AzTrials
AzTrials

Older WomenNCT07694349

Moderate-Intensity Treadmill Walking With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Pulmonary Volumes in Older Adults

A study testing Blood Flow Restriction and Aerobic training in people with Older Women, run by Universidad Santo Tomas, Chile at 1 site in Chile.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This quasi-experimental pilot study evaluated the effect of 12 months of moderate-intensity treadmill walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) on pulmonary function in 14 trained older women. Participants were allocated to either a BFR group (30-40% arterial occlusion pressure) or a control group without BFR. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Older Women
What is being tested?
Blood Flow Restriction and Aerobic training
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteChile
Study dates
1 Jan 2025to 2 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 60 to 80 years without a diagnosis of chronic non-communicable diseases.
  • Physically active individuals.
  • At least 3 consecutive months of participation in structured exercise programs.
  • Weekly physical activity volume ≥ 180 minutes, assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).

Who cannot join

  • Use of ergogenic aids.
  • Current smoking habit.
  • Diagnosis of cardiometabolic diseases.
  • Presence of neurological disorders or musculoskeletal impairments affecting the lower extremities.
  • Peripheral vascular diseases.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chile1 site
  • Clinica Oces

    Santiago, 8320000

Other trials in Chile

About this study

This quasi-experimental pilot study evaluated the effect of 12 months of moderate-intensity treadmill walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) on pulmonary function in 14 trained older women. Participants were allocated to either a BFR group (30-40% arterial occlusion pressure) or a control group without BFR. Both groups completed the same aerobic exercise program three times per week. The BFR group showed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC), along with a reduction in resting heart rate, with no adverse events reported. These findings suggest that BFR is a safe and promising strategy to optimize respiratory function in older adults.

Read the detailed description

This quasi-experimental pilot study aimed to investigate whether a moderate-intensity treadmill walking program combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) could improve pulmonary function in trained older women. Fourteen physically active women (68.1 ± 3.6 years), free from major chronic diseases, were enrolled and allocated to either an intervention group (n = 7) or a control group (n = 7). The intervention group performed a modified Bruce treadmill protocol with BFR applied to both thighs at 30-40% of arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the control group completed the same training program without BFR. Both groups trained three times per week for 12 months, progressively advancing to stage 4 of the protocol.

Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry every three months, measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC). The BFR group demonstrated significant improvements in FEV₁, increasing from approximately 2.26 L to 3.10 L, particularly during the first six months of the intervention, representing an improvement of nearly 41%. FVC also showed progressive increases; however, between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. The control group exhibited smaller and generally non-significant improvements.

The authors suggest that these benefits may be explained by mechanisms related to the metabolic stress induced by BFR, activation of the respiratory metaboreflex, and stimulation of anabolic signaling pathways such as Akt/mTOR, which may promote adaptations in the respiratory musculature. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters remained within safe ranges throughout the intervention, and no adverse events were reported, supporting the safety of the method.

Conditions
Older Women
Being tested
Blood Flow Restriction, Aerobic training
Keywords
Physically trained, rehabilitation, elderly people, respiratory sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood Flow RestrictionDevice

    Blood flow restriction was applied using 108 × 10 cm pneumatic cuffs (BodyPro®, Kinemax®) positioned at the proximal region of both thighs, approximately three finger-widths below the gluteal fold. Occlusion pressure was set at 30-40% of each participant's arterial occlusion pressure, which was determined using sphygmomanometry and an 8-MHz vascular Doppler probe placed over the posterior tibial artery. Blood flow restriction was maintained continuously throughout the treadmill walking sessions based on the modified Bruce protocol. The intervention lasted 12 months and was performed three times per week.

  • Aerobic trainingOther

    Participants completed the same modified Bruce treadmill walking program, matched for frequency and duration, without blood flow restriction.

Study groups in NCT07694349
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Brazo experimental:ExperimentalAerobic treadmill training combined with blood flow restriction (30-40% of arterial occlusion pressure).
Receives: Device: Blood Flow Restriction
Brazo comparador/control:Active comparatorAerobic treadmill training without blood flow restriction.
Receives: Other: Aerobic training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV₁)

    Assessed by spirometry to determine changes in pulmonary function from baseline to 12 months of intervention. FEV₁ was expressed in liters (L) and compared between the blood flow restriction group and the control group.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months (although quarterly assessments were performed, the primary analysis was based on pre- and post-intervention measurements).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion25 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion2 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07694349
Sponsor's protocol ID
196-2025
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
10 Jun 2026
Last updated
9 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All individual participant data (IPD) underlying a publication.

Publications

  • No publications are currently available for this study protocol.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood Flow Restriction and Aerobic training in people with Older Women, run by Universidad Santo Tomas, Chile at 1 site in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV₁) (time frame: Baseline and 12 months (although quarterly assessments were performed, the primary analysis was based on pre- and post-intervention measurements).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07694349, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in