Naoxintong Capsule for Diabetic Nephropathy With Dampness Retention Pattern: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled TrialAcronymNXT-DKD

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in economically developed countries. China has the largest diabetic population globally, and DN now accounts for approximately 30% of new dialysis patients. Despite the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in the microalbuminuric stage, landmark trials (RENNAL, IDNT, VA NEPHRON-D) have shown that these agents alone or in combination fail to significantly reduce cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in advanced DN. There is an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches to slow DN progression and improve survival.

Naoxintong Capsule (National Drug Approval No.: Guoyaozhunzi Z20025001) is a well-established traditional Chinese medicine formulation that has been widely used in China for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. It comprises 16 herbal and animal-derived ingredients that collectively exert effects through endothelial protection, anti-inflammatory activity, inhibition of thrombosis, and plaque stabilization. Based on the integrative medicine concept of brain-heart-kidney co-treatment and the shared pathophysiological mechanisms underlying DN progression and cardiovascular complications, Naoxintong Capsule represents a promising adjunctive therapy for DN.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to provide high-level evidence for the efficacy and safety of Naoxintong Capsule in treating DN. The study will enroll 410 adult patients with confirmed Type 2 diabetic nephropathy across approximately 20 clinical centers in China.

The primary objective is to evaluate whether adding Naoxintong Capsule to standard conventional therapy can slow the annual rate of eGFR decline compared with standard therapy alone (with placebo). Secondary objectives include assessing effects on proteinuria, CKD stage progression, time to ESKD, cardiovascular events, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome scores, and health-related quality of life.

PARTICIPANT POPULATION

Eligible participants are adults (age >= 18 years) with confirmed Type 2 diabetic nephropathy, 24-hour urinary protein excretion between 0.5 and 3.5 g, eGFR >= 45 mL/min/1.73m2, and on stable ACEI/ARB therapy for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients must discontinue all other traditional Chinese medicine products for a washout period of at least 4 weeks before randomization.

INTERVENTION

Participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive either Naoxintong Capsules or matching placebo capsules, both administered as 4 capsules per dose, 3 times daily, taken orally 30 to 60 minutes after meals. All participants continue to receive standard conventional therapy for DN, including glycemic control, blood pressure management, lipid-lowering therapy, dietary management, and treatment of CKD-related complications as clinically indicated. The treatment duration is 12 months.

FOLLOW-UP AND ASSESSMENTS

Following randomization at Visit 1 (V1), participants will attend scheduled visits at Month 1 (V2), Month 3 (V3), Month 6 (V4), Month 9 (V5), and Month 12 (V6). At each visit, clinical assessments include physical examination, laboratory tests (urinalysis, 24-hour urine protein, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, complete blood count, blood biochemistry including renal function, HbA1c, lipid profile, hs-CRP, IL-6), ECG, TCM syndrome scoring, and adverse event monitoring. At selected visits (V1, V6), additional imaging studies (chest X-ray/CT, renal ultrasound) and optional fundoscopy are performed. Biological samples (blood, urine, stool) are collected at V1, V4, and V6 for exploratory analyses including gut microbiota and metabolomics.

SAMPLE SIZE

The sample size of 410 (205 per group) was calculated based on detecting a clinically meaningful difference of 1.0 mL/min/1.73m2/year in eGFR annual decline slope between groups (expected: -3.0 vs. -2.0 mL/min/1.73m2/year), with a pooled standard deviation of 3.2, at a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, allowing for a 20% dropout rate.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Efficacy analyses will be conducted on both the Full Analysis Set (FAS, intention-to-treat) and the Per-Protocol Set (PPS). The primary analysis will use a mixed-effects model for the eGFR slope, adjusting for center effect. Time-to-event outcomes will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Safety analyses will be performed on the FAS.