Chronic Mechanical Neck PainCERVICAL-OCTANCT07688707
Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Eye Blood Flow
A study testing Cervical Manual Therapy in people with Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain, run by Yuzuncu Yil University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study evaluates the acute effects of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). In this prospective randomized sham-controlled trial, 100 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to receive either… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Cervical Manual Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2026to 9 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-70 years
- Chronic mechanical neck pain lasting ≥3 months according to IASP criteria
- Baseline VAS pain score ≥3
- Absence of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures
- Adequate ocular image quality for OCTA assessment
Who cannot join
- Previous cervical spine surgery or major cervical trauma
- Vertebrobasilar insufficiency or other contraindications to cervical manual therapy
- Active inflammatory rheumatic disease or systemic connective tissue disorder
- Known retinal or optic nerve disease that may affect OCTA measurements (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, optic neuritis, etc.)
- Diabetes mellitus with end-organ complications or uncontrolled systemic hypertension (>160/100 mmHg)
- Refractive error > ±6.0 D spherical equivalent or astigmatism >3.0 D
Show all 11Show fewer
- Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg
- Previous ocular surgery, ocular trauma, or retinal laser treatment
- Media opacity preventing adequate OCTA image acquisition
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Participation in another interventional clinical study within the previous 30 days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
SBU Van Training and Research Hospital
Van, 65000
About this study
Official title: Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the acute effects of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). In this prospective randomized sham-controlled trial, 100 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to receive either cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation combined with Maitland mobilization (manual therapy group) or sham treatment. Bilateral OCTA examinations were performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intervention. The primary outcome is whole-image density Secondary outcomes include whole-image and parafoveal vessel density, radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, subfoveal choroidal thickness, foveal avascular zone parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell complex thickness, and macular thickness. The study aims to determine whether cervical manual therapy produces a significant augmentation of retinal and choroidal perfusion compared with sham treatment, with peak effects expected at 60 minutes post-intervention.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale
Cervical musculoskeletal disorders, including mechanical neck pain and cervicogenic headache, affect an estimated 30-50% of the general population. Manual therapy encompassing spinal manipulation and mobilization techniques targeting the cervical spine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain intensity and improving functional outcomes. However, beyond its established biomechanical and neurophysiological effects, growing interest has emerged in elucidating the potential vascular and autonomic consequences of cervical manual therapy, particularly with respect to ocular circulation.
The eye is uniquely positioned as a window into systemic and regional vascular status. The retinal and choroidal vasculature are regulated by a complex interplay of local autoregulatory mechanisms, systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and autonomic nervous system tone. The cervical sympathetic chain, lying in close anatomical proximity to the cervical vertebrae and the carotid artery, provides preganglionic and postganglionic sympathetic innervation to the ocular structures. Mechanical stimulation of the cervical spine may therefore modulate ocular perfusion through sympathetic pathways, alterations in vertebral artery blood flow, or changes in intracranial pressure dynamics.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive, high-resolution imaging modality capable of quantifying retinal and choroidal microvasculature with unprecedented detail. Quantitative metrics derived from OCTA, including vessel density, foveal avascular zone area, and choroidal thickness, provide sensitive and reproducible indices of microvascular status.
To date, the effects of cervical manual therapy on ocular circulation have been investigated only sporadically and with methodological limitations, including small sample sizes, absence of bilateral assessment, lack of temporal resolution, and absence of sham or no-treatment control arms. No prior study has employed OCTA to comprehensively evaluate the acute, time-resolved effects of cervical manual therapy across multiple retinal and choroidal vascular compartments in both eyes simultaneously using a sham-controlled design.
Objectives
The primary objective is to evaluate the acute effects of a single session of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion as measured by OCTA in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.
The secondary objectives are:
To assess changes in parafoveal vessel density
To assess changes in radial peripapillary capillary density
To assess changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness
To assess changes in foveal avascular zone parameters
To assess changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
To assess changes in ganglion cell complex thickness
To assess changes in macular thickness
To evaluate the temporal profile of vascular responses (at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention)
To compare vascular responses between active manual therapy and sham treatment
Hypothesis
Cervical manual therapy will produce a significantly greater augmentation of retinal and choroidal perfusion compared with sham treatment, with peak between-group differences at 60 minutes post-intervention, followed by convergence toward baseline by 120 minutes.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized sham-controlled trial. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation combined with Maitland mobilization (manual therapy group) or sham treatment. Bilateral OCTA examinations are performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intervention.
Setting
The study is conducted at SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Participant Timeline
Screening and enrollment: February 2026
Intervention and follow-up: Single session with 120-minute post-intervention observation
Final data collection: May 2026
Sample Size
Based on published OCTA test-retest data (intraday coefficient of variation ~2.5% for SCP whole-image density; within-subject standard deviation ~1.2 percentage points), a minimum detectable between-group difference of ≥2 percentage points, α=0.05 (two-tailed), and 1-β=0.80, a minimum of 42 participants per group is required. The enrolled sample of 50 per group provides ≥85% power and accommodates an estimated 15% dropout rate.
Interventions
Manual therapy group: A single, standardized session consisting of cervical HVLA thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator.
Sham control group: Light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force). Session duration identical to active intervention.
Both groups remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcome: "Primary outcome was right-eye SCP whole-image density
Secondary outcomes:
whole-image and parafoveal vessel density Radial peripapillary capillary optic disc density Subfoveal choroidal thickness (μm) Foveal avascular zone area, perimeter, and circularity Retinal nerve fiber layer global thickness Ganglion cell complex thickness Macular center thickness Signal strength index Data Collection OCTA imaging is performed with a spectral-domain OCT device (Optovue Solix, Visionix / Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) at T0, T15, T30, T60, and T120 minutes post-intervention by the same blinded technician. Protocols include 6×6 mm foveal-centered and 4.5×4.5 mm optic disc-centered scans. Only images with SSI ≥6 are included.
To mitigate repeated-scan artifacts, the same automated segmentation algorithm is applied uniformly across all time points, and all segmentations are manually verified by a masked grader. Participants undergo a 2-minute dark adaptation prior to each scan, and the built-in eye-tracking system is activated. Scan registration across time points is performed using the device's automated follow-up mode.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses use Python 3.11 (SciPy 1.11, pandas 2.1, pingouin 0.5.4, statsmodels 0.14). Normality is assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Within-group temporal changes are analyzed using the Friedman test; post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction are applied. Between-group differences are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercept for subject and random slope for time, including fixed effects for group, time, and group×time interaction. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction is applied across all secondary outcomes.
Analysis is performed on both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) basis.
Adverse Event Monitoring All participants are monitored for adverse events throughout the study period (from randomization through 24 hours post-intervention). Participants are asked at T15, T30, T60, T120, and via telephone at 24 hours about the occurrence of: neck pain worsening, dizziness, headache, nausea, visual symptoms (blurred vision, floaters, photopsia), or any other unusual symptom. All events are recorded and graded for severity and relationship to intervention.
- Conditions
- Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Cervical Manual Therapy, Sham Treatment
- Keywords
- optical coherence tomography angiography, cervical manual therapy, retinal perfusion, choroidal thickness, autonomic nervous system, randomized controlled trial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical Manual TherapyOther
A single, standardized session consisting of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator. Participants remain seated throughout the post-intervention observation period.
Sham TreatmentOther
Light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites as the active intervention, without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force, verified by force gauge during training). Session duration is identical to the active intervention (15-20 minutes). Participants remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Therapy Group | Experimental | Participants receive a single session of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Receives: Other: Cervical Manual Therapy |
| Sham Control Group | Sham comparator | Participants receive light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force). Session duration is identical to the active intervention. Receives: Other: Sham Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Superficial Capillary Plexus (SCP) Whole-Image Vessel Density
Change in SCP whole-image density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change deep capillary plexus (DCP) whole-image Vessel Density
Change in DCP whole-image and parafoveal vessel density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Deep Capillary Plexus (DCP) Parafoveal Vessel Density
Change in DCP parafoveal vessel density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2026
- Study start12 Aug 2026
- Primary completion8 Sep 2026
- Study completion9 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Mechanical Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cervical manual therapy or sham treatment.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yuzuncu Yil University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sebahattin Celik MD, Yuzuncu Yil University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07688707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GOKAEK/2026-02-20
- Other IDs
- SBU Van Training and Research
- Acronym
- CERVICAL-OCTA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial, including demographic characteristics, OCTA measurements (superficial and deep capillary plexus vessel density, radial peripapillary capillary density, subfoveal choroidal thickness, foveal avascular zone parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell complex thickness, and macular center thickness) collected at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention, de-identified.
Publications
Evcimen Y, Başkan B, Öztürk S. Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. [Manuscript]. SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey; 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20788573.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07688707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CERVICAL-OCTA / GOKAEK/2026-02-20
- Conditions
- Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
- Keywords
- optical coherence tomography angiography, cervical manual therapy, retinal perfusion, choroidal thickness, autonomic nervous system, randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yuzuncu Yil UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the acute effects of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). In this prospective randomized sham-controlled trial, 100 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to receive either cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation combined with Maitland mobilization (manual therapy group) or sham treatment. Bilateral OCTA examinations were performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intervention. The primary outcome is whole-image density Secondary outcomes include whole-image and parafoveal vessel density, radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, subfoveal choroidal thickness, foveal avascular zone parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell complex thickness, and macular thickness. The study aims to determine whether cervical manual therapy produces a significant augmentation of retinal and choroidal perfusion compared with sham treatment, with peak effects expected at 60 minutes post-intervention.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale
Cervical musculoskeletal disorders, including mechanical neck pain and cervicogenic headache, affect an estimated 30-50% of the general population. Manual therapy encompassing spinal manipulation and mobilization techniques targeting the cervical spine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain intensity and improving functional outcomes. However, beyond its established biomechanical and neurophysiological effects, growing interest has emerged in elucidating the potential vascular and autonomic consequences of cervical manual therapy, particularly with respect to ocular circulation.
The eye is uniquely positioned as a window into systemic and regional vascular status. The retinal and choroidal vasculature are regulated by a complex interplay of local autoregulatory mechanisms, systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and autonomic nervous system tone. The cervical sympathetic chain, lying in close anatomical proximity to the cervical vertebrae and the carotid artery, provides preganglionic and postganglionic sympathetic innervation to the ocular structures. Mechanical stimulation of the cervical spine may therefore modulate ocular perfusion through sympathetic pathways, alterations in vertebral artery blood flow, or changes in intracranial pressure dynamics.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive, high-resolution imaging modality capable of quantifying retinal and choroidal microvasculature with unprecedented detail. Quantitative metrics derived from OCTA, including vessel density, foveal avascular zone area, and choroidal thickness, provide sensitive and reproducible indices of microvascular status.
To date, the effects of cervical manual therapy on ocular circulation have been investigated only sporadically and with methodological limitations, including small sample sizes, absence of bilateral assessment, lack of temporal resolution, and absence of sham or no-treatment control arms. No prior study has employed OCTA to comprehensively evaluate the acute, time-resolved effects of cervical manual therapy across multiple retinal and choroidal vascular compartments in both eyes simultaneously using a sham-controlled design.
Objectives
The primary objective is to evaluate the acute effects of a single session of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion as measured by OCTA in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.
The secondary objectives are:
To assess changes in parafoveal vessel density
To assess changes in radial peripapillary capillary density
To assess changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness
To assess changes in foveal avascular zone parameters
To assess changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
To assess changes in ganglion cell complex thickness
To assess changes in macular thickness
To evaluate the temporal profile of vascular responses (at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention)
To compare vascular responses between active manual therapy and sham treatment
Hypothesis
Cervical manual therapy will produce a significantly greater augmentation of retinal and choroidal perfusion compared with sham treatment, with peak between-group differences at 60 minutes post-intervention, followed by convergence toward baseline by 120 minutes.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized sham-controlled trial. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation combined with Maitland mobilization (manual therapy group) or sham treatment. Bilateral OCTA examinations are performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intervention.
Setting
The study is conducted at SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Participant Timeline
Screening and enrollment: February 2026
Intervention and follow-up: Single session with 120-minute post-intervention observation
Final data collection: May 2026
Sample Size
Based on published OCTA test-retest data (intraday coefficient of variation ~2.5% for SCP whole-image density; within-subject standard deviation ~1.2 percentage points), a minimum detectable between-group difference of ≥2 percentage points, α=0.05 (two-tailed), and 1-β=0.80, a minimum of 42 participants per group is required. The enrolled sample of 50 per group provides ≥85% power and accommodates an estimated 15% dropout rate.
Interventions
Manual therapy group: A single, standardized session consisting of cervical HVLA thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator.
Sham control group: Light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force). Session duration identical to active intervention.
Both groups remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcome: "Primary outcome was right-eye SCP whole-image density
Secondary outcomes:
whole-image and parafoveal vessel density Radial peripapillary capillary optic disc density Subfoveal choroidal thickness (μm) Foveal avascular zone area, perimeter, and circularity Retinal nerve fiber layer global thickness Ganglion cell complex thickness Macular center thickness Signal strength index Data Collection OCTA imaging is performed with a spectral-domain OCT device (Optovue Solix, Visionix / Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) at T0, T15, T30, T60, and T120 minutes post-intervention by the same blinded technician. Protocols include 6×6 mm foveal-centered and 4.5×4.5 mm optic disc-centered scans. Only images with SSI ≥6 are included.
To mitigate repeated-scan artifacts, the same automated segmentation algorithm is applied uniformly across all time points, and all segmentations are manually verified by a masked grader. Participants undergo a 2-minute dark adaptation prior to each scan, and the built-in eye-tracking system is activated. Scan registration across time points is performed using the device's automated follow-up mode.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses use Python 3.11 (SciPy 1.11, pandas 2.1, pingouin 0.5.4, statsmodels 0.14). Normality is assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Within-group temporal changes are analyzed using the Friedman test; post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction are applied. Between-group differences are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercept for subject and random slope for time, including fixed effects for group, time, and group×time interaction. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction is applied across all secondary outcomes.
Analysis is performed on both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) basis.
Adverse Event Monitoring All participants are monitored for adverse events throughout the study period (from randomization through 24 hours post-intervention). Participants are asked at T15, T30, T60, T120, and via telephone at 24 hours about the occurrence of: neck pain worsening, dizziness, headache, nausea, visual symptoms (blurred vision, floaters, photopsia), or any other unusual symptom. All events are recorded and graded for severity and relationship to intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cervical manual therapy or sham treatment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Therapy Group | Experimental | Other: Cervical Manual TherapyParticipants receive a single session of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. |
| Sham Control Group | Sham comparator | Other: Sham TreatmentParticipants receive light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force). Session duration is identical to the active intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18-70 years
- Chronic mechanical neck pain lasting ≥3 months according to IASP criteria
- Baseline VAS pain score ≥3
- Absence of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Previous cervical spine surgery or major cervical trauma
- Vertebrobasilar insufficiency or other contraindications to cervical manual therapy
- Active inflammatory rheumatic disease or systemic connective tissue disorder
- Known retinal or optic nerve disease that may affect OCTA measurements (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, optic neuritis, etc.)
- Diabetes mellitus with end-organ complications or uncontrolled systemic hypertension (>160/100 mmHg)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Manual TherapyA single, standardized session consisting of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator. Participants remain seated throughout the post-intervention observation period. | Other | Manual Therapy Group |
| Sham TreatmentLight, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites as the active intervention, without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force, verified by force gauge during training). Session duration is identical to the active intervention (15-20 minutes). Participants remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness. | Other | Sham Control Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Superficial Capillary Plexus (SCP) Whole-Image Vessel Density
Time frame: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Change in SCP whole-image density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
2 secondary outcomes
Change deep capillary plexus (DCP) whole-image Vessel Density
Time frame: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Deep Capillary Plexus (DCP) Parafoveal Vessel Density
Time frame: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Results publicationEvcimen Y, Başkan B, Öztürk S. Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. [Manuscript]. SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey; 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20788573.
- Link to the dataset and supporting information for this study on Zenodo.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial, including demographic characteristics, OCTA measurements (superficial and deep capillary plexus vessel density, radial peripapillary capillary density, subfoveal choroidal thickness, foveal avascular zone parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell complex thickness, and macular center thickness) collected at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention, de-identified.
Related trials for Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Suboccipital Release and Muscle Energy Technique in Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture
Myofascial Trigger Points, Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Bruegger's Relief Exercise in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
Enrolling by invitation
MANUAL THERAPY ON PAIN, DISABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE
Neck Pain, Neck Pain Musculoskeletal
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Adding Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique to Cervical Stabilization Exercise in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Sensory Motor Control and Muscle Energy Technique for Chronic Mechanical Neck
Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cervical Manual Therapy in people with Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain, run by Yuzuncu Yil University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Superficial Capillary Plexus (SCP) Whole-Image Vessel Density (time frame: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07688707, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.