CancerA-EPACNCT07690904
Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication
A study of Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In 2017, the VA launched the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), a national program to promote Goals of Care communication between clinicians and patients regarding goals and preferences for care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2026to 30 Jun 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Veteran patients with diagnosis of a solid malignancy with any cancer stage
- English or Spanish-speaking
- Can self-administer questionnaires in English or Spanish
- Valid telephone number
- Receiving oncology care at one of 7 sites
- Receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy, defined as oral, injection, or intravenous therapy
Show all 11Show fewer
- chemotherapy
- hormone therapy
- targeted therapy
- or immunotherapy defined by the National Cancer Institute A to Z List of Cancer Drugs)
- Care Assessment Needs (CAN) risk score ≥98th percentile (may be adjusted after examining site-level CAN performance)
Who cannot join
- No capacity to consent
- Actively receiving hospice care
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1207
About this study
Official title: Algorithm-Enabled Engagement of Patients With Advanced Cancer (A-EPAC) to Improve Goals of Care Communication Among Veterans With Advanced Stages of Cancer
In 2017, the VA launched the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), a national program to promote Goals of Care communication between clinicians and patients regarding goals and preferences for care. Despite clinician training and standardized Life Sustaining Treatment (LST) notes in the electronic health record (EHR), 60% of Veterans with cancer have not engaged in such communication with their oncology clinicians before death. Over the past 10 years, the team developed and tested: 1) a lay health worker-led intervention to improve these conversations and reduce unwanted, intensive end-of-life care, and 2) an algorithm-driven approach to identify patients in need of urgent conversations with their clinical teams. This randomized study will evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining these two approaches across 7 VA oncology sites. The outcomes include LST documentation, Veteran-reported anxiety and depression, and the identification of factors to inform broad scale of Veteran-centric interventions to improve GoC communication.
Read the detailed description
The investigators developed the Engagement of Patients with Advanced Cancer (EPAC) intervention - a 6-month telephone-based intervention in which trained lay health workers (LHWs) educate and empower Veterans with cancer to engage in goals of care conversations with their oncology clinical teams. To facilitate scale, the investigator propose Algorithm-Enabled EPAC (A-EPAC), which uses the VA Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score to automatically identify patients with cancer who could benefit from EPAC. This intent-to-treat randomized trial is conducted in collaboration with the NTO and the National VA Oncology Programs (NOP). The investigators will randomize 200 Veterans with cancer receiving care across 7 VA facilities to either the A-EPAC intervention (algorithm-based identification and referral to EPAC for 6-months) or usual cancer care alone (cancer care provided by oncology teams at the local site). Participants will be followed for 12-months post enrollment. The primary outcome is Life Sustaining Treatment documentation at 3 months post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes are patient anxiety and depression at 3 months measured by PROMIS® short forms. Exploratory outcomes include intensive end-of-life care, advance directive documentation, and acute care use. Using a quant-qual framework, the investigators will conduct validated surveys with 40 Veterans with cancer and Veteran and clinician interviews at 6 months to identify factors associated with feasibility, adoption, acceptability, and A-EPAC fidelity.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Usual Care, Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC)
- Keywords
- Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Usual CareBehavioural
Also called Standard of care, standard therapy
Usual care or standard of care as per the clinical site in which participant is receiving cancer care.
Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC)Behavioural
Also called Goals of Care Behavioral Intervention
Educational and support intervention for participants regarding goals of care discussions and engagement in these topics with a lay health worker.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Participants will receive usual cancer care for 12 months or until death whichever is first. Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care |
| Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC) | Experimental | Participants will be assigned to a lay health worker who will conduct education sessions over 30-45 minutes by phone initially followed by 15 minute conversations twice monthly for 6 months to discuss goals of care and how to engage in these discussions with their clinical teams. Participants will also receive usual cancer care for a total of 12 months or until death, whichever is first. Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care; Behavioral: Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Proportion of participants in both study groups who have a life sustaining treatment document in the electronic health record.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Patient-reported Anxiety and Depression
Change in mean score using the validated PROMIS Short Form v1.0 of Anxiety 4a and Depression 4a between time of enrollment and 3 months post-enrollment. Each scale consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. That is - higher score represents a worse outcome.
Measured: 3 months
Advance Directive Documentation
Proportion of participants with any advance directive documentation in the electronic health record between baseline and 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Acute Care Use
Any hospitalization or emergency room admission within 12-months of follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Proportion of participants in both study groups who have a life sustaining treatment document in the electronic health record.
Measured: 6 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Proportion of participants in both study groups who have a life sustaining treatment document in the electronic health record.
Measured: 9 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Proportion of participants in both study groups who have a life sustaining treatment document in the electronic health record.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2026
- Study start21 Sep 2026
- Primary completion30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel randomization at the participant-level
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Manali I Patel, MD MSPH, Principal investigator, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07690904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSR6-015-24W
- Other IDs
- 1I01RD000421-01A1
- Acronym
- A-EPAC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Algorithm-Enabled Engagement of Patients With Advanced Cancer (A-EPAC) to Improve Goals of Care Communication Among Veterans With Advanced Stages of Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07690904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A-EPAC / HSR6-015-24W
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In 2017, the VA launched the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), a national program to promote Goals of Care communication between clinicians and patients regarding goals and preferences for care. Despite clinician training and standardized Life Sustaining Treatment (LST) notes in the electronic health record (EHR), 60% of Veterans with cancer have not engaged in such communication with their oncology clinicians before death. Over the past 10 years, the team developed and tested: 1) a lay health worker-led intervention to improve these conversations and reduce unwanted, intensive end-of-life care, and 2) an algorithm-driven approach to identify patients in need of urgent conversations with their clinical teams. This randomized study will evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining these two approaches across 7 VA oncology sites. The outcomes include LST documentation, Veteran-reported anxiety and depression, and the identification of factors to inform broad scale of Veteran-centric interventions to improve GoC communication.
Detailed description
The investigators developed the Engagement of Patients with Advanced Cancer (EPAC) intervention - a 6-month telephone-based intervention in which trained lay health workers (LHWs) educate and empower Veterans with cancer to engage in goals of care conversations with their oncology clinical teams. To facilitate scale, the investigator propose Algorithm-Enabled EPAC (A-EPAC), which uses the VA Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score to automatically identify patients with cancer who could benefit from EPAC. This intent-to-treat randomized trial is conducted in collaboration with the NTO and the National VA Oncology Programs (NOP). The investigators will randomize 200 Veterans with cancer receiving care across 7 VA facilities to either the A-EPAC intervention (algorithm-based identification and referral to EPAC for 6-months) or usual cancer care alone (cancer care provided by oncology teams at the local site). Participants will be followed for 12-months post enrollment. The primary outcome is Life Sustaining Treatment documentation at 3 months post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes are patient anxiety and depression at 3 months measured by PROMIS® short forms. Exploratory outcomes include intensive end-of-life care, advance directive documentation, and acute care use. Using a quant-qual framework, the investigators will conduct validated surveys with 40 Veterans with cancer and Veteran and clinician interviews at 6 months to identify factors associated with feasibility, adoption, acceptability, and A-EPAC fidelity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel randomization at the participant-level
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Usual CareParticipants will receive usual cancer care for 12 months or until death whichever is first. |
| Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC) | Experimental | Behavioral: Usual Care, Behavioral: Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC)Participants will be assigned to a lay health worker who will conduct education sessions over 30-45 minutes by phone initially followed by 15 minute conversations twice monthly for 6 months to discuss goals of care and how to engage in these discussions with their clinical teams. Participants will also receive usual cancer care for a total of 12 months or until death, whichever is first. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Veteran patients with diagnosis of a solid malignancy with any cancer stage
- English or Spanish-speaking
- Can self-administer questionnaires in English or Spanish
- Valid telephone number
- Receiving oncology care at one of 7 sites
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- No capacity to consent
- Actively receiving hospice care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Usual CareAlso: Standard of care, standard therapyUsual care or standard of care as per the clinical site in which participant is receiving cancer care. | Behavioural | Usual Care, Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC) |
| Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC)Also: Goals of Care Behavioral InterventionEducational and support intervention for participants regarding goals of care discussions and engagement in these topics with a lay health worker. | Behavioural | Usual Care + Algorithm-enabled Goals of Care Communication (A-EPAC) |
Primary outcome
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Time frame: 3 months
Proportion of participants in both study groups who have a life sustaining treatment document in the electronic health record.
6 secondary outcomes
Patient-reported Anxiety and Depression
Time frame: 3 months
Advance Directive Documentation
Time frame: 12 months
Acute Care Use
Time frame: 12 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Time frame: 6 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Time frame: 9 months
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Enrolling by invitation
Exercise Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients With Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia, Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing TAK-928 With Docetaxel in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
IO Resistant Squamous and Nonsquamous NSCLC
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Saruparib in HRDsig+ Solid Tumors
Malignant Neoplastic Disease (Disorder)
RecruitingPhase 2
IGFBP-2 Vaccine to Prevent Ovarian Cancer Progression in Patients With Serologic Detection of Recurrence
Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Ovarian Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Manali I Patel, MD MSPH principal investigator
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Life Sustaining Treatment Documentation (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.