Esophageal Cancer (EsC)NCT07691944
Effect of VExUS Score on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer (EsC) and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs), run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
Trial summary
Brief Summary This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) targeting a venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score of 1 can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer (EsC), Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs)
- What is being tested?
- VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 126 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2026to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Study population: The study protocol has been submitted for ethical approval to the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. A total of 126 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic three-incision radical esophagectomy (McKeown MIE) will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between February 2026 and July 2026.
Who may be able to join
- Age between 65 and 80 years old
- Scheduled for elective McKeown MIE
- ASA physical status classification I to III
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18 kg/m² and 30 kg/m² (exclusive of 18 kg/m²)
Who cannot join
- Respiratory failure (SaO₂ < 60 mmHg and/or PaCO₂ > 50 mmHg)
- Severe cardiac dysfunction (NYHA class III-IV)
- Angina pectoris within the past 3 months or acute myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) within the past 6 months
- Pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure, PASP > 35 mmHg)
- Moderate to severe tricuspid stenosis/regurgitation (valve orifice area < 1.5 cm² / vena contracta width ≥ 0.3 cm)
- Decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class ≥ B)
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD stage ≥ 3a) (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²)
- Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE < 27) and inability to cooperate with follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Effect of VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brief Summary This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) targeting a venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score of 1 can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The study will also assess postoperative organ microcirculatory perfusion and quality of recovery.
Key research questions the trial seeks to answer include:
Read more
Does VExUS score-guided GDFT reduce the incidence of PPCs in elderly patients following McKeown MIE? Do participants receiving VExUS-guided GDFT achieve better clinical outcomes? Investigators will compare VExUS score-targeted GDFT with fluid therapy guided by the standard Vigileo-FloTrac™ system, to determine if the VExUS-guided approach reduces the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients.
Participant assessments and data collection include:
VExUS score assessment at four time points: preoperatively, after thoracic phase of surgery, after abdominal phase of surgery, and at the end of surgery. Concomitant measurements will include capillary refill time (CRT, in minutes), perfusion index (PI), blood lactate level (Lac, in mmol/L), and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂, in percent).
Postoperative lung ultrasound score assessment. Recording of clinical outcomes including length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (in days), postoperative hospital length of stay (in days), 30-day postoperative readmission rate due to pulmonary complications (in percent), and in-hospital postoperative mortality rate (in percent).
Read the detailed description
- Background In China, esophageal cancer (EsC) is a common malignancy of the digestive tract, and surgery remains the primary treatment modality . Currently used esophageal tumor resection approaches include McKeown esophagectomy, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, and Sweet esophagectomy, among others. Among these, thoracoscopic three-incision McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (McKeown MIE) offers advantages in lymph node dissection and is therefore one of the commonly used surgical approaches for esophageal cancer. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most frequent type of complication following esophagectomy, accounting for 28.9%-50% of all complications , and have been demonstrated to be associated with in-hospital mortality , prolonged hospital stay, and increased medical costs . With the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, perioperative fluid management in esophageal cancer surgery has become increasingly important. Inappropriate perioperative fluid volume is an independent risk factor for lung injury . Veelo et al. emphasized that goal-directed hemodynamic therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia . In the absence of continuous hemodynamic monitoring, total intraoperative fluid infusion exceeding 5000 mL should be avoided in patients without ongoing blood loss . Inappropriate intraoperative blood transfusion increases the incidence of PPCs, elevates postoperative mortality, and leads to poorer long-term prognosis due to higher tumor recurrence rates . Therefore, perioperative fluid management is particularly critical in McKeown MIE. In patients undergoing this procedure, perioperative fluid overload can lead to: (a) increased capillary hydrostatic pressure, and (b) accumulation of excess fluid in the alveolar space, causing alveolar compression, collapse, and exudation, resulting in increased dead space ventilation and intrapulmonary shunt, which in turn induces pulmonary venous congestion and interstitial pulmonary edema. Conversely, inadequate fluid resuscitation may lead to insufficient organ perfusion, exacerbating organ injury such as acute kidney injury (AKI). The traditional "empiric fluid therapy" approach is gradually being replaced by goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT). Thus, GDFT has become an important target for preventing PPCs in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE. GDFT aims to optimize end-organ perfusion and improve tissue oxygen delivery through precise fluid administration, thereby reducing the risk of PPCs. Existing GDFT strategies include fluid therapy based on dynamic hemodynamic parameters (Vigileo-FloTrac™), central venous pressure (CVP)-guided fluid therapy , perfusion index-guided therapy, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided fluid therapy. However, compared with the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score, these monitoring modalities cannot accurately and real-time reflect overall venous congestion, nor can they provide integrated monitoring of the matching between venous return driving pressure and right ventricular function. The VExUS score is an emerging bedside ultrasound-based volume quantification tool that evaluates important capacitance veins, including the inferior vena cava diameter, and the hepatic, portal, and renal veins. By comprehensively monitoring their vessel diameter, resistance indices, and Doppler waveforms, it provides a real-time, non-invasive, and direct reflection of the match between fluid therapy and patient status . Elevated venous pressure is associated with poor prognosis and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay . This non-invasive assessment of venous congestion may become an important bedside tool for clinicians. This novel technique has several potential applications in the ICU , including guiding diuretic therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock and individualizing fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock . Studies have demonstrated that VExUS-guided fluid therapy reduces circulation-related complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and in those with heart failure. However, evidence regarding its application in elderly patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery remains lacking. Elderly patients are characterized by reduced vascular elasticity, diminished renal functional reserve, and poor tolerance to fluid fluctuations. In elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE, extensive surgical wounds, prolonged one-lung ventilation, and impaired pulmonary venous return increase the risk of pulmonary congestion. Fluid responsiveness and lung-protective strategies are closely related to fluid therapy. Therefore, the application of the VExUS score - a "cardiac congestion score" - in this patient population may effectively prevent PPCs. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of perioperative GDFT targeting a VExUS score of 1 on postoperative PPCs in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE, with the goal of providing a more precise and safer fluid management strategy for this patient population. This study holds important clinical significance for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications, improving prognosis, and advancing perioperative fluid management concepts.
- Objectives and Expected Outcomes 2.1 Objectives Primary Objective: To verify whether GDFT based on the VExUS score can reduce the incidence of PPCs in elderly patients after McKeown MIE, compared with classic Vigileo-FloTrac™ system-guided fluid therapy. Secondary Objectives: To explore the effects of VExUS score-based GDFT on postoperative lung ultrasound score (LUS), duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate due to pulmonary complications, and in-hospital postoperative mortality in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE. Additionally, to identify important risk factors affecting postoperative pulmonary complications in this population within the framework of GDFT-based perioperative management. 2.2 Expected Outcomes Through clinical intervention, data analysis, and synthesis, this study aims to clarify the efficacy of VExUS score-based GDFT in preventing pulmonary complications in elderly patients after McKeown MIE, and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the associated risk factors. These findings will provide an optimized perioperative fluid management strategy for this patient population, improve postoperative recovery and overall prognosis, offer a reference for early screening and future rational intervention in this high-risk group, and ultimately enhance the quality of postoperative recovery.
- Study Design and Methods 3.1 Study Design This randomized controlled clinical trial strictly adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki [19] and employs a randomized, controlled, prospective design, following the ethical principles of clinical trials and the CONSORT guidelines for the conduct and reporting of randomized controlled trials. The study will be registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.
3.2 Study Population Ethical approval for this study will be submitted to the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Patients scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic three-incision McKeown MIE will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, from February 2026 to July 2026. An estimated total of 126 patients will be enrolled.
3.3 Allocation, Randomization, and Blinding Enrolled subjects will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the VExUS score-guided GDFT group (Group V) and the control group (Group C). Randomization will be performed using a permuted block design (block size of 4) by an independent researcher not involved in patient management, using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Allocation concealment will be achieved using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. On the day of surgery, a research nurse not involved in anesthesia management or data collection will open the next envelope before induction and inform the attending anesthesiologist of the group assignment. All VExUS assessments will be performed by the same senior ultrasonographer to ensure procedural consistency. To preserve internal validity, the anesthesiologists managing intraoperative care, the postoperative outcome assessors, and the data analysts will all remain blinded to group allocation.
3.4 Study Methods and Procedures 3.4.1 Anesthesia Management All enrolled patients must provide written informed consent, and the study protocol must be approved by the hospital ethics committee. One day before surgery, the attending anesthesiologist will conduct a preoperative visit to assess the patient's baseline condition. Patients will undergo standard preoperative fasting for 6-8 h and abstain from clear liquids for 2 h. All patients will receive routine preoperative preparation with complete preoperative examinations. Blood pressure and blood glucose levels in patients with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes will be controlled within ranges appropriate for surgery.
Both groups will receive standardized anesthesia management as follows:
Anesthesia induction: Midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.5 μg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg).
After induction, a double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker will be placed for one-lung ventilation (OLV), and correct positioning will be confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. After the patient is repositioned to the left lateral decubitus position, a paravertebral nerve block (T4-T6) will be performed using 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine. All nerve block procedures will be performed by the same group of senior anesthesiologists.
Anesthesia maintenance: Remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min), propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h), sevoflurane (1-2%), with cisatracurium added as needed. Doses will be adjusted according to depth of anesthesia, with the bispectral index (BIS) maintained at 40-60.
At the time of transition from OLV to two-lung ventilation and at the end of surgery, thorough tracheal suctioning will be performed, followed by an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) (30 cmH₂O for 30 s).
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA): Sufentanil 2 μg/kg diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 100 mL, administered at a background infusion rate of 2 mL/h, with a bolus dose of 2 mL and a lockout interval of 15 min.
At the end of surgery, the double-lumen endotracheal tube will be exchanged for a single-lumen tube in the operating room, and patients will be transferred to the thoracic surgery ICU intubated. Spontaneous breathing will be allowed to recover, and tracheal extubation will be performed according to extubation criteria. The same anesthesiologist will be responsible for perioperative anesthesia management for all patients in this study; another staff member will collect all perioperative data. Postoperative pulmonary complications will be assessed by thoracic surgeons not involved in the surgery or anesthesia.
Lung-protective ventilation strategy: OLV tidal volume (VT): 4-6 mL/kg; respiratory rate (RR): 12-18 breaths/min; fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂): 50%-100% . The lowest driving pressure (ΔP) will be targeted at 10-15 cmH₂O: PEEP will be increased from 1 cmH₂O to 10 cmH₂O, with each PEEP level maintained for 10 respiratory cycles. The ΔP of the last respiratory cycle at each level will be recorded, and the PEEP associated with the lowest ΔP will be selected and maintained throughout OLV . PETCO₂ will be maintained at 35-45 mmHg, and SpO₂ > 95%.
3.7.2 Study Interventions
- Control Group (Group C): GDFT guided by the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system (Edwards Lifesciences, USA). The radial artery will be cannulated and connected to the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system to monitor stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index (CI). Maintenance fluids will be administered at 2-3 mL/kg/h. Targets: SVV: 10%-12%; CI: 2.5-4.0 L/min/m²; systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI): 1900-2400 dyn·s/cm⁵; CVP: 8-12 cmH₂O. When SVV > 12% and CVP < 12 cmH₂O, a colloid bolus of 3 mL/kg will be infused over 10 min for volume expansion. If, after volume expansion, SVV decreases to < 12% or CI fluctuation ≤ 10%, CI will be assessed: if CI > 2.5 L/min/m², reassessment will be performed after 5 min; if CI ≤ 2.5 L/min/m², dopamine will be infused at 3 μg/kg/min until CI > 2.5 L/min/m². If urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h, 150-200 mL of fluid will be administered; if after 30 min urine output remains < 0.5 mL/kg/h, furosemide 10 mg will be administered intravenously until urine output reaches 0.5-1 mL/kg/h .
- Experimental Group (Group V): VExUS scoring will be performed by an ultrasonographer proficient in ultrasound techniques (experience with > 100 cases and certified by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Ultrasound Branch). Assessment time points: before surgery, after thoracic manipulation, after abdominal manipulation, and at the end of surgery.
- Being tested
- VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid TherapyProcedure or surgery
Intervention Group: VExUS score will be performed by an ultrasonographer proficient in ultrasound operation (with > 100 cases of experience and special certification from the Ultrasound Physician Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association) at the following time points: preoperatively, after thoracic procedure, after abdominal procedure, and at the end of surgery.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (%)
Measured: Censoring will be performed at 30 days, with time to event defined as the time from surgery to ICU admission and discharge. Patients who die in the ICU or before discharge will be censored as not discharged at 30 days.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Postoperative Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)(points)
Measured: Lung ultrasound score assessed at 1 hour postoperatively
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Time from surgery completion to tracheal extubation (in minutes)
Measured: From time of surgery completion to tracheal extubation, assessed up to 72 hours postoperatively
Duration of Non-Invasive Ventilation / High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use
Total duration of NIV or HFNC support in minutes, from surgery completion to discontinuation
Measured: From time of surgery completion to discontinuation of NIV or HFNC support, assessed up to 72 hours postoperatively
Oxygenation Index (PaO₂/FiO₂)(PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio)
Measured: Oxygenation index measured at three time points: at the end of surgery, at extubation, and 24 hours postoperatively
Capillary Refill Time (CRT)
Capillary refill time measured in seconds at four perioperative time points
Measured: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Peripheral Perfusion Index (PI)(%)
Capillary refill time measured in seconds at four perioperative time points
Measured: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Lactic Acid (Lac)(mmol/L)
Capillary refill time measured in seconds at four perioperative time points
Measured: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (ScvO₂)(%)
Capillary refill time measured in seconds at four perioperative time points
Measured: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Length of ICU Stay
Total duration of intensive care unit stay in days, from surgery completion to ICU discharge
Measured: From time of surgery completion to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay(days)
Total duration of hospital stay in days, from surgery completion to discharge
Measured: From time of surgery completion to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
30-Day Readmission Rate Due to Pulmonary Complications(%)
Measured: Proportion of patients readmitted to hospital within 30 days due to pulmonary complications
In-Hospital Postoperative Mortality
Proportion of patients who died during the index hospitalization following surgery
Measured: From time of surgery completion to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2026
- Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal Cancer (EsC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mengning Wan, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Investigators
- Juying Jin, Study director
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07691944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H50010300166
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be considered only when receiving legally valid, ethically approved requests that are in compliance with applicable data protection regulations and trial protocols.
Publications
Zhang YT, Chen Y, Shang KX, Yu H, Li XF, Yu H. Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2024 Sep 1;139(3):571-580. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006814. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
PubMed 38195081Nishio Y, Hara M, Oshita K, Jotaki S, Murotani K, Hiraki T. Relationship between Tryptase and Hypotension in Anaphylaxis during Anesthesia. Kurume Med J. 2024 Jul 2;70(1.2):19-27. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012012. Epub 2024 May 17.
PubMed 38763736Wang D, Zhang Y, Wang S, Xue Y, Hu X, Gao J, Yu R, Zhuang Q, Cheng E, Li X. Correlation of lung ultrasound score with postoperative pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: a prospective observational study. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Oct 21;30(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03271-2.
PubMed 41121392Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, Tuley MR. Operative risk in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):967-71.
PubMed 1580723Cheong I. Unconventional Echocardiographic Techniques for LVOT VTI Measurement in Critical Care Settings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 Jul-Aug;53(6):1418-1424. doi: 10.1002/jcu.24007. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
PubMed 40219729Oba Y, Salzman GA. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):813; author reply 813-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 10991706Zhang Y, Zhan L, Li D, Huang G, Lan Y. Influence of goal-directed fluid therapy guided by the Vigileo-FloTracTM system on intestinal mucosal barrier function in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Sep;18(3):460-466. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.128010. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
PubMed 37868288Yang G, Hu C, Sun Z. An Updated Review of Driving-Pressure Guided Ventilation Strategy and Its Clinical Application. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:6236438. doi: 10.1155/2022/6236438. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35958824Park M, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Yang M, Heo BY, Choi JW, Kim YR, Lee SH, Jeong H, Choi SJ, Song IS. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):385-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002600.
PubMed 30664548Shen Y, Zhong M, Wu W, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1267-73; discussion 1273-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
PubMed 23993028Brogger H. [The new Declaration of Helsinki]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2023 Dec 14;143(1). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0798. Print 2024 Jan 23. No abstract available. Norwegian.
PubMed 38258726Song J, Chen G, Lai D, Zhong L, Fan H, Hu W, Wang M, Hu C, Chen W, Ming Z, Gong S, Luo Q. Association between the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01529-w.
PubMed 40699273Guinot PG. VExUS score: optimizing its use in perioperative and critical care management. Crit Care. 2025 Nov 4;29(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05687-y.
PubMed 41188936Brat K, Sova M, Homolka P, Plutinsky M, Genzor S, Pokorna A, Dosbaba F, Imrichova B, Chovanec Z, Mitas L, Mikulaskova M, Svoboda M, Olson L, Cundrle I; study group. Multimodal prehabilitation before lung resection surgery: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;135(1):188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 May 14.
PubMed 40374400Reeh M, Ghadban T, Dedow J, Vettorazzi E, Uzunoglu FG, Nentwich M, Kluge S, Izbicki JR, Vashist YK. Allogenic Blood Transfusion is Associated with Poor Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Esophageal Cancer. World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):208-215. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3730-8.
PubMed 27730355
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07691944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H50010300166
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Brief Summary This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) targeting a venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score of 1 can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The study will also assess postoperative organ microcirculatory perfusion and quality of recovery.
Key research questions the trial seeks to answer include:
Does VExUS score-guided GDFT reduce the incidence of PPCs in elderly patients following McKeown MIE? Do participants receiving VExUS-guided GDFT achieve better clinical outcomes? Investigators will compare VExUS score-targeted GDFT with fluid therapy guided by the standard Vigileo-FloTrac™ system, to determine if the VExUS-guided approach reduces the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients.
Participant assessments and data collection include:
VExUS score assessment at four time points: preoperatively, after thoracic phase of surgery, after abdominal phase of surgery, and at the end of surgery. Concomitant measurements will include capillary refill time (CRT, in minutes), perfusion index (PI), blood lactate level (Lac, in mmol/L), and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂, in percent).
Postoperative lung ultrasound score assessment. Recording of clinical outcomes including length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (in days), postoperative hospital length of stay (in days), 30-day postoperative readmission rate due to pulmonary complications (in percent), and in-hospital postoperative mortality rate (in percent).
Detailed description
- Background In China, esophageal cancer (EsC) is a common malignancy of the digestive tract, and surgery remains the primary treatment modality . Currently used esophageal tumor resection approaches include McKeown esophagectomy, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, and Sweet esophagectomy, among others. Among these, thoracoscopic three-incision McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (McKeown MIE) offers advantages in lymph node dissection and is therefore one of the commonly used surgical approaches for esophageal cancer. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most frequent type of complication following esophagectomy, accounting for 28.9%-50% of all complications , and have been demonstrated to be associated with in-hospital mortality , prolonged hospital stay, and increased medical costs . With the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, perioperative fluid management in esophageal cancer surgery has become increasingly important. Inappropriate perioperative fluid volume is an independent risk factor for lung injury . Veelo et al. emphasized that goal-directed hemodynamic therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia . In the absence of continuous hemodynamic monitoring, total intraoperative fluid infusion exceeding 5000 mL should be avoided in patients without ongoing blood loss . Inappropriate intraoperative blood transfusion increases the incidence of PPCs, elevates postoperative mortality, and leads to poorer long-term prognosis due to higher tumor recurrence rates . Therefore, perioperative fluid management is particularly critical in McKeown MIE. In patients undergoing this procedure, perioperative fluid overload can lead to: (a) increased capillary hydrostatic pressure, and (b) accumulation of excess fluid in the alveolar space, causing alveolar compression, collapse, and exudation, resulting in increased dead space ventilation and intrapulmonary shunt, which in turn induces pulmonary venous congestion and interstitial pulmonary edema. Conversely, inadequate fluid resuscitation may lead to insufficient organ perfusion, exacerbating organ injury such as acute kidney injury (AKI). The traditional "empiric fluid therapy" approach is gradually being replaced by goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT). Thus, GDFT has become an important target for preventing PPCs in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE. GDFT aims to optimize end-organ perfusion and improve tissue oxygen delivery through precise fluid administration, thereby reducing the risk of PPCs. Existing GDFT strategies include fluid therapy based on dynamic hemodynamic parameters (Vigileo-FloTrac™), central venous pressure (CVP)-guided fluid therapy , perfusion index-guided therapy, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided fluid therapy. However, compared with the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score, these monitoring modalities cannot accurately and real-time reflect overall venous congestion, nor can they provide integrated monitoring of the matching between venous return driving pressure and right ventricular function. The VExUS score is an emerging bedside ultrasound-based volume quantification tool that evaluates important capacitance veins, including the inferior vena cava diameter, and the hepatic, portal, and renal veins. By comprehensively monitoring their vessel diameter, resistance indices, and Doppler waveforms, it provides a real-time, non-invasive, and direct reflection of the match between fluid therapy and patient status . Elevated venous pressure is associated with poor prognosis and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay . This non-invasive assessment of venous congestion may become an important bedside tool for clinicians. This novel technique has several potential applications in the ICU , including guiding diuretic therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock and individualizing fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock . Studies have demonstrated that VExUS-guided fluid therapy reduces circulation-related complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and in those with heart failure. However, evidence regarding its application in elderly patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery remains lacking. Elderly patients are characterized by reduced vascular elasticity, diminished renal functional reserve, and poor tolerance to fluid fluctuations. In elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE, extensive surgical wounds, prolonged one-lung ventilation, and impaired pulmonary venous return increase the risk of pulmonary congestion. Fluid responsiveness and lung-protective strategies are closely related to fluid therapy. Therefore, the application of the VExUS score - a "cardiac congestion score" - in this patient population may effectively prevent PPCs. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of perioperative GDFT targeting a VExUS score of 1 on postoperative PPCs in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE, with the goal of providing a more precise and safer fluid management strategy for this patient population. This study holds important clinical significance for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications, improving prognosis, and advancing perioperative fluid management concepts.
- Objectives and Expected Outcomes 2.1 Objectives Primary Objective: To verify whether GDFT based on the VExUS score can reduce the incidence of PPCs in elderly patients after McKeown MIE, compared with classic Vigileo-FloTrac™ system-guided fluid therapy. Secondary Objectives: To explore the effects of VExUS score-based GDFT on postoperative lung ultrasound score (LUS), duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate due to pulmonary complications, and in-hospital postoperative mortality in elderly patients undergoing McKeown MIE. Additionally, to identify important risk factors affecting postoperative pulmonary complications in this population within the framework of GDFT-based perioperative management. 2.2 Expected Outcomes Through clinical intervention, data analysis, and synthesis, this study aims to clarify the efficacy of VExUS score-based GDFT in preventing pulmonary complications in elderly patients after McKeown MIE, and to develop a comprehensive understanding of the associated risk factors. These findings will provide an optimized perioperative fluid management strategy for this patient population, improve postoperative recovery and overall prognosis, offer a reference for early screening and future rational intervention in this high-risk group, and ultimately enhance the quality of postoperative recovery.
- Study Design and Methods 3.1 Study Design This randomized controlled clinical trial strictly adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki [19] and employs a randomized, controlled, prospective design, following the ethical principles of clinical trials and the CONSORT guidelines for the conduct and reporting of randomized controlled trials. The study will be registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.
3.2 Study Population Ethical approval for this study will be submitted to the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Patients scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic three-incision McKeown MIE will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, from February 2026 to July 2026. An estimated total of 126 patients will be enrolled.
3.3 Allocation, Randomization, and Blinding Enrolled subjects will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the VExUS score-guided GDFT group (Group V) and the control group (Group C). Randomization will be performed using a permuted block design (block size of 4) by an independent researcher not involved in patient management, using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Allocation concealment will be achieved using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. On the day of surgery, a research nurse not involved in anesthesia management or data collection will open the next envelope before induction and inform the attending anesthesiologist of the group assignment. All VExUS assessments will be performed by the same senior ultrasonographer to ensure procedural consistency. To preserve internal validity, the anesthesiologists managing intraoperative care, the postoperative outcome assessors, and the data analysts will all remain blinded to group allocation.
3.4 Study Methods and Procedures 3.4.1 Anesthesia Management All enrolled patients must provide written informed consent, and the study protocol must be approved by the hospital ethics committee. One day before surgery, the attending anesthesiologist will conduct a preoperative visit to assess the patient's baseline condition. Patients will undergo standard preoperative fasting for 6-8 h and abstain from clear liquids for 2 h. All patients will receive routine preoperative preparation with complete preoperative examinations. Blood pressure and blood glucose levels in patients with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes will be controlled within ranges appropriate for surgery.
Both groups will receive standardized anesthesia management as follows:
Anesthesia induction: Midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.5 μg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg).
After induction, a double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker will be placed for one-lung ventilation (OLV), and correct positioning will be confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. After the patient is repositioned to the left lateral decubitus position, a paravertebral nerve block (T4-T6) will be performed using 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine. All nerve block procedures will be performed by the same group of senior anesthesiologists.
Anesthesia maintenance: Remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min), propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h), sevoflurane (1-2%), with cisatracurium added as needed. Doses will be adjusted according to depth of anesthesia, with the bispectral index (BIS) maintained at 40-60.
At the time of transition from OLV to two-lung ventilation and at the end of surgery, thorough tracheal suctioning will be performed, followed by an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) (30 cmH₂O for 30 s).
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA): Sufentanil 2 μg/kg diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 100 mL, administered at a background infusion rate of 2 mL/h, with a bolus dose of 2 mL and a lockout interval of 15 min.
At the end of surgery, the double-lumen endotracheal tube will be exchanged for a single-lumen tube in the operating room, and patients will be transferred to the thoracic surgery ICU intubated. Spontaneous breathing will be allowed to recover, and tracheal extubation will be performed according to extubation criteria. The same anesthesiologist will be responsible for perioperative anesthesia management for all patients in this study; another staff member will collect all perioperative data. Postoperative pulmonary complications will be assessed by thoracic surgeons not involved in the surgery or anesthesia.
Lung-protective ventilation strategy: OLV tidal volume (VT): 4-6 mL/kg; respiratory rate (RR): 12-18 breaths/min; fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂): 50%-100% . The lowest driving pressure (ΔP) will be targeted at 10-15 cmH₂O: PEEP will be increased from 1 cmH₂O to 10 cmH₂O, with each PEEP level maintained for 10 respiratory cycles. The ΔP of the last respiratory cycle at each level will be recorded, and the PEEP associated with the lowest ΔP will be selected and maintained throughout OLV . PETCO₂ will be maintained at 35-45 mmHg, and SpO₂ > 95%.
3.7.2 Study Interventions
- Control Group (Group C): GDFT guided by the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system (Edwards Lifesciences, USA). The radial artery will be cannulated and connected to the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system to monitor stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index (CI). Maintenance fluids will be administered at 2-3 mL/kg/h. Targets: SVV: 10%-12%; CI: 2.5-4.0 L/min/m²; systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI): 1900-2400 dyn·s/cm⁵; CVP: 8-12 cmH₂O. When SVV > 12% and CVP < 12 cmH₂O, a colloid bolus of 3 mL/kg will be infused over 10 min for volume expansion. If, after volume expansion, SVV decreases to < 12% or CI fluctuation ≤ 10%, CI will be assessed: if CI > 2.5 L/min/m², reassessment will be performed after 5 min; if CI ≤ 2.5 L/min/m², dopamine will be infused at 3 μg/kg/min until CI > 2.5 L/min/m². If urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h, 150-200 mL of fluid will be administered; if after 30 min urine output remains < 0.5 mL/kg/h, furosemide 10 mg will be administered intravenously until urine output reaches 0.5-1 mL/kg/h .
- Experimental Group (Group V): VExUS scoring will be performed by an ultrasonographer proficient in ultrasound techniques (experience with > 100 cases and certified by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Ultrasound Branch). Assessment time points: before surgery, after thoracic manipulation, after abdominal manipulation, and at the end of surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- The study protocol has been submitted for ethical approval to the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. A total of 126 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic three-incision radical esophagectomy (McKeown MIE) will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between February 2026 and July 2026.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age between 65 and 80 years old
- Scheduled for elective McKeown MIE
- ASA physical status classification I to III
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18 kg/m² and 30 kg/m² (exclusive of 18 kg/m²)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Respiratory failure (SaO₂ < 60 mmHg and/or PaCO₂ > 50 mmHg)
- Severe cardiac dysfunction (NYHA class III-IV)
- Angina pectoris within the past 3 months or acute myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) within the past 6 months
- Pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure, PASP > 35 mmHg)
- Moderate to severe tricuspid stenosis/regurgitation (valve orifice area < 1.5 cm² / vena contracta width ≥ 0.3 cm)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VExUS Score-Guided Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid TherapyIntervention Group: VExUS score will be performed by an ultrasonographer proficient in ultrasound operation (with > 100 cases of experience and special certification from the Ultrasound Physician Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association) at the following time points: preoperatively, after thoracic procedure, after abdominal procedure, and at the end of surgery. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (%)
Time frame: Censoring will be performed at 30 days, with time to event defined as the time from surgery to ICU admission and discharge. Patients who die in the ICU or before discharge will be censored as not discharged at 30 days.
12 secondary outcomes
Postoperative Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)(points)
Time frame: Lung ultrasound score assessed at 1 hour postoperatively
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Time frame: From time of surgery completion to tracheal extubation, assessed up to 72 hours postoperatively
Duration of Non-Invasive Ventilation / High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use
Time frame: From time of surgery completion to discontinuation of NIV or HFNC support, assessed up to 72 hours postoperatively
Oxygenation Index (PaO₂/FiO₂)(PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio)
Time frame: Oxygenation index measured at three time points: at the end of surgery, at extubation, and 24 hours postoperatively
Capillary Refill Time (CRT)
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Peripheral Perfusion Index (PI)(%)
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Lactic Acid (Lac)(mmol/L)
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (ScvO₂)(%)
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively), immediately after thoracic manipulation, immediately after abdominal manipulation, and at surgery completion (skin closure)
Length of ICU Stay
Time frame: From time of surgery completion to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay(days)
Time frame: From time of surgery completion to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
30-Day Readmission Rate Due to Pulmonary Complications(%)
Time frame: Proportion of patients readmitted to hospital within 30 days due to pulmonary complications
In-Hospital Postoperative Mortality
Time frame: From time of surgery completion to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38195081Zhang YT, Chen Y, Shang KX, Yu H, Li XF, Yu H. Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2024 Sep 1;139(3):571-580. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006814. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
- Background: PubMed 38763736Nishio Y, Hara M, Oshita K, Jotaki S, Murotani K, Hiraki T. Relationship between Tryptase and Hypotension in Anaphylaxis during Anesthesia. Kurume Med J. 2024 Jul 2;70(1.2):19-27. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012012. Epub 2024 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 41121392Wang D, Zhang Y, Wang S, Xue Y, Hu X, Gao J, Yu R, Zhuang Q, Cheng E, Li X. Correlation of lung ultrasound score with postoperative pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: a prospective observational study. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Oct 21;30(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03271-2.
- Background: PubMed 1580723Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, Tuley MR. Operative risk in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):967-71.
- Background: PubMed 40219729Cheong I. Unconventional Echocardiographic Techniques for LVOT VTI Measurement in Critical Care Settings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 Jul-Aug;53(6):1418-1424. doi: 10.1002/jcu.24007. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 10991706Oba Y, Salzman GA. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):813; author reply 813-4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 37868288Zhang Y, Zhan L, Li D, Huang G, Lan Y. Influence of goal-directed fluid therapy guided by the Vigileo-FloTracTM system on intestinal mucosal barrier function in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Sep;18(3):460-466. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.128010. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 35958824Yang G, Hu C, Sun Z. An Updated Review of Driving-Pressure Guided Ventilation Strategy and Its Clinical Application. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:6236438. doi: 10.1155/2022/6236438. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30664548Park M, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Yang M, Heo BY, Choi JW, Kim YR, Lee SH, Jeong H, Choi SJ, Song IS. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):385-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002600.
- Background: PubMed 23993028Shen Y, Zhong M, Wu W, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1267-73; discussion 1273-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 38258726Brogger H. [The new Declaration of Helsinki]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2023 Dec 14;143(1). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0798. Print 2024 Jan 23. No abstract available. Norwegian.
- Background: PubMed 40699273Song J, Chen G, Lai D, Zhong L, Fan H, Hu W, Wang M, Hu C, Chen W, Ming Z, Gong S, Luo Q. Association between the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01529-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be considered only when receiving legally valid, ethically approved requests that are in compliance with applicable data protection regulations and trial protocols.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Based Risk Prediction Model for Upper Digestive Tract Cancer
Gastric Cancer (GC), Premalignant Lesion
RecruitingObservational study
Semmelweis Esophageal Cancer Study: Noninvasive Prognostic Parameters in Patients With Oesophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer
Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Clinical Study Exploring Prognostic Factors in Esophageal Cancer Patients
Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Patient-Reported Symptom Care Versus Usual Care After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center Phase 3 Randomized Trial
Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single-arm, Open, Single-center Exploratory Study of Adebrelimab (SHR-1316) in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Perioperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma
Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Juying Jin study director
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer (EsC) and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs), run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lihua Li Peng, Doctor (+86 89011876 ext. +8615823443968, plhcqmu@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (%) (time frame: Censoring will be performed at 30 days, with time to event defined as the time from surgery to ICU admission and discharge. Patients who die in the ICU or before discharge will be censored as not discharged at 30 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07691944, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2026.