers placed every 3 meters. Patients will be instructed to wear comfortable clothing and athletic shoes during the test and to avoid eating for at least two hours prior to the test.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Body Awareness Assessment
Body awareness involves paying attention to and focusing on internal bodily sensations. Body awareness was assessed using the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ). To determine the level of sensitivity to body composition-whether normal or abnormal-the BAQ comprises four subscales (changes in bodily processes, sleep-wake cycles, prediction of illness onset, and prediction of bodily reactions) and 18 statements, such as "I notice differences in how my body reacts to various foods," "I can predict when I am coming down with the flu," and "I notice specific bodily reactions when I am extremely hungry." Individuals were asked to rate each statement on a scale from 1 (not true for me) to 7 (completely true for me). Scoring is calculated by summing the ratings given for the statements. The total score ranges from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater body awareness.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Balance
Y Balance Test
This is a valid and reliable, functional dynamic test developed from the Star Balance Test to increase measurement repeatability and standardize test performance. It is used to evaluate physical performance and dynamic balance ability in various sports. Requiring strength, flexibility, and proprioception, the aim of the Star Balance Test is to assess the ability to reach maximum distance in 8 different directions with the contralateral extremity while maintaining a balance position on one leg. Compared to expensive and non-portable computerized systems used to assess balance today, the Star Balance Test is an inexpensive, practical, and reliable test used to evaluate balance in various sports and to identify ankle instability problems in individuals
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Disability Assessment
Oswestry Dizabilite İndeksi (ODİ)
Pain intensity is assessed through 10 questions measuring the degree of pain experienced during personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, and travel. Each question has 6 options. Each question is scored between 0 and 5 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores increase the level of disability.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Neck Disability Level
The Neck Disability Index was used to assess how much neck pain affects individuals' daily lives. This questionnaire, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Aslan and colleagues, is used to evaluate the impact of neck pain on an individual's daily living activities. Each question on the scale is scored between 0 and 5; 0 represents the best case, with no pain or functional limitations, while 5 represents the most severe pain and maximum functional limitations. This assessment tool is based on self-assessment, and participants are asked to select the option they feel best reflects their situation. All scores obtained at the end of the scale are summed to determine the individual's neck disability level.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Quality of Life Assessment
The Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire-30 (SRS-30) was used to assess the quality of life of the subjects. The scale has 5 subgroups classifying the components of quality of life: Pain: questions 1, 2, 8, 11, and 17; Function: questions 5, 9, 12, 15, and 18; Image/Appearance: questions 4, 6, 10, 14, 19, 23, 28, 29, and 30; Mental health: questions 3, 7, 13, 16, and 20; Treatment satisfaction: questions 21, 22, and 24. Each question is rated on a scale of 5 points, from 1 (worst case) to 5 (best case). The three-option questionnaire presented to patients undergoing surgical treatment is scored on a scale of 1 (bad outcome), 3 (same outcome), and 5 (good outcome), ignoring even numbers. Higher scores on the scale indicate improved quality of life.
Measured: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2026
- Study start4 May 2025
- Primary completion4 Sep 2025
- Study completion4 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Scoliosis Idiopathic AdolescentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NURSİMA İNCE
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, NURSİMA İNCE, Hasan Kalyoncu University
- Investigators
- YAVUZ YAKUT, PROF, Study director, HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07681739
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025/O42
- Acronym
- Scoliosis
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 21 May 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: For patient privacy reasons, we do not plan to share individual data.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparıson Of Dıfferent Exercıse Traınıng Programs In Adolescents Wıth Idıopathıc Scolıosıs Undergoıng Spınal Fusıon Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07681739
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Scoliosis / 2025/O42
- Conditions
- Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
- Keywords
- Spinal Fusion, Exercise, Body Awareness, Balance, Quality of Life., Scoliosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NURSİMA İNCEUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to comparatively examine the effects of different exercise training programs on kinesiophobia, functional capacity, disability level, neck injury status, balance, body health, and quality of life in adolescent individuals diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and undergoing spinal fusion planning.
A total of 42 individuals were included in the spinal fusion group and divided into three regular groups (Body Awareness Therapy + Core Stabilization: n=14, Core Stabilization: n=14, Control: n=14). Exercise programs were to be implemented twice a week for 8 weeks under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The classic exercise group received a home exercise program.
Assessments were conducted before and after the examination. The following questionnaires will be used to assess: pain (McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire), dynamic balance (Y Balance Test), disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), body care (Body Awareness Questionnaire), functional capacity (6-animal gait test), kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Questionnaire), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Association-30 (SRS-30) Questionnaire).
Detailed description
Comparison of the Effects of Different Exercise Training Programs on Pain, Balance, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis and Spinal Fusion Surgery
Hasan Kalyoncu University, Graduate School, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, PhD Thesis, Gaziantep (2025).
Body awareness refers to a holistic approach to human movement that considers the physical, physiological, psychological, and existential aspects of human existence. The aim of this study is to present, based on evidence, the effects of body awareness, applied as postoperative training, on pain, quality of life, body awareness, disability, lower extremity function, functional capacity, balance, and kinesiophobia in scoliosis patients undergoing fusion surgery. Because the study focuses on body awareness, a topic that has gained importance in recent years and continues to increase in significance each year, it is anticipated to shed light on future research. Furthermore, in addition to body awareness, since studies on exercise programs for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who have undergone surgical treatment are quite limited, this study aims to present, based on evidence, the effects of core stabilization exercises on pain, quality of life, body awareness, disability, lower extremity function, functional capacity, balance, and kinesiophobia in another group. This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to support the adaptation and healing of the fused spine in the post-discharge period after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Body Awareness Therapy and Core Stabilization Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Body Awareness Therapy, Procedure: Core Stabilization ExercisesParticipants in this group received Body Awareness Therapy in addition to core stabilization exercises. The intervention was administered twice weekly under the supervision of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of approximately 30 minutes of core stabilization exercises and an additional 30 minutes of Body Awareness Therapy. On the remaining days of the week, participants performed the prescribed exercise program independently at home. Body Awareness Therapy included a series of movements performed in different positions such as lying, sitting, standing, and walking. Considering the eight-week intervention period, the training program was structured to progress gradually on a weekly basis. |
| Core Stabilization Exercise Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Core Stabilization ExercisesParticipants in this group received a core stabilization exercise program. Prior to implementation, all exercises were demonstrated by the physiotherapist, and during the sessions, verbal and tactile feedback were provided to ensure correct movement patterns and exercise performance. Each session began with approximately 10 minutes of warm-up exercises and ended with a 10-minute cool-down period, resulting in a total session duration of approximately 60 minutes. Progression of the exercises was individualized according to each participant's functional capacity and tolerance level. The exercise program was designed to progress gradually from 1 to 3 sets and from 7-10 repetitions to 10-15 repetitions. In addition, exercise difficulty was progressively increased through modifications in body position, the use of body weight, resistance bands, and exercise balls. |
| Classic exercise group | Active comparator | Procedure: Classic ExerciseIn the control group undergoing classical exercise therapy, the program content consisted primarily of stretching exercises targeting the erector spinae and hamstring muscle groups, as well as strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles, thoracic and lumbar extensors, pelvis, and shoulder girdle muscles. In addition, training to improve postural awareness and deep breathing exercises were included in the program. Following the warm-up, exercises were initially selected from lower-difficulty movements performed in a supine position, gradually progressing to more complex and challenging exercises according to the individual's tolerance. Cool-down exercises were included at the end of each program. In the first session of treatment, individuals were shown exercises to perform at home. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 months to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,
- Between the ages of 10-19,
- Operated on with Posterior Fusion and Instrumentation technique at least 3 months and at most 4 years ago,
- Individuals whose participation in the study was voluntary by themselves and their parents were included.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Operated on with Anterior or Combined Anteroposterior Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation, Thoracoscopic Vertebral Body Stretching or Stapling techniques,
- Previously undergone spinal surgery,
- Having advanced neuromuscular, rheumatological, or orthopedic diseases accompanying scoliosis,
- Presence of congenital deformity (leg shortening, limb agenesis, or hypoplasia),
- Having a history of serious psychiatric or psychological disorders,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Body Awareness TherapyAlso: Classic Exercise, Core Stabilization ExercisesBody awareness refers to a holistic approach to human movement, considering the physical, physiological, psychological, and existential aspects of human existence. The educational philosophy based on this holistic perspective includes fundamental functions such as postural stability, natural breathing, and awareness. Body awareness aims to normalize muscle tension experienced and visible in posture, balance, breathing, and movement behavior. The program begins with "journey within the body" exercises in a supine position on a mat, followed by breath focus, muscle contraction and relaxation, combined breathing exercises with sound, and full-body stretching exercises. In a seated position, the program focuses on finding the correct body alignment, stimulating the core through breathing and coordination exercises, and performing trunk movements while maintaining body alignment. In a standing position, the goal is to find the correct body alignment and functional posture. | Procedure or surgery | Body Awareness Therapy and Core Stabilization Group |
| Core Stabilization ExercisesAlso: ExercisesPatients in this group will undergo a classic physiotherapy program including posture and stabilization exercises. Stabilization exercises aim to strengthen trunk muscles, increase spinal stability, support the vertebral column, and improve postural control by increasing kinesthetic awareness. The program will begin with warm-up exercises, followed by supine straight leg raises, supine hip flexion, supine shoulder flexion, supine bridge, hip abduction, cat-camel exercises, stabilization exercises with pelvic tilt while sitting on a Pilates ball, posture training in front of a mirror, upper extremity exercises while sitting on a ball, and upper extremity exercises while standing. During the exercises, movements will be made easier in conjunction with breathing. The exercises will progress from simple exercises and patterns to more complex movement patterns as control improves. | Procedure or surgery | Body Awareness Therapy and Core Stabilization Group, Core Stabilization Exercise Group |
| Classic ExerciseIn the control group, which received classical exercise therapy, the program content consisted primarily of stretching exercises targeting the erector spinae and hamstring muscle groups, as well as strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles, thoracic and lumbar extensors, pelvis, and shoulder girdle muscles. In addition, training to increase postural awareness and deep breathing exercises were included in the program. | Procedure or surgery | Classic exercise group |
Primary outcome
Pain assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Pain Assessment McGill Pain Scale Short Form: The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-McGill), developed by Melzack and Torgerson in 1975, was used to assess pain levels in the individuals. The primary component of the SF-McGill consists of 15 pain-descriptive items (11 sensory and 4 affective), rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The scale also includes a present pain intensity index (0 = no pain, 1 = mild, 2 = discomforting, 3 = distressing, 4 = horrible, 5 = excruciating) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Scores derived from the sensory and affective items in the first section of the scale were recorded both separately and as a total. The present pain intensity index was used to determine whether the individual was experiencing pain and, if so, to assess its severity. In the VAS section, the individual was asked to mark the severity of their pain on a 10-centimeter (cm) linear scale, which was then measured with a ruler and recorded.
Kinesiophobia assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
- Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale Kinesiophobia is a condition characterized by an individual's avoidance of physical activities due to pain-related fear; it triggers illness behavior and is associated over time with a syndrome of functional impairment and a decline in cognitive and physical performance. It is a 17-item measurement tool. The scale includes dimensions that assess fear of injury and re-injury, as well as fear-avoidance behaviors, within the context of work-related activities. Utilizing a four-point Likert-type scoring system, responses range from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 4 ("Strongly agree"). Items 4, 8, 12, and 16 are reverse-scored, and the total score is calculated following this step. Participants can achieve a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 68. A higher total score indicates an increased level of kinesiophobia, and the use of the total score for assessment purposes is recommended in research.
Functional capacity assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
6-Minute Walk Test The Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal, indirect cardiovascular physical fitness test. Developed by Balke in 1963 to measure functional capacity, the test measures the distance covered in meters within 6 minutes. Because most daily living activities are performed at a submaximal level, the 6-Minute Walk Test can better reflect the level of functional exercise for everyday physical activities. Following the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, the test will be conducted for 6 minutes in a 30-meter corridor with brightly colored markers placed every 3 meters. Patients will be instructed to wear comfortable clothing and athletic shoes during the test and to avoid eating for at least two hours prior to the test.
Body Awareness Assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Body awareness involves paying attention to and focusing on internal bodily sensations. Body awareness was assessed using the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ). To determine the level of sensitivity to body composition-whether normal or abnormal-the BAQ comprises four subscales (changes in bodily processes, sleep-wake cycles, prediction of illness onset, and prediction of bodily reactions) and 18 statements, such as "I notice differences in how my body reacts to various foods," "I can predict when I am coming down with the flu," and "I notice specific bodily reactions when I am extremely hungry." Individuals were asked to rate each statement on a scale from 1 (not true for me) to 7 (completely true for me). Scoring is calculated by summing the ratings given for the statements. The total score ranges from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater body awareness.
Balance
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Y Balance Test This is a valid and reliable, functional dynamic test developed from the Star Balance Test to increase measurement repeatability and standardize test performance. It is used to evaluate physical performance and dynamic balance ability in various sports. Requiring strength, flexibility, and proprioception, the aim of the Star Balance Test is to assess the ability to reach maximum distance in 8 different directions with the contralateral extremity while maintaining a balance position on one leg. Compared to expensive and non-portable computerized systems used to assess balance today, the Star Balance Test is an inexpensive, practical, and reliable test used to evaluate balance in various sports and to identify ankle instability problems in individuals
Disability Assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
Oswestry Dizabilite İndeksi (ODİ) Pain intensity is assessed through 10 questions measuring the degree of pain experienced during personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, and travel. Each question has 6 options. Each question is scored between 0 and 5 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores increase the level of disability.
Neck Disability Level
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
The Neck Disability Index was used to assess how much neck pain affects individuals' daily lives. This questionnaire, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Aslan and colleagues, is used to evaluate the impact of neck pain on an individual's daily living activities. Each question on the scale is scored between 0 and 5; 0 represents the best case, with no pain or functional limitations, while 5 represents the most severe pain and maximum functional limitations. This assessment tool is based on self-assessment, and participants are asked to select the option they feel best reflects their situation. All scores obtained at the end of the scale are summed to determine the individual's neck disability level.
Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.
The Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire-30 (SRS-30) was used to assess the quality of life of the subjects. The scale has 5 subgroups classifying the components of quality of life: Pain: questions 1, 2, 8, 11, and 17; Function: questions 5, 9, 12, 15, and 18; Image/Appearance: questions 4, 6, 10, 14, 19, 23, 28, 29, and 30; Mental health: questions 3, 7, 13, 16, and 20; Treatment satisfaction: questions 21, 22, and 24. Each question is rated on a scale of 5 points, from 1 (worst case) to 5 (best case). The three-option questionnaire presented to patients undergoing surgical treatment is scored on a scale of 1 (bad outcome), 3 (same outcome), and 5 (good outcome), ignoring even numbers. Higher scores on the scale indicate improved quality of life.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. For patient privacy reasons, we do not plan to share individual data.
Related trials for Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
Active, not recruiting
Diaphragm Mobilization in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Recruiting
Tranexamic Acid in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
Scoliosis Idiopathic, Scoliosis; Adolescence
RecruitingObservational study
Turkish Adaptation and Validation of the Scoliosis Misconception Scale in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical and Biological Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Recruiting
Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens
Juvenile; Scoliosis, Scoliosis Idiopathic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
YAVUZ YAKUT, PROF study director
HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Body Awareness Therapy, Core Stabilization Exercises and Classic Exercise in people with Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent, run by NURSİMA İNCE at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain assessment (time frame: Initial assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks before exercise training. Second final assessment: Performed between the 1st day and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment.). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.