AzTrials
AzTrials

Refractory Focal Epilepsyso-tDCS-RENCT07684352

Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Refractory Focal Epilepsy

A study testing Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) in people with Refractory Focal Epilepsy, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study evaluated whether a type of non-invasive brain stimulation called slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) can reduce seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Refractory Focal Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
13 Jan 2024to 31 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Inclusion criteria were established as follows:(1)a confirmed diagnosis of focal-onset seizures, with or without focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic evolution, according to the ILAE 2017 classification; (2)a disease duration of at least 2 years; (3)pharmacoresistance, defined as failure of adequately tried, appropriately chosen, and well-tolerated trials of at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs); (4)a stable ASM regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline with agreement to maintain the same regimen throughout the study; (5)concurrent use of one to five ASMs; (6)at least two seizures during the 4-week baseline observation period.

Exclusion criteria included:(1) psychogenic nonepileptic seizures; (2) progressive neurological or systemic disorders other than epilepsy; (3) pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) substance abuse; (5) the presence of implanted electrical medical devices.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treating Refractory Focal Epilepsy

This pilot study evaluated whether a type of non-invasive brain stimulation called slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) can reduce seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Ten patients received 14 days of so-tDCS (2 mA, 1 Hz) for 20 minutes twice daily, guided by their individual seizure focus identified by EEG and MRI. Seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges were measured before, during, and up to 8 weeks after treatment. The study also assessed safety and tolerability. Results showed that so-tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency, with the greatest effect occurring during the first week of treatment, and the benefit was sustained during follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported. These preliminary findings suggest that so-tDCS may be a safe and effective non-invasive option for refractory focal epilepsy, but larger sham-controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy.

Read the detailed description

tudy Design This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study conducted at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Ten patients with refractory focal epilepsy (ILAE 2017 criteria) were enrolled. All patients completed the full treatment and follow-up protocol.

Participants Inclusion criteria: age 6-60 years, focal epilepsy, failed ≥2 anti-seizure medications, stable medication for ≥4 weeks, ≥2 seizures during 4-week baseline. Exclusion criteria: psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, progressive neurological disease, implanted electronic devices, pregnancy/lactation.

Intervention Slow-oscillatory tDCS (so-tDCS) was delivered using a constant-current stimulator (Hypnos Tech, China). The cathode was placed over the neuroimaging-defined epileptogenic zone (using MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, and scalp EEG). The reference anode was placed at FP1 or FP2 (contralateral). Stimulation parameters: 1 Hz sinusoidal oscillatory current, 2 mA peak-to-peak, delivered for 20 minutes per session, twice daily, with a 20-minute interval between sessions, for 14 consecutive days (total 40 minutes/day). Each session included a 20-second linear ramp-up and ramp-down. Sponge electrodes (13.68 cm²) soaked in 0.9% saline were used.

Outcome Measures Primary outcome: Percentage change in seizure frequency during treatment (14 days) and follow-up (8 weeks) compared with baseline.

Secondary outcomes: Change in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) per hour on long-term EEG; change in alpha power (8-13 Hz) at Pz, CZ, P3, and C3 electrodes; safety and tolerability (adverse events); exploratory analysis of etiology (e.g., encephalomalacia vs. FCD) and treatment response.

Assessments Seizure diaries were kept daily. Long-term EEG (~16 hours) was recorded at baseline, post-treatment (week 2), and follow-up (week 10). Epileptiform discharges were quantified by two blinded electroencephalographers. EEG spectral analysis (FFT) was performed for theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands.

Statistical Analysis Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for seizure frequency changes. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for IEDs. For alpha power, Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction (12 electrode sites, α=0.00417) was applied. Effect sizes (Cliff's delta, Cohen's d) were calculated where appropriate. No imputation was made for missing data (none occurred).

Results Summary Seizure frequency significantly decreased during treatment (median reduction 95.65%, p=0.0020) and follow-up (median reduction 76.35%, p=0.0122). Six of ten patients achieved ≥78% reduction. IED frequency decreased significantly (p=0.0434). Alpha power increased significantly at Pz, CZ, and P3 (Bonferroni-corrected). The most pronounced seizure reduction occurred in the first week. No serious adverse events were reported; only mild transient skin itching/erythema in two adults, which resolved without treatment.

Limitations Small sample size, open-label design (no sham control), and heterogeneity in etiologies limit generalizability. The results are hypothesis-generating; sham-controlled randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy.

Conclusion This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that so-tDCS is safe, well-tolerated, and associated with seizure reduction in refractory focal epilepsy, with a rapid onset and sustained effect. Further studies with sham control and larger cohorts are warranted.

Being tested
Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS)
Medical subject headings
Epilepsies, Partial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS)Device

    1 Hz sinusoidal oscillatory current, 2 mA peak-to-peak, delivered via sponge electrodes (13.68 cm²) soaked in 0.9% saline. Cathode placed over individual epileptogenic zone (defined by MRI, FDG-PET, MEG, and scalp EEG). Reference anode placed at FP1 or FP2 (contralateral). Each session: 20 minutes with 20-second ramp-up/ramp-down. Two sessions per day, separated by a 20-minute rest period, for 14 consecutive days.

Study groups in NCT07684352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
so-tDCSExperimentalParticipants received 14 days of slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) over the neuroimaging-defined epileptogenic zone (cathode), with reference anode at FP1/FP2. Stimulation: 1 Hz, 2 mA, two 20-minute sessions per day (20-minute interval), for 14 consecutive days.
Receives: Device: Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in seizure frequency

    Percentage change in weekly seizure frequency from baseline to the end of the 2-week treatment period, and to the end of the 8-week follow-up period.

    Measured: Baseline (4 weeks), during treatment (weeks 1-2), and follow-up (weeks 3-10)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2026
  2. Study start13 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07684352
Sponsor's protocol ID
so-tDCS-RE-2024
Other IDs
2022YFC3600500
Acronym
so-tDCS-RE
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
29 Jun 2026
Last updated
6 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) in people with Refractory Focal Epilepsy, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in seizure frequency (time frame: Baseline (4 weeks), during treatment (weeks 1-2), and follow-up (weeks 3-10)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in